Abstract

Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) of the inferior vena cava (IVC) is an extremely rare malignancy with <400 cases reported. We present a 42-year-old woman with a 3-day history of vague and non-specific abdominal pain. Examination revealed mild tenderness to the epigastrium and right upper quadrant with no other findings. Abdominal ultrasound was performed, which revealed a large hypoechoic mass overlying the IVC. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) was performed which revealed an 8.9 × 7.9 × 9 cm multilobulated lesion encasing the IVC. A CT-guided biopsy was performed which revealed a primary LMS of the IVC. Surgical en bloc excision was performed with an end-to-end Dacron graft for IVC reconstruction. Histopathology confirmed LMS of the vessel wall with negative surgical margins.

INTRODUCTION

Leiomyosarcomas (LMS) are tumors of mesenchymal origin that arise from smooth muscle cells. When they affect vessels, they arise from the tunica media. LMS of the inferior vena cava (IVC) are exceedingly rare, accounting for 0.5% of all adult tissue sarcomas and they affect < 1/100,000 of all adult malignancies [1]. Prognosis is typically poor and definitive treatment is surgical resection with clear margins [2]. The most common symptom of LMS of the IVC is non-specific abdominal pain, but patients can be asymptomatic [3].

In this case report, we present a 42-year-old woman with a 3-day history of non-specific abdominal pain. Ultrasound and (computed tomography) CT supported a diagnosis of an LMS of the IVC with confirmation via CT-guided biopsy.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 42-year-old woman presented to the emergency room with a 3-day history of vague and non-specific abdominal pain. This was the patient’s first time experiencing this type of pain and only presented because her pain was not improving. She reported no other symptoms, no previous medical problems, and no prior surgeries. A pregnancy test was performed and was negative. Examination only revealed mild tenderness in the epigastrium and right upper quadrant with an otherwise a benign exam.

Initial ultrasound showing a large heterogenous, hypoechoic mass like lesion overlying the IVC.
Figure 1

Initial ultrasound showing a large heterogenous, hypoechoic mass like lesion overlying the IVC.

Abdominal CT scan demonstrating IVC lesion that partially encircles the aorta.
Figure 2

Abdominal CT scan demonstrating IVC lesion that partially encircles the aorta.

Abdominal CT demonstrating the length and location of the IVC in relation to the aorta.
Figure 3

Abdominal CT demonstrating the length and location of the IVC in relation to the aorta.

Abdominal CT demonstrating the location of the tumor in the IVC.
Figure 4

Abdominal CT demonstrating the location of the tumor in the IVC.

Dissection of primary tumor away abdominal aorta pictured in the lower aspect of the image.
Figure 5

Dissection of primary tumor away abdominal aorta pictured in the lower aspect of the image.

End to end Dacron graft placement.
Figure 6

End to end Dacron graft placement.

The patient had a body mass index of 40, so combined with her presentation, age and gender. The presumptive diagnosis was of gallbladder pathology, which prompted an abdominal ultrasound. Ultrasound revealed a large 7.7 × 6.3 × 7.2 cm heterogenous, hypoechoic masslike lesion overlying the IVC (Fig 1). Abdominal CT was performed, which revealed an 8.9 × 7.9 × 9 cm multilobulated, heterogeneous soft tissue mass in the right hemiabdomen, encasing the IVC and partially encasing the distal abdominal aorta (Figs. 2–4). CT-guided biopsy was performed, which revealed an LMS.

A midline exploratory laparotomy was performed. The tumor extended from inferior to the renal veins to superiorly of the bifurcation. The tumor abutted and partially encased the aorta but did not invade it. Once the tumor was fully mobilized, the patient was heparinized and the vena cava was proximally and distally clamped (Fig 5). The vena cava and tumor were removed en bloc and sent to histopathology. A 22 mm Gelweave Dacron graft was inserted using 5–0 Prolene both proximally and distally (Fig 6). Clamps were removed, and hemostasis was achieved with an overall estimated blood loss of 50 ml. Histopathology of the specimen confirmed an LMS with clear surgical margins.

Patient tolerated the procedure well and had no complications during her hospital stay. Patient was discharged on postoperative Day 4. Patient is scheduled to undergo a CT scan in 3 months for follow-up.

DISCUSSION

LMS are exceedingly rare tumors with < 400 cases reported since their discovery by Perl in 1871 [3]. These tumors are more commonly found in woman (4:1) ratio in the fifth–sixth decade of life [1]. Because of such a rare disease, most literature consists of case studies and case reports, making uniform clinical practice difficult.

Wachtel et al. [3] performed a pooled analysis of 377 patients with LMS and found that median overall survival is reported to be 23 months with overall survival at 1 year at 92 and 55% at 5 years. They found several factors to impact overall survival and disease-free survival with clear surgical margins being one of the most significant.

Two case series directly speak to the impact of clear surgical margins with Hines et al. [4] in a series of 14 patients reported a 5-year survival of 68% in patients with negative margins compared to 0% in patients with positive margins. Hollenbeck et al. [5] in a series of 25 patients reported a similar finding with disease-specific 5-year survival of 33% in patients with negative margins versus 0% in patients with positive margins.

