Abstract

Glossopharyngeal neuralgia is a rare condition characterized by pain along the distribution of the glossopharyngeal nerve. Surgical approaches via microvascular decompression represent a common treatment strategy. For this procedure, an understanding of the location of the cranial nerve and the offending vasculature is critically important. A mixed reality system was used to register patient-specific 3D models onto the patients head for operative planning and anatomical visualization. A 58-year-old female presented to neurosurgery with severe right-sided facial, tongue, and jaw pain unresponsive to multiple conservative therapies including medication. T2-weighted MRI with FIESTA sequence demonstrated right posterior inferior communicating artery compression of the right glossopharyngeal nerve entry zone. An augmented reality system was used to visualize the patients’ anatomy overlaid onto the patients’ head. A microvascular decompression of Cranial Nerves IX and X was performed via a retrosigmoid approach. Patient obtained significant relief of preoperative pain symptoms without complications.

Introduction

A detailed anatomic understanding of the spatial relationships between offending vessels and cranial nerves is critical for surgical management of glossopharyngeal neuralgia [1, 2]. In the case of glossopharyngeal neuralgia with neurovascular compression, the most common offending artery is the posterior inferior communicating artery (PICA) [3]. Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the most common surgical treatment to create separation of the nerve and offending artery [4, 5].

Surgeons rely heavily on neuroimaging to confirm structural pathology of the patient’s clinical symptoms. New imaging technology and methods of visualization have continued to improve the surgeon’s understanding and operative approach to complex cranial cases. One such technology, augmented reality, has emerged recently as a novel method for interacting with and visualizing complicated neuroanatomy in three dimensions. Augmented reality superimposes digital content, such as 3D anatomical models onto the surgeon’s real-world view. The technology allows surgeons to visualize and manipulate 3D models from different perspectives as well as overlay the 3D model with the physical patient [6–11].

Herein, we describe the use of a novel markerless AR registration technology for operative planning of MVD for glossopharyngeal neuralgia. The AR system is an ultrafast, lightweight technology that precisely superimposes patient-specific 3D anatomy onto the head. This system provides a unique means of visualizing patient-anatomy, and the rapid registration process fits seamlessly into the clinical workflow. The system has the potential to improve localization and targeting of lesions and facilitates the development of a more comprehensive and accurate operative approach. Thus, this case report serves as a case study for the application of this technology in the setting of complex skull base anatomy in the surgical context of MVD for glossopharyngeal neuralgia.

Case report

A 58-year-old female presented to neurosurgery with severe right-sided facial, tongue, and jaw pain unresponsive to multiple conservative therapies including medication. T2-weighted MRI with FIESTA sequence demonstrated right PICA compression of the right glossopharyngeal nerve entry zone (Fig. 1).

T2-weighted MRI with FIESTA sequence demonstrated right PICA compression of the right glossopharyngeal nerve entry zone demonstrating the axial and sagittal view. Arrow demonstrates location of neurovascular compression.
Figure 1

T2-weighted MRI with FIESTA sequence demonstrated right PICA compression of the right glossopharyngeal nerve entry zone demonstrating the axial and sagittal view. Arrow demonstrates location of neurovascular compression.

Augmented reality technology platform

The AR software application was developed by Hoth Intelligence (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and functions on the Microsoft Hololens 2 HMD (Redmond, Washington). The Microsoft Hololens 2 is an untethered optical see-through head-mounted display that superimposes virtual content (i.e. holograms, images, and screens) onto the users’ real-world field of view. A clinical workflow of the AR process is described in Fig. 2.

Overview of augmented reality system work flow. The process begins with segmentation of relevant anatomy followed by generation of a patient-specific 3D anatomical models. Using the headset, a surgeon registers the 3D model onto the patients’ head using a fiducial-less approach allowing for visualization of the 3D model overlaid onto the patients’ head.
Figure 2

Overview of augmented reality system work flow. The process begins with segmentation of relevant anatomy followed by generation of a patient-specific 3D anatomical models. Using the headset, a surgeon registers the 3D model onto the patients’ head using a fiducial-less approach allowing for visualization of the 3D model overlaid onto the patients’ head.

Mixed reality registration

The AR technology used for this case overlays 3D digital models of the patient’s anatomy onto the head when viewed through the headset using a rapid, markerless (fiducial-less) registration process.

Mixed reality presurgical planning

After the patient was pinned in the operative position, the physician scanned the patient’s head while wearing the headset to overlay the patient’s 3D anatomical model onto their head (Fig. 3). The system was used in the operating room to visualize anatomy as well as assist with positioning and craniotomy planning. In particular, visualization of the glossopharyngeal nerve-PICA complex overlaid on the patient’s head. This allowed the user to better appreciate the physical interaction between PICA and the glossopharyngeal nerve and was used to inform incision planning.

Representative views through the AR headset of 3D models overlaid onto the patient’s head from different perspectives. Brain (blue/orange), vasculature (red), cranial nerves (yellow), and brainstem (white).
Figure 3

Representative views through the AR headset of 3D models overlaid onto the patient’s head from different perspectives. Brain (blue/orange), vasculature (red), cranial nerves (yellow), and brainstem (white).

