Abstract

Vertebral haemangiomas are common amongst primary benign tumours of the spine, usually asymptomatic and discovered incidentally, whereby symptomatic cases are rare. Aggressive vertebral haemangiomas, occurring even less frequently, are characterized by their expansion, resulting in pain and neural compression symptoms. Depending on presentation and severity, several treatment options exist, and when causing progressive neurological deficit, surgical decompression and resection is warranted. Despite local recurrence being rare, regular follow-ups to detect recurrence are advised. In case of recurrent aggressive vertebral haemangiomas, however, subsequent treatment strategy usually depends on a case-by-case consideration, whereby reports in the literature are lacking. We describe a case of a recurrent aggressive vertebral haemangiomas of the thoracic spine in a 20-year-old male causing progressive thoracic myelopathy with segmental kyphosis, treated with a revision total en bloc spondylectomy and a multilevel fixation with vertebral column reconstruction using radiolucent instrumentation.

Introduction

Amongst primary benign tumours of the spine, vertebral haemangiomas (VH) are the most common, usually asymptomatic and discovered incidentally [1–3]. Approximately 10% of adults experience VH, with symptomatic cases occurring less frequently, while aggressive vertebral haemangiomas (AVH) represent only 0.9%–1.2% of all cases [1–3]. Although benign, aggressive local growth can cause pain and even neurological symptoms due to expansion, extraosseous extension toward the spinal canal, and compressive fractures, all potentially causing neural compression symptoms with myelopathy [2–5].

Depending on presentation and severity, several treatment options exist, including vertebroplasty, ethanol ablation, endovascular embolization, and, when causing progressive neurological deficit, surgical decompression with resection [1, 2, 4, 6, 7]. Despite local recurrence being rare, regular follow-ups to detect recurrence are advised [1, 6]. In case of recurrent AVH, however, subsequent treatment strategy usually depends on a case-by-case consideration, whereby reports in the literature are scarce [8].

Case report

A 20-year-old male presented to our institution with clinical symptoms of myelopathy and a history of previous surgery for AVH at Th6. Upon admission, the patient reported a 1-month-long progressive paraesthesia in both thighs and back pain. Neurological examination revealed a right-sided extension plantar reflex and residual hypoesthesia in the right anterior thigh, with no significant motor impairment observed (ASIA score D, VAS pain score 7).

Three and a half years prior to admission to our institution, the patient underwent emergent Th6 vertebroplasty with laminectomy for a radiologically characteristic and histologically confirmed Th6 AVH causing acute thoracic myelopathy with a week-long paresis of the right foot dorsiflexion, performed by another surgeon. A progressive kyphotic deformity of the Th6 vertebrae was observed on radiographic follow-ups, whereby the hypoesthesia on the right anterior thigh persisted (ASIA score D, VAS pain score 7). Follow-up MRI and CT imaging revealed recurrent AVH of the Th6 vertebrae expanding into the spinal canal, leading to newly recognized worsening of myelopathy (Fig. 1). Additionally, a concomitant haemangioma was observed in the right transverse and articular process of Th8 (Fig. 2).

Follow-up CT imaging revealed recurrent AVH of the Th6 vertebrae, MRI scan showing AVH expanding into the spinal canal and causing myelopathy.
Figure 1

Follow-up CT imaging revealed recurrent AVH of the Th6 vertebrae, MRI scan showing AVH expanding into the spinal canal and causing myelopathy.

MRI scan of the thoracic spine showing a concomitant haemangioma in the right transverse and articular process of Th8.
Figure 2

MRI scan of the thoracic spine showing a concomitant haemangioma in the right transverse and articular process of Th8.

