Abstract

Recurrent hepatic metastases at the resection margin following laparoscopic hepatectomy present technical challenges due to adhesions and altered anatomy. We describe an innovative traction technique using locking clips to facilitate safe re-resection. A 65-year-old patient with colorectal liver metastasis in segment 6 underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy. Three years post-operatively, imaging revealed recurrence at the hepatectomy margin. We describe a novel technique utilizing previously placed locking clips from the initial surgery as traction elements to provide optimal exposure during laparoscopic re-resection. The technique involves repurposing locking clips that were placed during the initial hepatectomy for hemostasis, using them as traction elements to create controlled manipulation of liver segments, allowing safe dissection and optimal visualization of the recurrent lesion, particularly valuable in peripheral hepatectomies. This innovative technique of repurposing previously placed locking clips as traction elements represents a valuable addition to the laparoscopic hepatobiliary surgeon’s armamentarium for managing recurrent hepatic metastases.

Introduction

Laparoscopic hepatectomy has become the gold standard for selected hepatic metastases, offering reduced morbidity and faster recovery compared to open surgery [1, 2]. However, local recurrence at the resection margin remains a significant challenge, occurring in 10%–15% of cases [3]. Re-resection of recurrent hepatic metastases presents unique technical difficulties due to adhesions, altered anatomy, and the need for precise identification of the recurrence site [4].

Traditional approaches to hepatic re-resection often require conversion to open surgery due to visualization challenges and difficulty in achieving adequate traction [5]. We present an innovative laparoscopic technique utilizing previously placed locking clips from the initial hepatectomy as traction elements to facilitate safe and effective re-resection of recurrent hepatic metastases at the hepatectomy margin.

Case presentation

A 65-year-old patient with a history of colorectal cancer presented with a solitary hepatic metastasis in segment 6. Initial treatment consisted of laparoscopic wedge resection with negative margins (R0 resection). During the initial procedure, several locking clips were placed for hemostasis along the resection margin and adjacent hepatic tissue. Histopathology confirmed complete excision of a 3.5 cm moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma metastasis.

Three post-operatively, routine surveillance imaging (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) revealed a 2.2 cm recurrent lesion at the previous hepatectomy margin in segment 6. The patient was asymptomatic with normal liver function tests (aspartate aminotransferase: 28 U/L, alanine aminotransferase: 32 U/L, bilirubin: 12 μmol/L). Multidisciplinary team discussion concluded that laparoscopic re-resection was feasible and appropriate.

Surgical technique

Preoperative planning

  • High-resolution computed tomography with arterial and portal venous phases

  • MRI with hepatobiliary contrast for precise localization

  • Virtual 3D reconstruction to assess relationship to vascular structures

  • Preoperative marking of the recurrence site using ultrasound guidance

Operative setup

  • Patient positioned supine with left side elevated 30°

  • Five-port laparoscopic approach with CO2 insufflation at 12 mmHg

  • 0° laparoscope for optimal visualization

  • Harmonic scalpel and bipolar electrocautery available

  • Pringle maneuver capability if required.

Novel traction technique using previously placed clips

Step 1: Assessment and identification of existing clips.

Initial laparoscopic exploration revealed dense adhesions at the previous resection site with fibrous tissue surrounding the recurrent lesion. Careful adhesiolysis was performed to identify anatomical landmarks and locate the locking clips placed during the initial hepatectomy (Fig. 1).

Laparoscopic view showing adhesiolysis and mobilization of the right liver lobe with identification of the locking clip on the margin of the previous S6 hepatectomy. Dense adhesions are visible at the resection site, requiring careful dissection to locate the previously placed hemostatic clip.
Figure 1

Laparoscopic view showing adhesiolysis and mobilization of the right liver lobe with identification of the locking clip on the margin of the previous S6 hepatectomy. Dense adhesions are visible at the resection site, requiring careful dissection to locate the previously placed hemostatic clip.

Step 2: Clip identification and assessment

Key Innovation: The locking clips placed during the initial surgery for hemostasis were identified and assessed for their potential use as traction elements.

The clips had maintained their position and integrity, providing ideal anchor points for traction (Fig. 2).

Close-up laparoscopic view demonstrating precise identification of the locking clip that will serve as the traction element. The clip maintains its structural integrity and positioning 3 years after the initial hepatectomy, providing an ideal anchor point for liver manipulation.
Figure 2

Close-up laparoscopic view demonstrating precise identification of the locking clip that will serve as the traction element. The clip maintains its structural integrity and positioning 3 years after the initial hepatectomy, providing an ideal anchor point for liver manipulation.

Step 3: Repurposing clips for traction

Using laparoscopic graspers, the existing locking clips were engaged and repurposed as traction elements. This innovative approach offered several advantages:

  • Predetermined positioning: Clips were already optimally placed from the initial surgery

  • Multidirectional traction: Clips allowed 360° manipulation of liver segments (Fig. 3)

  • Stable grip: Locking mechanism provided consistent traction force

  • Tissue preservation: No additional trauma from new clip placement

  • Optimal exposure: Enhanced visualization of critical structures around the recurrence (Fig. 4)

Demonstration of multidirectional liver manipulation using the repurposed locking clip as a traction element. The clip allows 360° manipulation of the liver segment, providing optimal exposure of the recurrent lesion and surrounding structures during dissection.
Figure 3

Demonstration of multidirectional liver manipulation using the repurposed locking clip as a traction element. The clip allows 360° manipulation of the liver segment, providing optimal exposure of the recurrent lesion and surrounding structures during dissection.

