Journal Article

Surgical clip migration following laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a cause of cholangitis

Journal of Surgical Case Reports, Volume 2014, Issue 4, April 2014, rju026, https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rju026
Published:
17 April 2014
Article history
Received:
13 February 2014
Accepted:
17 March 2014
Published:
17 April 2014

Abstract

Gallstone disease is a common surgical presentation, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the favoured method of surgical management. Ligation of the cystic duct is usually performed with surgical clips, which have the potential to migrate into the common bile duct with time. This paper describes a case of cholangitis secondary to clip migration in a 42-year-old male patient 9 years after the initial laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaography imaging revealed a surgical clip lodged in dilated common bile duct. The patient was managed successfully by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

INTRODUCTION

Gallstone disease is a common presentation in secondary care, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most commonly used procedure for this condition with >60 000 procedures being carried out per year in the NHS.

Surgical clip migration following cholecystectomy is a rare but well-documented complication. The timeframe between the initial cholecystectomy and development of complications can be variable with case reports describing migration after as much as 14 years [1].

In most reported cases, the migrated surgical clip acts as a nidus for choledocholithiasis and subsequent biliary obstruction [2]. The exact pathophysiological process by which this occurs is not clearly understood but is thought to involve involution of the cystic duct with the attached clip into the lumen of the common bile duct as a consequence of compression by local structures, such as the liver [3]. Complete inversion and necrosis of the involuted duct then leaves the surgical clips free within the lumen of the common bile duct with subsequent complication such as obstructive jaundice, cholangitis, biliary colic or pancreatitis [4]. Most cases are treated successfully by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). This case report describes a patient who developed cholangitis secondary to surgical clip migration 9 years after the initial laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

CASE REPORT

A 42-year-old male with a history of cerebral palsy, learning difficulties and epilepsy was admitted with a 24-h history of nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain. Past surgical history included laparoscopic cholecystectomy with operative cholangiogram 9 years previously and laparotomy and drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst 16 years previously.

Examination revealed a midline laparotomy scar and a distended, tender abdomen.

Laboratory tests revealed elevated liver function tests: ALP 285 U/l, ALT 465 U/l, GGT 669 U/l with a normal bilirubin. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography demonstrated marked dilatation of the common bile duct to 15 mm (Fig. 1). A surgical clip was noted in the distal common bile duct, presumed to have migrated from the cystic duct, which it had been used to close 9 years previously.

A coronal view of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography showing the presence of a surgical clip and common bile duct dilatation.
Figure 1:

A coronal view of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography showing the presence of a surgical clip and common bile duct dilatation.

The patient had an ERCP and sphincterotomy during which the clip was removed leading to complete resolution of symptoms and return of biochemical markers to normal.

DISCUSSION

Although a rare complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, surgical clip migration is a well-documented event with several case reports published.

The mechanism by which surgical clip migration takes place is unclear but is thought to be partly affected by technical factors such as correct placement and use of minimal numbers of clips [5].

A proposed mechanism of clip migration by Kitamura et al. [3] initially involves the compression of the clipped cystic duct by the liver. The cystic duct and clips then become inverted into the lumen of the common bile duct. Over time, this structure becomes necrotic, and the clips fall away into the common bile duct where they can then act as a nidus for gallstone formation.

The time scale for this pathophysiological process can vary. Indeed, the time period between cholecystectomy and development of complications has been reported by Chong et al. [4] to be anything from 11 days to 20 years with a median of 26 months. The most common diagnoses at presentation are obstructive jaundice (37.7%), cholangitis (27.5%), biliary colic (18.8%) and acute pancreatitis (8.7%) [4]. The majority of cases are treated successfully with ERCP (77%) or surgery (20.2%) [4].

REFERENCES

1
Brandt
LJ
.
,
Surgical clip migration and stone formation in a gallbladder remnant after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
, 
Gastrointes Endosc
,
2009
, vol.
70
pg.
781
2
Attwell
A
,
Hawes
R
.
,
Surgical clip migration and choledocholithiasis: a late, abrupt complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
, 
Dig Dis Sci
,
2007
, vol.
52
(pg.
2254
-
6
)
3
Kitamura
K
,
Yamaguchi
T
,
Nakatani
H
,
Ichikawa
D
,
Shimotsuma
M
,
Yamane
T
, et al.
,
Why do cystic duct clips migrate into the common bile duct?
, 
Lancet
,
1995
, vol.
346
(pg.
965
-
6
)
4
Chong
VH
,
Chong
CF
.
,
Biliary complications secondary to post-cholecystectomy clip migration: a review of 69 cases
, 
J Gastrointest Surg
,
2010
, vol.
14
(pg.
688
-
96
)
5
Cetta
F
,
Baldi
C
,
Lombardo
F
,
Monti
L
,
Stefani
P
,
Nuzzo
G
.
,
Migration of metallic clips used during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and formation of gallstones around them: surgical implications from a prospective study
, 
J Laparoendosc Adv
,
1997
, vol.
7
(pg.
37
-
46
)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

Supplementary data

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close

Gift article access

As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.

Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Please sign in to your personal account to gift article access.

Gift article access

Please create a link below to share with others. This will provide temporary access to this restricted article.

The link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Gift articles remaining: --

Gift article access

The link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Gift articles remaining: --

Gift article access

As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.

Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses.

You have reached the limit of 10 links within a 30 day period