Abstract

Fetus-in-fetu (FIF), a rare congenital anomaly, involves a malformed fetus within its twin. It typically presents as an asymptomatic abdominal mass discovered postnatally, with an incidence of 1/500000 births. An 11-day-old Arab female infant presented with progressive abdominal distention. General physical examinations were normal. Abdominal examination revealed an ill-defined fixed lump in the right upper quadrant. Imaging revealed a 8 × 6 cm retroperitoneal mass containing skeletal elements. Surgical exploration via laparotomy confirmed diagnosis. Careful dissection was necessary due to its vascular and anatomical complexity. Histopathological examination revealed tissues from all three germ layers, excluding teratoma. FIF is distinguished from teratomas by the presence of a vertebral column with organized development of surrounding tissues, and typically manifests without malignant potential. Surgical excision is curative, with minimal risk of recurrence. Long-term follow-up with imaging and tumor markers is recommended to monitor for complications, despite its benign nature.

Introduction

Fetus-in-fetu (FIF), also known as cryptodidymus, is a rare developmental anomaly in which a mass of fetus-like tissue forms inside the body of its twin [1]. Since FIF is asymptomatic throughout pregnancy, children with abdominal mass are typically identified with it after birth. Detection is most often done in infancy, but the oldest reported ages of the host twin were 65 and 47 years old [2, 3]. Different organs can be seen in FIF, including vertebral column (91%), limbs (82.5%), central nervous system (55.8%), gastrointestinal tract (45%), vessels (40%), and genitourinary tract (26.5%) [4]. This manuscript was prepared following the CARE guidelines (https://www.care-statement.org).

Case presentation

History and examination

An 11-day-old,, 3.4 kg, full-term Arab female child was referred to the pediatric surgery department in Mansoura University with abdominal distention that was gradually increasing in size. An antenatal 4D ultrasound showed an abnormal pelvi-abdominal mass and a postnatal examination showed mild abdominal distension. She was tolerating oral feeding, and passing stool. There was no history of fever, jaundice, or urinary symptoms. On abdominal examination, there was a lump involving the right upper quadrant of the abdomen. It had ill-defined margins with soft to firm consistency, irregular surface, and immobile with respiration. There was no history of twin birth, teratoma or similar condition in the family and no family consanguinity. The patient had no past medical or surgical history of significant importance.

Lab and radiological investigation

On evaluation, her routine blood investigations were within normal limits, and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) was 8 mIU/ml, serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) was 39, 631 ng/ml and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was 434 U/L. USG Ultrasonography (USG) showed a large 8 × 6 cm, ill-defined heterogeneous mass in the right side of the abdominal cavity adjacent to the liver, having multiple hypoechoic areas and echogenic structures with internal vascularity. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen and pelvis revealed a large heterogeneous mass in the right side of the abdomen, measuring ~8 × 6 cm having cystic areas, fat attenuating areas, foci of calcifications, malformed skeletal parts resembling long bones, ribs, vertebrae, pelvic bones, and heterogeneous soft tissue fetal components. The mass resided in the right side of the abdomen, inferior to the liver displacing the loops posteriorly. It is fed by a large artery and draining vein along its posterior aspect. CT findings were suggestive of a FIF with various mass effects. Organized teratoma was kept as a differential diagnosis (Fig. 1). All lab and radiological investigations were fully funded by the government.

Post-contrast CT scan for the abdomen showing a heterogeneous soft tissue mass related to the lower part of the liver: (A) malformed skeletal parts resembling long bones, (B) cystic areas of fat attenuation and foci of calcifications of long bone, (C) malformed skeletal parts resembling three vertebrae, (D) cystic areas of fat attenuation.
Figure 1

Post-contrast CT scan for the abdomen showing a heterogeneous soft tissue mass related to the lower part of the liver: (A) malformed skeletal parts resembling long bones, (B) cystic areas of fat attenuation and foci of calcifications of long bone, (C) malformed skeletal parts resembling three vertebrae, (D) cystic areas of fat attenuation.

The mass after removal of the covering sac. Note the presence of two limbs and an umbilical cord.
Figure 2

The mass after removal of the covering sac. Note the presence of two limbs and an umbilical cord.