Laparoscopic view showing how the clip-assisted traction optimally exposes the vascular structures requiring ligation during the re-resection. The enhanced visualization allows for safe identification and control of hepatic vessels while maintaining adequate surgical margins around the recurrent metastasis.
Figure 4

Laparoscopic view showing how the clip-assisted traction optimally exposes the vascular structures requiring ligation during the re-resection. The enhanced visualization allows for safe identification and control of hepatic vessels while maintaining adequate surgical margins around the recurrent metastasis.

Step 4: Resection

With adequate traction and exposure achieved, the recurrent lesion was carefully dissected. Intraoperative ultrasound confirmed complete visualization of the tumor and its relationship to hepatic vessels. A 1 cm margin was achieved circumferentially.

Step 5: Hemostasis and closure

Following resection, hemostasis was achieved using bipolar electrocautery and hemostatic agents. The repurposed clips remained in place as they continued to provide hemostatic benefit. The resection bed was inspected for bleeding. A Jackson-Pratt drain was placed.

Discussion

Technical advantages

The described technique of repurposing previously placed locking clips offers several advantages over conventional methods:

  • (1) Optimal pre-positioning: The clips were already ideally positioned from the initial surgery, eliminating the need for additional clip placement and reducing operative time [6].

  • (2) Enhanced visualization: The ability to manipulate liver segments using existing clips provides optimal exposure of the surgical field, particularly crucial in peripheral hepatectomies where access can be challenging [7].

  • (3) Reduced tissue trauma: Unlike placing new clips or using other traction methods, repurposing existing clips avoids additional tissue manipulation and potential complications [8].

  • (4) Cost-effectiveness: Utilizing existing clips reduces the need for additional surgical materials and operative time.

  • (5) Anatomical familiarity: The clips serve as anatomical landmarks, helping orient the surgeon to the previous surgical field and critical structures.

Clinical implications

Recurrent hepatic metastases present significant challenges, with traditional approaches often requiring conversion to open surgery. Our technique demonstrates that complex laparoscopic re-resections can be performed safely by repurposing surgical materials from the initial procedure, representing a paradigm shift in resource utilization [9].

The oncological outcomes in our case are encouraging, with R0 resection achieved and no recurrence at 12 months follow-up. This aligns with recent literature suggesting that laparoscopic re-resection can achieve similar oncological outcomes to open surgery when appropriate techniques are employed [10].

Conclusion

We present a novel laparoscopic technique utilizing previously placed locking clips from the initial hepatectomy as traction elements during hepatic re-resection of recurrent metastases. This approach offers optimal pre-positioning, enhanced visualization, and reduced tissue trauma while being cost-effective and utilizing existing surgical materials. The technique represents a valuable addition to the minimally invasive hepatobiliary surgeon’s armamentarium and may help reduce the need for conversion to open surgery in selected cases.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Ethical approval

This case report was conducted in accordance with institutional guidelines and patient consent was obtained.

References

1.

Aldrighetti
 
L
,
Boggi
 
U
,
Falconi
 
M
, et al.  
Perspectives and challenges in laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review
.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
 
2020
;
27
:
534
43
.

2.

Cipriani
 
F
,
Shelat
 
VG
,
Rawashdeh
 
M
, et al.  
Laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing resections for nonperipheral liver lesions, the diamond technique
.
Ann Surg
 
2018
;
267
:
533
40
.

3.

Margonis
 
GA
,
Sergentanis
 
TN
,
Ntanasis-Stathopoulos
 
I
, et al.  
Impact of surgical margin width on recurrence and overall survival following R0 hepatic resection of colorectal metastases
.
Ann Surg
 
2018
;
267
:
1047
55
.

4.

Yamashita
 
S
,
Sheth
 
RA
,
Niekamp
 
AS
, et al.  
Comprehensive complication index predicts cancer-specific survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases independent of RAS mutational status
.
Ann Surg
 
2017
;
266
:
1045
54
.

5.

Hatwell
 
C
,
Bretagnol
 
F
,
Farges
 
O
, et al.  
Laparoscopic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: our experience in 58 cases
.
J Gastrointest Surg
 
2018
;
22
:
73
81
.

6.

Mise
 
Y
,
Tani
 
K
,
Aoki
 
T
, et al.  
Virtual liver resection and volumetric analysis of future liver remnant using 3D hepatic enhancement map
.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
 
2015
;
22
:
105
12
.

7.

Robles-Campos
 
R
,
Lopez-Lopez
 
V
,
Brusadin
 
R
, et al.  
Open versus minimally invasive liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases (LapOpHuva): a prospective randomized controlled trial
.
Surg Endosc
 
2019
;
33
:
3926
36
.

8.

Takahashi
 
M
,
Hasegawa
 
K
,
Aoki
 
T
, et al.  
Laparoscopic liver resection for patients with colorectal liver metastases: a literature review
.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
 
2018
;
28
:
44
50
.

9.

Fretland
 
AA
,
Dagenborg
 
VJ
,
Bjornelv
 
GMW
, et al.  
Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases: the OSLO-COMET randomized controlled trial
.
Ann Surg
 
2018
;
267
:
199
207
.

10.

Sposito
 
C
,
Battiston
 
C
,
Facciorusso
 
A
, et al.  
Propensity score analysis of outcomes following laparoscopic or open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma
.
Br J Surg
 
2016
;
103
:
871
80
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com