Abstract

Plasmacytoma is a rare plasma cell neoplasm. Whether solitary or associated with multiple myeloma (MM), it rarely involves the skull base, particularly the sphenoid bone. We present a unique case of sphenoid bone plasmacytoma secondary to MM, highlighting diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. A 56-year-old female presented with headaches, vomiting, epistaxis, and cranial nerve deficits. Cerebral imaging revealed a 65-mm tumor infiltrating the sphenoid bone and adjacent structures. Subtotal resection was performed using an endoscopic nasal approach. Histopathology revealed plasmacytoma, and diagnostic workup confirmed MM. By the end of biological exploration, relapse of the sphenoid plasmacytoma was observed, and the patient was successfully treated with radiotherapy, immunochemotherapy, and autologous stem cell transplantation. After 18-month follow-up, sustained complete remission was confirmed. Although rare, the diagnosis of plasmacytoma should be considered in cases of skull base tumors. This localization is highly predictive of MM, warranting comprehensive investigations to initiate prompt and adequate management.

Introduction

Plasmacytoma is a rare neoplasm characterized by the localized proliferation of a single clone of plasma cells. It may be solitary or associated with multiple myeloma (MM), eventually being its initial presentation. Whether originating from bone or soft tissue, intracranial involvement of plasmacytoma is an unusual phenomenon, particularly at the skull base [1].

Clinical and radiological differentiation from other regional tumors is often challenging, potentially leading to misdiagnosis. Given the notable differences in therapeutic strategies and outcomes, timely recognition of plasmacytoma is of utmost importance.

Here, we present an illustrative case of a patient with multiple cranial nerve deficits and signs of increased intracranial pressure revealing a skull base sphenoid bone plasmacytoma (BP), secondary to MM. This case highlights the complexity involved in diagnosing and managing such patients.

Case report

A 56-year-old female patient, presented with a 2-week history of moderate headaches, intermittent vomiting, epistaxis, and blurred vision. Physical examination revealed decreased visual acuity (5/10 left eye, 7/10 right eye) and bilateral papilledema, with left peripheral facial palsy and trigeminal hypoesthesia.

Cerebral computed tomography (CT) revealed a 65-mm hyperdense tumor invading the sphenoid bone and sinus, and eroding the adjacent skull base and clivus. On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the tumor appeared isointense on T1 and hypointense on T2-weighted images, showing mild heterogeneous enhancement after gadolinium injection. Local compression and extension to the left cavernous sinus, internal carotid artery, and optic chiasm were observed (Fig. 1).

Cerebral MRI (axial views) showing a 65-mm lesion centered on the sphenoid bone (red arrow) with extension to the internal carotid artery (blue arrow), demonstrating iso-intensity with mild heterogeneous enhancement on T1-weighted (a, b) and hypo-intensity on T2-weighted (c).
Figure 1

Cerebral MRI (axial views) showing a 65-mm lesion centered on the sphenoid bone (red arrow) with extension to the internal carotid artery (blue arrow), demonstrating iso-intensity with mild heterogeneous enhancement on T1-weighted (a, b) and hypo-intensity on T2-weighted (c).

The patient underwent an endoscopic endonasal approach for debulking and cranial nerve decompression, which revealed a relatively soft, multilayered, reddish tumor, with moderate bleeding. Per-operative frozen section analysis was inconclusive. Resection was conducted to near complete with satisfactory decompression of nervous structures, as confirmed by postoperative cerebral CT, leading to significant improvement in neurological symptoms.

Histopathological examination revealed monoclonal proliferation of dystrophic plasma cells, thereby identifying plasmacytoma (Fig. 2). Serum protein immunoelectrophoresis showed a narrow peak in gammaglobulins (15 g/l) with a monoclonal IgG kappa band. Serum free light chain (sFLC) kappa was elevated at 299 mg/L, with lambda at 78 mg/l, and a K/L ratio of 3.8. Bone marrow aspiration did not reveal abnormal plasma cells or high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. Bence–Jones proteinuria was negative. Diffuse osteolytic lesions were visualized in the spine. There was no associated anemia, hypercalcemia, or renal failure. Albumin, beta-2-microglobulin, and lactate dehydrogenase levels were normal. Subsequently, the patient was diagnosed with stage I IgG kappa MM.