Management

Given the substantial size of the mass, challenging surgical planes, and surrounding structural relationships, a laparotomy was superior to laparoscopic approach. A transverse upper abdominal incision was made, and the mass was identified to be related to the inferior surface of the liver. On dissection, the portal vein was close to the mass with no line of separation, so a dissection was done with a repair for the small portal vein tear. The common bile duct was embedded in the wall of the mass, so it was excised. A further Roux-En-Y hepaticojejunostomy was done. Finally, the cyst was completely excised. Grossly, it was enclosed in a sac that contained fat, malformed bony and cartilaginous tissues, two limbs, and an umbilical cord (Fig. 2). The mass was sent for histopathological examination, and the closure of the abdominal wall was in layers. Then two abdominal drains (Morrison & splenorenal) were put in. The microscopic examination showed mature embryonic tissue containing elements of the three germinative layers; skin, vertebral column, germinative buds of limbs, skeletal muscles, fat, ganglion, and intestines (Fig. 3). The postoperative course was uneventful. Oral feeding started on day three postoperatively, and the abdominal drain was removed on the fourth day. The patient was discharged, and a follow-up after 1 year was done showing normal serum bilirubin, AFP, and B-HCG levels.

Microscopic examination revealed the presence of skin (A), skeletal muscles, and fat (B). Sections from the limbs revealed cartilage with a minimal amount of bone marrow. Vertebral column with nerve bundles (D) and ganglia are also detected (E). Parts of the intestine are also detected (F). All are hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Magnification 40× (A–D); 100× (E, F).
Figure 3

Microscopic examination revealed the presence of skin (A), skeletal muscles, and fat (B). Sections from the limbs revealed cartilage with a minimal amount of bone marrow. Vertebral column with nerve bundles (D) and ganglia are also detected (E). Parts of the intestine are also detected (F). All are hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Magnification 40× (A–D); 100× (E, F).

Discussion

FIF has an incidence of 1 in every 500 000 births and <100 cases reported worldwide [5]. Thakral et al. [6] noted that FIF has an equal female-to-male incidence, but Federici et al. [7] reported predominance in males with a ratio of 2:1. Teratomas, on the other hand, have a female predominance. Our case was found in an 11-day-old female.

It is important to differentiate between an FIF case and teratoma because the later requires constant monitoring with sonography, AFP serology and has a higher risk of malignant transformation [8]. The existence of a vertebral column, frequently with the proper placement of other organs or limbs surrounding it, distinguishes FIF from teratoma [9]. Unlike teratomas, FIF primarily affects the upper abdomen, whereas teratomas primarily affect the lower abdomen and pelvis [10]. Our case was found in the upper abdomen beside the liver, and pathologic examination showed a vertebral column with cartilage within the mass, further supporting the diagnosis of FIF.

Using ultrasound, Lagausie et al. [11] reported the first case of finding cardiac activity in the pseudo fetus that had a heart rate (88 beats/min) different from the affected neonate (140 beats/min) which helped in diagnosing FIF later. In our case, no fetal cardiac activity was noted in the antenatal 4D ultrasound.

Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard in diagnosing FIF, the diagnosis of FIF may be simply based on the observation of a vertebral column in an abdominal mass on a plain abdominal X-ray or CT [12]. Our case was confirmed using US and CT together, with the CT confirming the presence of a vertebral column and long bones representing the limbs.

The treatment of choice for FIF is operative removal either through the open approach or laparoscopically. It is necessary to perform adequate transperitoneal exposure and cautious management of the fetus's vascular supply, which may come via the superior mesenteric artery. Additionally, the capsule and mass should be kept intact during separation and removal [13]. FIF doesn’t have a malignant transformation tendency, however, follow-up evaluation of AFP or β-HCG levels combined with imaging is recommended as Hopkins et al. reported a case with malignant transformation that occurred after FIF resection [14]. In our case, AFP and B-HCG were within normal limits during a 1-year follow-up.

Strengths and limitations

Our case report would have benefited from an MRI imaging of the pathology, as that would enrich literature, however, given the accurate findings on CT and US, an MRI was thought to be of no importance.

Conclusion

FIF is a rare anomaly where one fetus encapsulates another during embryonic development. This case is a typical presentation of FIF found as an incidental abdominal mass in an infant. Surgical excision is the treatment of choice with a favorable prognosis and low recurrence risk. The presence of a vertebral column and organized tissue differentiation in biopsied specimen is the main distinguishing factor between FIF and teratomas. Long-term follow-up, through imaging and tumor markers, is recommended for potential complications despite its benign nature. This report highlights the importance of multidisciplinary management of FIF.

