Abstract

There is insufficient clinical knowledge about xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (XGC) due to biased reporting. This study aims to investigate the incidence of XGC and evaluate the clinical outcome regarding operative time, rate of conversion and intraoperative or postoperative complications. We included 1141 patients who underwent surgery for gallbladder disease between January 2019 and December 2021. Of 1141 patients who underwent cholecystectomy, XGC was seen in 10 (0.87%). The average age is 47 (24–81 years old) with a male to female ratio of 3:2. Biliary pancreatitis and obstructive jaundice are seen in two patients who did ERCP and stenting before surgery. One patient presented with a 4 cm necrotizing soft-tissue granuloma. The BMI was high, with class I obesity in five patients. Symptoms last from 1 to 12 weeks. One patient was only diagnosed preoperatively as XGC. Four out of 10 (40%) required more than 72 h of hospitalization. All patients underwent elective sitting surgery, with eight successfully managed by laparoscopy and one converted to open. The average operative time was 90 min (43–193 min), and a postoperative drain was inserted in four patients. The median follow-up is after 24 months (11–30 months), with no postoperative collection, bleeding, complication or readmission. XGC is a rare benign entity requiring no further action upon incidental discovery. Surgical resection is the cornerstone of management, with the laparoscopic approach considered feasible and safe. Four out of 10 patients might need more than 3 days of hospitalization. In the presence of mass, the frozen section can help guide the management.

INTRODUCTION

Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (XGC) is a rare condition, initially identified by Christensen and Ishak in 1970 and later referred to as XGC by McCoy et al. in 1976. It is characterized by a destructive inflammatory reaction that can be focal or diffuse [1]. The chronic inflammation caused by XGC is marked by the production of xanthogranulomas, extensive proliferative fibrosis, and the infiltration of macrophages and foam cells into the gallbladder wall [2]. Although the etiology is unknown, XGC is commonly associated with gallstones and cholestasis. XGC is caused by an inflammatory and granulomatous response, followed by bile extravasation into the gallbladder wall [3]. Consequently, acute inflammation is accompanied by a granulomatous reaction and a cellular immune response [4]. XGC can be severe, extending into adjacent tissues such as the liver, bowel and stomach, causing adhesions, perforation, abscess and fistulous connection with the surrounding bowel [5].

Further, the gallbladder wall thickening and a fibrous response result in gross adhesions, complicating surgical dissection [6, 7]. As a result, it is regularly misdiagnosed as gallbladder carcinoma by ultrasound and CT imaging. [8]. The diagnosis is confirmed by a postoperative histological examination [9]. The current gold standard for treating benign gallbladder disease is laparoscopic cholecystectomy; nevertheless, XGC is linked to a high conversion rate to open. [1]. Preoperative distinctions between XGC and carcinoma must be addressed to avoid severe morbidity, particularly in radical surgery. There is a need to gather evidence in the literature about XGC; additionally, no article published in Saudi Arabia discusses such peculiar pathology.

CASE SERIES

The patient evaluation and the data collection of gallbladder disease were prospectively performed at a single, private tertiary center, Dr Soliman Fakeeh Hospital (Jeddah, Saudi Arabia). The current study investigated the incidence of XGC in 1141 consecutive patients who underwent cholecystectomy in our institution between January 2019 and December 2021. We excluded pediatric age groups and patients who did cholecystectomy combined with other surgeries. The gallbladder disease was confirmed by ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and diagnostic laparoscopy. The measured outcome included surgical intervention, conversion to open and complication rate. Factors that might extend the length of hospital stay postoperatively were also evaluated. The Institutional Review Board approved the study protocol of Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital with approval no. 228/IRB/2021. Of 1141 patients who underwent cholecystectomy, XGC was seen in 10 (0.87%). The average age was 47 (24–81 years). Six patients were male, and four were female, with a male-to-female ratio of 3:2. The patients’ nationalities varied, including Arab (8/10), Filipino, and Irish. Comorbidity was present in five patients. The average body mass index (BMI) was 30.8 (27.7–34.5). The duration of symptoms ranged between 1 and 12 weeks. The preoperative diagnoses were biliary colic (5/10), acute cholecystitis (3/10), biliary pancreatitis and obstructive jaundice. Endoscopic retrograde pancreaticography (ERCP) and stenting were done on two patients preoperatively. The average WBC was 8.3 x 10 3 (3.94–15.52), total bilirubin was 0.71 mg/dl (0.18–1.81) and international normalized ratio (INR) was 0.9 (1.2–0.98). The preoperative ultrasonography did not predict the presence of XGC or suggest the need for further imaging, except in one patient with soft-tissue mass inside the gallbladder. The average wall thickness was 5 mm (2–37), stone size was 7 mm [5–13], CBD diameter was 4.5 mm [2–7] and pericholecystic fluid was present only in 20% (2/10). One patient was described to have a mural diverticula and one pyocele. Four out of ten (40%) required more than 72 h of hospitalization. All patients underwent elective surgery with a laparoscopic approach. One patient required conversion to open due to a thickened 12 mm wall with perforation. The average operative time was 90 min (43–193), with no significant intraoperative event. The drain was inserted in 40% of the patients (4/10). One patient required excision of the liver bed; this section was frozen immediately and returned as negative for malignancy. No postoperative complications were listed over the median follow-up of 24 months (11–30). None of the patients had a postoperative collection, bleeding, surgical site infection, biliary leak or readmission. Tables 1 and 2 summarized the patients data. One patient was diagnosed preoperatively on images as suspicious of XGC versus malignancy. The characteristics shared histological features, including ulcerated mucosa with transmural acute and chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate, a sheet of foamy histocyte and multinucleated foreign body giant cell granuloma (Fig. 1).

