Abstract

Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare primary cutaneous neuroendocrine tumour that is locally aggressive. In most cases the primary treatment is local surgical excision; however, there is a high incidence recurrence both local and distant. Cerebral metastases from Merkel cell carcinoma are extremely uncommon with only 12 cases published in the literature. This case is particularly unusual in that, not only was no established primary lesion identified, but also the patient has survived for 10 years following initial diagnosis and for 9 years following excision of a single brain metastasis.

Introduction

Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare primary cutaneous neuroendocrine tumour that is locally aggressive and has potential for metastatic spread. It was originally described in 1972 by Toker as a sweat gland variant and has become so named because of the discovery of membrane bound dense core neurosecretory granules similar to those found in the normal merkel cell, a neuroendocrine cell of the skin [1].

Given the limited number of published series, there is currently no consensus regarding optimal therapeutic approach [2, 3]. The principal treatment is surgical excision; however, the clinical behaviour is characterized by a high incidence of local recurrence, lymph node involvement and distant metastases [2, 3]. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy have limited impact on overall survival and the prognosis for those patients with progressive disease is poor [3]. The incidence of disease related death ranges from 35% to almost 50% [2, 3].

Cerebral metastases from Merkel cell carcinoma are extremely uncommon with only 12 cases published in the literature. This case is particularly unusual in that, not only was no established primary lesion identified, but also the patient has survived for 10 years following initial presentation and for 9 years following excision of a single brain metastasis.

Case Report

In June 2006 a 65-year-old male presented with a 10 cm mass in the right axilla. This had been present for several months but had recently increased in size. There were no primary skin lesions. Initially he underwent fine needle aspiration cytology and then an axillary clearance. Histopathological examination showed metastatic high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma in three out of nine lymph nodes. The tumour cells showed positive immunohistochemical staining for the neuroendocrine markers synaptophysin, chromogranin and CD56. There was perinuclear dot-like positivity for cytokeratin 20 and the overall findings were consistent with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. He was extensively investigated but there was no clinical or radiological evidence of a primary source. He had local radiotherapy at a dose of 50.8 Gy in 28 fractions to the right axilla and supraclavicular fossa over a 6-week period followed by systemic chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide.

He made an uneventful recovery but presented 1 year later with intermittent dysphasia and confusion. MRI of the brain revealed a homogeneously enhancing lesion in the left posterior temporal lobe (Fig. 1). Staging CT scans identified no other lesions and this was felt to be an isolated metastasis. The patient had a craniotomy and excision of the tumour. Histopathology confirmed a high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma with an identical immunohistochemical profile consistent with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (Fig. 2).

Axial T1 with Gadolinium MRI showing left temporal lesion.
Figure 1:

Axial T1 with Gadolinium MRI showing left temporal lesion.

H&E stain for brain tissue, left. Immuno-stain for CK20, bottom right. Immuno-stain for CD56, upper right. ×400 magnification.
Figure 2:

H&E stain for brain tissue, left. Immuno-stain for CK20, bottom right. Immuno-stain for CD56, upper right. ×400 magnification.

After recovering from surgery the patient had a course of whole brain radiation therapy (30 Gy). He remains well at 10 years following initial presentation, with no clinical or radiological evidence of recurrence (Fig. 3).

Axial T1 with Gadolinium MRI showing no evidence of recurrence at 10-year follow-up.
Figure 3:

Axial T1 with Gadolinium MRI showing no evidence of recurrence at 10-year follow-up.

Discussion

Merkel cell carcinoma is a cutaneous, neuroendocrine tumour, which is locally aggressive and has the potential for metastatic spread [3]. While the incidence has been reported to be increasing, it is still a relatively rare tumour [2]. It predominantly affects elderly Caucasians with a male predominance and it most commonly arises on sun exposed areas of the head and neck region (40.6%) with lesions in the extremities and trunk representing 33% and 23% of cases, respectively [2, 3]. In some cases no primary lesion can be identified [3, 4].