Histology section showing diffuse dystrophic plasma cells predominantly mature (left), with positive CD138 staining on immunohistochemistry (right).
Figure 2

Histology section showing diffuse dystrophic plasma cells predominantly mature (left), with positive CD138 staining on immunohistochemistry (right).

By the end of biological exploration, the patient reported a recurrence of headaches and blurred vision, 2 months after surgical decompression. Cerebral MRI revealed a relapse of the sphenoid plasmacytoma, measuring 70 mm (Fig. 3). Given the pathological diagnostic result, surgical re-intervention was not decided. Instead, the patient was treated with external beam radiotherapy (RTX) focused on the sphenoid bone (30 Gy), followed by immunochemotherapy with zoledronic acid. After 6 months, complete response was noted with the resolution of symptoms, disappearance of the monoclonal band, normalization of sFLC, and persistence of lytic sequelae on cerebral MRI (Fig. 4). Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was successfully performed, and the patient was put under treatment maintenance. After 18 months of follow-up, clinical, biological, and radiological evaluation confirmed sustained complete remission.

Cerebral MRI (axial views) showing a relapse of the sphenoid BP measuring 70 mm (a, b: T1 weighted post-gadolinium; c: T2 weighted).
Figure 3

Cerebral MRI (axial views) showing a relapse of the sphenoid BP measuring 70 mm (a, b: T1 weighted post-gadolinium; c: T2 weighted).

Control cerebral MRI (axial views) showing the disappearance of the sphenoid BP after treatment with RTX and immunochemotherapy. (a: T1-weighted; b: T2-weighted).
Figure 4

Control cerebral MRI (axial views) showing the disappearance of the sphenoid BP after treatment with RTX and immunochemotherapy. (a: T1-weighted; b: T2-weighted).

Discussion

We report the case of a 56-year-old female patient who presented with headaches, intermittent vomiting, epistaxis, and multiple cranial nerve deficits attributed to a sphenoid bone mass. Surgical resection was performed, and histological examination identified a plasmacytoma secondary to IgG kappa MM. Following relapse, the initiation of RTX, immunochemotherapy, and ASCT enabled sustained clinical remission.

Plasma neoplasms are a group of hematological disorders defined by the clonal proliferation of plasma cells [2]. Plasmacytoma, the localized form (<4%), originates from osseous/intramedullary sites, called “BP,” or from non-osseous/extramedullary sites, called “extramedullary plasmacytoma” (EMP) [3]. BP is more frequent (70%), mainly involving the spine (30%–40%) and long bones (20%–40%) [4, 5]. However, intracranial involvement is uncommon, especially at the skull base. Only 14 cases of sphenoid plasmacytoma were reported, two associated with MM (Table 1) [1].

Table 1

Summary of sphenoid plasmacytoma cases from the literature.

