Abstract

Roux-en-O (ROGB) configuration is a rare technical complication caused by incorrect limb orientation, resulting in biliopancreatic secretions draining into the gastric pouch. We report a 47-year-old female with multiple prior bariatric surgeries who underwent conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease and developed persistent food intolerance, bilious vomiting, and reflux. ROGB was suspected on imaging and confirmed intraoperatively. Surgical revision with reconstruction of the gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy restored proper limb orientation, leading to complete symptom resolution. This case emphasizes the importance of careful limb identification during revisional bariatric surgery to prevent this rare complication.

Introduction

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) remains one of the most effective metabolic and bariatric surgical procedures. It is well established as both primary and revisional operation, providing durable weight reduction and significant improvement in obesity-related comorbidities [1, 2]. Achieving optimal perioperative outcomes, however, requires substantial technical experience. Evidence suggests that surgeons must perform ~500 RYGB procedures to attain proficiency and minimize procedure-related complications [3]. Despite its widespread adoption, RYGB requires meticulous attention to operative detail to avoid technical errors. One such error is the inadvertent creation of the ‘Roux-en-O’ configuration, which results from incorrect orientation of the bowel limbs. Reported cases of this incorrect configuration have predominantly occurred following primary RYGB.

In this paper, we present a case of Roux-en-O gastric bypass (ROGB) configuration occurring during conversion from a one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) to RYGB. We describe the mechanism of occurrence, the operative management, and provide a focused review of the existing literature.

Case report

A 47-year-old female with longstanding gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and multiple prior bariatric procedures (LSG 12 years earlier, conversion to OAGB 6 years later, and subsequent conversion to RYGB after iatrogenic perforation during endoscopy) presented with persistent food intolerance, bilious vomiting, and refractory reflux. Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) contrast study showed a dilated alimentary limb with severe reflux, and endoscopy revealed bile in the alimentary limb, raising suspicion of ROGB configuration (Fig. 1). Intraoperative limb tracing confirmed ROGB, with the alimentary limb mesentery continuing toward the ligament of Treitz in a loop configuration. Surgical correction was performed by dismantling the gastrojejunostomy, reconstructing a new gastrojejunostomy, and creating a jejunojejunostomy 100 cm distal to it. Postoperative UGI showed normal contrast flow, and the patient achieved complete symptom resolution with satisfactory weight stabilization.

UGI (upper gastrointestinal) contrast study showed adilated alimentary limb with severe reflux.
Figure 1

Contrast study showing excessively dilated Roux limb.

Discussion

Incorrect construction of RYGB is rare, and one possible technical error is the ROGB configuration. In this scenario, the bowel limb draining the excluded stomach is inadvertently anastomosed to the gastric pouch, resulting in a closed loop in which biliopancreatic secretions drain into the gastric pouch. This flawed configuration may occur particularly during revisional bariatric procedures, where anatomical alterations and adhesions increase technical complexity. Additionally, obesity itself may increase the technical difficulty of such procedures. Incorrect restoration of gastrointestinal continuity has also been reported in other gastrointestinal surgeries outside bariatric surgery practice. For example, Zorn et al. reported two cases of recurrent cholangitis following hepaticojejunostomy [4]. Exploration revealed that the biliary anastomosis had been constructed incorrectly using the wrong limb, resulting in recurrent cholangitis.

The symptoms of ROGB configuration can often be predicted based on the abnormal drainage of biliopancreatic secretions into the gastric pouch. Patients may present with early postoperative bilious vomiting, persistent nausea, abdominal pain, food intolerance, excessive weight loss, and intractable GERD [6, 8]. Diagnosis can be challenging due to the rarity of the condition and requires a high index of suspicion. Reported cases demonstrate significant variability in the time to diagnosis, ranging from identification during the index operation to several months after surgery (Table 1).

