Abstract

Gastric bypass effectively treats morbid obesity but may cause complications like anastomotic strictures and marginal ulceration. Bowel perforation from foreign body ingestion is rare. A 49-year-old woman with previous gastric bypass presented with acute abdominal pain. A fish bone perforated her small intestine, causing an acute abdomen. Emergency laparotomy was performed, successfully repairing all perforations. Patients with gastric bypass may have anatomical changes increasing their risk of foreign body-induced perforation. Clinicians should consider this possibility when assessing sudden abdominal pain. Awareness of uncommon causes of abdominal pain in post-gastric bypass patients is crucial for accurate diagnosis and treatment.

Introduction

Severe obesity can be effectively treated with gastric bypass surgery, which frequently results in significant weight loss. However, it carries risks that require close monitoring. Anastomotic strictures and marginal ulceration are common complications, leading to abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Other side effects include gastrogastric fistulas, internal hernias, dumping syndrome, and nutritional deficiencies, notably calcium, vitamin D, and B12, potentially resulting in anemia and osteoporosis. Rapid weight loss can also cause gallstones [1].

Bowel perforation is a particularly dangerous consequence, which can occur even without prior gastrointestinal issues. Foreign body ingestion is a rare cause of such perforation, highlighting the importance of considering this diagnosis in patients presenting with sudden abdominal pain post-bypass surgery. This report underscores the necessity for early detection and intervention to prevent adverse outcomes.

Case report

A 49-year-old Black woman with a history of controlled hypertension, sickle cell anemia, and gastric bypass surgery performed eight years ago in Nice, France, presented to the emergency department of our institution with sudden epigastric and left flank pain lasting 12 hours. She described the pain as cramping with a burning sensation and an urge to defecate, unrelieved by Buscopan and paracetamol. She denied nausea, vomiting, fever, or changes in stool pattern. No recent endoscopy had been performed.

On examination, her abdomen was soft, with laparoscopic scars and tenderness in the left flank and renal angle. Rovsing’s, McBurney’s, Psoas, and Murphy’s signs were negative. Vital signs were stable, the Glasgow Coma Scale score was 15/15, and she was breathing comfortably and was afebrile. Despite administration of 150 micrograms of fentanyl, the pain persisted.

Laboratory investigations showed normal hemoglobin levels, with a mean corpuscular volume of 79 femtoliters and a mean corpuscular hemoglobin of 27 picograms, suggesting microcytic anemia associated with her sickle cell disease. There was also evidence of inflammation without leukocytosis, but with a slight increase in C-reactive protein to 15.5 milligrams per liter, while renal and hepatic function tests were within normal limits. Urinalysis revealed ketonuria, attributed to reduced oral intake, but was otherwise unremarkable.

Due to ongoing pain, a contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) was performed. It showed post-gastric bypass anatomy with no obstruction, but with an enlarged loop, free air in the left hypochondrium, and a 4 cm linear hyperdensity in the small bowel, consistent with a fish bone. No contrast extravasation was seen (Figs 13).

Axial abdominal CT scan showing a 4 cm hake fishbone (lower arrow) and free intraperitoneal air in the abdominal cavity (upper arrow).
Figure 1

Axial abdominal CT scan showing a 4 cm hake fishbone (lower arrow) and free intraperitoneal air in the abdominal cavity (upper arrow).

Coronal abdominal CT scan showing the 4 cm hake fishbone (arrow).
Figure 2

Coronal abdominal CT scan showing the 4 cm hake fishbone (arrow).

Sagittal abdominal CT scan showing the 4 cm hake fishbone (arrow).
Figure 3

Sagittal abdominal CT scan showing the 4 cm hake fishbone (arrow).

Surgical exploration was indicated. Diagnostic laparoscopy revealed mild small bowel dilatation and localized peritonitis, with turbid fluid in the Douglas pouch but no purulent collection. A hyperemic and fibrin-covered segment was noted near the biliary anastomosis. As the perforation could not be identified laparoscopically, conversion to a minilaparotomy was necessary. Two small bowel perforations caused by a 4 cm fish bone were identified near the foot of the alimentary limb. The foreign body was removed through a 0.5 cm enterotomy. Both perforations were closed using 3-0 Vicryl sutures, followed by peritoneal lavage and omental patching (Figs 4 and 5). The patient recovered uneventfully and later recalled eating hake, although she did not remember ingesting a bone.