The most consistent prognostic factor associated with survival is the stage of the disease at presentation [5]. Investigators at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre identified tumour diameter as an independent predictor of survival and developed a 4 tiered staging system in 1999. The more recently modified 4 tiered system separates patients with localized and distant disease. Stage I (primary tumour <2 cm); Stage II (primary tumour >2 cm diameter); Stage III (patients with regional disease) and Stage IV (patients with distant disease) [5]. Around 70% of patients present with Stage I or II disease, 25% have loco-regional lymph node involvement and 5% present with Stage IV [3, 6, 7].

Because of its aggressive clinical behaviour, the treatment of choice is wide surgical excision of the primary tumour with adjuvant radiotherapy to control local disease [3]. Chemotherapy is generally reserved for Stage III disease. Despite these treatment regimes outcome can be poor especially for Stage III and Stage IV disease [3, 4]. Allen reported their single institution 5-year survival rates for Stage I—81%, Stage II–67%, Stage III—52% and Stage IV—11% [6].

When considering all types of isolated brain metastases, surgical resection can give better results than radiotherapy alone in cases where the lesion is accessible and causing either neurological symptoms or significant mass effect. A number of studies have demonstrated that patients with a good preoperative level of function and well-controlled systemic disease have improved survival, longer functional independence and a better quality of life than similar patients treated with radiotherapy alone [8–10].

Interpreting these studies in relation to merkel cell tumours has its limitations as there have been only 12 cases reported [4, 11–21]. Of these, one case advocated for aggressive chemotherapy and radiotherapy with curative intent resulting in marginal prolongation of survival [19]. A similar management strategy was supported by Ikawa, with the addition of surgical resection in combination with radiotherapy and chemotherapy; however, this lead to survival of only 11 months [15]. Unfortunately, most cases with brain metastases have been treated with palliative radiotherapy and chemotherapy and overall survival has been poor.

The question still remains as to why our particular patient has survived for so long.

The lack of a known primary tumour may be of some relevance. While MCC presenting with lymph node metastases and an unknown primary is a rare occurrence it is well reported [3, 4], and two possible hypotheses have been suggested: firstly, spontaneous regression of the primary lesion and secondly, primary nodal localization of MCC [7].

While the complete spontaneous regression is very rare it is well documented [22] and it has been suggested to be due to an immune reaction induced by biopsy [3, 22]. Whether this may be responsible for the prolonged survival in this case and in other cases of spontaneous remission is currently unknown; however, there are certainly unanswered questions regarding immunological aspects of this cancer.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

References

1

Tang
CK
,
Toker
C
.
Trabecular carcinoma of the skin: an ultrastructural study
.
Cancer
1978
;
42
:
2311
21
.

2

Bichakjian
CK
,
Lowe
L
,
Lao
CD
,
Sandler
HM
,
Bradford
CR
,
Johnson
TM
, et al. .
Merkel cell carcinoma: critical review with guidelines for multidisciplinary management
.
Cancer
2007
;
110
:
1
12
.

3

Medina-Franco
H
,
Urist
MM
,
Fiveash
J
,
Heslin
MJ
,
Bland
KI
,
Beenken
SW
.
Multimodality treatment of merkel cell carcinoma: case series and literature review of 1024 cases
.
Ann Surg Oncol
2001
;
8
:
204
8
.

4

De Cicco
L
,
Vavassori
A
,
Jereczek-Fossa
BA
,
Pruneri
G
,
Catalano
G
,
Ferrari
AM
, et al. .
Lymph node metastases of Merkel cell carcinoma from unknown primary site: report of three cases
.
Tumori
2008
;
94
:
758
61
.

5

Allen
PJ
,
Zhang
ZF
,
Coit
DG
.
Surgical management of Merkel cell carcinoma
.
Ann Surg
1999
;
229
:
97
105
.

6

Allen
PJ
,
Browne
WB
,
Jaques
DP
,
Brennan
MF
,
Busam
K
,
Coit
DG
.
Merkel cell carcinoma: prognosis and treatment of patients from a single institution
.
J Clin Oncol
2005
;
23
:
2300
9
.

