Abstract

Venous malformations (VMs) are the most common type of vascular malformation. In resource-limited settings, treating these with minimally invasive and cost-effective approaches can achieve optimal outcomes. We present the case of a 7-year-old child with a large, slow-flow VM on the right anterior chest wall, successfully treated with ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided foam sclerotherapy using polidocanol via the ``contrast washout'' technique. The procedure resulted in significant lesion resolution with no post-procedural pain. In addition to its effectiveness, this approach also spares patients from extensive surgical interventions, making it a valuable treatment option for pediatric VMs.

fluoroscopyminimally invasivesclerotherapyvascular malformation

Introduction

Vascular malformations are rare disorders that can present as isolated solitary lesions, multifocal anomalies, or as part of various syndromic conditions [1]. Among these, venous malformations (VMs) are the most common congenital vascular malformations, often manifesting as soft, subcutaneous masses with a bluish-purple discoloration. These malformations may occur sporadically or have a hereditary component [2]. Despite their prevalence, the exact etiology of VMs remains incompletely understood [3]. The diagnosis of vascular malformations is frequently delayed or missed [4], particularly in resource-limited settings such as Nepal. Here, we report a case of a 4-year-old child with a right anterior chest wall VM, successfully treated with a single session of ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided foamed sclerotherapy using a contrast washout technique with no residual symptomatology.

Case presentation

A 7-year-old child presented with a large bluish-purple lesion on the right anterior chest wall extending to the axilla. The lesion had been present since birth and was noted by the mother to enlarge when the child cried. It was intermittently painful. The child had previously undergone evaluations at multiple healthcare centers, and a magnetic resonance angiography had confirmed the presence of a VM. No additional lesions were identified during clinical examination (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Video 1). The child’s developmental history was unremarkable, and there was no familial history of similar lesions.

A large venous malformation on the right anterior chest wall, visibly enlarging when the child cries.
Figure 1

A large venous malformation on the right anterior chest wall, visibly enlarging when the child cries.

Color and spectral Doppler ultrasonography revealed a multicystic, low-flow vascular lesion (Fig. 2). Based on these findings, a diagnosis of sporadic, unifocal, slow-flow VM was established. Pre-procedure coagulation screening, including prothrombin time, and baseline renal function tests were conducted.

(A and B) Ultrasound images demonstrating cystic vascular spaces with non-pulsatile venous flow.
Figure 2

(A and B) Ultrasound images demonstrating cystic vascular spaces with non-pulsatile venous flow.

A single-needle direct-stick phlebography was performed using a 25-gauge butterfly cannula under ultrasound guidance. Blood aspiration confirmed the lesion's venous nature. Iopromide (Ultravist™) was administered and subsequent fluoroscopic imaging by Phillips Allura Xper FD System demonstrated slow contrast washout, further confirming the low-flow nature of the malformation (Fig. 3). Minimal venous drainage was observed, consistent with Puig Class I categorization [5].

Fluoroscopy image showing contrast administration into the malformation, confirming its slow-flow nature, and drainage pattern.
Figure 3

Fluoroscopy image showing contrast administration into the malformation, confirming its slow-flow nature, and drainage pattern.

The sclerosing agent used was 3% polidocanol foam, prepared via Tessari’s technique. The foam formulation comprised 3 ml of polidocanol, 3 ml of normal saline, and 3 ml of air, totaling 9 ml. The non-radiopaque polidocanol was administered through the same needle. The contrast was subsequently ``washed out'' by the sclerosing agent, ensuring comprehensive treatment of all cystic spaces (Fig. 4). The procedure was done as a day case under local anesthesia with a support staff calming the patient. Pre- and post-procedure digital subtraction angiography images were obtained for mapping and completion. Post-instillation ultrasonography was performed to confirm adequate sclerotherapy distribution and to confirm extravasation did not occur. Compression taping was applied post-procedure, and the patient was discharged within a few hours on oral paracetamol as required.

Image showing sclerotherapy administration through the same needle used for contrast injection, effectively ``washing out'' the contrast while sclerosing the venous malformation.
Figure 4

Image showing sclerotherapy administration through the same needle used for contrast injection, effectively ``washing out'' the contrast while sclerosing the venous malformation.

At the 2-month follow-up, significant resolution of the swelling was observed, with only minor residual fullness noted in the inframammary region of the right chest wall (Fig. 5). Ultrasonography revealed sclerosed vascular channels without flow (Fig. 6). The patient did not experience post-procedural pain. The parents were satisfied with the outcome with no residual symptomatology reported in their child since the time of the single session treatment. They ultimately opted for possible additional sclerotherapy sessions at a later date to address any residual malformation as needed.