Case n°Authors  
(year)
SexAge  
(years)
SymptomsPrimary sitePCNTreatmentEvolution (months)
1Losa et al. [18] (1992)F50DiplopiaSphenoid sinusSPResection + RTXLC
2Marais et al. [19] (1992)M64Headaches, diplopiaSphenoid sinusSPRTXLC (18)
3Bindal et al. [20] (1995)F51DiplopiaSphenoid +clivusSPResection + RTXLC (96)
4Miller et al. [21] (1998)M47HeadachesSphenoid sinusSPRTXLC (62)
5Mandagere et al. [22] (1998)F53Headaches, blurry visionSphenoidSPRTXLC (84)
6Wein et al. [23] (2002)M48Headaches, epistaxisSphenoid sinus +clivusMMRTX + CTXER
7Akhaddar et al. [24] (2008)M83Headaches, diplopiaSphenoidMMRTX + CTXND
8Lakhdar et al. [25] (2008)F62Headaches, diplopia, anosmiaSphenoidSPRTXLC (12)
9Park et al. [26]
(2009)
M32DiplopiaSphenoidSPResection + RTXLC (8)
10Siyag et al. [27] (2018)M41Headaches, diplopia, strabismusSphenoid +clivusSPRTXLC (3)
11Loong et al. [28] (2019)F43Headaches, diplopiaSphenoidSPRTXND
12Sharifi et al. [29] (2022)F62Headaches, ptosis, visual lossSphenoidSPResection + RTXLC (6)
13Ampil et al. [30] (2022)M63Headaches, diplopiaSphenoid sinusSPResection + RTX + CTXLC (3)
14Mansouri et al. [31] (2023)F51Headaches, diplopia, visual loss, epistaxisSphenoid +clivusSPRTXLC (12)
Our caseF56Headaches, vomiting, blurry vision, epistaxisSphenoid + clivusMMResection + RTX + CTX + ASCTCR (18)
Case n°Authors  
(year)
SexAge  
(years)
SymptomsPrimary sitePCNTreatmentEvolution (months)
1Losa et al. [18] (1992)F50DiplopiaSphenoid sinusSPResection + RTXLC
2Marais et al. [19] (1992)M64Headaches, diplopiaSphenoid sinusSPRTXLC (18)
3Bindal et al. [20] (1995)F51DiplopiaSphenoid +clivusSPResection + RTXLC (96)
4Miller et al. [21] (1998)M47HeadachesSphenoid sinusSPRTXLC (62)
5Mandagere et al. [22] (1998)F53Headaches, blurry visionSphenoidSPRTXLC (84)
6Wein et al. [23] (2002)M48Headaches, epistaxisSphenoid sinus +clivusMMRTX + CTXER
7Akhaddar et al. [24] (2008)M83Headaches, diplopiaSphenoidMMRTX + CTXND
8Lakhdar et al. [25] (2008)F62Headaches, diplopia, anosmiaSphenoidSPRTXLC (12)
9Park et al. [26]
(2009)
M32DiplopiaSphenoidSPResection + RTXLC (8)
10Siyag et al. [27] (2018)M41Headaches, diplopia, strabismusSphenoid +clivusSPRTXLC (3)
11Loong et al. [28] (2019)F43Headaches, diplopiaSphenoidSPRTXND
12Sharifi et al. [29] (2022)F62Headaches, ptosis, visual lossSphenoidSPResection + RTXLC (6)
13Ampil et al. [30] (2022)M63Headaches, diplopiaSphenoid sinusSPResection + RTX + CTXLC (3)
14Mansouri et al. [31] (2023)F51Headaches, diplopia, visual loss, epistaxisSphenoid +clivusSPRTXLC (12)
Our caseF56Headaches, vomiting, blurry vision, epistaxisSphenoid + clivusMMResection + RTX + CTX + ASCTCR (18)

PCN: plasma cell neoplasm; M: male; F: female; MM: multiple myeloma; SP: solitary plasmacytoma; RTX: radiotherapy; CTX: chemotherapy; CR: complete remission; LC: local control; ER: early response; ND: non-documented.

Table 1

Summary of sphenoid plasmacytoma cases from the literature.

