Abstract

Abdominal wall tumors are sometimes diagnosed as metastases of ovarian cancer, however, primary peritoneal tumors should be taken into consideration in the final diagnosis. A 49-year-old female patient was admitted in our Department for the excision of a pulpable abdominal wall lump, with no other abnormalities shown on imaging investigation. On histology examination, the excised specimen revealed characteristics of metastatic high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Total hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, omentectomy and appendectomy were performed. No signs of malignancy were proved on histology, leading to the final diagnosis of a primary serous peritoneal tumor. This is the third described case of solitary primary serous peritoneal tumor located in the abdominal wall. This condition should be included in the differential diagnosis of a probable metastatic ovarian carcinoma, as both present similar histologic characteristics.

INTRODUCTION

Abdominal wall tumors can present as uncommon conditions, such as leiomyomas, leiomyosarcomas, desmoids tumors or schwannomas; they include more commonly endometriomas or metastatic tumors [1], as due to primary ovarian carcinoma. On the other hand, peritoneal tumors are commonly presented as carcinomatosis with ascites, and only rarely presented as solitary abdominal wall masses [2].

We present the rarest case of an abdominal wall tumor in a woman with free clinical history of gynecologic malignancies, that was initially indicated to be a metastatic mass of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, but was later proved to be a primary solitary serous peritoneal tumor.

CASE REPORT

The patient, an otherwise healthy 49-year-old Caucasian female, was admitted to the Surgical Department of our Center complaining about a palpable abdominal wall lump that presented 6 months before, with gradual enlargement and mild tenderness on palpation. Her medical history was free; she had not presented any recent abnormal weight loss, while she mentioned one birth through caesarian section 15 years ago. Her gynecologic history was free and recent routine ultrasonography presented normal findings from the uterus, ovaries and fallopian tubes.

On clinical examination, no specific signs from the abdomen were revealed or any abnormal findings on the site of the Pfannenstiel incision. In the left lower abdominal quadrant, ~3 cm lower than the level of the umbilicus, a solid mass of the abdominal wall was palpated, of a diameter of ~5 cm, with tenderness only on intense palpation.

Complete blood laboratory tests, including tumor markers, showed values within normal limits. An abdominal computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were performed; the latest revealed that the mass presented dimensions of 6.7 × 4.9 × 3.5 cm3, was located on the left rectus abdominis muscle, whereas no further intra-abdominal pathologic conditions were found (Figs 1 and 2). After adequate information and written consent, the patient was submitted to surgical excision of the mass.

MRI imaging of the abdominal wall tumor.
Figure 1:

MRI imaging of the abdominal wall tumor.

MRI imaging. Absence of other disorders.
Figure 2:

MRI imaging. Absence of other disorders.

Intraoperatively, the mass was found to be in close relation to the uterus, but was excised in healthy borders without the need of hysterectomy. Through direct visualization and thorough examination of the abdominal cavity, no other abnormal conditions or ascites were present, while both ovaries presented normal size. The patient’s post-operative period was uneventful and she was discharged on the third day after the surgery. Histologic examination showed a high-grade carcinoma, presenting high positivity in cytokeratin 7 and CA-125, whereas less in estrogen receptors in immunohistochemistry (Figs 3 and 4), leading to the diagnosis of a high-grade serous carcinoma, that had metastasized from the ovaries.

Histologic examination of the excised specimen. Positivity in cytokeratin.
Figure 3:

Histologic examination of the excised specimen. Positivity in cytokeratin.

Histologic examination of the excised specimen. Positivity in cytokeratin and CA-125.
Figure 4:

Histologic examination of the excised specimen. Positivity in cytokeratin and CA-125.

A reoperation was considered necessary some days later, which included total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy and appendectomy. No signs of ascites, carcinomatosis, or ovarian abmormalities were present (Figs 5 and 6). Histology of all excised specimens did not reveal any ovarian or other malignancies, leading, thus, to the conclusion that the initial mass was a primary solitary serous peritoneal tumor. The patient was advised to perform a 6-month follow-up control, due to reported poor prognosis of the condition.

Normal condition of the right ovary intraoperatively.
Figure 5:

Normal condition of the right ovary intraoperatively.

Normal condition of the left ovary intraoperatively.
Figure 6:

Normal condition of the left ovary intraoperatively.

DISCUSSION

Peritoneal serous carcinoma is a rare malignancy that is commonly associated with ascites, without significant ovarian involvement, but usually presenting dissemination on diagnosis; however, this did not occur in our case. Moreover, it also affects women of older age (mean age of diagnosis: 57.4 years) and can be related to breast cancer history [3].

