- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Yukie Metoki, Dai Iwase, Ryo Ota, Jun Aikawa, Manabu Mukai, Kensuke Fukushima, Gen Inoue, Masashi Takaso, Correction of lower limb deformity in an adult patient with Ellis-van Creveld syndrome: a rare case report, Journal of Surgical Case Reports, Volume 2024, Issue 10, October 2024, rjae648, https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjae648
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Ellis-van Creveld syndrome (EVC) is a rare disorder with marked valgus knee deformity, and orthopedic surgeons may experience challenges with lower limb treatment. Most previous reports have focused on EVC in childhood and few on its treatment in adulthood. Our patient was a 23-year-old woman with bilateral knee pain and gait abnormalities, with no history of orthopedic treatment. Valgus knee deformities with anterolateral depression of the lateral tibial plateaus and external rotation deformities of the lower legs were observed on radiography. We performed extra-articular osteotomy of the femurs and tibias and soft tissue release. Although the correction of each femur and tibia was good, mild valgus deformity of the lower limbs remained. This may be because the depression of the lateral tibial plateau was not repaired, and no postoperative remodeling was performed. However, 10 years post-surgery, no recurrence of the deformity was observed and walking was stable without pain.
Introduction
Ellis-van Creveld syndrome (EVC) is an uncommon genetic disorder that was first reported by Van Ellis and Creveld in 1940. EVC has four main features: chondrodysplasia, polydactyly, congenital heart disease, and ectodermal dysplasia [1]. For orthopedic surgeons, patellar dislocation and severe valgus knee deformity have been the main problems reported in the past. However, most reports have focused on treatment in childhood [2–6], and few exist on lower limb deformity associated with EVC in adulthood [7]. We describe a case of lower limb deformity associated with EVC that was untreated in childhood and treated surgically only in adulthood.
Case report
A 23-year-old woman presented with bilateral knee pain and gait abnormalities owing to marked lower extremity deformity. She was diagnosed with EVC as a child but had never been followed up by orthopedics because she was not in pain. On physical examination, marked valgus instability was observed in both knees, and the motion of both knees ranged from 10° to 135°. Radiographic examinations of both knees, including computed tomography, showed valgus deformity, lateral and anterior depression of the proximal lateral tibial plateau, and external rotation deformity of the lower leg. Patellar dislocation was observed in the right knee (Fig. 1). The radiological angles are presented in Table 1. The right knee underwent surgery first, followed by the left 10 months later. Lateral and medial skin incisions were made. Extensive lateral retinacular release, fractional lengthening of the distal lateral hamstring, and Z-lengthening of the iliotibial band were then performed. At this stage, peroneal nerve strain was identified, and decompression of the peroneal nerve was performed. Osteotomy was subsequently performed on the tibia. Closed-wedge varus and derotational osteotomy of the proximal tibia and open-wedge varus osteotomy of the distal femoral varus were performed. In addition, vastus medialis advancement was performed on the right knee, and patellar realignment was achieved in extension (Fig. 2). However, the knee showed a subluxation tendency owing to flexion of >30°; therefore, the postoperative rehabilitation plan progressed more slowly than that of the left knee. Range of motion training began on the left knee immediately after surgery without any restrictions, but on the right knee only after 3 weeks of postoperative immobilization in the extended position. However, ambulation exercise was performed on both knees with no loading for 3 weeks, then partial loading was initiated, and full loading was permitted at 8 weeks postoperatively. Early postoperative standing radiography showed residual mild valgus deformity of the lower limbs (Fig. 2, Table 2). In addition, the right knee showed patellar re-dislocation 2 months postoperatively, and the patellar deformity gradually progressed owing to the femoral implant; therefore, the patient underwent implant removal, tibial tubercle transfer, and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction 1.5 years after the initial surgery (Fig. 3). Six months later, she fell while walking and developed a fracture at the osteotomy of the right femur; open reduction and internal fixation were performed (Fig. 4). The remaining years passed uneventfully, and 10 years after the initial surgery, the patient still had mild valgus deformity of the lower limbs, but had no recurrence other than that experienced immediately after surgery, no complaints of knee pain, and a stable gait (Fig. 5, Table 2).
