Abstract

Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is an aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma that rarely involves the appendix and may mimic acute appendicitis, complicating preoperative diagnosis. In the context of nonoperative management for appendicitis, such malignancies risk being overlooked. A 32-year-old immunocompetent male presented with right upper quadrant pain, leukocytosis, cholestatic liver profile, and a hepatic lesion on imaging. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) showed intense fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the colon, liver, and peritoneum. Laparoscopy revealed an enlarged appendix (15 × 3 cm) with abscess; appendectomy was performed. Histopathology confirmed BL with a ‘starry sky’ pattern and Ki-67 of 95%. Appendiceal BL, though rare, should be suspected in atypical or complicated appendicitis, even without classic risk factors. Histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens is crucial. Surgery, even when not oncologic in intention, may lead to early cancer detection and timely systemic treatment, improving outcomes.

lymphomaBurkitt lymphomacomplicated appendicitissurgery managementlaparoscopic surgery

Introduction

Acute appendicitis is a frequent surgical emergency, usually benign, but rare neoplastic causes like Burkitt lymphoma (BL) must be considered [1]. This aggressive B-cell lymphoma may mimic uncomplicated appendicitis, complicating diagnosis [1].

With increasing use of nonoperative management, the risk of overlooking incidental malignancies has grown, underscoring the value of appendectomy in atypical cases [1, 2]. BL, often seen in young or immunocompromised patients, frequently involves the gastrointestinal tract, including the appendix [3–5].

These tumors can present as an acute abdomen, but preoperative detection is difficult. Thus, histopathological analysis remains essential for diagnosis [4, 6, 7]. Prompt surgical evaluation and multidisciplinary treatment are critical, given the tumor’s rapid progression and poor prognosis without early therapy [1, 5].

Methods

The physical and electronic medical records of a patient treated at Medica Sur Hospital by G.T.V. and the surgery department were reviewed. Informed consent was obtained from the patient or their legal representative. The case report was prepared in accordance with the CARE Guidelines [8].

Case presentation

A 32-year-old male with no relevant medical history presented with a 5-day history of spasmodic right upper quadrant abdominal pain radiating to the right scapula. Physical exam revealed tenderness in the right upper quadrant and a positive Murphy’s sign. Labs showed leukocytosis (15.2 × 109/L) with neutrophilia, elevated C-reactive protein (447 mg/L), and cholestatic liver function tests.

Abdominal ultrasound showed a hypoechoic, avascular lesion in hepatic segment VI (31 × 37 × 26 mm) without Doppler flow. Triphasic computed tomography (CT) confirmed an irregular, heterogeneous lesion in the same area. Given the suspicion of a neoplastic or infectious hepatic lesion, a multidisciplinary team (surgery, gastroenterology, radiology) was convened for further evaluation and treatment planning.

Colonoscopy demonstrated a right-sided subepithelial colonic lesion measuring ⁓30 mm (Fig. 1). Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) revealed circumferential thickening of the ascending colon with intense fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake (SUVmax 20.0), along with multiple peritoneal implants, mesenteric, perigastric, and right subdiaphragmatic lymphadenopathy, as well as hypermetabolism in the previously identified hepatic lesion (SUVmax 19.8), findings highly suggestive of neoplastic dissemination (Fig. 2).

Colonoscopic findings. (A) Near-focus narrow-band imaging showing a prominent, nodular subepithelial lesion measuring ⁓30 mm, with disrupted mucosal architecture, erythema, and loss of surface vascular pattern—features suggestive of acute mucosal infiltration. (B) Conventional white-light endoscopy demonstrating smooth, elevated mucosa with focal congestion and superficial linear disruption, corresponding to the area of the subepithelial lesion.
Figure 1

Colonoscopic findings. (A) Near-focus narrow-band imaging showing a prominent, nodular subepithelial lesion measuring ⁓30 mm, with disrupted mucosal architecture, erythema, and loss of surface vascular pattern—features suggestive of acute mucosal infiltration. (B) Conventional white-light endoscopy demonstrating smooth, elevated mucosa with focal congestion and superficial linear disruption, corresponding to the area of the subepithelial lesion.