Intraoperative image of small bowel perforation caused by the hake fishbone.
Figure 4

Intraoperative image of small bowel perforation caused by the hake fishbone.

Extracted 4 cm hake fishbone responsible for the double small bowel perforation.
Figure 5

Extracted 4 cm hake fishbone responsible for the double small bowel perforation.

Discussion

Foreign body ingestion is common, but <1% of cases result in bowel perforation—most commonly caused by sharp objects like fish bones, chicken bones, or toothpicks. Fish bones account for up to 84% of such cases [2]. In adults, accidental ingestion is much more common than intentional ingestion, which is typically associated with prisoners or suicidal patients [3].

Unintentional ingestion is also more frequent among elderly individuals, children, and those with psychiatric disorders or impaired vision. Predisposing factors include cold beverage consumption, NSAID use, rapid eating, and poor dentition [4]. Although ~75% of ingested objects become lodged in the cricopharyngeal sphincter, >90% of objects that reach the stomach pass without complications. Endoscopic retrieval is required in 10%–20% of cases, whereas surgery is necessary in approximately 1% [5].

Anatomically, the duodenal C-loop and terminal ileum are the most vulnerable due to fixed angulations and limited mobility [6]. Post-bypass patients may be more susceptible due to altered intestinal architecture, including angulated loops and slower transit. These features can increase the likelihood of obstruction or perforation [1].

The intestinal mucosa normally defends itself through mucus production and peristalsis. However, sharp foreign bodies such as fish bones can anchor into weak points, causing necrosis or inflammation [7, 8]. Most pass within a week [1, 4], but lodged bones can result in delayed injuries.

Diagnosis is difficult because symptoms can mimic appendicitis, diverticulitis, or perforated ulcers [9]. Patients may present with sharp pain, rebound tenderness, fever, nausea, vomiting, or hemodynamic instability [10].

Imaging is essential in the evaluation of suspected foreign body ingestion and its complications. Plain radiographs can detect metallic objects and free intraperitoneal air but often fail to identify nonmetallic materials such as fish bones [11]. Ultrasound may reveal localized fluid collections but is less reliable for evaluating deep abdominal structures. CT is the imaging modality of choice, as it can demonstrate fish bones, pneumoperitoneum, bowel wall thickening, and fat stranding [12]. Multidetector CT (MDCT) provides high-resolution, multiplanar reconstructions that enhance detection of nonmetallic foreign bodies [13]. In addition to confirming the presence of a foreign body, CT helps identify complications and guide the need for surgical intervention. Radiographic opacity of fish bones can vary by species, which may limit detection on plain films, whereas CT can reveal associated tissue reactions and penetration depth. Ultra-low-dose CT offers these diagnostic advantages while reducing radiation exposure [12]. In the present case, CT established the diagnosis and enabled prompt surgical management.

While contrast esophagography is not frequently used due to the risk of aspiration, it can still be valuable in detecting esophageal perforations. This procedure should use water-soluble contrast agents, which are quickly absorbed, minimizing complications [12, 14].

Prompt removal of fish bone foreign bodies is essential due to the risk of perforation (15%–35%) [15]. They are often retrieved successfully within 6 hours if lodged above the cricoid. Flexible endoscopy is generally preferred for retrieval because it avoids general anesthesia and has lower complication rates. Rigid endoscopy is more effective for objects lodged in the upper esophagus or with complex anatomy.

Once perforation occurs, surgical intervention is typically required. Laparoscopy is less invasive and preferred when feasible, but conversion to open surgery may be necessary if the perforation is not located. Management options include enterotomy, primary suture, or resection, depending on perforation size, contamination, and bowel viability [16]. Our patient underwent minilaparotomy for foreign body removal and successful suture closure, with a good clinical outcome.

This case highlights the importance of considering rare but serious causes of abdominal pain in post-gastric bypass patients. Altered anatomy increases susceptibility to complications from ingested objects. CT is indispensable for diagnosis, especially from radiolucent materials like fish bones. Early detection and individualized surgical management remain essential to reduce morbidity and ensure favorable outcomes.