Table 1

Patient demographic and surgical data

PatientAgeGenderDiagnosisSittingConversionComplicationDrainHospital stay (days)
181MaleBiliary pancreatitisElectiveNoNoNo2
247FemaleBiliary colicElectiveNoNoNo3
360MaleAcute cholecystitisElectiveYesNoYes5
439MaleAcute cholecystitisElectiveNoNoNo2
524FemaleAcute cholecystitisElectiveNoNoNo2
638MaleBiliary colicElectiveNoNoYes2
738MaleObstructive jaundiceElectiveNoNoNo2
836FemaleBiliary colicElectiveNoNoYes3
960FemaleBiliary colicElectiveNoNoYes4
1061MaleChronic cholecystitisElectiveNoNoNo3
PatientAgeGenderDiagnosisSittingConversionComplicationDrainHospital stay (days)
181MaleBiliary pancreatitisElectiveNoNoNo2
247FemaleBiliary colicElectiveNoNoNo3
360MaleAcute cholecystitisElectiveYesNoYes5
439MaleAcute cholecystitisElectiveNoNoNo2
524FemaleAcute cholecystitisElectiveNoNoNo2
638MaleBiliary colicElectiveNoNoYes2
738MaleObstructive jaundiceElectiveNoNoNo2
836FemaleBiliary colicElectiveNoNoYes3
960FemaleBiliary colicElectiveNoNoYes4
1061MaleChronic cholecystitisElectiveNoNoNo3
Table 1

Patient demographic and surgical data

PatientAgeGenderDiagnosisSittingConversionComplicationDrainHospital stay (days)
181MaleBiliary pancreatitisElectiveNoNoNo2
247FemaleBiliary colicElectiveNoNoNo3
360MaleAcute cholecystitisElectiveYesNoYes5
439MaleAcute cholecystitisElectiveNoNoNo2
524FemaleAcute cholecystitisElectiveNoNoNo2
638MaleBiliary colicElectiveNoNoYes2
738MaleObstructive jaundiceElectiveNoNoNo2
836FemaleBiliary colicElectiveNoNoYes3
960FemaleBiliary colicElectiveNoNoYes4
1061MaleChronic cholecystitisElectiveNoNoNo3
PatientAgeGenderDiagnosisSittingConversionComplicationDrainHospital stay (days)
181MaleBiliary pancreatitisElectiveNoNoNo2
247FemaleBiliary colicElectiveNoNoNo3
360MaleAcute cholecystitisElectiveYesNoYes5
439MaleAcute cholecystitisElectiveNoNoNo2
524FemaleAcute cholecystitisElectiveNoNoNo2
638MaleBiliary colicElectiveNoNoYes2
738MaleObstructive jaundiceElectiveNoNoNo2
836FemaleBiliary colicElectiveNoNoYes3
960FemaleBiliary colicElectiveNoNoYes4
1061MaleChronic cholecystitisElectiveNoNoNo3
Table 2