Case n°Authors  
(year)
SexAge  
(years)
SymptomsPrimary sitePCNTreatmentEvolution (months)
1Losa et al. [18] (1992)F50DiplopiaSphenoid sinusSPResection + RTXLC
2Marais et al. [19] (1992)M64Headaches, diplopiaSphenoid sinusSPRTXLC (18)
3Bindal et al. [20] (1995)F51DiplopiaSphenoid +clivusSPResection + RTXLC (96)
4Miller et al. [21] (1998)M47HeadachesSphenoid sinusSPRTXLC (62)
5Mandagere et al. [22] (1998)F53Headaches, blurry visionSphenoidSPRTXLC (84)
6Wein et al. [23] (2002)M48Headaches, epistaxisSphenoid sinus +clivusMMRTX + CTXER
7Akhaddar et al. [24] (2008)M83Headaches, diplopiaSphenoidMMRTX + CTXND
8Lakhdar et al. [25] (2008)F62Headaches, diplopia, anosmiaSphenoidSPRTXLC (12)
9Park et al. [26]
(2009)
M32DiplopiaSphenoidSPResection + RTXLC (8)
10Siyag et al. [27] (2018)M41Headaches, diplopia, strabismusSphenoid +clivusSPRTXLC (3)
11Loong et al. [28] (2019)F43Headaches, diplopiaSphenoidSPRTXND
12Sharifi et al. [29] (2022)F62Headaches, ptosis, visual lossSphenoidSPResection + RTXLC (6)
13Ampil et al. [30] (2022)M63Headaches, diplopiaSphenoid sinusSPResection + RTX + CTXLC (3)
14Mansouri et al. [31] (2023)F51Headaches, diplopia, visual loss, epistaxisSphenoid +clivusSPRTXLC (12)
Our caseF56Headaches, vomiting, blurry vision, epistaxisSphenoid + clivusMMResection + RTX + CTX + ASCTCR (18)
Case n°Authors  
(year)
SexAge  
(years)
SymptomsPrimary sitePCNTreatmentEvolution (months)
1Losa et al. [18] (1992)F50DiplopiaSphenoid sinusSPResection + RTXLC
2Marais et al. [19] (1992)M64Headaches, diplopiaSphenoid sinusSPRTXLC (18)
3Bindal et al. [20] (1995)F51DiplopiaSphenoid +clivusSPResection + RTXLC (96)
4Miller et al. [21] (1998)M47HeadachesSphenoid sinusSPRTXLC (62)
5Mandagere et al. [22] (1998)F53Headaches, blurry visionSphenoidSPRTXLC (84)
6Wein et al. [23] (2002)M48Headaches, epistaxisSphenoid sinus +clivusMMRTX + CTXER
7Akhaddar et al. [24] (2008)M83Headaches, diplopiaSphenoidMMRTX + CTXND
8Lakhdar et al. [25] (2008)F62Headaches, diplopia, anosmiaSphenoidSPRTXLC (12)
9Park et al. [26]
(2009)
M32DiplopiaSphenoidSPResection + RTXLC (8)
10Siyag et al. [27] (2018)M41Headaches, diplopia, strabismusSphenoid +clivusSPRTXLC (3)
11Loong et al. [28] (2019)F43Headaches, diplopiaSphenoidSPRTXND
12Sharifi et al. [29] (2022)F62Headaches, ptosis, visual lossSphenoidSPResection + RTXLC (6)
13Ampil et al. [30] (2022)M63Headaches, diplopiaSphenoid sinusSPResection + RTX + CTXLC (3)
14Mansouri et al. [31] (2023)F51Headaches, diplopia, visual loss, epistaxisSphenoid +clivusSPRTXLC (12)
Our caseF56Headaches, vomiting, blurry vision, epistaxisSphenoid + clivusMMResection + RTX + CTX + ASCTCR (18)

PCN: plasma cell neoplasm; M: male; F: female; MM: multiple myeloma; SP: solitary plasmacytoma; RTX: radiotherapy; CTX: chemotherapy; CR: complete remission; LC: local control; ER: early response; ND: non-documented.

BP typically manifests with variable mass effect, pain, and infiltrative behavior [6]. When located at the skull, it may grow asymptomatic, only manifesting when reaching large sizes and infiltrating neural elements, as was observed in our case [7]. The patient presented multiple cranial nerve deficits mainly attributed to a direct compressive effect. These findings are usually present in tumors involving the sphenoid bone, petrous bone, and cavernous sinus [5].

Radiologically, BP appears as a well-circumscribed mass on CT scan, often associated with lytic lesions and infiltration of adjacent structures. On MRI, discrete heterogeneity is generally observed, with iso to hyperintensity on T1 and iso to hypointensity on T2-weighted images, and mild to vivid homogeneous contrast enhancement [8, 9]. Yet, these radiological findings are not specific to plasmacytoma and may be difficult to differentiate from other regional tumors (chordoma, chondroma, carcinomas, etc.) [10].

The diagnosis of plasmacytoma is established on immunohistological examination showing diffuse infiltration by monoclonal dystrophic plasma cells. Serum and urine immunoelectrophoresis must be performed to detect monoclonal protein [11]. To differentiate solitary plasmacytoma (SP; Table 2) from MM, bone marrow involvement and organ damage evidence that can be attributed to MM, including additional sites of bone lesions, must be investigated (Table 3) [12, 13]. If MM is confirmed, risk stratification is needed to further guide management (Table 4).

Table 2

International Myeloma Working Group diagnostic criteria for SP [12].

