Abstract

A Meckel’s diverticulum is the most common congenital anomaly of the gastrointestinal tract, with a population incidence of approximately 2%. They are known to cause several complications including obstruction, haemorrhage, tumours, infection, and perforation. The vast majority however are asymptomatic and therefore provide a management conundrum when discovered incidentally. We report the case of a 71-year-old female who presented with abdominal pain and bloating. She was taken for a diagnostic laparoscopy which revealed a partial caecal obstruction secondary to a fibrous band running from a Meckel’s diverticulum around the caecal pole to the mesentery. The band had likely been severed from the umbilicus but not resected at a previous surgery. The caecal obstruction was relieved and the diverticulum resected uneventfully. This rare case underscores the variety of complications that a Meckel’s diverticulum can cause and highlights the difficult management decision when faced with an asymptomatic incidentally found Meckel’s diverticulum.

Introduction

The vitelline duct (omphaloenteric duct) in a foetus serves to connect the yolk sac to the intestinal tract [1]. Incomplete obliteration of this duct can result in a variety of abnormalities, the most common of which is a Meckel’s diverticulum (MD) [1]. A MD is a true diverticulum of the small bowel, it has a reported prevalence of between 0.3% and 2.9% and is found on the antimesenteric surface of the mid to distal ileum [1, 2].

Intestinal obstruction is a common complication associated with a MD. Other complications include haemorrhage, tumours, infection, and perforation. Obstruction can be caused by the MD acting as a lead point and causing intussusception of the small bowel. This process is more common in the paediatric population [2]. Other mechanisms by which a MD may cause a bowel obstruction are related to the attached bands which may be present [1, 3, 4]. A MD may or may not have associated fibrous bands running to the mesentery (mesodiverticular band) or the umbilicus [1, 4].

A band running from a MD to the umbilicus is a continuation of the incompletely obliterated vitelline duct [4]. A mesodiverticular band is the incompletely obliterated remnant of the foetal vitelline artery, it runs from the tip of the MD to the mesentery of the ileum creating a snare like opening [5]. Both types of bands are known to cause small bowel obstruction however there are only limited reports of caecal obstruction [4–7].

Of those patients with a MD the vast majority are thought to be asymptomatic, with the lifetime risk of developing a complication reported between 4.2% and 6.4% [8, 9]. There is a variety of practice in surgeons’ approaches to the incidentally found asymptomatic MD. A study of 1476 patients at the Mayo Clinic failed to support or reject the approach of resecting all incidentally found asymptomatic diverticula [10]. The study did however suggest that any MD with one of their four high risk criteria (age less than 50 years, male sex, diverticulum length greater than 2 cm, presence of histologically abnormal tissue) should be prophylactically resected [10].

Resection of a MD can be achieved by either simple diverticulectomy or segmental resection and primary anastomosis. An Australian study showed that while a long (length twice the diameter) MD can be safely removed by simple diverticulectomy, a short MD should be removed by segmental resection because of the uncertainty of the site of potential ectopic mucosa within the MD [11]. In addition, consideration should be given to segmental resection if there is a palpable abnormality at the base of the diverticulum or if it is thought simple diverticulectomy might result in narrowing of the intestinal lumen.

Case report

We report the case of a 71-year-old female who presented with a long history of abdominal pain and cramps since childhood. These symptoms had increased and been associated with bloating since a recent bout of uncomplicated sigmoid diverticulitis which was managed conservatively. She had recently had a colonoscopy which had failed to identify any abnormality. A computed tomography (CT) scan showed a distended caecum and suggested a degree of stenosis in the proximal ascending colon (Fig. 1). Her surgical history included an upper midline laparotomy extending to the umbilicus for an open cholecystectomy and an abdominoplasty.

Computed tomography imaging of the patient pre-operatively. (A) The structure suspected to be the band partially obstructing the caecum is indicated by the arrow. (B) The distension of the caecum prior to the obstructing band is demonstrated.
Figure 1

Computed tomography imaging of the patient pre-operatively. (A) The structure suspected to be the band partially obstructing the caecum is indicated by the arrow. (B) The distension of the caecum prior to the obstructing band is demonstrated.

She underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy which identified a partial caecal obstruction secondary to a fibrous band running from a Meckel’s diverticulum around the caecal pole to the small bowel mesentery (Fig. 2). It did not have the typical appearance of a mesodiverticular band and was thought to have been a band running from the MD to the umbilicus which had been let down from the umbilicus at her previous laparotomy and subsequently implanted itself in the small bowel mesentery. The band was untwisted from around the caecum. Simple diverticulectomy of the MD and its band was performed. The patient recovered uneventfully. She was subsequently seen in the out-patient clinic and reported resolution of her symptoms.

Intraoperative laparoscopic views. (A) The band is seen wrapped around the caecum causing the partial obstruction. (B) The band is untwisted from around the caecum and the Meckel’s diverticulum is revealed. (C) The Meckel’s diverticulum and its band are examined. (D) The band is transected.
Figure 2

Intraoperative laparoscopic views. (A) The band is seen wrapped around the caecum causing the partial obstruction. (B) The band is untwisted from around the caecum and the Meckel’s diverticulum is revealed. (C) The Meckel’s diverticulum and its band are examined. (D) The band is transected.

Discussion

Approximately 2% of the population have a MD, of these only a small percentage will ever become symptomatic. A symptomatic MD may mimic many other abdominal pathologies and is difficult to diagnose.

A MD with a fibrous band running to the umbilicus is a further rare subset of this congenital anomaly. This case highlights the importance of considering resecting these diverticulum when found incidentally. Previous authors discussing complications of diverticular bands have suggested that resection of either the diverticulum or at least the band is appropriate if found incidentally as they are possible sites of future obstruction [4–6]. This case supports this opinion.

This case demonstrates a rare sequela of an unresected MD and a safe workup and laparoscopic approach to this pathology.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Funding

None declared.

References

1.

Persaud
 
T
,
Torchia
 
M
. Alimentary system. In:
The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology
, 12th edn.
Philadelphia
:
Elsevier
,
2025
.

2.

Hansen
 
CC
,
Soreide
 
K
.
Systematic review of epidemiology, presentation, and management of Meckel's diverticulum in the 21st century
.
Medicine (Baltimore)
 
2018
;
97
:
e12154
. .

3.

Johnson
 
GF
,
Verhagen
 
AD
.
Mesodiverticular band
.
Radiology
 
1977
;
123
:
409
12
. .

4.

Stevenson
 
RE
. Meckel diverticulum. In:
Human Malformations and Related Anomalies
, Vol.
xviii
, Third edn.
Oxford, New York
:
Oxford University Press
,
2016
,
978
.

5.

Bamarni
 
S
,
HungFong
 
S
,
Mino
 
J
, et al.  
Systematic review of mesodiverticular band: a rare cause of small bowel strangulation and hemoperitoneum in adults
.
IJS Short Reports
 
2021
;
6
:
e33
. .

6.

Blum
 
B
,
Grimes
 
AD
,
Carroll
 
HL
, et al.  
Cecal volvulus secondary to mesodiverticular band
.
J Surg Case Rep
 
2024
;
2024
:
rjae296
. .

7.

Neidlinger
 
NA
,
Madan
 
AK
,
Wright
 
MJ
.
Meckel's diverticulum causing cecal volvulus
.
Am Surg
 
2001
;
67
:
41
3
. .

8.

Cullen
 
JJ
,
Kelly
 
KA
,
Moir
 
CR
, et al.  
Surgical management of Meckel's diverticulum. An epidemiologic, population-based study
.
Ann Surg
 
1994
;
220
:
564
8
,
discussion 568–9
. .

9.

Soltero
 
MJ
,
Bill
 
AH
.
The natural history of Meckel's diverticulum and its relation to incidental removal. A study of 202 cases of diseased Meckel's diverticulum found in King County, Washington, over a fifteen year period
.
Am J Surg
 
1976
;
132
:
168
73
. .

10.

Park
 
JJ
,
Wolff
 
BG
,
Tollefson
 
MK
, et al.  
Meckel diverticulum: the Mayo Clinic experience with 1476 patients (1950-2002)
.
Ann Surg
 
2005
;
241
:
529
33
. .

11.

Varcoe
 
RL
,
Wong
 
SW
,
Taylor
 
CF
, et al.  
Diverticulectomy is inadequate treatment for short Meckel's diverticulum with heterotopic mucosa
.
ANZ J Surg
 
2004
;
74
:
869
72
. .

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com