Patient radiological and pathological data

PatientSymptoms duration (Weeks)White blood countWall thickness (mm)Average stone size (mm)US findingPathology finding
125.7767Pericholecystic fluidUlcerated mucosa, foamy histocyte
2111.0745Multiple stonesFoamy histocyte and multinucleated giant cells
3112.161210Mural diverticulaChronic xanthogranulomatous cells
4126.9633Biliary mudUlcerated mucosa, foamy histocyte
588.88410MucoceleFoamy macrophages and cholesterol granuloma
625.8665Multiple stonesUlcerated mucosa, foamy histocyte, and giant foreign body
786.90713Wall edemaForeign body giant cell with a sheet of histocytes
8415.5225Multiple stonesTransmural extensive macrophages infiltrate
926.1225Multiple stonesForeign body giant cell granuloma with ulcerated mucosa
10123.944Mud4 cm massSevere necrotizing granuloma with chronic cholecystitis, xanthogranulomatous, negative for malignancy, tuberculosis, lymphoma, or parasite
PatientSymptoms duration (Weeks)White blood countWall thickness (mm)Average stone size (mm)US findingPathology finding
125.7767Pericholecystic fluidUlcerated mucosa, foamy histocyte
2111.0745Multiple stonesFoamy histocyte and multinucleated giant cells
3112.161210Mural diverticulaChronic xanthogranulomatous cells
4126.9633Biliary mudUlcerated mucosa, foamy histocyte
588.88410MucoceleFoamy macrophages and cholesterol granuloma
625.8665Multiple stonesUlcerated mucosa, foamy histocyte, and giant foreign body
786.90713Wall edemaForeign body giant cell with a sheet of histocytes
8415.5225Multiple stonesTransmural extensive macrophages infiltrate
926.1225Multiple stonesForeign body giant cell granuloma with ulcerated mucosa
10123.944Mud4 cm massSevere necrotizing granuloma with chronic cholecystitis, xanthogranulomatous, negative for malignancy, tuberculosis, lymphoma, or parasite
Table 2

Patient radiological and pathological data

PatientSymptoms duration (Weeks)White blood countWall thickness (mm)Average stone size (mm)US findingPathology finding
125.7767Pericholecystic fluidUlcerated mucosa, foamy histocyte
2111.0745Multiple stonesFoamy histocyte and multinucleated giant cells
3112.161210Mural diverticulaChronic xanthogranulomatous cells
4126.9633Biliary mudUlcerated mucosa, foamy histocyte
588.88410MucoceleFoamy macrophages and cholesterol granuloma
625.8665Multiple stonesUlcerated mucosa, foamy histocyte, and giant foreign body
786.90713Wall edemaForeign body giant cell with a sheet of histocytes
8415.5225Multiple stonesTransmural extensive macrophages infiltrate
926.1225Multiple stonesForeign body giant cell granuloma with ulcerated mucosa
10123.944Mud4 cm massSevere necrotizing granuloma with chronic cholecystitis, xanthogranulomatous, negative for malignancy, tuberculosis, lymphoma, or parasite
PatientSymptoms duration (Weeks)White blood countWall thickness (mm)Average stone size (mm)US findingPathology finding
125.7767Pericholecystic fluidUlcerated mucosa, foamy histocyte
2111.0745Multiple stonesFoamy histocyte and multinucleated giant cells
3112.161210Mural diverticulaChronic xanthogranulomatous cells
4126.9633Biliary mudUlcerated mucosa, foamy histocyte
588.88410MucoceleFoamy macrophages and cholesterol granuloma
625.8665Multiple stonesUlcerated mucosa, foamy histocyte, and giant foreign body
786.90713Wall edemaForeign body giant cell with a sheet of histocytes
8415.5225Multiple stonesTransmural extensive macrophages infiltrate
926.1225Multiple stonesForeign body giant cell granuloma with ulcerated mucosa
10123.944Mud4 cm massSevere necrotizing granuloma with chronic cholecystitis, xanthogranulomatous, negative for malignancy, tuberculosis, lymphoma, or parasite
Diffuse proliferation of histiocytes with foreign body giant cell granuloma, Hematoxylin and Eosin H&E, 40x high power filed.
Figure 1

Diffuse proliferation of histiocytes with foreign body giant cell granuloma, Hematoxylin and Eosin H&E, 40x high power filed.

DISCUSSION

XGC is a rare inflammatory chronic gallbladder disorder that accounts for 0.7–13.2% of all cholecystitis cases [1, 3, 6]. In our review, 10 cases were diagnosed with XGC out of 1441 (0.87%). Our sample was limited to people aged 24–81 years, with an average age of 47 years, consistent with the article suggesting that age may be a risk factor for XGC [11].