Author contributions

M.E., R.E.A., and M.A. were primarily responsible for the conceptualization, methodology, and execution of the research study. M.A. led the data collection and analysis, with critical contributions from R.E.A. and M.E. and A.E. provided significant support in the surgical procedures and interpretation of clinical outcomes. M.A. contributed to the literature review and assisted in data management. M.A. and M.E. were involved in the statistical analysis and interpretation of the data. M.E. and M.A. played key roles in patient recruitment and follow-up. K.M.A. wrote and supervised the pathology report of the study. R.E.A. participated in drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content. A.E. supervised all aspects of the work and provided guidance throughout the research process.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This case study wasn’t funded by any party.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

Consent for publication

The patient’s guardians were informed, and consent was obtained to publish the included information.

References

1.

Dutta
 
HK
,
Thomas
 
JK
,
Sahewala
 
NK
, et al.  
Fetus in fetu in a neonate: report of a case
.
Surg Today
 
2013
;
43
:
547
9
.

2.

Piltcher-da-Silva
 
R
,
Sasaki
 
VL
,
Piltcher-Recuero
 
M
, et al.  
Retroperitoneal fetus in fetu in a 65-year-old man
.
Clin Biomed Res
 
2022
;
42
.

3.

Dagradi
 
AD
,
Mangiante
 
GL
,
Serio
 
GE
, et al.  
Fetus in fetu removal in a 47-year-old man
.
Surgery
 
1992
;
112
:
598
602
.

4.

Eighemhenrio
 
A
,
Owolabi
 
O
,
Odefiagbon
 
E
, et al.  
Foetus-in-fetu, a paediatric rarity in an infant at IRRUA specialist teaching hospital, IRRUA, Nigeria
.
Ann Ib Postgrad Med
 
2023
;
21
:
85
8
.

5.

Kumar
 
A
,
Paswan
 
SS
,
Kumar
 
B
, et al.  
Fetus in fetu in an adult woman
.
BMJ Case Rep CP
 
2019
;
12
:
e230835
.

6.

Thakral
 
CL
,
Maji
 
DC
,
Sajwani
 
MJ
.
Fetus-in-fetu: a case report and review of the literature
.
J Pediatr Surg
 
1998
;
33
:
1432
4
.

7.

Federici
 
S
,
Ceccarelli
 
PL
,
Ferrari
 
M
, et al.  
Fetus in fetu: report of three cases and review of the literature
.
Pediatr Surg Int
 
1991
;
6
:
60
5
.

8.

Mohta
 
A
,
Khurana
 
N
.
Fetus-in-fetu or well-differentiated teratoma- a continued controversy
.
Indian J Surg
 
2011
;
73
:
372
4
.

9.

Faizi
 
FR
,
Rasouly
 
N
,
Aien
 
MT
.
Fetus in fetu or fetiform teratoma? Report of two cases
.
J Pediatr Surg Case Rep
 
2020
;
61
:
101605
.

10.

Sitharama
 
SA
,
Jindal
 
B
,
Vuriti
 
MK
, et al.  
Fetus in Fetu: case report and brief review of literature on embryologic origin, clinical presentation, imaging and differential diagnosis
.
Pol J Radiol
 
2017
;
82
:
46
9
.

11.

de Lagausie
 
P
,
de Napoli Cocci
 
S
,
Stempfle
 
N
, et al.  
Highly differentiated teratoma and fetus-in-fetu: a single pathology?
 
J Pediatr Surg
 
1997
;
32
:
115
6
.

12.

Grosfeld
 
JL
,
Stepita
 
DS
,
Nance
 
WE
, et al.  
Fetus-in-fetu: an unusual cause for abdominal mass in infancy
.
Ann Surg
 
1974
;
180
:
80
4
.

13.

Xiaowen
 
M
,
Lingxi
 
C
,
Song
 
L
, et al.  
Rare fetus-in-fetu: experience from a large tertiary pediatric referral center
.
Front Pediatr
 
2021
;
9
:
678479
.

14.

Hopkins
 
KL
,
Dickson
 
PK
,
Ball
 
TI
, et al.  
Fetus-in-fetu with malignant recurrence
.
J Pediatr Surg
 
1997
;
32
:
1476
9
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.