Abstract

Fournier’s gangrene is a necrotizing fasciitis of the perineum that can occur due to a loss of integrity of the gastrointestinal or urethral mucosa. Its appearance as the debut of a perforated rectal neoplasm is unusual, more uncommon in young patients, leading to an advanced stage of the disease. Therefore, we present the case of a 47-year-old male with Fournier’s gangrene as the debut of a rectal cancer that, despite severe presentation, the pathological stage was early (pT2N0), highlighting the importance of considering neoplastic etiology in perineal gangrene and the need for an early multidisciplinary approach.

Introduction

Fournier’s gangrene is a necrotizing fasciitis of the perineum that may result from gastrointestinal or urethral mucosal disruption. Its presentation as the first manifestation of perforated rectal cancer is unusual, particularly in young patients, and is generally associated with advanced disease.

Case report

We present the case of a 47-year-old male with no prior medical history who arrived at the Emergency Department with a rapidly evolving perianal abscess (Fig. 1). Within hours, he developed Fournier’s gangrene secondary to an undiagnosed rectal neoplasm (Fig. 2).

Initial presentation of Fournier’s gangrene.
Figure 1

Initial presentation of Fournier’s gangrene.

Diagnostic CT scan.
Figure 2

Diagnostic CT scan.

Urgent surgery was performed, including debridement of necrotic tissue, biopsy of the distal rectal lesion, and diverting colostomy. The patient’s postoperative course was favorable (Fig. 3).

Surgical debridement and early postoperative outcome.
Figure 3

Surgical debridement and early postoperative outcome.

Histopathological analysis revealed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Colonoscopy showed no additional lesions and tumour markers were normal. PET-CT excluded distant disease. Pelvic MRI demonstrated involvement of the left levator ani, mesorectal fascia, and suspicious lymph nodes, suggestive of cT4bN1a disease (Fig. 4).

Pelvic MRI staging cT4bN1a.
Figure 4

Pelvic MRI staging cT4bN1a.

After multidisciplinary team review, the patient underwent abdominoperineal resection with terminal colostomy in the left iliac fossa and perineal closure using a modified Friedrich technique. Postoperative evolution was favourable, with progressive healing of the perineoscrotal wound by secondary intention (Fig. 5).

Abdominoperineal resection with favorable perineal healing.
Figure 5

Abdominoperineal resection with favorable perineal healing.

Final pathology revealed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (G2) without mucinous features, staged pT2 pN0 pMx, with negative surgical margins. Given the early stage, the patient did not require adjuvant therapy and to date has not presented recurrence.

Discussion

Fournier’s gangrene is a severe surgical emergency characterized by rapidly progressive necrosis of perineal soft tissues, with reported mortality ranging from 20% to 40%, depending on comorbidities and timeliness of treatment. Although most cases are associated with urological or anorectal infections, its presentation as the first manifestation of perforated rectal cancer is extremely rare [1, 2].

Few cases have been described in the literature, most involving advanced tumours and poor outcomes in elderly or comorbid patients [3, 4]. In contrast, our case is notable for involving a young, otherwise healthy patient, whose final tumour staging was unexpectedly early (pT2N0) despite the aggressive clinical debut.

This discrepancy between clinical and pathological staging has been reported previously. Yoshino et al. described a similar case where Fournier’s gangrene due to rectal cancer did not correspond to locally advanced pathology, highlighting the role of early multidisciplinary intervention [3]. Likewise, Hamidian Jahromi et al. emphasized the therapeutic challenge of managing severe sepsis alongside an unknown malignancy, requiring prioritization of hemodynamic stabilization, urgent debridement, and targeted biopsies before definitive oncologic surgery [4].

From a surgical standpoint, the staged strategy employed here (initial debridement, urgent fecal diversion, followed by abdominoperineal resection) aligns with current recommendations [5]. This sequence facilitates infection control, reduces risk of tumour dissemination, and prepares the patient for definitive resection under safer conditions [5]. Secondary intention closure of the perineal wound using a modified Friedrich technique also proved effective in this setting [6].

Final histology revealed a moderately differentiated tumour without nodal involvement or metastasis, suggesting that early perforation may have triggered bacterial dissemination and local necrosis without necessarily reflecting aggressive tumour biology. MRI findings of apparent invasion likely represented reactive inflammatory changes rather than true extension, consistent with final pathology.

In conclusion, Fournier’s gangrene should prompt consideration of an underlying neoplastic cause, even in young patients. Early suspicion and histological confirmation allow for tailored oncologic management, avoiding both undertreatment and overtreatment. The limited literature supports structured, multidisciplinary approaches to optimize outcomes in these rare but severe scenarios [3–8].

Conclusions

Fournier’s gangrene is a surgical emergency due to its fasciocutaneous necrosis and high mortality. It is essential to consider rectal cancer as a possible underlying cause, since prognosis and survival depend on timely and appropriate initial management.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Funding

None declared.

References

1.

Eke
 
N
.
Fournier's gangrene: a review of 1726 cases
.
Br J Surg
 
2000
;
87
:
718
28
.

2.

Benjelloun el
 
B
,
Souiki
 
T
,
Yakla
 
N
, et al.  
Fournier's gangrene: our experience with 50 patients and analysis of factors affecting mortality
.
World J Emerg Surg
 
2013
;
8
:
13
.

3.

Yoshino
 
Y
,
Funahashi
 
K
,
Okada
 
R
, et al.  
Severe Fournier's gangrene in a patient with rectal cancer: case report and literature review
.
World J Surg Oncol
 
2016
;
14
:
234
.

4.

Hamidian Jahromi
 
A
,
DuBose
 
A
,
Skweres
 
J
, et al.  
Oncologic management dilemma of locally advanced occult rectal cancer presenting as Fournier's gangrene
.
Am Surg
 
2015
;
81
:
E184
7
.

5.

Delalande
 
JP
,
Hay
 
JM
,
Fingerhut
 
A
, et al.  
Perineal wound management after abdominoperineal rectal excision for carcinoma with unsatisfactory hemostasis or gross septic contamination: primary closure vs. packing. A multicenter, controlled trial. French Association for Surgical Research
.
Dis Colon Rectum
 
1994
;
37
:
890
6
.

6.

Bowen
 
D
,
Hughes
 
T
,
Juliebø-Jones
 
P
, et al.  
Fournier's gangrene: a review of predictive scoring systems and practical guide for patient management
.
Ther Adv Infect Dis
 
2024
;
11
:
20499361241238521
.

7.

Carr
 
JA
.
Perforated rectal cancer presenting as Fournier's gangrene
.
J Clin Oncol
 
2010
;
28
:
e605
6
.

8.

Ossibi
 
PE
,
Souiki
 
T
,
Ibn Majdoub
 
K
, et al.  
Fournier gangrene: rare complication of rectal cancer
.
Pan Afr Med J
 
2015
;
20
:
288
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.