Patient at 2-month follow-up demonstrating significant resolution of the venous malformation.
Figure 5

Patient at 2-month follow-up demonstrating significant resolution of the venous malformation.

Ultrasound images at 2-month follow-up showing sclerosed vascular channels without flow.
Figure 6

Ultrasound images at 2-month follow-up showing sclerosed vascular channels without flow.

Discussion

Sporadic slow-flow VMs can be managed using various treatment modalities, including sclerotherapy, surgical excision, radiofrequency ablation, or a combination of these approaches [6]. Among these, sclerotherapy is widely recognized as a safe and effective option for pediatric patients [7], particularly for Puig type I and II lesions [5]. Several sclerosing agents, such as bleomycin, sodium tetradecyl sulfate, and polidocanol, have demonstrated favorable outcomes in the treatment of VMs [8]. In our case, we utilized 3% polidocanol as the sclerosing agent due to its availability at our center and its well-documented safety and efficacy profile, with a lower risk of complications compared to other agents [9]. Its safety and effectiveness have been further established in the treatment of oral vascular malformations, including those affecting the tongue [10].

Although sclerotherapy is generally safe, serious complications, including skin ulceration, post-procedural pain, dysrhythmias, and strokes, have been documented in the literature [11]. However, such adverse events are rare in slow-flow malformations. To minimize the risk of complications, we limit the administered volume of polidocanol to maximal 10 ml per session [12], ensure the exclusion of high-flow vascular malformations prior to treatment, and confirm minimal venous drainage into deep systemic veins through phlebography prior to procedure.

Ultrasound plays a crucial role in the evaluation and management of vascular malformations. VMs typically exhibit a heterogeneous uni- or multilocular structure with cystic areas that may or may not be compressible, in addition to the presence of phleboliths, which are considered pathognomonic [13]. Pre-procedural ultrasound assessment provides valuable information regarding lesion accessibility for percutaneous needle placement, selection of appropriate treatment modalities (sclerotherapy vs. alternative interventions) [13], and evaluation of surrounding venous structures [14]. Furthermore, ultrasound can serve as an objective tool for monitoring treatment response in pediatric patients undergoing sclerotherapy [15]. However, ultrasound is highly subjective and operator dependent, therefore, reliance on a single imaging modality for diagnosis may be insufficient. A multimodal diagnostic approach incorporating clinical examination, ultrasound, phlebography, and magnetic resonance imaging enhances diagnostic accuracy and optimizes treatment planning [16].

The combination of ultrasound and fluoroscopy guidance during percutaneous sclerotherapy is a highly effective approach in the management of VMs. Bagga et al. identified four distinct phlebographic patterns of VMs: cavitary, spongy, dysplastic vein, and mixed patterns [14]. Their study, which evaluated prognostic indicators for successful sclerotherapy outcomes, found that cystic vascular lesions on ultrasound demonstrated the highest rates of favorable response [14]. Our case involved a lesion with a predominantly cavitary pattern on phlebography, and our findings align with their results.

The standard percutaneous technique for treating VMs involves a double-needle approach, wherein a second needle is employed for aspiration to prevent sclerosant extravasation and ensure optimal endothelial contact with the sclerosing agent [17]. In this case, we utilized a single-needle approach under ultrasound guidance, ensuring precise intracystic placement of the needle tip. Fluoroscopy confirmed lesion morphology and the slow-flow nature of the malformation. The contrast washout technique allowed for visualization of the sclerosant displacement and ensured complete treatment coverage. Post-procedural ultrasound assessment verified adequate distribution of the sclerosing agent, and immediate compression with elastic tape was applied to optimize therapeutic efficacy. We propose that this single-needle technique serves as a viable alternative to the conventional double-needle approach, particularly for the treatment of isolated slow-flow malformations.

Assessing treatment outcomes for vascular malformations remains a clinical challenge. Moussa et al. advocate for both objective and subjective evaluation methods, incorporating standardized questionnaires with predefined parameters for pre- and post-treatment assessment [18]. Objective outcome measures, including reduction in lesion size, increased echogenicity, and diminished cystic spaces, were successfully confirmed via post-treatment ultrasound in our case. However, subjective patient-reported satisfaction is equally important in determining therapeutic success. In our case, the mother of the pediatric patient expressed satisfaction with the treatment outcome, highlighting the significance of patient and caregiver perspectives in assessing clinical efficacy.