We decided to perform a revision total en bloc spondylectomy at Th6, along with resection of the Th8 pedicle and costovertebral joint, with a partial resection of the adjacent rib. Posterior spinal fixation from Th3 to Th10 was performed using radiolucent carbon screws, and the Th6 body was reconstructed using a radiolucent expandable cage (Figs 3 and 4). During the surgery, MEPs and SEPs were lost, with the patient waking up paraplegic (ASIA score B, VAS pain score 5). Immediate postoperative MRI showed no residual signs of thoracic spinal cord compression due to tumour or haemathoma (Fig. 5). The patient’s neurological status substantially improved the day after surgery, and thereafter, gradually improving over the next few days, allowing the patient to walk independently within 10 days (ASIA score D, VAS pain score 3). A multidisciplinary council decided against postoperative radiotherapy to avoid aggravating neurological symptoms by possibly causing additional damage to the myelopathic spinal cord. On the 11th postoperative day, the patient reported dyspnoea, and urgent CT angiography revealed peripheral pulmonary embolism, which was managed utilizing Deltaparine. Subsequent postoperative course was uneventful, leading to his discharge on the 15th postoperative day, ambulating independently using a walker. MRI follow-up was conducted 6 months postsurgery, followed by yearly checks. At the last follow-up, 2.5 years after the second surgery, there were no signs of tumour recurrence, and the patient exhibited no gait disturbance, back pain, or radiological signs of spinal instability (Fig. 6) (ASIA score E, VAS pain score 0).

Intraoperative pictures of Th6 removal, instrumentation, and cage application.
Figure 3

Intraoperative pictures of Th6 removal, instrumentation, and cage application.

Postoperative X-ray imaging immediately after surgery; anteroposterior view (left) and lateral view (right).
Figure 4

Postoperative X-ray imaging immediately after surgery; anteroposterior view (left) and lateral view (right).

Immediate postoperative MRI showing no residual signs of thoracic spinal cord compression.
Figure 5

Immediate postoperative MRI showing no residual signs of thoracic spinal cord compression.

Final follow-up X-Ray scan and MRI imaging showing no radiological signs of spinal instability or myelopathy.
Figure 6

Final follow-up X-Ray scan and MRI imaging showing no radiological signs of spinal instability or myelopathy.

Discussion

VHs are prevalent among adults, yet only about 1% exhibit expansion (known as AVH) and symptoms such as pain, pathologic fractures, and neural compression. [1, 3]. The thoracic spine is the predilected region, a characteristic shared with our case [4, 9]. In contrast, our patient’s primary symptoms and the index operation occurred during childhood, a rarity in this context [4, 5].

Treatment options for AVH vary based on presentation and severity, with surgical decompression, with or without instrumentation, being the preferred approach in cases of neural compression [1, 4, 5, 10]. There are some recommendations on the management of VHs [7, 8, 11]. Despite most treatment options providing good outcomes, recurrence is still an issue with varying rates, depending on the treatment method [1]. The surgical strategy for AVHs remains controversial due to its rarity, with decision-making strategy for the management and the choice of surgical intervention varying dependently over the location and the extension of the tumour [6, 8, 12]. Moreover, reports on treatment strategies for recurrent AVH cases are lacking. According to Goldstein et al. [1], recurrence rates vary and cannot be predicted based on the procedure, but can be minimized by using diagnostic and classification criteria, which could help plan procedures and progress tracking.

Most authors agree that, when possible, preoperative arterial embolization should be performed to minimize blood loss during surgery [1, 2, 4, 5, 10, 13, 14], yet as a stand-alone procedure, it may only be moderately effective as a definitive treatment due to tumour recanalization [1]. The extent of resection when dealing with recurrence in revision surgery setting is questionable, whereby most authors favour piecemeal gross-resection and en bloc resection as definitive treatment options with varying amount of blood loss [1, 2, 4, 5, 10]. A modern, real-time monitoring navigation-guided methods show promise in enabling better results in reducing residual AVH while maintaining a safer and easier tumour resection [15].

Showing excellent pain control in various studies, with minimal toxicities, radiation therapy may be an acceptable treatment option in aggressive or inoperable cases and is also recommended in cases following partial resection and extensive lesions, bearing a recurrence rate as high as 30%–50% without the addition of radiotherapy after subtotal resection [12]. A combination of vertebroplasty and radiation therapy may also present a treatment alternative.

To conclude, cases of recurrent AVH are rare and subsequent treatment depends on a case-by-case consideration. In the presented case report, en bloc resection of the vertebral body was chosen to minimize the chances of renewed recurrence. Our decision has thus far demonstrated considerable clinical success; however, the adequacy of this treatment will ultimately be determined over time.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Informed consent statement

The patient provided written informed consent for his participation in the study and for his anonymized data to be published in this article.

