Abstract

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair has become a standard approach for inguinal hernia repair; however, rare but serious complications, such as small bowel obstruction (SBO) caused by peritoneal dehiscence, can occur. We report the case of an 82-year-old man who developed early postoperative SBO due to peritoneal dehiscence after TAPP. Although conservative management was initially attempted, it failed to resolve the symptoms. Laparoscopic reoperation on postoperative day 21 revealed small bowel loops adherent to the mesh through a peritoneal defect. As the peritoneum was retracted and fragile, primary closure was not feasible. The defect was successfully repaired using a pedicled omental flap reinforced with an anti-adhesion barrier. The postoperative course was uneventful. Four years later, laparoscopic observation confirmed complete peritoneal regeneration without adhesions. When primary peritoneal reclosure is not feasible, reconstruction using a pedicled omental patch and an anti-adhesion barrier is a simple, safe, and durable method.

Introduction

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair has become an established procedure for inguinal hernia repair because of its low invasiveness, reduced postoperative pain, and faster recovery. However, the technique involves peritoneal incision and closure, which introduces a unique risk of postoperative complications, such as peritoneal dehiscence and small bowel obstruction (SBO). Several studies have shown that SBO after TAPP occurs more frequently than after totally extraperitoneal (TEP) or open Lichtenstein repair, with reported incidences of 0.5%, 0.07%, and 0.16%, respectively [1–3]. The mechanism usually involves bowel herniation into the preperitoneal space through a dehisced peritoneal closure, leading to entrapment or adhesion to the mesh. Abe et al. reviewed 22 cases and reported that 72.7% occurred within 10 days after surgery, suggesting that this complication predominantly arises during the early postoperative period [4]. Although rare, this condition can lead to significant morbidity. Awareness of its pathophysiology and management strategies is critical. We herein present a case of early postoperative SBO due to peritoneal dehiscence after TAPP repair. As primary peritoneal closure was not feasible, we employed a pedicled omental flap and an anti-adhesion barrier to cover the defect, achieving complete healing without adhesions even four years after surgery.

Case presentation

An 82-year-old man with a history of cerebral infarction underwent laparoscopic TAPP repair for a left inguinal hernia. The peritoneum was incised from the medial umbilical fold to the lateral aspect, and a polypropylene mesh was placed to cover the myopectineal orifice. Peritoneal closure was performed using a continuous absorbable barbed suture (3–0). The operation was completed without complications, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day (POD) 3. On POD 5, he presented with abdominal pain and vomiting. CT suggested a SBO caused by herniation of the small intestine into the preperitoneal space through a peritoneal defect (Fig. 1A and B). A diagnosis of simple SBO was made, and conservative management with nasogastric decompression was initiated. However, the obstruction persisted despite conservative treatment. Laparoscopic reoperation was performed on POD 21. Intraoperatively, a 5 × 3 cm peritoneal defect was identified at the site of the previous closure. The small bowel was herniated through this defect and adherent to the mesh (Fig. 2A). After careful adhesiolysis, the peritoneum was found to be retracted and too fragile to allow primary closure (Fig. 2B). To prevent recurrence, a pedicled omental flap was mobilized and sutured to the surrounding peritoneal margins with absorbable sutures to cover the defect (Fig. 3A). Oxidized regenerated cellulose (Interceed®) was placed over the omental patch to reinforce it and minimize adhesion (Fig. 3B). The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on POD 12. Four years later, contralateral TAPP repair was performed. Laparoscopic inspection revealed that the previous repair site was smooth, covered by regenerated peritoneum, and entirely free of adhesion or fibrosis (Fig. 4).

Laparoscopic view showing mesh placement in the preperitoneal space and subsequent peritoneal closure during initial TAPP repair.
Figure 1

(A) Intraoperative view during the initial TAPP repair showing mesh placement to cover the myopectineal orifice. (B) Peritoneal closure with continuous barbed suture (3–0).

Laparoscopic view at reoperation showing small bowel incarceration through a peritoneal defect and findings after adhesiolysis.
Figure 2

(A) Laparoscopic view at reoperation showing small bowel loops incarcerated and adherent to the mesh through a large peritoneal defect. (B) After careful adhesiolysis, a 5 × 3 cm defect was confirmed with retracted, fragile peritoneum.

Laparoscopic view showing coverage of the peritoneal defect using a pedicled omental flap with reinforcement by an anti-adhesion barrier.
Figure 3

(A) The defect was covered using a pedicled omental flap sutured to the peritoneal edges. (B) The omental flap was reinforced by oxidized regenerated cellulose (Interceed®) to prevent adhesion.

Laparoscopic view four years after reoperation showing regenerated peritoneum without adhesion.
Figure 4

Laparoscopic view four years later showing smooth regenerated peritoneum at the previous site with no adhesion.