Because of the variable anatomical involvement of the tumor, different surgical resection techniques and approaches should be employed toward specific tumor characteristics and location. Kieffer et al. [6] in a series of 22 patients, divided the IVC into the retro-hepatic or suprarenal, the interrenal and the infrarenal portions as determined by the location of the sarcoma. They reported various methods of access, including the use of bilateral subcostal or midline abdominal incisions. Based on our patient’s tumor location, we utilized a midline laparotomy.

In patients undergoing IVC surgery a surgeon can utilize either a primary repair, patch, or IVC reconstruction as determined by the size and location of the tumor. Because of the importance of clear surgical margins and the size and location of our patient’s tumor, we elected to undergo an IVC reconstruction. Literature surrounding IVC reconstructions have found to be a safe and effective surgical approach to achieve oncologic surgical goals of clear margins while maintaining patient safety. Ruiz et al. [7] in a series of 52 patients for retroperitoneal cancer found a 1-year survival of 75% and 1-year primary patency approaching 90% for patients who underwent IVC construction. We find that due to the importance of clear surgical margins, as previously stated, IVC reconstruction offers the best chance at achieving that goal.

Beyond achieving clear surgical margins, the data regarding the utilization of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or both in combination with surgical resection is limited, with the best treatment strategy being unclear [8]. In our patient, we elected to forgo utilizing combination therapy, as she had clear surgical margins, and the benefit is not well supported in the literature.

Histopathology from our case was shown to be a well-differentiated LMS with clear surgical margins. It has been well documented that the histology of type retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma predicts survival in patients with well-differentiated tumors having better overall survival as compared with poorly differentiated tumors [9].

In conclusion, LMS of the IVC are incredibly rare tumors that will most commonly present in women in their fifth to fifth decade of life. Currently, best treatment is en bloc resection with clear surgical margins. The evidence for the utilization of radiation, chemotherapy or chemoradiation is still in question. For overall success in these complex surgical cases, we suggest a multidisciplinary team of surgeons consisting of surgical oncology and cardiothoracic specialties to address the various oncology and vascular complexities.

References

1.

López-Ruiz
 
JA
,
Tallón-Aguilar
 
L
,
Marenco-de la Cuadra
 
B
,
López-Pérez
 
J
,
Oliva-Mompeán
 
F
,
Padillo-Ruiz
 
J
.
Leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava. Case report and literature review
.
Cir Cir
 
2017
;
85
:
361
5
.

2.

Sulpice
 
L
,
Rayar
 
M
,
Levi Sandri
 
G-B
,
de
 
Wailly
 
P
,
Henno
 
S
,
Turner
 
K
, et al.  
Leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava
.
J Visc Surg
 
2016
;
153
:
161
5
.

3.

Wachtel
 
H
,
Gupta
 
M
,
Bartlett
 
EK
,
Jackson
 
BM
,
Kelz
 
RR
,
Karakousis
 
GC
, et al.  
Outcomes after resection of leiomyosarcomas of the inferior vena cava: a pooled data analysis of 377 cases
.
Surg Oncol
 
2015
;
24
:
21
7
.

4.

Hines
 
OJ
,
Nelson
 
S
,
Quinones-Baldrich
 
WJ
,
Eilber
 
FR
.
Leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava: prognosis and comparison with leiomyosarcoma of other anatomic sites
.
Cancer
 
1999
;
85
:
1077
83
.

5.

Hollenbeck
 
ST
,
Grobmyer
 
SR
,
Kent
 
KC
,
Brennan
 
MF
.
Surgical treatment and outcomes of patients with primary inferior vena cava leiomyosarcoma
.
J Am Coll Surg
 
2003
;
197
:
575
9
.

6.

Kieffer
 
E
,
Alaoui
 
M
,
Piette
 
J-C
,
Cacoub
 
P
,
Chiche
 
L
.
Leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava: experience in 22 cases
.
Ann Surg
 
2006
;
244
:
289
95
.

7.

Ruiz
 
CS
,
Kalbaugh
 
CA
,
Browder
 
SE
,
McGinigle
 
KL
,
Kibbe
 
MR
,
Farber
 
MA
, et al.  
Operative strategies for inferior vena cava repair in oncologic surgery
.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord
 
2020
;
8
:
396
404
.

8.

Teixeira
 
FJR
,
do
 
Couto Netto
 
SD
,
Perina
 
AL d F
,
Torricelli
 
FCM
,
Ragazzo Teixeira
 
L
, et al.  
Leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava: survival rate following radical resection
.
Oncol Lett
 
2017
;
14
:
3909
16
.

9.

Tseng
 
W
,
Martinez
 
SR
,
Tamurian
 
RM
,
Borys
 
D
,
Canter
 
RJ
.
Histologic type predicts survival in patients with retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma
.
J Surg Res
 
2012
;
172
:
123
30
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com