In previous studies, XGC was more frequently seen in men than women [8], the same in our sample, with a 3:2 male-to-female ratio. Furthermore, research has shown that male-to-female ratios vary, with some studies indicating that males dominate—such as Guzman-Valdivia’s report (M:F = 107:54) and Han and Chen’s report (M:F = 30:9)—while others, like Youcel et al., conclude that XGC affects both men and women equally [1]. These varying reports reflect the low incidence rate of XGC and the missing extensive clinical data, emphasizing the need for larger studies investigating the disease. Although sudden weight loss has been documented as a clinical presentation of XGC [12], our cases presented a high BMI of 30.8.

XGC is generally physiologically aggressive, spreading through the gallbladder wall into neighboring tissues and causing substantial morbidity [12, 13]. As a result, XGC is thought to have a unique clinical feature and an invasive form of chronic cholecystitis [13]. Gallbladder stones and biliary obstruction may contribute to the development of XGC by allowing bile to extravasate into the gallbladder wall through ruptured Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses and mucosal surface ulcers [4]. The researchers have indicated a significant correlation between XGC and cholelithiasis; all the patients in our study had a 7 mm [5–13] gallbladder stone, supporting that cholelithiasis has a role in the development of XGC [16].

Generally, clinical manifestations of XGC are not specific and are confused with other illnesses, such as gallbladder carcinoma, and commonly present as abdominal pain, especially in the upper quadrant, jaundice, nausea and vomiting [1, 9]. In the present report, approximately half of the patients (5/10) experienced biliary colic, which cannot help diagnose XGC. Despite the existence of clinical, radiological and laboratory evidence, distinguishing XGC from gallbladder cancer remains challenging [14–16]; histopathology remains the gold standard [17, 18].

Makimoto et al. [13] indicated that 26 (83.9%) cases were diagnosed as suspicious XGC using preoperative ultrasonography and computed tomography findings. Conversely, only one case was detected as XGC perioperatively on images in our sample 10% (1/10). While the data were consistent with XGC reported in cross-sectional imaging retrospective analysis, we believe that radiologists and clinicians are still unaware of this rare condition.

Surgery is the only effective therapy for XGC [19]. Such findings direct treatment choice depending on the thickness of the wall, malignancy, involvement of adjacent structures and the need for radical surgery, which also impact the duration of the procedure, complication rate and hospital stay [20]. Patients with XGC had a greater risk of conversion to open surgery than patients with other types of cholecystitis, with rates ranging from 19 to 80% [21]. In contrast to these findings, only 1 patient out of 10 (10%) required a conversion in our review due to a thickened 12 mm wall with perforation. Two patients underwent prior ERCP and stent procedures due to gallbladder stones, while only one had a mural diverticula and one pyocele.

Although biliary injury, bile leakage, bleeding and surgical site infection are all possible postoperative complications [6], none of the patients in our study suffered any. However, approximately four patients required more than 72 h in the hospital (an average of 2.8 days), which is less than a recent large-case series reported by Youcel et al. [1], where the average hospital stay was 5.1 days.

CONCLUSIONS

XGC is a rare benign entity requiring no further action upon incidental discovery. Surgical resection is the cornerstone in the management, with the laparoscopic approach considered feasible and safe. The rate of intraoperative events and postoperative complications are comparable with non-XGC. The average hospital stay is 3 days, and the surgical drain might be needed in half of the patients due to difficult dissection. An intraoperative frozen section can help differentiate XGC from cancer.

AUTHORSHIPS AND CONTRIBUTIONS

A.M.A. contributed to study conception and design, data acquisition, analysis, interpretation, drafted a critical manuscript revision and approved the text’s final version. E.A. contributed to study conception and design, data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation drafted a critical manuscript revision, and approved the text’s final version. H.A. contributed to study conception and design, data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation, drafted a critical manuscript revision, and approved the text’s final version. A.A. contributed to study conception and design, data acquisition, analysis, interpretation, drafted a critical manuscript revision, and approved the text’s final version.

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

Disclosure: Abdulrahman Alotaibi, Eid Almasoudi, Hassan Ahmed, and Abubakr Alzwaihiri, have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

1.

Yucel
O
,
Uzun
MA
,
Tilki
M
,
Alkan
S
,
Kilicoglu
ZG
,
Goret
CC
.
Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: analysis of 108 patients
.
Indian J Surg
2017
;
79
:
510
4
.

2.

Kwon
AH
,
Matsui
Y
,
Uemura
Y
.
Surgical procedures and histopathologic findings for patients with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis
.
J Am Coll Surg
2004
;
199
:
204
10
.

3.

Guzmán-Valdivia
G
.
Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: 15 years' experience
.
World J Surg
2004
;
28
:
254
7
.

