Abstract

Simultaneous laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and synchronous liver metastases (SLM) remains a surgical challenge, especially when lesions involve posterosuperior liver segments. We present a case of a 42-year-old male with a transverse colon adenocarcinoma with SLM in segments 7 and 4. A simultaneous laparoscopic procedure was performed: anatomical liver resections in a modified left jack-knife position followed by transverse colectomy in the supine position. In-flow and out-flow blood control was achieved using intracorporeal Pringle manoeuvre and right hepatic vein tourniquet. The patient initiated a chemotherapy regimen with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) postoperatively and remained recurrence-free at 8 months. This case demonstrates the feasibility and safety of simultaneous laparoscopic resection for CRC with limited SLM involving challenging hepatic segments.

laparoscopic liver resectionsimultaneous resection for colorectal and liver metastasesposterosuperior liver segmentssynchronous liver metastases

Introduction

Approximately 40% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) develop liver metastases throughout the course of the disease [1]. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment and R0 resection is highly recommended for both primary tumour and cites of distant metastases. The optimal approach to the multimodal management of CRC and synchronous liver metastases (SLM) remains controversial. Simultaneous resections may be considered for patients with good performance status and a limited liver tumour burden [2]. However, when both major liver resection and high-risk colorectal surgery are required, this combination should be avoided [3]. The data is scarce regarding the oncological and surgical effectiveness of simultaneous laparoscopic resections of a primary CRC with SLM. There are no unified guidelines for the laparoscopic ports’ placement and patient’s positioning when both middle and upper abdomen surgical stages are planned. Given the data from randomized trials on liver surgery, it can be argued that minimally invasive surgical approach can reduce surgical stress and postoperative complications, with blood loss comparable to open surgery [4, 5]. Therefore, laparoscopic simultaneous resections in patients with CRC and SLM may have an advantage over open surgery. We present a case report of laparoscopic resection of liver metastases allocated in S7 and S4 and simultaneous resection of the transverse colon.

Case presentation

A 42-year-old male patient presented with a 2-month history of melena, and a weight loss. The laboratory examination showed anaemia: red blood cells (RBC) – 3,9 × 109/L, Hb – 8.6 g/dl. The patient’s serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 were elevated—28.3 and 47.72 U/ml, respectively. Imaging of the abdomen using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance techniques revealed a tumour measuring 25 × 35 mm in the transverse colon, along with two liver lesions located in segment 7 and segment 4 inferior, measuring 35 mm and 26 mm, respectively (Fig. 1).

CT abdomen revealing a primary colon tumour (A) and liver metastases (S7, S4inf) (B).
Figure 1

CT abdomen revealing a primary colon tumour (A) and liver metastases (S7, S4inf) (B).

Following evaluation, the multidisciplinary tumour board recommended proceeding upfront to surgery, with a planned simultaneous laparoscopic anatomical resection of liver segments 7 and 4 inferior, along with removal of the tumour in the transverse colon.

Liver surgery was conducted as a first surgical stage with application of Ligasure Maryland and ultrasonic cavitation device. The patient was positioned in the modified left jack-knife position (Fig. 2). The trocars were placed according to the technique described by Y. Okuda with 5 mm trocar in ninth intercostal space [6]. We used the intracorporeal intermittent Pringle manoeuvre technique according to Jian-Wei Huang for in-flow blood control [7]. Liver mobilization included transection of the right triangular, and falciform ligaments with patrial ‘piggy-back’ manoeuvre. 14 Fr Foley catheter was placed as a tourniquet on the right hepatic vein (RHV) to control the outflow (Video).

Patient's positioning on the operating table (modified left Jack-knife position) during liver resection. A 5-mm trocar was placed next to the xiphoid process, and the other two 12-mm trocars were placed at intervals of 6 cm next to the 5-mm trocar. The intercostal 5 mm trocar was placed through the ninth intercostal space on the right posterior axillary line.
Figure 2

Patient's positioning on the operating table (modified left Jack-knife position) during liver resection. A 5-mm trocar was placed next to the xiphoid process, and the other two 12-mm trocars were placed at intervals of 6 cm next to the 5-mm trocar. The intercostal 5 mm trocar was placed through the ninth intercostal space on the right posterior axillary line.

The second (transverse colon) surgical stage demanded to reverse the patient’s position to supine. Two additional trocars were placed: 5 mm right paraumbilically and 5 mm infraumbilically (Fig. 3). A transverse colon resection was performed, followed by an extracorporeal, hand-sutured end-to-end colon anastomosis (Video).

Graphic representation of the patient's positioning on the operating table (supine position) during colon resection and final view on the fifth postoperative day.
Figure 3

Graphic representation of the patient's positioning on the operating table (supine position) during colon resection and final view on the fifth postoperative day.

Total operative time was 345 min, with an estimated blood loss of ~150 ml, portal ischemia during Pringle manoeuvre was 28 min.

The postoperative adverse event was classified as Clavien-Dindo IIIA: the right-sided exudative pleuritis was treated with a percutaneous drainage of the right pleural sinus on fourth postoperative day, yielding up to 300 ml of serous fluid. Empirical antibiotic therapy with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (875 mg twice daily for 5 days orally) was initiated. The patient required a transfusion of two red blood cells units due to anaemia (Hb – 6.4 g/dl). By the time of discharge, the Hb level had increased to 10.8 g/dl.