Acknowledgements

We extend our sincere appreciation to the emergency department team at the Établissement Hospitalier du Nord Vaudois, Switzerland, for initiating the patient’s medical care. We also thank the radiology department for their timely and accurate diagnosis, and the general surgery team for their excellent performance during the surgical intervention and their attentive postoperative care. Finally, we are grateful to all those who contributed to the preparation of this manuscript. Your efforts were instrumental in the effective management of this clinical case.

Author contributions

L.B.D. authored the article and conducted data collection. C.T. contributed to data collection and correction. V.B. initiated the project and reviewed the manuscript. P.C. assisted with the organization.

Conflict of interest statement

None disclosed.

Funding

This study received no external funding.

Data availability

The data generated or analyzed during this study are fully included in this article. For further inquiries, please contact the corresponding author.

Patient consent statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and accompanying images.

References

1.

Seeras
 
K
,
Acho
 
RJ
,
Lopez
 
PP
. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass chronic complications. In:
StatPearls
.
Treasure Island, FL
:
StatPearls Publishing
,
2023
.

2.

Choi
 
Y
.
Peritonitis with small bowel perforation caused by a fish bone in a healthy patient
.
World J Gastroenterol
 
2014
;
20
:
4257
62
.

3.

Venkatesh
 
SH
,
Venkatanarasimha Karaddi
 
NK
.
CT findings of accidental fish bone ingestion and its complications
.
Diagn Interv Radiol
 
2016
;
22
:
156
60
.

4.

Coulier
 
B
,
Tancredi
 
M-H
,
Ramboux
 
A
.
Spiral CT and multidetector-row CT diagnosis of perforation of the small intestine caused by ingested foreign bodies
.
Eur Radiol
 
2004
;
14
:
1918
25
.

5.

Husain
 
R
,
Alghamdi
 
DA
,
Ghzoi
 
FA
, et al.  
Conservative management of fish bone-induced large bowel perforation: case report
.
Int J Surg Case Rep
 
2022
;
95
:
107157
.

6.

Kuo
 
C-C
.
Medical treatment for a fish bone-induced ileal micro-perforation: a case report
.
World J Gastroenterol
 
2012
;
18
:
5994
7
.

7.

Gupta
 
V
,
Kumar
 
S
.
Intestinal perforation by fish bone: a case report
.
Indian J Surg
 
2013
;
75
:
393
4
.

8.

Lee
 
IS
,
Yoo
 
KH
,
Park
 
MJ
, et al.  
A retrospective analysis of clinical features of mucosal injury after ingestion of fish bones
.
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol
 
2014
;
7
:
297
301
.

9.

Lunsford
 
KE
,
Sudan
 
R
.
Small bowel perforation by a clinically unsuspected fish bone: laparoscopic treatment and review of literature
.
J Gastrointest Surg
 
2012
;
16
:
218
22
.

10.

Costa Almeida
 
CE
,
Rainho
 
R
,
Gouveia
 
A
.
Codfish may cause acute abdomen
.
Int J Surg Case Rep
 
2013
;
4
:
969
71
.

11.

Qureshi
 
TA
,
Awan
 
MS
,
Hussain
 
M
, et al.  
Effectiveness of plain X-ray in detection of fish and chicken bone foreign body in upper aerodigestive tract
.
J Pak Med Assoc
 
2017
;
67
:
556
9
.

12.

Mardani
 
P
,
Shahriarirad
 
R
,
Khosravi
 
F
, et al.  
The role and value of low-dose computed tomography scan compared to esophagoscopy in the diagnosis of foreign body ingestion in adults
.
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
 
2023
;
71
:
198
204
.

13.

Hunter
 
TB
,
Taljanovic
 
MS
.
Foreign bodies
.
RadioGraphics
 
2003
;
23
:
731
57
.

14.

Klein
 
A
,
Ovnat-Tamir
 
S
,
Marom
 
T
, et al.  
Fish bone foreign body: the role of imaging
.
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol
 
2019
;
23
:
110
5
.

15.

Webb
 
WA
.
Management of foreign bodies of the upper gastrointestinal tract: update
.
Gastrointest Endosc
 
1995
;
41
:
39
51
.

16.

Elbakouri
 
A
,
Yaqine
 
K
,
Bouali
 
M
, et al.  
Fish bone perforation of the small bowel: a case report
.
Ann Med Surg (Lond)
 
2021
;
65
:
102348
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.