Table 1

Reports of errant bowel limb construction in gastrointestinal surgeries

Author / YearType of surgeryNo.Error typePresentationInvestigationsOperative findingsManagement
Zorn et al., 1999 [4]RY hepaticojejunostomy2Antiperistaltic Roux limbRecurrent cholangitisRe-explorationReversed limbIsoperistaltic reconstruction
DiBaise et al.,, 2005 [5]Total gastrectomy, RY-esophagojejunostomy2Antiperistaltic Roux limbBilious vomiting, aspiration pneumonia, malnutritionUGI, CT, EGD, manometryRetrograde phase III contractions confirming a reversed limbReorientation of the esophagojejunostomy to an isoperistaltic direction
Nelson et al., 2006 [6]Open and laparoscopic RYGB5Antiperistaltic Roux limbBilious vomiting, protein-calorie malnutritionNAAntiperistaltic orientationReorientation to an isoperistaltic direction
Schrope et al., 2006 [7]Open ROGB3Reverse peristaltic alimentary limbObstructive symptoms after surgeryNAReverse peristaltic alimentary limbNot specified
Sherman et al., 2009 [8]Open and laparoscopic RYGB4ROGBBilious vomiting, small bowel obstruction.UGI, CT, small bowel follow-through, EGDIncorrect JJ, blind limb, excessively long biliopancreatic limb, volvulusMultiple laparotomies; revision of the JJ and GJ
Sanders et al., 2012 [9]Laparoscopic RYGB1Antiperistaltic secondary to partial obstructionNausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, malnutritionUGI, CT, EGDDilated Roux limb with retrograde contractionsTwo revisions of the JJ

RY: Roux en Y, RYGB: Roux en Y gastric bypass, ROGB: Roux en O gastric bypass, UGI: upper gastrointestinal series, CT: computed tomography, EGD: esophagogastroduodenoscopy, GJ: gastrojejunostomy, JJ: jejunojejunostomy

UGI contrast studies are commonly used in suspected cases. Radiologic findings suggestive of incorrect configuration include an excessively dilated Roux limb and the observation of peristalsis directed toward the gastric pouch during fluoroscopy [6, 10]. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy can also be helpful, as it may demonstrate bile reflux within the gastric pouch. Another diagnostic modality used to evaluate duodenogastric reflux is technetium-99 m–labeled hydroxyiminodiacetic acid scintigraphy. After intravenous administration, the tracer is excreted by hepatocytes into the bile and can be visualized using gamma cameras. Reflux of the tracer into the gastric pouch suggests abnormal biliary drainage [8]. Some authors have suggested that upper gastrointestinal contrast studies alone may be insufficient to confirm incorrect configuration and advocate for additional diagnostic testing, such as intestinal manometry [11].

Fortunately, technical errors in gastrointestinal reconstruction remain rare. However, with the increasing number of bariatric procedures performed worldwide, revisional bariatric surgery is becoming more common due to various indications, including intractable GERD and bile reflux [12, 13]. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing a ROGB configuration following conversion from OAGB. Two possible mechanisms may explain the occurrence of this configuration.

The first possibility is that the original OAGB was constructed according to the classic Billroth II, where the biliopancreatic limb is brought from the right side of the patient to the left. During conversion to RYGB, the common channel was been divided and anastomosed to the same biliary limb, resulting in an O-configuration (Fig. 2). The second possibility is that the OAGB was constructed with the biliary limb running from left to right, but the limb became twisted or flipped during conversion. Consequently, the common channel have been inadvertently divided and anastomosed to the biliary limb, again producing the O-configuration (Fig. 3).

During conversion to RYGB, the common channel was been divided and anastomosed to the same biliary limb, resulting in an O-configuration.
Figure 2

Explanation 1 of mechanism of ROGB construction after Billroth II.

The OAGB was constructed with the biliary limb running from left to right, but the limb became twisted or flipped during conversion. Consequently, the common channel have been inadvertently divided and anastomosed to the biliary limb, producing the Oconfiguration
Figure 3

Explanation 2 of mechanism of ROGB construction after OAGB.

During the construction of OAGB, the orientation of the biliary limb to the gastric pouch, i.e. from left to right or right to lift is not stated explicitly in the literature, but the authors who popularized this procedure and large studies are displaying that the biliary limb going from the left to the right side of the patient [14, 15]. We believe that this is the main reason why a ROGB developed in this particular case.