7

Ott
MJ
,
Tanabe
KK
,
Gadd
MA
,
Stark
P
,
Smith
BL
,
Finkelstein
DM
, et al. .
Multimodality management of Merkel cell carcinoma
.
Arch Surg
1999
;
134
:
388
92
.

8

Patchell
RA
,
Tibbs
PA
,
Walsh
JW
,
Dempsey
RJ
,
Maruyama
Y
,
Kryscio
RJ
, et al. .
A randomised trial of surgery in the treatment of single metastases to the brain
.
N Engl J Med
1990
;
322
:
494
500
.

9

Patchell
RA
,
Tibbs
PA
,
Regine
WF
.
Postoperativeradiotherapy in the treatment of single metastases to the brain: a randomised trial
.
JAMA
1998
;
280
:
1485
9
.

10

Vecht
C
,
Haaxma-Rieche
H
,
Noordijk
EM
.
Treatment of single brain metastases: radiotherapy alone or combined with neurosurgery
.
Ann Neurol
1993
;
33
:
583
90
.

11

Eggers
SD
,
Salomao
DR
,
Dinapoli
RP
,
Vernino
S
.
Paraneoplastic and metastatic neurological complications of Merkel Cell Carcinoma
.
Mayo Clin Proc
2001
;
76
:
327
30
.

12

Giannone
L
,
Johnson
D
,
Grosh
W
,
Dabis
B
,
MArangos
P
,
Greco
FA
.
Serum neuron-specific enolase in metatstatic Merkel cell tumours
.
Med Pediatr Oncol
1985
;
13
:
357
62
.

13

Goepfert
H
,
Remmler
D
,
Silva
E
,
Wheeler
B
.
Merkel cell carcinoma (endocrine carcinoma of the skin) of the head and neck
.
Arch Otolaryngol
1984
;
110
:
707
12
.

14

Hitchcock
CL
.
Neuroendocrine (Merkel Cell) Carcinoma of the skin its natural history, diagnosis and treatment
.
Ann Surg
1988
;
207
:
201
7
.

15

Ikawa
F
,
Kia
K
,
Uozumi
T
,
Yuki
K
,
Takeshita
S
,
Hamasaki
O
, et al. .
Brain metastasis of Merkel cell carcinoma
.
Neurosurg Rev
1999
;
22
:
54
7
.

16

Sharma
D
,
Flora
G
,
Grunberg
SM
.
Chemotherapy of metastatic Merkel Cell carcinoma: case report and review of the literature
.
Am J Clin Oncol
1991
;
14
:
166
9
.

17

Small
KW
,
Rosenwasser
GO
,
Alexander
E
III
,
Rossitch
G
,
Dutton
JJ
.
Presumed choroidal metastasis of merkel cell carcinoma
.
Ann Ophthalmol
1990
;
22
:
187
90
.

18

Snodgrass
SM
,
Landy
H
,
Markoe
AM
,
Feun
L
.
Neurologic complications of Merkel cell carcinoma
.
J Neurooncol
1994
;
22
:
231
4
.

19

Wick
M
,
Goellner
JR
,
Scheithauer
B
,
Thomas
JR
,
Sanchez
N
,
Schroeter
A
.
Primary neuroendocrine ccarcinomas of the skin (Merkel Cell tumours)
.
Am J Clin Pathol
1983
;
79
:
6
13
.

20

Yiengspruksawan
A
,
Coit
DG
,
Thaler
HT
,
Urmacher
C
,
Knapper
WK
.
Merkel cell carcinoma. Prognosis and management
.
Arch Surg
1991
;
126
:
1514
9
.

21

Eusebi
V
,
Capella
C
,
Cossu
A
,
Rosai
J
.
Neuroendocrine carcinoma within lymph nodes in the absence of a primary tumor, with special reference to Merkel cell carcinoma
.
Am J Surg Pathol
1992
;
16
:
658
66
.

22

Connelly
TJ
,
Cribier
B
,
Brown
TJ
,
Yanguas
I
.
Complete spontaneous regression of merkel cell arcinoma: a review of 10 reported cases
.
Dermatol Surg
2000
;
26
:
853
6
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com