Conclusion

Ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided single-needle percutaneous foamed sclerotherapy using contrast washout technique is a safe and effective method for treating low-flow VMs in pediatric patients. This technique allows for precise lesion characterization and comprehensive treatment while minimizing procedural morbidity. Further studies are warranted to establish standardized protocols for optimal dosing and agent selection in pediatric vascular malformation management. The limited use of resources and resolution of symptoms and pain, especially in a pediatric cohort, offer high value per cost for the technique in practices that treat vascular malformations in low-income countries.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Funding

None declared.

References

1.

International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies  

ISSVA Classification of Vascular Anomalies [Internet]
. International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies; 2025.
Available from:
 https://www.issva.org/classification.

2.

Kunimoto  

K
, Yamamoto  
Y
, Jinnin  
M
. ISSVA classification of vascular anomalies and molecular biology.
Int J Mol Sci
 2022;23:2358.

3.

Markovic  

JN
, Shortell  
CK
. Venous malformations.
J Cardiovasc Surg
 2021;62:456–66.

4.

Konez  

O
, Burrows  
PE
. Magnetic resonance of vascular anomalies.
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am
 2002;10:363–88.

5.

Puig  

S
, Aref  
H
, Chigot  
V
, et al.  Classification of venous malformations in children and implications for sclerotherapy.
Pediatr Radiol
 2003b;33:99–103.

6.

Dompmartin  

A
, Baselga  
E
, Boon  
LM
, et al.  The VASCERN-VASCA working group diagnostic and management pathways for venous malformations.
J Vasc Anom (Phila)
 2023;4:e064.

7.

Markovic  

JN
, Nag  
U
, Shortell  
CK
. Safety and efficacy of foam sclerotherapy for treatment of low-flow vascular malformations in children.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord
 2020;8:1074–82.

8.

Brandão  

PS
, Jacinto  
J
, Rodrigues  
H
, et al.  Intralesional bleomycin sclerotherapy for head and neck low-flow vascular malformations—a retrospective single-center experience.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
 2025;53:332–9.

9.

Çay  

F
, Altunbulak  
AY
, Özbay  
Y
, et al.  Clinical results of polidocanol sclerotherapy in venous malformation treatment: patient-perceived improvement and satisfaction.
Phlebology.
 2023;38:36–43.

10.

Mukul  

SK
, Singh  
A
, Kumar  
A
, et al.  Foam polidocanol sclerotherapy for low-flow vascular malformations of tongue.
Ann Maxillofac Surg
 2019;9:257–60.

11.

Lim  

CS
, Evans  
N
, Kaur  
I
, et al.  Incidence of major complication following embolo-sclerotherapy for upper and lower extremity vascular malformations.
Vascular.
 2021;29:69–77.

12.

Rabe  

E
, Breu  
FX
, Cavezzi  
A
, et al.  European guidelines for sclerotherapy in chronic venous disorders.
Phlebology.
 2014;29:338–54.

13.

McCafferty  

I
. Management of low-flow vascular malformations: clinical presentation, classification, patient selection, imaging and treatment.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol
 2015;38:1082–104.

14.

Bagga  

B
, Goyal  
A
, Das  
A
, et al.  Clinicoradiologic predictors of sclerotherapy response in low-flow vascular malformations.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord
 2021;9:209–19.

15.

Nichat  

V
, Shenouda  
N
, Koujak  
K
, et al.  Clinical and radiological correlation of low flow vascular malformation treated with percutaneous sclerotherapy.
Can Assoc Radiol J
 2023;74:415–21.

16.

Mitamura  

S
, Ishikawa  
K
, Sasaki  
Y
, et al.  Pitfalls in ultrasound diagnosis of vascular malformations: a retrospective review of 14 nonvascular Tumors treated as vascular malformations.
Diagnostics (Basel)
 2025;15:506.

17.

Puig  

S
, Aref  
H
, Brunelle  
F
. Double-needle sclerotherapy of lymphangiomas and venous angiomas in children: a simple technique to prevent complications.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
 2003a;180:1399–401.

18.

Moussa  

RM
, Oseni  
AO
, Patel  
S
, et al.  Outcome evaluation for the treatment of low flow venous and lymphatic malformations.
CVIR Endovasc
 2024;7:84.

© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press and JSCR Publishing Ltd.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.

Supplementary data