Abstract

Parry Romberg syndrome also known as progressive hemifacial atrophy is an uncommon degenerative condition, characterized by unilateral, slow, and progressive atrophy of face. Patient presents with loss of facial symmetry and neurological manifestations. After the degenerative process settles, reconstructive surgeries are performed to address facial asymmetry. For accurate assessment of volume deficit, laser scanning and three- dimensional printing can be used which offers the advantage of precise surgical planning and good aesthetic outcome. We present a case of soft tissue reconstruction in Parry Romberg syndrome with anterolateral thigh flap with use of three- dimensional laser scanning.

Introduction

Parry Romberg syndrome also known as progressive hemifacial atrophy (PHA) is an acquired, typically unilateral distortion of face, due to atrophy of skin, soft tissues and muscles with occasional bony involvement. [1] It was first described by Parry in 1825 [2] and Romberg in 1846 [3]. Disease manifestation starts in first or early second decade of life affecting women slightly more than men [4]. True incidence of disease is unknown due to its rare presentation, overlapping features with linear scleroderma and lack of standardized diagnostic criteria [5]. Exact etio pathogenesis is yet not defined, however, various theories like auto-immunity, viral infections, trauma and inflammation of brain has been proposed [6]. Patients usually require aesthetic restoration of underlying soft tissue and bony defects. Reconstructive options include autologous fat grafting and tissue transfer, depending on severity of disease, degree of deformity, patient compatibility and surgeons’ preference.

Case report

A 17-years-female presented to our tertiary center concerned for her left sided facial deformity. At birth no such deformity was noticed by the parents (Fig. 1A), However, -gradual change in contour and sunken in appearance of left side of face was appreciated at age of 2 years. Parents also gave history of accidental fall of an iron box over left side of her face and history of epileptic episodes during sleep, for 5 years of age. Physical examination revealed marked facial asymmetry with hypoplasia of left side of face and deviation of nose, lips, and chin to left side (Fig. 1 B and C). Facial nerve examination was normal. Patient was investigated and parents were counselled regarding the nature of disease, treatment options and outcomes. Three -dimensional computed tomography scan (3 D- CT) revealed, shortened ramus of left hemimadible with subcutaneous fat atrophy of left anterior maxillary, zygomatic, left parotid, buccal, and masseter space (Fig. 2 A). Laser scanning and 3 D printing was done for accurate defect analysis and planning of volume restoration (Fig. 2 B). The atrophic area was ~10 cm × 5 cm with a volume discrepancy of 299 ml between the left and right face. A free anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap was planned and counselling was done for additional corrective surgeries if required.

(A) Patient at 6 months of age without any deformity. (B, C) At presentation front and left oblique facial profile.
Figure 1

(A) Patient at 6 months of age without any deformity. (B, C) At presentation front and left oblique facial profile.

(A) Preoperative CT showing shortened left hemimandible. (B) 3 D model.
Figure 2

(A) Preoperative CT showing shortened left hemimandible. (B) 3 D model.

Intraoperative details

Marking of atrophied site of face was done and template of defect was made using 3 D laser scanning (Fig. 3). For perforator mapping, a line drawn from superolateral aspect of patella to the anterosuperior iliac spine on the ipsilateral thigh of affected site (Fig. 4 A). A 3-cm-radius circle was drawn, centered on midpoint of this line and with use of a handheld Doppler probe; perforators inside the circle were identified followed by marking of the desired flap. A 12 cm × 6 cm flap based on single musculocutaneous perforator was harvested (Fig. 4 B). The flap was planned larger than estimated dimensions, due to the retractile properties of skin and to compensate for contraction. It was done so because, if a flap is stretched after harvest to fit the defect, it may reduce its viability leading to necrosis [7]. Preparation of the facial pocket was done and skin and subcutaneous tissue was elevated towards the nasolabial fold along with dissection of recipient vessels (facial artery and facial vein). The harvested flap was de-epithelialized and secured to periosteum of zygoma and infra-orbital rim and mandible. Primary closure of donor site was done. Flap settled well without any complications. Post-operatively no seroma, wound dehiscence or flap necrosis was seen. Donor site healed well. A second stage surgery for contour restoration was done after 18 months in form of flap debulking. There was dramatic improvement in facial contour and symmetry which was satisfactory for the patient.

(A) Laser scanning for defect assessment. (B) Template.
Figure 3

(A) Laser scanning for defect assessment. (B) Template.

(A) Free anterolateral thigh flap preoperative marking. (B) Flap after harvest and ready for transfer. (C) After free ALT flap. (D) After flap debulking surgery.
Figure 4

(A) Free anterolateral thigh flap preoperative marking. (B) Flap after harvest and ready for transfer. (C) After free ALT flap. (D) After flap debulking surgery.

Discussion

PHA results in marked facial asymmetry which leads to psychological upset [8]. The condition is self- limiting and progresses for years to decades before cessation [9]. Diagnosis is based on detailed history, clinical examination and certain specialized tests based on individual disease manifestation. Hemifacial atrophy following trauma is rare. In our case, asymmetry was noticed by parents following trauma. Surgical treatment is usually done after the cessation of atrophic process and options include autologous fat grafting, pedicled, or free flaps depending upon the defect. At times, more than one treatment modality or a combination may be required [10].