PET-CT images demonstrating extensive hypermetabolic abdominal disease. (A) Coronal image showing circumferential mural thickening of the right colon with intense FDG uptake (SUVmax 20.0), suggestive of transmural neoplastic infiltration, alongside multiple peritoneal implants and mesenteric hypermetabolism. (B) Axial slice at the hepatic level revealing a hypodense, hypermetabolic lesion in segment VI of the liver (SUVmax 19.8), consistent with a secondary metastatic deposit. (C) Axial mid-abdominal view showing abnormal FDG uptake in mesenteric and pericolonic regions, with nodular foci consistent with lymphadenopathy and peritoneal seeding. (D) The inferior axial section depicts multiple hypermetabolic foci along the peritoneum, indicative of diffuse peritoneal involvement. These findings are consistent with metabolically active, disseminated abdominal disease in keeping with a diagnosis of high-grade lymphoma.
Figure 2

PET-CT images demonstrating extensive hypermetabolic abdominal disease. (A) Coronal image showing circumferential mural thickening of the right colon with intense FDG uptake (SUVmax 20.0), suggestive of transmural neoplastic infiltration, alongside multiple peritoneal implants and mesenteric hypermetabolism. (B) Axial slice at the hepatic level revealing a hypodense, hypermetabolic lesion in segment VI of the liver (SUVmax 19.8), consistent with a secondary metastatic deposit. (C) Axial mid-abdominal view showing abnormal FDG uptake in mesenteric and pericolonic regions, with nodular foci consistent with lymphadenopathy and peritoneal seeding. (D) The inferior axial section depicts multiple hypermetabolic foci along the peritoneum, indicative of diffuse peritoneal involvement. These findings are consistent with metabolically active, disseminated abdominal disease in keeping with a diagnosis of high-grade lymphoma.

Due to clinical and radiologic findings suggestive of advanced neoplasia with intra-abdominal infection, a diagnostic laparoscopy was performed. It revealed an enlarged, firm appendix (15 × 3 cm) with dense inflammatory phlegmon and a 30 mL periapendicular abscess with fibrinopurulent material. Laparoscopic drainage and appendectomy were performed without complications.

The surgical piece was sent to the pathology department, where it was observed the serosal surface of the appendix appeared brown with widespread fibrinopurulent plaques. Cross-sections revealed a white, soft tumor diffusely infiltrating the entire appendiceal wall and mesoappendix (Fig. 3).

Gross pathology of the appendix: The serosal surface of the appendix appears brown, with fibrinopurulent plaques (A). Longitudinal (B) and cross (C) sections reveal obliteration of the appendiceal lumen by a diffusely growing, bulging, soft, and white tumor involving the entire appendiceal wall and mesoappendix. This appearance is often described as a ‘fish flesh’ appearance.
Figure 3

Gross pathology of the appendix: The serosal surface of the appendix appears brown, with fibrinopurulent plaques (A). Longitudinal (B) and cross (C) sections reveal obliteration of the appendiceal lumen by a diffusely growing, bulging, soft, and white tumor involving the entire appendiceal wall and mesoappendix. This appearance is often described as a ‘fish flesh’ appearance.

Histologically, the tumor was composed of monomorphic medium-sized lymphocytes with round nuclei, dispersed and clumped chromatin, basophilic nucleoli, and squared-off cell membranes. These lymphocytes are altered with scattered tingible body macrophages, creating a characteristic ‘starry sky’ pattern (Fig. 4).