All four criteria must be met
– Biopsy-proven solitary lesion of bone or soft tissue with evidence of clonal plasma cells
– Normal bone marrow with no evidence of clonal plasma cells
– Normal skeletal survey and MRI (or CT) of spine and pelvis (except for the primary solitary lesion)
– Absence of end-organ damage such as hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, or bone lesions (CRAB) that can be attributed to a lympho-plasma cell proliferative disorder
All four criteria must be met
– Biopsy-proven solitary lesion of bone or soft tissue with evidence of clonal plasma cells
– Normal bone marrow with no evidence of clonal plasma cells
– Normal skeletal survey and MRI (or CT) of spine and pelvis (except for the primary solitary lesion)
– Absence of end-organ damage such as hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, or bone lesions (CRAB) that can be attributed to a lympho-plasma cell proliferative disorder
Table 2

International Myeloma Working Group diagnostic criteria for SP [12].

All four criteria must be met
– Biopsy-proven solitary lesion of bone or soft tissue with evidence of clonal plasma cells
– Normal bone marrow with no evidence of clonal plasma cells
– Normal skeletal survey and MRI (or CT) of spine and pelvis (except for the primary solitary lesion)
– Absence of end-organ damage such as hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, or bone lesions (CRAB) that can be attributed to a lympho-plasma cell proliferative disorder
All four criteria must be met
– Biopsy-proven solitary lesion of bone or soft tissue with evidence of clonal plasma cells
– Normal bone marrow with no evidence of clonal plasma cells
– Normal skeletal survey and MRI (or CT) of spine and pelvis (except for the primary solitary lesion)
– Absence of end-organ damage such as hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, or bone lesions (CRAB) that can be attributed to a lympho-plasma cell proliferative disorder
Table 3

International Myeloma Working Group diagnostic criteria for MM [12].

Both criteria must be met:
– Clonal bone marrow plasma cells ≥10% or biopsy-proven bony or EMP
– Any one or more of the following myeloma-defining events:
  • ➢ Evidence of end-organ damage that can be attributed to the underlying plasma cell proliferative disorder:

    • Hypercalcemia: Ca  > 0.25 mmol/L (>1 mg/dL) higher than the upper limit of normal or Ca > 2.75 mmol/L (>11 mg/dL)

    • Renal insufficiency: creatinine clearance <40 mL per minute or serum creatinine >177 μmol/L (>2 mg/dL)

    • Anemia: Hb >2 g/dL below the lower limit of normal, or a Hb < 10 g/dL

    • Bone lesions: one or more osteolytic lesions on skeletal radiography, CT, PET-CT

  • ➢ Clonal bone marrow plasma cell percentage ≥ 60%

  • ➢ Involved/uninvolved sFLC ratio ≥ 100 (involved FLC level must be ≥100 mg/L)

  • ➢ >1 focal lesion on MRI studies (at least 5 mm in size)

Both criteria must be met:
– Clonal bone marrow plasma cells ≥10% or biopsy-proven bony or EMP
– Any one or more of the following myeloma-defining events:
  • ➢ Evidence of end-organ damage that can be attributed to the underlying plasma cell proliferative disorder:

    • Hypercalcemia: Ca  > 0.25 mmol/L (>1 mg/dL) higher than the upper limit of normal or Ca > 2.75 mmol/L (>11 mg/dL)

    • Renal insufficiency: creatinine clearance <40 mL per minute or serum creatinine >177 μmol/L (>2 mg/dL)

    • Anemia: Hb >2 g/dL below the lower limit of normal, or a Hb < 10 g/dL

    • Bone lesions: one or more osteolytic lesions on skeletal radiography, CT, PET-CT

  • ➢ Clonal bone marrow plasma cell percentage ≥ 60%

  • ➢ Involved/uninvolved sFLC ratio ≥ 100 (involved FLC level must be ≥100 mg/L)

  • ➢ >1 focal lesion on MRI studies (at least 5 mm in size)

Abbreviations: Ca: serum calcium; Hb: hemoglobin; PET-CT: positron emission tomography-CT; FLC: free light chains; sFLC: serum free light chains.

Table 3

International Myeloma Working Group diagnostic criteria for MM [12].