Data availability

This manuscript presents a case report, and therefore, the data are not available publicly or upon request to protect the privacy and identity of the patient.

References

1.

Goldstein
CL
,
Varga
PP
,
Gokaslan
ZL
, et al. 
Spinal hemangiomas: results of surgical management for local recurrence and mortality in a multicenter study
.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
2015
;
40
:
656
64
. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000840.

2.

Vasudeva
VS
,
Chi
JH
,
Groff
MW
.
Surgical treatment of aggressive vertebral hemangiomas
.
Neurosurg Focus
2016
;
41
:
E7
. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.5.FOCUS16169.

3.

Iida
S
,
Kobayashi
F
,
Kawano
R
, et al. 
Thoracic spine hemangioma causing rapidly progressive myelopathy and mimicking a malignant tumor: a case report
.
Radiol Case Rep
2021
;
16
:
938
41
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2021.01.060.

4.

Brunette-Clément
T
,
Weil
AG
,
Shedid
D
.
Total en bloc spondylectomy of locally aggressive vertebral hemangioma in a pediatric patient
.
Childs Nerv Syst
2021
;
37
:
2115
20
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-020-04954-3.

5.

Cheung
NK
,
Doorenbosch
X
,
Christie
JG
.
Rapid onset aggressive vertebral haemangioma
.
Childs Nerv Syst
2011
;
27
:
469
72
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-011-1391-3.

6.

Gala
RB
,
Dhar
SB
,
Kale
SY
, et al. 
Aggressive vertebral Hemangioma causing recurring myelopathy – a rare case report and review of literature
.
J Orthop Case Rep
2021
;
11
:
19
22
. https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2021.v11.i06.2240.

7.

Maciejczak
A
,
Gasik
R
,
Kotrych
D
, et al. 
Spinal tumours: recommendations of the Polish Society of Spine Surgery, the Polish Society of Oncology, the Polish Society of Neurosurgeons, the Polish Society of Oncologic Surgery, the Polish Society of Oncologic Radiotherapy, and the Polish Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
.
Eur Spine J
2023
;
32
:
1300
25
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07546-2.

8.

Diarra
MD
,
Zhang
Z
,
Wang
Z
, et al. 
Surgical options for aggressive vertebral hemangiomas:a case series, literature review and treatment recommendations
.
J Bone Oncol
2023
;
43
:100515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2023.100515.

9.

Guna Pratheep
K
,
Shetty
AP
,
Sri Vijay Anand
KS
, et al. 
In vertebral hemangiomas with neurological deficit, is a less extensive approach adequate
.
Asian Spine J
2023
;
17
:
37
46
. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2021.0481.

10.

Ciftdemir
M
,
Kaya
M
,
Selcuk
E
, et al. 
Tumors of the spine
.
World J Orthop
2016
;
7
:
109
16
. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v7.i2.109.

11.

Subramaniam
MH
,
Moirangthem
V
,
Venkatesan
M
.
Management of aggressive vertebral haemangioma and assessment of differentiating pointers between aggressive vertebral haemangioma and metastases – a systematic review
.
Global Spine J
2023
;
13
:
1120
33
. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682221137026.

12.

Sharma
S
,
Kamal
R
,
Rathi
AK
.
Vertebral hemangioma — the current radiation therapy perspective
.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother
2023
;
28
:
93
101
. https://doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2023.0009.

13.

Ogawa
R
,
Hikata
T
,
Mikami
S
, et al. 
Total en bloc spondylectomy for locally aggressive vertebral hemangioma causing neurological deficits
.
Case Rep Orthop
2015
;
2015
:
1
7
. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/724364.

14.

Zafeiris
CP
,
Lewkonia
P
,
Jacobs
WB
.
Atypical vertebral hemangioma: an aggressive form of a benign disease. Case report and literature review
.
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact
2021
;
21
:
317
21
.

15.

Nagashima
Y
,
Nishimura
Y
,
Haimoto
S
, et al. 
Piecemeal resection of aggressive vertebral hemangioma using real-time navigation-guided drilling technique
.
Nagoya J Med Sci
2021
;
83
:
861
8
. https://doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.83.4.861.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.