Microscopic tumor morphology: (A) In sections stained with H&E, the tumor shows a starry sky pattern composed of monomorphic medium-sized neoplastic lymphocytes and clear tingible body macrophages (100×). (B) Lymphocytes make the sky while tingible body macrophages (arrow) the sky of the starry sky pattern. Neoplastic lymphocytes exhibit a round nucleus, basophilic nucleoli, basophilic cytoplasm, and squared-off membranes (200×). (C) The lymphoma invades the appendiceal mucosa (100×).
Figure 4

Microscopic tumor morphology: (A) In sections stained with H&E, the tumor shows a starry sky pattern composed of monomorphic medium-sized neoplastic lymphocytes and clear tingible body macrophages (100×). (B) Lymphocytes make the sky while tingible body macrophages (arrow) the sky of the starry sky pattern. Neoplastic lymphocytes exhibit a round nucleus, basophilic nucleoli, basophilic cytoplasm, and squared-off membranes (200×). (C) The lymphoma invades the appendiceal mucosa (100×).

In the immunohistochemistry analysis, neoplastic lymphocytes tested positive for CD20, CD10, BCL6, and c-MYC. CD5, BCL2, and TdT were negative in neoplastic cells. The proliferation index was 95%, measured with MIB1. In situ hybridization for Epstein–Barr virus-encoded RNA (EBER) was negative (Fig. 5).

Immunohistochemistry panel (A–G) and in situ hybridization (H): Neoplastic cells exhibit diffuse membrane positivity for CD20 (A) and CD10 (B). Nuclear positivity is observed with the markers BCL6 (C) and c-MYC (D). Proliferation index measured with Ki67 (MIB1) is close to 100%; only scarce lymphocytes and macrophages are negative for MIB1 (E). CD5 (F) is negative in lymphoma cells, and only a few scattered reactive T cells are positive. BCL2 (G) is negative. Finally, in situ hybridization for Epstein–Barr virus, EBER (H), is completely negative in this case.
Figure 5

Immunohistochemistry panel (A–G) and in situ hybridization (H): Neoplastic cells exhibit diffuse membrane positivity for CD20 (A) and CD10 (B). Nuclear positivity is observed with the markers BCL6 (C) and c-MYC (D). Proliferation index measured with Ki67 (MIB1) is close to 100%; only scarce lymphocytes and macrophages are negative for MIB1 (E). CD5 (F) is negative in lymphoma cells, and only a few scattered reactive T cells are positive. BCL2 (G) is negative. Finally, in situ hybridization for Epstein–Barr virus, EBER (H), is completely negative in this case.

Histology and immunophenotype confirmed BL of the appendix with transmural involvement. The patient had a favorable postoperative course and was referred to oncology for further workup and initiation of systemic treatment.

Discussion

BL is a highly aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and is considered the fastest-growing human tumor [9]. Its incidence is notably high, with an aggressive clinical course in immunosuppressed patients in non-endemic areas, particularly when associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Clinically, patients with BL typically do not present with B symptoms (fever, chills, night sweats, and weight loss) that are characteristic of early stage non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This is attributed to the transformation of these cells, which compromises host defenses and develops mechanisms to evade immune surveillance [3].

Patients with rapidly growing intra-abdominal extranodal BL often present with symptoms of intestinal obstruction, intussusception, or appendicitis [4]. Although non-Hodgkin lymphoma is the most common malignant intestinal tumor in children over 5 years of age, BL presenting as appendicitis is rare [5].

If intra-abdominal BL is suspected, especially in endemic regions, preoperative imaging—either ultrasonography in expert hands or CT—is an effective tools for diagnosing the malignant nature of the tumor [6, 7]. Furthermore, histopathological examination following an appendectomy for apparent appendicitis is mandatory, as it may reveal ileocecal BL.

This study reports a condition that has been described in the literature primarily in patients with associated risk factors, such as residence in malaria-endemic areas, family history, or association with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) or HIV infection. However, in our experience, the patient did not present any of these aforementioned risk factors, making this case even more unusual.