Both criteria must be met:
– Clonal bone marrow plasma cells ≥10% or biopsy-proven bony or EMP
– Any one or more of the following myeloma-defining events:
  • ➢ Evidence of end-organ damage that can be attributed to the underlying plasma cell proliferative disorder:

    • Hypercalcemia: Ca  > 0.25 mmol/L (>1 mg/dL) higher than the upper limit of normal or Ca > 2.75 mmol/L (>11 mg/dL)

    • Renal insufficiency: creatinine clearance <40 mL per minute or serum creatinine >177 μmol/L (>2 mg/dL)

    • Anemia: Hb >2 g/dL below the lower limit of normal, or a Hb < 10 g/dL

    • Bone lesions: one or more osteolytic lesions on skeletal radiography, CT, PET-CT

  • ➢ Clonal bone marrow plasma cell percentage ≥ 60%

  • ➢ Involved/uninvolved sFLC ratio ≥ 100 (involved FLC level must be ≥100 mg/L)

  • ➢ >1 focal lesion on MRI studies (at least 5 mm in size)

Both criteria must be met:
– Clonal bone marrow plasma cells ≥10% or biopsy-proven bony or EMP
– Any one or more of the following myeloma-defining events:
  • ➢ Evidence of end-organ damage that can be attributed to the underlying plasma cell proliferative disorder:

    • Hypercalcemia: Ca  > 0.25 mmol/L (>1 mg/dL) higher than the upper limit of normal or Ca > 2.75 mmol/L (>11 mg/dL)

    • Renal insufficiency: creatinine clearance <40 mL per minute or serum creatinine >177 μmol/L (>2 mg/dL)

    • Anemia: Hb >2 g/dL below the lower limit of normal, or a Hb < 10 g/dL

    • Bone lesions: one or more osteolytic lesions on skeletal radiography, CT, PET-CT

  • ➢ Clonal bone marrow plasma cell percentage ≥ 60%

  • ➢ Involved/uninvolved sFLC ratio ≥ 100 (involved FLC level must be ≥100 mg/L)

  • ➢ >1 focal lesion on MRI studies (at least 5 mm in size)

Abbreviations: Ca: serum calcium; Hb: hemoglobin; PET-CT: positron emission tomography-CT; FLC: free light chains; sFLC: serum free light chains.

Table 4

Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) for MM [32].

StagesCriteria
Stage IAll the following:
  • Serum albumin 3.5 mg/dl

  • Serum beta-2-microglobulin <3.5 mg/dl

  • No high-risk cytogenetics

  • Normal serum lactate dehydrogenase level

Stage IINot fitting Stage I or III
Stage IIIBoth of the following:
  • Serum beta-2-microglobulin >5.5 mg/l

  • High risk cytogenetics [t(4;14), t(14;16), or del(17p)] OR elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase level

StagesCriteria
Stage IAll the following:
  • Serum albumin 3.5 mg/dl

  • Serum beta-2-microglobulin <3.5 mg/dl

  • No high-risk cytogenetics

  • Normal serum lactate dehydrogenase level

Stage IINot fitting Stage I or III
Stage IIIBoth of the following:
  • Serum beta-2-microglobulin >5.5 mg/l

  • High risk cytogenetics [t(4;14), t(14;16), or del(17p)] OR elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase level

Abbreviations: t: translocation; del: deletion.

Table 4

Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) for MM [32].

StagesCriteria
Stage IAll the following:
  • Serum albumin 3.5 mg/dl

  • Serum beta-2-microglobulin <3.5 mg/dl

  • No high-risk cytogenetics

  • Normal serum lactate dehydrogenase level

Stage IINot fitting Stage I or III
Stage IIIBoth of the following:
  • Serum beta-2-microglobulin >5.5 mg/l

  • High risk cytogenetics [t(4;14), t(14;16), or del(17p)] OR elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase level

StagesCriteria
Stage IAll the following:
  • Serum albumin 3.5 mg/dl

  • Serum beta-2-microglobulin <3.5 mg/dl

  • No high-risk cytogenetics

  • Normal serum lactate dehydrogenase level

Stage IINot fitting Stage I or III
Stage IIIBoth of the following:
  • Serum beta-2-microglobulin >5.5 mg/l

  • High risk cytogenetics [t(4;14), t(14;16), or del(17p)] OR elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase level

Abbreviations: t: translocation; del: deletion.

Approximately 50% of plasmacytomas progress to MM, with a higher risk for BP (60%–70%) than EMP (10%–20%) [6]. Moreover, its localization at the skull base is highly predictive of MM. However, our case is only the third reported of sphenoid plasmacytoma related to MM. Other risk factors correlated with this progression include age over 40 years, lesion > 5 cm, high monoclonal protein level, and persistence of residual disease after treatment [14, 15].