Conclusion

Roux-en-O configuration is a rare but significant technical complication of RYGB that can be prevented by meticulous surgical technique and careful verification of bowel limb orientation. This case adds to the literature by reporting Roux-en-O following conversion from OAGB to RYGB, highlighting the technical complexity of revisional bariatric surgery and the importance of strict adherence to fundamental reconstructive principles to avoid this preventable complication.

Author contribution

M.A. contributed to writing of paper, literature review, collecting images. A. Alswat made literature review. A. Alqahtani performed review & editing.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Funding

None declared.

References

1.

Guimarães
 
M
,
Osório
 
C
,
Silva
 
D
 et al.  
How sustained is Roux-en-Y gastric bypass long-term efficacy?
 
Obes Surg
 
2021
;
31
:
3623
9
.

2.

Uhe
 
I
,
Douissard
 
J
,
Podetta
 
M
 et al.  
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, or one-anastomosis gastric bypass? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials
.
Obesity
 
2022
;
30
:
614
27
.

3.

Doumouras
 
AG
,
Saleh
 
F
,
Anvari
 
S
 et al.  
Mastery in bariatric surgery. The long-term surgeon learning curve of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
.
Ann Surg
 
2018
;
267
:
489
94
.

4.

Zorn
 
GL
,
Wright
 
JK
,
Pinson
 
CW
 et al.  
Antiperistaltic Roux-en-Y biliary-enteric bypass after bile duct injury: a technical error in reconstruction
.
Sage J
 
1999
;
65
:
581
5
.

5.

DiBaise
 
JK
,
Iyer
 
K
,
Thompson
 
JS
.
Identification and management of an errant antiperistaltic Roux limb after total gastrectomy
.
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
.
2005
;
9
:
726
32
.

6.

Nelson
 
LG
,
Sarr
 
MG
,
Murr
 
MM
.
Errant and unrecognized antiperistaltic Roux limb construction during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for clinically significant obesity
.
Surg Obes Relat Dis
 
2006
;
2
:
523
7
.

7.

Schrope
 
BA
,
Daud
 
A
,
Bessler
 
M
.
Unintentional creation of reverse peristaltic alimentary limb during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery
.
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
 
2006
;
2
:
478
82
.

8.

Sherman
 
V
,
Dan
 
AG
,
Lord
 
JM
 et al.  
Complications of gastric bypass: avoiding the Roux-en-O configuration
.
Obes Surg
 
2009
;
19
:
1190
4
.

9.

Sanders
 
CM
,
Neff
 
M
,
Balsama
 
L
.
Surgical treatment of retrograde peristalsis following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
.
JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
 
2012
;
16
:
469
72
.

10.

Mitchell
 
MT
,
Pizzitola
 
VJ
,
Knuttinen
 
MG
 et al.  
Atypical complications of gastric bypass surgery
.
Eur J Radiol
 
2005
;
53
:
366
73
.

11.

Mitchell
 
MT
,
Gasparaitis
 
AE
,
Alverdy
 
J
 et al.  
Identification and management of an errant antiperistaltic Roux limb after total gastrectomy
.
J Gastrointest Surg
 
2006
;
10
:
622
.

12.

Jedamzik
 
J
,
Bichler
 
C
,
Felsenreich
 
DM
 et al.  
Conversion from one-anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: when and why—a single-center experience of all consecutive OAGB procedures
.
Surg Obes Relat Dis
 
2022
;
18
:
225
32
.

13.

Landreneau
 
JP
,
Barajas-Gamboa
 
JS
,
Strong
 
AT
 et al.  
Conversion of one-anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: short-term results from a tertiary referral center
.
Surg Obes Relat Dis
 
2019
;
15
:
1896
902
.

14.

Carbajo
 
MA
,
Luque-de-León
 
E
,
Jiménez
 
JM
 et al.  
Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: technique, results, and long-term follow-up in 1200 patients
.
Obes Surg
 
2017
;
27
:
1153
67
.

15.

Rutledge
 
R
.
The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases
.
Obes Surg
 
2001
;
11
:
276
80
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.