Currently, there are no clinical guidelines for its treatment; most evidence comes from case reports, series, and expert consensus based on clinical experience. Early identification of BL is crucial, as it is highly aggressive and rapidly metastasizes. Postoperative hematology-oncology follow-up is essential for comprehensive care.

A literature review revealed that, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case in Mexico. Therefore, it represents a relevant contribution to the understanding of the clinical and surgical approach to this disease, offering a foundation for the development of a future learning curve in healthcare centers with similar populations and clinical presentations. This could significantly improve patient outcomes in such settings (Table 1).

Table 1

Summary of cases reported worldwide.

AuthorsTitleYearJournalCountry
1Yahya HA, Kumar V, Lam JTBurkitt Lymphoma of the Appendix Presenting With Acute Appendicitis and Acute Kidney Injury: A Case Report and Review of Literature2022CureusUSA
2Shaw T, Cockrell H, Panchal R, Abraham A, Sawaya DBurkitt Lymphoma Presenting as Perforated Appendicitis2022Am SurgUSA
3Shahmanyan D, Saway B, Palmerton H, Rudderow JS, Reed CM, Wattsman TA, Faulks ER, Collier BR, Budin RE, Hamill MEBurkitt-type lymphoma incidentally found as the cause of acute appendicitis: a case report and review of literature2021Surg Case RepUSA
4Dashottar S, Sunita BS, Singh RK, Rana V, Suhag V, Singh AKA case series of unusual presentations of Burkitt’s lymphoma2020J Cancer Res TherIndia
5Mimery AH, Jabbour J, Sykes B, MacDermid E, Al-Askari M, De Clercq SBurkitt Leukemia Presenting as Acute Appendicitis: A Case Report and Literature Review2020Am J Case RepUSA
6Nam S, Kang J, Choi SE, Kim YR, Baik SH, Sohn SKXanthogranulomatous Appendicitis Mimicking Residual Burkitt’s Lymphoma After Chemotherapy2016Ann ColoproctolSouth Korea
7Sangma MM, Dasiah SD, Ashok AJIleo-Colic Burkitt Lymphoma in a Young Adult Female- A Case Report2016J Clin Diagn ResIndia
8Vrancx S, Van de Sande J, Vanclooster P, de Gheldere C, Van de Velde ABurkitt Lymphoma Mimicking an Acute Appendicitis in a 17 Years Old Boy: a Case Report2015Acta Chir BelgBelgium
9Weledji EP, Ngowe MN, Abba JSBurkitt’s lymphoma masquerading as appendicitis—two case reports and review of the literature2014World J Surg OncolCameroon
10Bhardwaj N, Bains SK, Ortonowski G, Murphy PA case of Burkitt’s lymphoma presenting as suspected acute appendicitis2010Afr J Paediatr SurgIndia
11Wang SM, Huang FC, Wu CH, Ko SF, Lee SY, Hsiao CCIleocecal Burkitt’s lymphoma presenting as ileocolic intussusception with appendiceal invagination and acute appendicitis2010J Formos Med AssocTaiwan