Because plasmacytomas are highly radiosensitive, RTX represents the mainstay of management, with or without surgery [16, 17]. Lesions at the skull base may be treated by subtotal resection followed by irradiation or by irradiation alone. Immunochemotherapy, with ASCT for eligible patients, is indicated in refractory plasmacytomas and MM [12, 13].

Although the prognosis of SP is favorable, long-term follow-up is required because of the risk of progression. The survival of patients with MM ranges from several months to more than 10 years, with a 3-year median life expectancy for skull base plasmacytomas. However, patient outcomes have drastically improved in recent decades with novel immunochemotherapy and ASCT [1, 12, 13].

Conclusion

Although rare, sphenoid BP should be considered in the differential diagnosis of skull base tumors. This localization is highly predictive of MM, which needs to be thoroughly investigated. Our patient achieved sustained complete remission following RTX, immunochemotherapy, and ASCT.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Funding

None declared.

References

1.

Liu
J
,
Shen
J
,
Liu
D
.
Case reports: central nervous system involvement in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
.
Front Neurol
 
2023
;
14
:
1072490
. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1072490.

2.

Pollard
JD
,
Young
GAR
.
Neurology and the bone marrow
.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
 
1997
;
63
:
706
17
. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.63.6.706.

3.

Bolek
TW
,
Marcus
RB
,
Mendenhall
NP
.
Solitary plasmacytoma of bone and soft tissue
.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
 
1996
;
36
:
329
33
. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(96)00334-3.

4.

Megdiche Bazarbacha
H
,
Jeribi
R
,
Zidi
MT
, et al.   
Plasmocytome de la base du crâne révélant un myélome multiple
.
J Radiol
 
2005
;
86
:
1810
2
. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0221-0363(05)81528-8.

5.

Pancholi
A
,
Raniga
S
,
Vohra
PA
, et al.   
“Imaging features of extramedullary plasmacytoma of skull base with multiple myeloma” - a rare case
.
Indian J Radiol Imaging
 
2006
;
16
:
29
32
. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.29040.

6.

Cerase
A
,
Tarantino
A
,
Gozzetti
A
, et al.   
Intracranial involvement in plasmacytomas and multiple myeloma: a pictorial essay
.
Neuroradiology
 
2008
;
50
:
665
74
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-008-0390-x.

7.

Ustuner
Z
,
Basaran
M
,
Kiris
T
, et al.   
Skull base plasmacytoma in a patient with light chain myeloma
.
Skull Base
 
2003
;
13
:
167
71
. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-43327.

8.

Agarwal
A
.
Neuroimaging of plasmacytoma
.
Neuroradiol J
 
2014
;
27
:
431
7
. https://doi.org/10.15274/NRJ-2014-10078.

9.

Grammatico
S
,
Scalzulli
E
,
Petrucci
MT
.
Solitary plasmacytoma
.
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis
 
2017
;
9
:
e2017052
. https://doi.org/10.4084/mjhid.2017.052.

10.

Higurashi
M
,
Yagishita
S
,
Fujitsu
K
, et al.   
Plasma cell myeloma of the skull base: report of two cases
.
Brain Tumor Pathol
 
2004
;
21
:
135
41
. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02482189.

11.

Dimopoulos
MA
,
Moulopoulos
LA
,
Maniatis
A
, et al.   
Solitary plasmacytoma of bone and asymptomatic multiple myeloma
.
Blood
 
2000
;
96
:
2037
44
. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V96.6.2037.

12.

Rajkumar
SV
.
Multiple myeloma: 2022 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management
.
Am J Hematol
 
2022
;
97
:
1086
107
. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26590.

13.

Cowan
AJ
,
Green
DJ
,
Kwok
M
, et al.   
Diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma: a review
.
JAMA
 
2022
;
327
:
464
77
. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.0003.

14.

Seetahal-Maraj
P
,
Knight
P
,
Ramnarine
N
.
Proptosis secondary to a solitary plasmacytoma of the sphenoid bone: a case report on a rare skull base tumor
.
Egypt J Neurosurg
 
2022
;
37
:
4
. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41984-022-00144-2.