. | Right knee . | Left knee . |
---|---|---|
Femoro-tibial angle | 142.0° | 152.0° |
Mechanical-lateral distal femoral angle | 76.9° | 81.6° |
Medial proximal tibia angle | 103.1° | 102.2° |
. | Right knee . | Left knee . |
---|---|---|
Femoro-tibial angle | 142.0° | 152.0° |
Mechanical-lateral distal femoral angle | 76.9° | 81.6° |
Medial proximal tibia angle | 103.1° | 102.2° |
. | Right knee . | Left knee . |
---|---|---|
Femoro-tibial angle | 142.0° | 152.0° |
Mechanical-lateral distal femoral angle | 76.9° | 81.6° |
Medial proximal tibia angle | 103.1° | 102.2° |
. | Right knee . | Left knee . |
---|---|---|
Femoro-tibial angle | 142.0° | 152.0° |
Mechanical-lateral distal femoral angle | 76.9° | 81.6° |
Medial proximal tibia angle | 103.1° | 102.2° |
. | Right knee . | Left knee . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Early PO period . | Final follow up . | Early PO period . | Final follow up . | |
Femoro-tibial angle | 164.6° | 166.3° | 164.7° | 164.8° |
Mechanical-lateral distal femoral angle | 87.2° | 89.2° | 84.5° | 86.1° |
Medial proximal tibia angle | 88.7° | 88.2° | 88.0° | 88.3° |
. | Right knee . | Left knee . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Early PO period . | Final follow up . | Early PO period . | Final follow up . | |
Femoro-tibial angle | 164.6° | 166.3° | 164.7° | 164.8° |
Mechanical-lateral distal femoral angle | 87.2° | 89.2° | 84.5° | 86.1° |
Medial proximal tibia angle | 88.7° | 88.2° | 88.0° | 88.3° |
PO: postoperative
. | Right knee . | Left knee . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Early PO period . | Final follow up . | Early PO period . | Final follow up . | |
Femoro-tibial angle | 164.6° | 166.3° | 164.7° | 164.8° |
Mechanical-lateral distal femoral angle | 87.2° | 89.2° | 84.5° | 86.1° |
Medial proximal tibia angle | 88.7° | 88.2° | 88.0° | 88.3° |
. | Right knee . | Left knee . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Early PO period . | Final follow up . | Early PO period . | Final follow up . | |
Femoro-tibial angle | 164.6° | 166.3° | 164.7° | 164.8° |
Mechanical-lateral distal femoral angle | 87.2° | 89.2° | 84.5° | 86.1° |
Medial proximal tibia angle | 88.7° | 88.2° | 88.0° | 88.3° |
PO: postoperative
Discussion
EVC is a rare disorder involving a severe, relentlessly progressive valgus deformity of the knee. Owing to the progressive nature of the disease, recurrence is frequent and treatment is often difficult. Although there have been several previous treatment reports, few have described treatment in adulthood (only one patient among 13 reported by Weiner et al. [7]).
Regarding the surgical technique, because only tibial osteotomy or inadequate soft tissue release (STR) results in recurrence, osteotomies of the femur and tibia and thorough STR are usually recommended [2, 4, 5, 7]. Weiner et al. [7] reported on 23 knees in 13 patients; they experienced reoperation in 2 patients (3 knees) but described favorable results with the above procedures. Several reports have also described additional procedures for patellar dislocation, such as repair and patellar tendon transfer, if necessary [2, 4, 7]. In the right knee of our patient, patellar tendon transfer was not performed because the knee was repositioned in extension using vastus medialis advancement, but it eventually dislocated again and required reoperation.
Although Palay et al. [8] and Feldman et al. [9] have reported good results with intra-articular osteotomies for significant external knee deformities with instability, Kamada et al. [3] have presented the only report of intra-articular osteotomy associated with EVC. Shibata et al. reported that the severe defect of the lateral tibial plateau was the main characteristic of valgus deformity in this syndrome and that intra-articular osteotomy should be performed for elevation of the lateral tibial plateau and bone grafting from the outset [10]. In the current patient, an extra-articular osteotomy was performed. Although the corrective angulation of the femur and tibia was effective, the depression of the lateral tibial plateau was not repaired, and no remodeling was performed postoperatively. We considered this a possible reason for the mild residual lower-limb valgus deformity. Because the growth plate was also closed in this patient and there was no associated risk of growth disturbance, intra-articular osteotomy was considered a useful method.
In the current patient, mild valgus deformity of the lower limbs persisted immediately after surgery, and there was no repair of the lateral plateau; however, the deformity had not recurred 10 years after surgery. One possible reason for the lack of recurrence is that the patient was an adult and the closure of the growth plate had been recognized preoperatively.
Acknowledgements
We thank Editage (http://www.editage.com) for editing and reviewing the manuscript for the English language.
Author contributions
All authors have critically reviewed and approved the final draft and are responsible for the content and similarity index of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Funding
None declared.
Data availability
Datasets supporting the conclusions of this study are included in this article. The corresponding author can provide the raw data upon request.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
This research was not related to human or animal use. Although a human patient was involved, this was a case report for which no ethics committee consent was required. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this report in accordance with the journal’s patient consent policy.