Discussion

SBO after TAPP is uncommon, but it can lead to significant morbidity if not recognized early. The reported mechanisms include (i) peritoneal dehiscence with bowel herniation into the preperitoneal space, (ii) adhesion between bowel and exposed mesh, and (iii) bowel entrapment by exposed barbed sutures [4–6]. Of these, peritoneal dehiscence is the most frequent cause and typically occurs within the first 10 PODs [4]. The widespread use of barbed sutures for peritoneal closure in laparoscopic hernia repair has introduced new complications. Although barbed sutures simplify laparoscopic closure by eliminating knot tying and maintaining even tension, their exposed ends can lead to small bowel entanglement, obstruction, or perforation [5, 6]. Segura-Sampedro et al. reported two such cases of SBO caused by exposed barbs, emphasizing the need for preventive strategies [5]. Several technical modifications have been proposed to mitigate these risks. These include reverse stitching the final few bites (“back-stitch technique”), burying the suture end under the peritoneum (“buried technique”), or applying an absorbable anti-adhesion barrier over the closure line [7, 8]. Oxidized regenerated cellulose (Interceed®) has been reported to reduce adhesion formation in laparoscopic abdominal surgery by providing a temporary physical barrier between the peritoneal surface and the bowel, which is gradually absorbed as the mesothelial layer regenerates. In the present case, peritoneal reclosure was not feasible because of extensive tissue retraction and fragility. Standard alternatives, such as medial umbilical fold advancement or absorbable mesh coverage, were not suitable. Therefore, we used a pedicled omental flap to cover the defect, supplemented by an anti-adhesion barrier. Several studies have documented the successful use of omental flaps in abdominal wall reconstruction, contaminated surgical fields, and infected mesh removal [8–10]. Experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated that physical separation between prosthetic mesh and the bowel is a key factor in preventing postoperative adhesion formation, supporting the concept of interposing biological tissue such as the omentum between the mesh and intestinal loops [9, 10]. In our case, the combination of a pedicled omental patch and oxidized regenerated cellulose achieved complete defect closure and long-term durability. The 4-year postoperative laparoscopic observation showed regenerated peritoneum with no adhesion, confirming the sustained efficacy of this method. The omentum likely promoted mesothelial regeneration, while the anti-adhesion barrier prevented early bowel contact during the healing phase. This case highlights the clinical importance of recognizing peritoneal dehiscence as an early postoperative complication of TAPP repair. Early identification and prompt surgical intervention are essential when conservative management fails. When primary closure is not possible, the combined use of an omental flap and anti-adhesion barrier provides a biologically sound, technically simple, and durable reconstruction method. This approach can be particularly beneficial in elderly patients or those with fragile peritoneal tissue.

Conclusions

Peritoneal dehiscence following TAPP repair is a rare but serious cause of early postoperative SBO. When peritoneal re-suturing is not feasible, covering the defect with a pedicled omental flap combined with an anti-adhesion barrier is a safe, simple, and durable solution. Long-term follow-up confirmed complete peritoneal regeneration without adhesion, demonstrating the biological efficacy of this approach. This combined technique should be considered a valuable option for irreparable peritoneal defects encountered during laparoscopic hernia surgery.

Acknowledgements

During the preparation of this work, the authors used artificial intelligence tools for English language editing and reference formatting. The authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.

Author contributions

SY performed the operation and drafted the manuscript. JF, ST, and YS contributed to postoperative management and provided critical feedback. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Ethical approval

This work does not require ethical considerations or approval.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

References

1.

Bittner
 
R
,
Arregui
 
ME
,
Bisgaard
 
T
 et al.  
Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia
.
Surg Endosc
 
2011
;
25
:
2773
843
.

2.

Neumayer
 
L
,
Giobbie-Hurder
 
A
,
Jonasson
 
O
 et al.  
Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia
.
N Engl J Med
 
2004
;
350
:
1819
27
.

3.

Köhler
 
G
,
Mayer
 
F
,
Lechner
 
M
 et al.  
Small bowel obstruction after TAPP repair caused by a self-anchoring barbed suture device for peritoneal closure: case report and review of the literature
.
Hernia
 
2015
;
19
:
389
94
.

4.

Kapiris
 
SA
,
Brough
 
WA
,
Royston
 
CM
 et al.  
Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair: a 7-year two-center experience in 3017 patients
.
Surg Endosc
 
2001
;
15
:
972
5
.

5.

Segura-Sampedro
 
JJ
,
Ashrafian
 
H
,
Navarro-Sánchez
 
A
 et al.  
Small bowel obstruction due to laparoscopic barbed sutures: an unknown complication?
 
Rev Esp Enferm Dig
 
2015
;
107
:
677
80
.

6.

Zipple
 
MK
,
Bankhead-Kendall
 
B
,
Roy
 
MD
.
Small bowel obstruction secondary to barbed suture after minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair
.
Am Surg
 
2020
;
86
:
e14
6
.

7.

Naito
 
M
,
Ogura
 
N
,
Yamanashi
 
T
 et al.  
Prospective randomized controlled study on the validity and safety of an absorbable adhesion barrier (Interceed®) made of oxidized regenerated cellulose for laparoscopic colorectal surgery
.
Asian J Endosc Surg
 
2017
;
10
:
7
11
.

8.

Takahashi
 
Y
,
Komatsu
 
D
,
Seki
 
H
.
Laparoscopic removal of an infected mesh with omental patch closure: a case report
.
Am J Case Rep
 
2023
;
24
:
e938122
.

9.

Abouzid
 
A
,
Shetiwy
 
M
,
Hossam
 
A
 et al.  
Abdominal wall reconstruction using omental flap with mesh repair following resection of aggressive abdominal wall neoplasms
.
Oncol Res Treat
 
2022
;
45
:
415
22
.

10.

van 't Riet
 
M
,
de Vos van Steenwijk
 
PJ
,
Bonthuis
 
F
 et al.  
Prevention of adhesion to prosthetic mesh: comparison of different barriers using an incisional hernia model
.
Ann Surg
 
2003
;
237
:
123
8
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.