13Caine YG, Peylan-Ramu N, Livoff AF, Schiller MPrimary Burkitt’s lymphoma of the appendix1990Z KinderchirGermany
14Ghani SA, Syed N, Tan PEA rare cause of acute appendicitis: Burkitt’s lymphoma of the appendix1984Med J MalaysiaMalaysia
15Nanji AA, Anderson FHBurkitt’s lymphoma with acute appendicitis1983Arch SurgCanada
16Sin IC, Ling ET, Prentice RSBurkitt’s lymphoma of the appendix: report of two cases1980Hum PatholUSA
AuthorsTitleYearJournalCountry
1Yahya HA, Kumar V, Lam JTBurkitt Lymphoma of the Appendix Presenting With Acute Appendicitis and Acute Kidney Injury: A Case Report and Review of Literature2022CureusUSA
2Shaw T, Cockrell H, Panchal R, Abraham A, Sawaya DBurkitt Lymphoma Presenting as Perforated Appendicitis2022Am SurgUSA
3Shahmanyan D, Saway B, Palmerton H, Rudderow JS, Reed CM, Wattsman TA, Faulks ER, Collier BR, Budin RE, Hamill MEBurkitt-type lymphoma incidentally found as the cause of acute appendicitis: a case report and review of literature2021Surg Case RepUSA
4Dashottar S, Sunita BS, Singh RK, Rana V, Suhag V, Singh AKA case series of unusual presentations of Burkitt’s lymphoma2020J Cancer Res TherIndia
5Mimery AH, Jabbour J, Sykes B, MacDermid E, Al-Askari M, De Clercq SBurkitt Leukemia Presenting as Acute Appendicitis: A Case Report and Literature Review2020Am J Case RepUSA
6Nam S, Kang J, Choi SE, Kim YR, Baik SH, Sohn SKXanthogranulomatous Appendicitis Mimicking Residual Burkitt’s Lymphoma After Chemotherapy2016Ann ColoproctolSouth Korea
7Sangma MM, Dasiah SD, Ashok AJIleo-Colic Burkitt Lymphoma in a Young Adult Female- A Case Report2016J Clin Diagn ResIndia
8Vrancx S, Van de Sande J, Vanclooster P, de Gheldere C, Van de Velde ABurkitt Lymphoma Mimicking an Acute Appendicitis in a 17 Years Old Boy: a Case Report2015Acta Chir BelgBelgium
9Weledji EP, Ngowe MN, Abba JSBurkitt’s lymphoma masquerading as appendicitis—two case reports and review of the literature2014World J Surg OncolCameroon
10Bhardwaj N, Bains SK, Ortonowski G, Murphy PA case of Burkitt’s lymphoma presenting as suspected acute appendicitis2010Afr J Paediatr SurgIndia
11Wang SM, Huang FC, Wu CH, Ko SF, Lee SY, Hsiao CCIleocecal Burkitt’s lymphoma presenting as ileocolic intussusception with appendiceal invagination and acute appendicitis2010J Formos Med AssocTaiwan
13Caine YG, Peylan-Ramu N, Livoff AF, Schiller MPrimary Burkitt’s lymphoma of the appendix1990Z KinderchirGermany
14Ghani SA, Syed N, Tan PEA rare cause of acute appendicitis: Burkitt’s lymphoma of the appendix1984Med J MalaysiaMalaysia
15Nanji AA, Anderson FHBurkitt’s lymphoma with acute appendicitis1983Arch SurgCanada
16Sin IC, Ling ET, Prentice RSBurkitt’s lymphoma of the appendix: report of two cases1980Hum PatholUSA