4.

Goodman
ZD
,
Ishak
KG
.
Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis
.
Am J Surg Pathol
1981
;
5
:
653
9
.

5.

Ahn
YJ
,
Kim
TH
,
Moon
SW
,
Choi
SN
,
Kim
HJ
,
Jung
WT
, et al. 
A case of perforated xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis presenting as biloma
.
Korean J Gastroenterol
2011
;
58
:
153
6
.

6.

Cui
Y
,
Zhang
H
,
Zhao
E
,
Cui
N
,
Li
Z
.
Differential diagnosis and treatment options for xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis
.
Med Princ Pract
2013
;
22
:
18
23
.

7.

Deng
YL
,
Cheng
NS
,
Zhang
SJ
,
Ma
WJ
,
Shrestha
A
,
Li
FY
, et al. 
Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis mimicking gallbladder carcinoma: an analysis of 42 cases
.
World J Gastroenterol
2015
;
21
:
12653
9
.

8.

Han
SH
,
Chen
YL
.
Diagnosis and treatment of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: a report of 39 cases
.
Cell Biochem Biophys
2012
;
64
:
131
5
.

9.

Rammohan
A
,
Cherukuri
SD
,
Sathyanesan
J
,
Palaniappan
R
,
Govindan
M
.
Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis masquerading as gallbladder cancer: can it be diagnosed preoperatively?
Gastroenterol Res Pract
2014
;
2014
:253645.

10.

Hsu
C
,
Hurwitz
JL
,
Schuss
A
,
Katz
DS
.
Radiology-pathology conference: xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis
.
Clin Imaging
2003
;
27
:
421
5
.

11.

Utsumi
M
,
Aoki
H
,
Kunitomo
T
,
Mushiake
Y
,
Yasuhara
I
,
Arata
T
, et al. 
Evaluation of surgical treatment for incidental gallbladder carcinoma diagnosed during or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: single center results
.
BMC Res Notes
2017
;
10
:
56
.

12.

Rao
RV
,
Kumar
A
,
Sikora
SS
,
Saxena
R
,
Kapoor
VK
.
Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: differentiation from associated gall bladder carcinoma
.
Trop Gastroenterol
2005
;
26
:
31
3
.

13.

Makimoto
S
,
Takami
T
,
Hatano
K
,
Kataoka
N
,
Yamaguchi
T
,
Tomita
M
, et al. 
Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: a review of 31 patients
.
Surg Endosc
2021
;
35
:
3874
80
.

14.

Suzuki
H
,
Wada
S
,
Araki
K
,
Kubo
N
,
Watanabe
A
,
Tsukagoshi
M
, et al. 
Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: difficulty in differentiating from gallbladder cancer
.
World J Gastroenterol
2015
;
21
:
10166
73
.

15.

Akkurt
G
,
Birben
B
,
Çoban
S
,
Akgül
Ö
,
Kulaçoğlu
S
,
Doğanay
M
.
Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis and gallbladder cancer: two diseases with difficult differential diagnoses
.
Turk J Gastroenterol
2021
;
32
:
694
701
.

16.

Frountzas
M
,
Schizas
D
,
Liatsou
E
,
Economopoulos
KP
,
Nikolaou
C
,
Apostolou
KG
, et al. 
Presentation and surgical management of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis
.
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int
2021
;
20
:
117
27
.

17.

Khan
S
,
Abeer
I
,
Husain
M
,
Hassan
MJ
,
Jetley
S
.
Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis mimicking advanced gallbladder carcinoma - analysis of 8 cases
.
J Cancer Res Ther
2021
;
17
:
969
75
.

18.

Giudicelli
X
,
Rode
A
,
Bancel
B
,
Nguyen
AT
,
Mabrut
JY
.
Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: diagnosis and management
.
J Visc Surg
2021
;
158
:
326
36
.

19.

Takeda
Y
,
Tomimaru
Y
,
Yokota
Y
,
Noguchi
K
,
Noura
S
,
Imamura
H
, et al. 
Outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis
.
Mol Clin Oncol
2019
;
11
:
279
84

20.

Güneş
Y
,
Bostancı
Ö
,
İlbar Tartar
R
,
Battal
M
.
Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: is surgery difficult? is laparoscopic surgery recommended?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
2021
;
31
:
36
40
.

21.

Li
YQ
,
Song
J
,
Liu
ZX
,
Xie
DY
,
Jiang
T
,
Wei
GH
, et al. 
Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis and misdiagnosis analysis
.
Chin Med J (Engl)
2015
;
128
:
1700
2
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.