Abstract

Auditory processing is initiated within the primary auditory cortex, concealed within the sylvian fissure bilaterally on a collection of gyri described as Heschl’s Gyrus (HG). Glial neoplasms localized to or involving HG are rare. The main symptoms of these tumours are complex partial seizures characterized by auditory features. Here, we describe an unusual case of bilateral tinnitus and hemi-paraesthesia associated with a HG diffuse astrocytoma. Bilateral tinnitus secondary to intrinsic brain tumours is atypical. Bilateral tinnitus is frequently observed in patients with noise-induced hearing loss, presbycusis, ototoxic medication, and metabolic and psychiatric disease. In the case we present, the synchronous sensory and auditory symptoms are likely due to seizure activity affecting the primary auditory and somatosensory cortex. In a patient presenting with chronic, bilateral tinnitus with no known underlying otologic disease which is associated with hemi-body paraesthesia, we would advocate for consideration of brain imaging to exclude pathology in HG.

Introduction

Auditory processing is initiated within the primary auditory cortex (PAC), concealed within the Sylvian fissure bilaterally on a collection of gyri described as Heschl’s Gyrus (HG). The PAC occupies the posteromedial two-thirds of HG, while plan temporale and superior temporal gyrus constitute areas of the secondary auditory association cortex [1, 2]. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have revealed that neurological activity within HG contributes to the development of tinnitus, which describes the perception of a continuous or intermittent sound in the absence of a corresponding external acoustic stimulus [3].

Intrinsic brain tumours localized to or involving HG are rare. The main symptoms of these lesions are complex partial seizures, characterized by auditory features, with or without secondary generalization. While unilateral tinnitus has been described in this setting, bilateral tinnitus is less typical.

Here, we describe an unusual case of bilateral tinnitus and hemi-paraesthesia associated with a HG diffuse astrocytoma.

Case report

A 32-year-old right-handed male, an apprentice mechanical engineer without any comorbidity, experienced an episode of concurrent bilateral tinnitus and left hemi-body paraesthesia involving the face, arm, and leg. He described the tinnitus as a ‘high pitched buzzing sound’ and the paraesthesia as ‘numbness’ which started in the face and expanded to the extremities. The patient denied any headache or associated confusion and there were no other otologic symptoms, olfactory perceptions, nausea, vomiting, limb weakness, hypoesthesia, photophobia, or phonophobia. The patient went to Accident and Emergency as he was concerned about a stroke, but they identified no deficit.

These episodes of synchronous bilateral tinnitus and left hemi-body paraesthesia continued to occur intermittently, on average two to three times a week, and were most pronounced in the morning. The episodes were sudden onset and offset, lasting a few seconds in duration. He continued to deny other otologic and neurological symptoms.

Neurological and cranial nerve examination were normal. The patient’s hearing tests were also normal.

In light of the persistent synchronous symptoms, imaging was obtained. An MRI head revealed a non-enhancing, T1-hyperintense lesion within the HG in the right cerebral hemisphere (Fig. 1), extending into the insular cortex. A Stealth guided burrhole biopsy of the right temporal lobe was performed. Pathological analysis revealed a Grade II diffuse astrocytoma.

Mass lesion occupying the HG on the right temporal gyrus on (A) axial post-contrast T1 - (B) axial non-contrast T1- (C + D) T1-weighted sagittal and coronal FLAIR MRIs, respectively.
Figure 1

Mass lesion occupying the HG on the right temporal gyrus on (A) axial post-contrast T1 - (B) axial non-contrast T1- (C + D) T1-weighted sagittal and coronal FLAIR MRIs, respectively.

The patient received a course of 500 mg Levetiracetam which resolved the tinnitus and paraesthesia.

Discussion

Tinnitus is characteristically described as buzzing, clicking, or pulsating [4]. It is a prevalent symptom, with a prevalence up to 37.2%, and has significant implications on quality of life [5]. Various metrics are used to classify tinnitus (Table 1).

Table 1

Tinnitus descriptions.

Type of TinnitusDescription
SubjectiveTinnitus only experienced by affected individual
ObjectiveObserver can hear the sounds as well
PulsatileSound corresponds with heart pulsations
UnilateralSound perceived only in one ear
BilateralSound perceived in both ears
PrimaryIdiopathic aetiology
SecondaryUnderlying aetiology associated
AcutePresent for <6 months
ChronicPresent for >6 months
PeripheralAbnormal neural activity at cochlear nerve level
CentralAbnormal neural activity in auditory centres
Type of TinnitusDescription
SubjectiveTinnitus only experienced by affected individual
ObjectiveObserver can hear the sounds as well
PulsatileSound corresponds with heart pulsations
UnilateralSound perceived only in one ear
BilateralSound perceived in both ears
PrimaryIdiopathic aetiology
SecondaryUnderlying aetiology associated
AcutePresent for <6 months
ChronicPresent for >6 months
PeripheralAbnormal neural activity at cochlear nerve level
CentralAbnormal neural activity in auditory centres
Table 1

Tinnitus descriptions.