The search criteria (‘Burkitt lymphoma’ [All Fields]) AND (‘appendicitis’ [All Fields]) were applied in databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Articles that were not case reports or case series were excluded, such as those without full-text availability in English or Spanish or those not indexed in the databases above.

Table 1

Summary of cases reported worldwide.

AuthorsTitleYearJournalCountry
1Yahya HA, Kumar V, Lam JTBurkitt Lymphoma of the Appendix Presenting With Acute Appendicitis and Acute Kidney Injury: A Case Report and Review of Literature2022CureusUSA
2Shaw T, Cockrell H, Panchal R, Abraham A, Sawaya DBurkitt Lymphoma Presenting as Perforated Appendicitis2022Am SurgUSA
3Shahmanyan D, Saway B, Palmerton H, Rudderow JS, Reed CM, Wattsman TA, Faulks ER, Collier BR, Budin RE, Hamill MEBurkitt-type lymphoma incidentally found as the cause of acute appendicitis: a case report and review of literature2021Surg Case RepUSA
4Dashottar S, Sunita BS, Singh RK, Rana V, Suhag V, Singh AKA case series of unusual presentations of Burkitt’s lymphoma2020J Cancer Res TherIndia
5Mimery AH, Jabbour J, Sykes B, MacDermid E, Al-Askari M, De Clercq SBurkitt Leukemia Presenting as Acute Appendicitis: A Case Report and Literature Review2020Am J Case RepUSA
6Nam S, Kang J, Choi SE, Kim YR, Baik SH, Sohn SKXanthogranulomatous Appendicitis Mimicking Residual Burkitt’s Lymphoma After Chemotherapy2016Ann ColoproctolSouth Korea
7Sangma MM, Dasiah SD, Ashok AJIleo-Colic Burkitt Lymphoma in a Young Adult Female- A Case Report2016J Clin Diagn ResIndia
8Vrancx S, Van de Sande J, Vanclooster P, de Gheldere C, Van de Velde ABurkitt Lymphoma Mimicking an Acute Appendicitis in a 17 Years Old Boy: a Case Report2015Acta Chir BelgBelgium
9Weledji EP, Ngowe MN, Abba JSBurkitt’s lymphoma masquerading as appendicitis—two case reports and review of the literature2014World J Surg OncolCameroon
10Bhardwaj N, Bains SK, Ortonowski G, Murphy PA case of Burkitt’s lymphoma presenting as suspected acute appendicitis2010Afr J Paediatr SurgIndia
11Wang SM, Huang FC, Wu CH, Ko SF, Lee SY, Hsiao CCIleocecal Burkitt’s lymphoma presenting as ileocolic intussusception with appendiceal invagination and acute appendicitis2010J Formos Med AssocTaiwan
13Caine YG, Peylan-Ramu N, Livoff AF, Schiller MPrimary Burkitt’s lymphoma of the appendix1990Z KinderchirGermany
14Ghani SA, Syed N, Tan PEA rare cause of acute appendicitis: Burkitt’s lymphoma of the appendix1984Med J MalaysiaMalaysia
15Nanji AA, Anderson FHBurkitt’s lymphoma with acute appendicitis1983Arch SurgCanada
16Sin IC, Ling ET, Prentice RSBurkitt’s lymphoma of the appendix: report of two cases1980Hum PatholUSA
AuthorsTitleYearJournalCountry
1Yahya HA, Kumar V, Lam JTBurkitt Lymphoma of the Appendix Presenting With Acute Appendicitis and Acute Kidney Injury: A Case Report and Review of Literature2022CureusUSA
2Shaw T, Cockrell H, Panchal R, Abraham A, Sawaya DBurkitt Lymphoma Presenting as Perforated Appendicitis2022Am SurgUSA
3Shahmanyan D, Saway B, Palmerton H, Rudderow JS, Reed CM, Wattsman TA, Faulks ER, Collier BR, Budin RE, Hamill MEBurkitt-type lymphoma incidentally found as the cause of acute appendicitis: a case report and review of literature2021Surg Case RepUSA
4Dashottar S, Sunita BS, Singh RK, Rana V, Suhag V, Singh AKA case series of unusual presentations of Burkitt’s lymphoma2020J Cancer Res TherIndia
5Mimery AH, Jabbour J, Sykes B, MacDermid E, Al-Askari M, De Clercq SBurkitt Leukemia Presenting as Acute Appendicitis: A Case Report and Literature Review2020Am J Case RepUSA
6Nam S, Kang J, Choi SE, Kim YR, Baik SH, Sohn SKXanthogranulomatous Appendicitis Mimicking Residual Burkitt’s Lymphoma After Chemotherapy2016Ann ColoproctolSouth Korea
7Sangma MM, Dasiah SD, Ashok AJIleo-Colic Burkitt Lymphoma in a Young Adult Female- A Case Report2016J Clin Diagn ResIndia
8Vrancx S, Van de Sande J, Vanclooster P, de Gheldere C, Van de Velde ABurkitt Lymphoma Mimicking an Acute Appendicitis in a 17 Years Old Boy: a Case Report2015Acta Chir BelgBelgium
9Weledji EP, Ngowe MN, Abba JSBurkitt’s lymphoma masquerading as appendicitis—two case reports and review of the literature2014World J Surg OncolCameroon
10Bhardwaj N, Bains SK, Ortonowski G, Murphy PA case of Burkitt’s lymphoma presenting as suspected acute appendicitis2010Afr J Paediatr SurgIndia
11Wang SM, Huang FC, Wu CH, Ko SF, Lee SY, Hsiao CCIleocecal Burkitt’s lymphoma presenting as ileocolic intussusception with appendiceal invagination and acute appendicitis2010J Formos Med AssocTaiwan
13Caine YG, Peylan-Ramu N, Livoff AF, Schiller MPrimary Burkitt’s lymphoma of the appendix1990Z KinderchirGermany
14Ghani SA, Syed N, Tan PEA rare cause of acute appendicitis: Burkitt’s lymphoma of the appendix1984Med J MalaysiaMalaysia
15Nanji AA, Anderson FHBurkitt’s lymphoma with acute appendicitis1983Arch SurgCanada
16Sin IC, Ling ET, Prentice RSBurkitt’s lymphoma of the appendix: report of two cases1980Hum PatholUSA