Histopathological examination of the resected liver and colon specimens confirmed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma: pT3 pN0 pM1. Molecular genetic analysis revealed a G12X-G13D mutation in exon 2 of the NRAS gene with stable MSS/MSI, KRAS, BRAF—wild type. Three weeks post-discharge, systemic chemotherapy was initiated using the CAPOX regimen. At 3 and 8 months postoperatively, CT showed no recurrence or metastases.

Discussion

A laparoscopic approach to liver surgery minimizes surgical trauma, leading to reduced postoperative pain, faster recovery, and a shorter hospital stay [5, 6]. However, simultaneous laparoscopic resection in CRC patients with SLM is a technically demanding procedure. Metastatic lesions allocated in posterosuperior segments or right ‘venous liver core’ have been identified as challenging by laparoscopic surgeons' societies [8]. Bleeding and failure to progress are the two primary reasons for conversion to open surgery in these cases, largely due to the limited angles of attack and the complex vascular anatomy [9]. The experience of open surgery is of great importance for understanding the basic principles of safety, which subsequently allows liver resections to be performed through a minimally invasive laparoscopic surgical approach [10]. In open surgery we apply the basic principles of the gentle right liver lobe mobilization and vascular tourniquets to control both blood inflow and outflow to minimize the bleeding [11, 12]. It is well known that laparoscopic surgery reduces parenchymal blood loss through carboperitoneum, which at the same time, jeopardizes patient’s safety in case of main hepatic veins injuries [13, 14]. That is why we recommended controlling the common trunk of RHV with tourniquet during the laparoscopic hepatic transection of S7.

In conclusion, laparoscopic anatomical resection of the S7 and S4 with simultaneous resection of the colon transversum can be safely performed through seven trocars with a change in patient’s positioning before the colon resection. Intracorporeal control of blood in- and outflow can reduce the risk of bleeding during the S7 resection.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

None declared.

Patient consent

Written informed consent for data processing was obtained from the patient.

References

1.

Väyrynen  

V
, Wirta  
EV
, Seppälä  
T
, et al.  Incidence and management of patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous and metachronous colorectal metastases: a population-based study.
BJS Open
 2020;4:685–92.

2.

Burlaka  

AA
, Makhmudov  
DE
, Lisnyi  
II
, et al.  Parenchyma-sparing strategy and oncological prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases.
World J Surg Oncol
 2022;20:122.

3.

Burlaka  

A
, Ryzhov  
A
, Ostapenko  
Y
, et al.  Twenty-year experience in liver surgery in metastatic colorectal patients: a case series study in Ukraine.
Ann Med Surg (Lond)
 2023;85:1413–9.

4.

Fretland  

ÅA
, Dagenborg  
VJ
, Bjørnelv  
GMW
, et al.  Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases: the OSLO-COMET randomized controlled trial.
Ann Surg
 2018;267:199–207.

5.

Sijberden  

JP
, Hoogteijling  
TJ
, Aghayan  
D
, et al.  International consortium on minimally invasive liver surgery (I-MILS). Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection in various settings: an international multicenter propensity score matched study of 10.075 patients.
Ann Surg
 2024;280:108–17.

6.

Okuda  

Y
, Honda  
G
, Kurata  
M
, et al.  A safe and valid procedure for pure laparoscopic partial hepatectomy of the most posterosuperior area: the top of segment 7.
J Am Coll Surg
 2015;220:e17–21.

7.

Huang  

JW
, Su  
WL
, Wang  
SN
. Alternative laparoscopic intracorporeal Pringle Maneuver by Huang's loop.
World J Surg
 2018;42:3312–5.

8.

Berardi  

G
, Igarashi  
K
, Wakabayashi  
G
. Laparoscopic liver resection-education and training.
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol
 2019;4:11.

9.

Cauchy  

F
, Fuks  
D
, Nomi  
T
, et al.  Risk factors and consequences of conversion in laparoscopic major liver resection.
Br J Surg
 2015;102:785–95.

10.

Kneifel  

F
, Mohr  
A
, Bungert  
AD
, et al.  Impact of parenchymal transection techniques on intraoperative blood loss during liver resection in a porcine model of elevated central venous pressure: a comparative study.
Ann Hepatol
 2025;30:101787.

11.

Moggia  

E
, Rouse  
B
, Simillis  
C
, et al.  Methods to decrease blood loss during liver resection: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
 2016;10:CD010683.

12.

Mobarak  

S
, Stott  
MC
, Tarazi  
M
, et al.  Selective hepatic vascular exclusion versus Pringle Maneuver in major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Front Surg
 2022;9:860721.

13.

Shimizu  

K
, Usuda  
M
, Kakizaki  
Y
, et al.  Cerebral infarction by paradoxical gas embolism detected after laparoscopic partial hepatectomy with an insufflation management system: a case report.
Surg Case Rep
 2023;9:34.

14.

Otsuka  

Y
, Katagiri  
T
, Ishii  
J
, et al.  Gas embolism in laparoscopic hepatectomy: what is the optimal pneumoperitoneal pressure for laparoscopic major hepatectomy?  
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
 2013;20:137–40.

© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press and JSCR Publishing Ltd.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.

Supplementary data