15.

de Waal
EGM
,
Leene
M
,
Veeger
N
, et al.   
Progression of a solitary plasmacytoma to multiple myeloma. A population-based registry of the northern Netherlands
.
Br J Haematol
 
2016
;
175
:
661
7
. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.14291.

16.

Tsang
RW
,
Campbell
BA
,
Goda
JS
, et al.   
Radiation therapy for solitary plasmacytoma and multiple myeloma: guidelines from the international lymphoma radiation oncology group
.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
 
2018
;
101
:
794
808
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.009.

17.

Suh
Y-G
,
Suh
C-O
,
Kim
JS
, et al.   
Radiotherapy for solitary plasmacytoma of bone and soft tissue
.
Ann Hematol
 
2012
;
91
:
1785
93
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-012-1510-6.

18.

Losa
M
,
Terreni
MR
,
Tresoldi
M
, et al.   
Solitary plasmacytoma of the sphenoid sinus involving the pituitary fossa: a case report and review of the literature
.
Surg Neurol
 
1992
;
37
:
388
93
. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-3019(92)90010-K.

19.

Marais
J
,
Brookes
GB
,
Lee
CC
.
Solitary plasmacytoma of the skull base
.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
 
1992
;
101
:
665
8
. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348949210100807.

20.

Bindal
AK
,
Bindal
RK
,
van
 
Loveren
H
, et al.   
Management of intracranial plasmacytoma
.
J Neurosurg
 
1995
;
83
:
218
21
. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1995.83.2.0218.

21.

Miller
FR
,
Lavertu
P
,
Wanamaker
JR
, et al.   
Plasmacytomas of the head and neck
.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
 
1998
;
119
:
614
8
. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0194-5998(98)70021-X.

22.

Mandagere
KA
,
Schimke
RN
,
Kyner
JL
, et al.   
An unusual sellar mass--solitary plasmacytoma
.
Endocr Pract
 
1998
;
4
:
382
6
. https://doi.org/10.4158/EP.4.6.382.

23.

Wein
RO
,
Popat
SR
,
Doerr
TD
, et al.   
Plasma cell tumors of the skull base: four case reports and literature review
.
Skull Base
 
2002
;
12
:
077
86
. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-31570-1.

24.

Akhaddar
A
,
Belhachmi
A
,
Albouzidi
A
, et al.   
Multiple myeloma revealing by sphenoid involvement. Case Report
.
AJNS
 
2008
;
27
:
126
.

25.

Lakhdar
F
,
Arkha
Y
,
Derraz
S
, et al.   
Solitary intrasellar plasmocytoma revealed by a diplopia: a case report
.
Neurochirurgie
 
2012
;
58
:
37
9
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2011.09.002.

26.

Park
SH
,
Kim
YZ
,
Lee
EH
, et al.   
Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection of solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma in the sphenoid sinus with destruction of skull base
.
J Korean Neurosurg Soc
 
2009
;
46
:
156
60
. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2009.46.2.156.

27.

Siyag
A
,
Soni
TP
,
Gupta
AK
, et al.   
Plasmacytoma of the skull-base: a rare tumor
.
Cureus
 
10
:e2073.

28.

Loong
SP
,
Afandi
AN
,
Lum
CL
, et al.   
Solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma of the sphenoid sinus: a case report
.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
 
2019
;
71
:
1692
4
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-015-0945-1.

29.

Sharifi
S
,
Asadi
M
.
Extramedullary plasmacytoma of the sphenoid sinus presenting with visual loss: a case report
.
Clin Case Rep
 
2022
;
10
:
e05758
. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.5758.

30.

Ampil
FL
,
Borski
TG
,
Nathan
CAO
, et al.   
Cavernous sinus involvement by extramedullary plasmacytoma of the sphenoid sinus
.
Leuk Lymphoma
 
2002
;
43
:
2037
40
. https://doi.org/10.1080/1042819021000015998.

31.

Mansouri
H
,
Elouaouch
S
,
El Youssi
Z
, et al.   
Solitary plasmacytoma of the skull base: a case report and literature review
.
Radiol Case Rep
 
2023
;
18
:
3894
8
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2023.08.027.

32.

Palumbo
A
,
Avet-Loiseau
H
,
Oliva
S
, et al.   
Revised International Staging System for multiple myeloma: a report from international myeloma working group
.
J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol
 
2015
;
33
:
2863
9
. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.61.2267.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com