Type of TinnitusDescription
SubjectiveTinnitus only experienced by affected individual
ObjectiveObserver can hear the sounds as well
PulsatileSound corresponds with heart pulsations
UnilateralSound perceived only in one ear
BilateralSound perceived in both ears
PrimaryIdiopathic aetiology
SecondaryUnderlying aetiology associated
AcutePresent for <6 months
ChronicPresent for >6 months
PeripheralAbnormal neural activity at cochlear nerve level
CentralAbnormal neural activity in auditory centres
Type of TinnitusDescription
SubjectiveTinnitus only experienced by affected individual
ObjectiveObserver can hear the sounds as well
PulsatileSound corresponds with heart pulsations
UnilateralSound perceived only in one ear
BilateralSound perceived in both ears
PrimaryIdiopathic aetiology
SecondaryUnderlying aetiology associated
AcutePresent for <6 months
ChronicPresent for >6 months
PeripheralAbnormal neural activity at cochlear nerve level
CentralAbnormal neural activity in auditory centres

Population-based data indicate that noise-induced hearing loss represents the most prevalent risk factor for tinnitus [6, 7]. While risk factors have been identified, the pathophysiology of tinnitus remains elusive. A commonly referenced model suggests that tinnitus occurs in response to neuroplastic changes in central auditory structures secondary to cochlear pathology. In neoplastic disease, particularly cerebellopontine angle tumours, tinnitus may be observed due to the mass effect on the vestibulocochlear nerve [8, 9].

Glioma’s localized to or involving HG are rare, only limited to few case reports in the English literature. Russel and Golfinos describe two patients who experienced piercing and muffled sounds preceding episodes of generalized seizures [10]. Like our case, biopsy samples revealed a low-grade astrocytoma involving the HG. They also discuss another case of auditory episodes characterized by a loud piercing beep associated with an astrocytoma of HG. In another study, Silbergeld [11] describes a patient with a low-grade astrocytoma involving HG who experienced a generalized tonic–clonic seizure which was preceded by ringing in the contralateral ear. Similarly, Benzagmout et al. discuss a patient who experienced auditory seizures secondary to a glioma involving the PAC [12]. Like our case, the symptoms resolved with anticonvulsant medication. In other work, Yamamoto and colleagues report a patient with a superior temporal lobe anaplastic astrocytoma involving HG, which presented as generalized seizures and cognitive decline [13].

Bilateral tinnitus associated with lesions involving HG, as presented in this case, is unusual. Bilateral tinnitus is frequently observed in patients with noise-induced hearing loss, presbycusis, head trauma, ototoxic medication, and metabolic and psychiatric disease [8]. In the case we present, the synchronous sensory and auditory symptoms are likely due to seizure activity affecting the primary auditory and somatosensory cortex given the response to the anticonvulsant medication. Invasion of limbic structures, including the amygdala and hippocampus, may explain why insular and temporal LGG initially manifest as complex partial seizures [14]. However, it remains difficult to fully ascertain seizure activity as electroencephalography was not obtained. Tumour-induced hypoperfusion of the primary auditory and somatosensory cortex may also be contributing to the development of the symptoms.

Conclusion

Lesions localized to or involving HG may present with auditory features, including bilateral tinnitus. In a patient presenting with chronic, bilateral tinnitus with no known underlying otologic disease which is associated with hemi-body paraesthesia, we would advocate for consideration of brain imaging to exclude pathology in HG.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for this research.

Informed consent

Written informed consent for the paper to be published was obtained from the patient.

References

1.

Fernández
L
,
Velásquez
C
,
Porrero
J
, et al. 
Heschl’s gyrus fiber intersection area: a new insight on the connectivity of the auditory-language hub
.
Neurosurg Focus
2020
;
48
:
7
.

2.

Rademacher
J
,
Caviness
V
,
Galaburda
A
.
Topographical variation of the human primary brain cortices: implications for neuroimaging, brain mapping, and neurobiology
.
Cereb Cortex
1993
;
3
:
313
29
.

3.

Zenke
J
,
Rahman
S
,
Guo
Q
, et al. 
Central processing in tinnitus: fMRI study outlining patterns of activation using an auditory discrimination task in normal versus tinnitus patients
.
Otol Neurotol
2021
;
42
:
1170
80
.

4.

Baguley
D
,
McFerran
D
,
Hall
D
.
Tinnitus
.
Lancet
2013
;
382
:
1600
7
.

5.

Jarach
CM
,
Lugo
A
,
Scala
M
, et al. 
Global prevalence and incidence of tinnitus
.
JAMA Neurol
2022
;
79
:
888
900
.

6.

Lockwood
AH
,
Salvi
RJ
,
Burkard
RF
.
Tinnitus
.
N Engl J Med
2002
;
347
:
904
10
.

7.

Tang
D
,
Li
H
,
Chen
L
.
Advances in understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of tinnitus
.
Adv Exp Med Biol
2019
;
1130
:
109
28
.

8.

Makar
S
.
Etiology and pathophysiology of tinnitus – a systematic review
.
Int Tinnitus J
2021
;
25
:
76
86
.

9.

Shulman
A
,
Wang
W
,
Luo
H
, et al. 
Neuroinflammation and tinnitus
.
Curr Top Behav Neurosci
2021
;
51
:
161
74
.

10.

Russel
S
,
Golfinos
J
.
Amusia following resection of a Heschls gyrus glioma
.
J Neurosurg
2003
;
98
:
1109
12
. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2003.98.5.1109.

11.

Silbergeld
D
.
Tumours of Heschl’s gyrus: report of two cases
.
Neurosurgery
1997
;
40
:
389
92
.

12.

Benzagmout
M
,
Chaoui
M
,
Duffau
H
.
Reversible defict affecting the perception of tone of human voice after tumour resection from the right auditory cortex
.
Acta Neurochir
2008
;
150
:
589
93
.

13.

Yamamoto
AK
,
Sanjuan
A
,
Pope
R
, et al. 
The effect of right temporal lobe gliomas on left and right hemisphere neural processing during speech perception and production tasks
.
Front Hum Neurosci
2022
;
16
:
803163
.

14.

Kemerdere
R
,
Yuksel
O
,
Kacira
T
, et al. 
Low-grade temporal gliomas: surgical strategy and long-term seizure outcome
.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg
2014
;
126
:
196
200
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.