Cases of abdominal wall tumors initially diagnosed as metastases of ovarian tumors may basically consist of peritoneal carcinomas. As the mesothelium of the peritoneum and the germinal epithelium of the ovaries share the same embryological origin, primary peritoneal carcinoma can be difficult to distinguish histologically from primary ovarian carcinoma [3]. The morphologic and histological similarities to ovarian serous tumors lead, thus, to difficulties in differential diagnosis [4]. In cases of metastases without detection of a primary site, clinical staging can be difficult; treatment or prognosis cannot be established with precision, either [5]. Conventional imaging methods are not always able to detect primary peritoneal tumors [6], therefore, CA-125 and PET might offer more diagnostic details [7].

Only other two such cases of abdominal masses have been reported in the literature. In the first case, a parietal tumor was found in a 32-year-old woman, with no ovarian or other malignancies, while ascetic fluid was absent [5]. In the second case, a parietal mass of a 60-year-old woman was also diagnosed as an ovarian metastasis after excision biopsy, but radical surgery 5 years later revealed no ovarian pathology [3]. Three cases of Sister Mary Joseph’s nodules that were in fact primary peritoneal tumors have also been described [8].

As these cases are rare, there are not sufficient guidelines considering further treatment or prognosis. Imaging of the chest, abdomen and pelvis, examination of tumor markers (including CA125) and further surgical exploration can help to establish diagnosis and achieve cytoreduction [8]. Adjuvant chemotherapy with platinum/taxane has also been suggested [9]. Primary peritoneal tumors are considered to have a poor prognosis, although in one of the aforementioned cases the patient remained disease-free 1 year postoperatively [3]. In order to achieve an early detection of future pathologies, our patient was referred to the oncologists and was advised to repeat a thorough follow-up control with chest and abdominal CT imaging and tumor markers with intervals of three months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary solitary peritoneal serous tumor of the abdominal wall is an extremely rare entity with unknown prognosis, but with similar histological characteristics to ovarian tumor metastases, presenting, therefore, increased risk of misdiagnosis. High suspicion of this condition in case of parietal masses is important, in order to realize a thorough preoperative examination and improve prognosis.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

None declared.

REFERENCES

1

Nath
V
,
Baliga
M
.
Urinary bladder adenocarcinoma metastatic to the abdominal wall: report of a case with cytohistologic correlation
.
Case Rep Pathol
2016
;
2016
:
8608412
.

2

Kim
JW
,
Lee
HS
,
Shin
KS
,
Gam
YH
,
Baik
KD
.
Primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma presenting as a large mesenteric mass mistaken for ovarian cancer: a case of primary peritoneal carcinoma
.
Obstet Gynecol Sci
2015
;
58
:
246
50
.

3

Wong
WL
,
Tay
EH
.
Adenocarcinoma of the abdominal wall
.
Singapore Med J
2008
;
49
:
359
60
.

4

Kim
JW
,
Lee
HS
,
Shin
KS
,
Gam
YH
,
Baik
KD
.
Primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma presenting as a large mesenteric mass mistaken for ovarian cancer: a case of primary peritoneal carcinoma
.
Obstet Gynecol Sci
2015
;
58
:
246
50
.

5

Matsuura
T
,
Sugihara
K
,
Kohmura
Y
,
Sugimura
H
,
Kanayama
M
.
Rare form of extraovarioan peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma with solitary tumor in the abdominal wall: a case report and literature review
.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res
2009
;
35
:
1142
7
.

6

Chiou
SY
,
Sheu
MH
,
Wang
JH
,
Chang
CY
.
Peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma: a reappraisal of CT imaging features and literature review
.
Abdom Imaging
2003
;
28
:
815
9
.

7

Wang
PH
,
Liu
RS
,
Li
YF
,
NG
HT
,
Yuan
CC
.
Whole-body PET with (fluorine-18)-2-deoxyglucose for detecting recurrent primary serous peritoneal carcinoma: an initial report
.
Gynecol Oncol
2000
;
77
:
44
7
.

8

Popovska
S
,
Veselinova
T
,
Gorchev
G
,
Tomov
S
,
Elenchev
L
.
Primary peritoneal carcinoma: a report of two cases and a review of the literature
.
Akush Ginekol (Sofia)
2005
;
44
:
8
10
.

9

Schickler
RL
,
Abdallah
R
,
McClung
EC
,
Shahzad
MM
.
Primary peritoneal carcinoma presenting as a Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule: a case report and review of the literature
.
Gynecol Oncol Rep
2016
;
17
:
20
2
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com