The search criteria (‘Burkitt lymphoma’ [All Fields]) AND (‘appendicitis’ [All Fields]) were applied in databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Articles that were not case reports or case series were excluded, such as those without full-text availability in English or Spanish or those not indexed in the databases above.

Conclusions

This case highlights a key surgical oncology dilemma: should gastrointestinal lymphomas be operated on when discovered incidentally? Although chemotherapy is the mainstay of BL treatment, surgery resolved the acute abdomen and enabled diagnosis. The appendectomy was diagnostic—not curative—but facilitated early oncologic care. In the era of nonoperative appendicitis management, surgeons must remain alert to unexpected malignancies with major prognostic implications.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Funding

None declared.

References

1.

El Bakouri  

A
, Ballati  
A
, Bouali  
M
, et al.  Primary appendiceal Burkitt’s lymphoma presenting as acute appendicitis: an extremely rare case report and review of the literatture.
Ann Med Surg (Lond)
 2021;61:16–8  

2.

Dong  

HY
, Scadden  
DT
, de  Leval  
L
, et al.  Plasmablastic lymphoma in HIV-positive patients: an aggressive Epstein-Barr virus-associated extramedullary plasmacytic neoplasm.
Am J Surg Pathol
 2005;29:1633–41.

3.

God  

JM
, Hague  
A
. Hague a: immune evasion by B-cell lymphoma.
J Clin Cell Immunol
 2011;2: 1000e103.

4.

Wang  

SM
, Huang  
FC
, Wu  
CH
, et al.  Ileocaecal Burkitt’s lymphoma presenting as ileocolic intussusception with appendiceal invagination and acute appendicitis.
J Formos Med Assoc
 2010;109:476–9.

5.

Bhardwaj  

N
, Bains  
SK
, Ortonowski  
G
, et al.  A case of Burkitt’s lymphoma presenting as suspected acute appendicitis.
Afr J Paediatr Surg
 2010;7:214–5.

6.

Bissen  

L
, Brasseur  
R
, Azagra  
JS
, et al.  Burkitt’s lymphoma of the appendix.
JBR-BTR
 2002;85:257–9. .

7.

Biswas  

S
. Report of a case of abdominal Burkitt’s lymphoma presenting as a localised right iliac fossa pain mimicking acute appendicitis.
Int J Surg
 2007;9:9.

8.

Riley  

DS
, Barber  
MS
, Kienle  
GS
, et al.  CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document.
J Clin Epidemiol
, 2017;89:218–35.

9.

de  Leval  

L
, Hasserjian  
RP
. Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas and burkitt lymphoma.
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am
 2009;23:791–827.

© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press and JSCR Publishing Ltd.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.