For moderate to severe fat atrophy associated with bony hypoplasia, free tissue transfer is usually warranted. Various free flaps have been discussed in literature including latissimus dorsi [11], radial forearm, scapular and parascapular and ALT flaps. Since its first description by Song et al., ALT flap has been one of ideal donor site for soft tissue reconstruction as the flap bulk can mask underlying bony hypoplasia and the donor site closure is possible with inconspicuous scar. Literature review describes a large series of ALT flap for facial contour restoration in case of PRS with its various modifications. Recently, use of laser scanning and 3 D printing for good aesthetic outcome has also been illustrated. In our case 3D printing was used to achieve our reconstructive goal of normal fullness and contour. We did address mandibular hypoplasia by bulk of ALT. Recent advancement in computer-aided design and manufacturing techniques has made feasibility of custom-made artificial bones possible. While these procedures have specific advantages, their use is limited due to stability and strength of implants. Also, use of any artificial material is associated with the risks of damage and infection, along with expulsion of implant. Hence, Brawn et al., has preferred autologous tissue reconstruction due to their long-term outcome [12]. In a recent case series of three patients by K.F. Abdullaev et al., defects resulting from PRS and hemifacial microsomia were addressed with ALT flap, good and satisfactory aesthetic results were obtained. In third patient, with 3-D visualization, detailed analysis of defect and proper preoperative planning good contour restoration was achieved after first surgery only [13].

Conclusion

Facial contour restoration is a challenge for reconstructive surgeon in PRS. Proper planning, analysis of components of defect and discussion of various reconstructive options with patient is mandatory. 3 D printing reduces number of procedures required and results in good aesthetic outcome.

Author contributions

Anupama Kumari: Writing the case report. Niraj Bhalara: Helped in study concept. Veena Singh: Operated, revised and approved it. Ansarul Haq: Operated and revised it. Sarsij Sharma: Operated and critically analysed. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests in this section.

Funding

This study has no funding or financial support.

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was given by author’s institution. Written informed consent for publication of this case report along with images was obtained from the patient. A copy of same is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request.

Guarantor

Dr. Anupama Kumari, M.Ch, Plastic Surgery, Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, PATNA, India. Mobile: 8795381249; E-mail: anu786.doc@gmail.com

References

1.

El-Kehdy
 
J
,
Abbas
 
O
,
Rubeiz
 
N
.
A review of Parry-Romberg syndrome
.
J Am Acad Dermatol
 
2012
;
67
:
769
84
.

2.

Parry
 
CH
.
Elements of Pathology and Therapeutics
Volume I
.
London
,
Underwoods 1815 [Incomplete Vol II posthumously presented 1825]
.

3.

Henoch
 
E
,
Romberg
 
HM
.
Klinische Ergebnisse
.
Berlin
:
Forstner
,
1846
,
75
81
.

4.

Hunt
 
JA
,
Hobar
 
PC
.
Common craniofacial anomalies: conditions of craniofacial atrophy/hypoplasia and neoplasia
.
Plast Reconstr Surg
 
2003
;
111
:
1497
510
.

5.

Orozco-Covarrubias
 
L
,
Guzman-Meza
 
A
,
Ridaura-Sanz
 
C
, et al.   
Scleroderma ‘en coup de sabre’ and progressive facial hemiatrophy. Is it possible to differentiate them
.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol
 
2002
;
16
:
361
6
.

6.

Moss
 
ML
,
Crikelair
 
GF
.
Progressive facial hemiatrophy following cervical sympathectomy in the rat
.
Arch Oral Biol
 
1960
;
1
:
254
.

7.

Agarwal
 
P
,
Mukati
 
P
,
Sharma
 
D
.
Contraction of skin flaps: Re-examining the scientific basis
.
Eur J Plast Surg
 
2020
;
43
:
453
8
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-020-01630-2.

8.

Deshingkar
 
SA
,
Barpande
 
SR
,
Bhavthankar
 
JD
, et al.   
Progressive hemifacial atrophy (Parry-Romberg syndrome)
.
Contemp Clin Dent
 
2012
;
3
:
S78
81
.

9.

Taub
 
P
,
Torok
 
KS
,
Schuster
 
L
. Hemifacial Atrophy. In:
Losee
 
J
(ed).
Plastic Surgery: Pediatric Plastic Surgery
.
AVES, Istanbul Turkey: Elsevier
,
2018
,
801
14
.

10.

Wo’jcicki
 
P
,
Zachara
 
M
.
Surgical treatment of patients with Parry–Romberg syndrome
.
Ann Plast Surg
 
2011
;
66
:
267
72
.

11.

Pisarek
 
W
.
Reconstruction of craniofacial microsomia and hemifacialatrophy with free latissimus dorsi flap
.
Acta Chir Plast
 
1988
;
30
:
194
201
.

12.

Abdullaev
 
KF
,
Orlova
 
EV
,
Yadav
 
MK
, et al.   
Preoperative planning for advanced modelling of anterolateral thigh flaps in the treatment of severe haemifacial atrophy in Parry–Romberg and Goldenhar syndrome
.
JPRAS Open
 
2018
;
16
:
36
49
.

13.

Brown
 
JS
,
Shaw
 
RJ
.
Reconstruction of the maxilla and midface: introducing a new classification
.
Lancet Oncol
 
2010
;
118
:
1001
8
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.