Operative and postoperative course

A retrosigmoid craniotomy for decompression of Cranial Nerves IX and X was performed. After opening the dura, microscopic visualization was used to open the cerebellopontine angle cistern and identify Cranial Nerves VII, IX, X, and XII. PICA was also identified. After failure to stimulate at 0.2 mA, Cranial Nerve IX was divided to visualize the root entry zone of Cranial Nerve X. Pledgets were placed between the PICA and the entry zones of Cranial Nerves IX and X before closure (Supplementary Video 1). Patient obtained significant relief of preoperative pain symptoms without complication and was discharged home with routine follow-up planned on postoperative Day 2.

Discussion

In this report, we utilized the system in an MVD operation for treatment of glossopharyngeal neuralgia. We demonstrate the unique registration capabilities of the system and its value for preoperative planning. In this case, the surgeon was able to visualize the location of underlying anatomic structures—cranial nerves, brain tissue, vasculature, and brain stem—for incision and craniotomy planning.

Although this is not a technical report, it is worth noting unique advantages of the AR system used for this case. The system uses a markerless registration process. Fiducials are not required. The surgeon simply looks at the patient’s head, and computer vision algorithms place the 3D model in the proper location. Additionally, the registration time for this case was ~10 s. As such, the system fits seamlessly into the presurgical planning workflow without causing any delays. Lastly, and perhaps most critical, is the fact that the entire system operates solely out of the Microsoft Hololens 2 headset. Additional cameras, towers, or computers are not required. Altogether, the fast, markerless registration process and small footprint of the technology make it an ideal tool for surgical planning.

Several studies have described the use of augmented reality for complex cranial cases and have highlighted the benefits such as improved learning, decreased operative time, and favorable patient outcomes [6, 8, 12–14]. In general, the ease-of-use afforded by user-friendly visualization of 3D anatomy is well established. While there are notable technology differences between the various AR systems described in the literature, it is becoming increasingly apparent that AR can be a valuable surgical tool for complex neurosurgical cases.

This case report describes the first experience of incorporating AR into the presurgical planning of an MVD for glossopharyngeal neuralgia. While we describe the notable value of the system, we did not directly compare surgeries performed with and without AR. Future studies drawing these comparisons are warranted. Here we describe the use of an augmented reality system to aid in planning an MVD for glossopharyngeal neuralgia. The system provided the care team with a heightened understanding of the patient’s anatomy, and the ability to register the 3D models with the patient’s head was felt to be valuable in positioning, pre-surgical visualization, and incision planning.

Author contributions

J.O.—concept, performed case, writing, final review of manuscript. A.T.—concept, writing, final review of manuscript. A.N.—concept, writing, final review of manuscript. M.L.—concept, performed case, writing, final review of manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Funding

None declared.

Ethical approval

IRB approval for application of this technology was obtained via Institutions IRB committee and allowed for intraoperative use for presurgical planning in the setting of this technology. Confirmation was obtained with appropriate consent.

References

1.

Rey-Dios
R
,
Cohen-Gadol
AA
.
Current neurosurgical management of glossopharyngeal neuralgia and technical nuances for microvascular decompression surgery
.
Neurosurg Focus
2013;
34
:
E8
. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.12.focus12391.

2.

Ma
Y
,
Feng
LY
,
Cai
WQ
,
Wang
B
,
Tao
HH
.
Neurosurgical treatment of glossopharyngeal neuralgia: analysis of 103 cases
.
J Neurosurg.
2016;
124
:
1088
92
. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.3.jns141806.

3.

Gaul
C
,
Hastreiter
P
,
Duncker
A
,
Naraghi
R
.
Diagnosis and neurosurgical treatment of glossopharyngeal neuralgia: clinical findings and 3-D visualization of neurovascular compression in 19 consecutive patients
.
J Headache Pain
.
2011
;
12
:
527
34
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10194-011-0349-x.

4.

Patel
A
,
Kassam
A
,
Horowitz
M
,
Chang
YF
.
Microvascular decompression in the management of glossopharyngeal neuralgia: analysis of 217 cases
.
Neurosurgery
2002;
50
:705–11. . https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200204000-00004.

5.

Kim
MK
,
Park
JS
,
Ahn
YH
.
Microvascular decompression for glossopharyngeal neuralgia: clinical analyses of 30 cases
.
J Korean Neurosurg Soc
2017;
60
:
738
48
. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2017.0506.010.

6.

Gibby
W
,
Cvetko
S
,
Gibby
A
, et al. 
The application of augmented reality–based navigation for accurate target acquisition of deep brain sites: advances in neurosurgical guidance
.
J Neurosurg.
2021;
137
:
489
95
. https://doi.org/10.3171/2021.9.jns21510.

7.

Meola
A
,
Cutolo
F
,
Carbone
M
,
Cagnazzo
F
,
Ferrari
M
,
Ferrari
V
.
Augmented reality in neurosurgery: a systematic review
.
Neurosurg Rev
. 2017;
40
:
537
548
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-016-0732-9.

8.

Vassallo
R
,
Kasuya
H
,
Lo
BWY
,
Peters
T
,
Xiao
Y
.
Augmented reality guidance in cerebrovascular surgery using microscopic video enhancement
.
Healthc Technol Lett
2018;
5
:
158
61
. https://doi.org/10.1049/htl.2018.5069.

9.

Cannizzaro
D
,
Zaed
I
,
Safa
A
, et al. 
Augmented reality in neurosurgery, state of art and future projections. A systematic review
.
Front Surg
2022;
9
:
864792
2
. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.864792.

10.

Tagaytayan
R
,
Kelemen
A
,
Sik-Lanyi
C
.
Augmented reality in neurosurgery
.
Arch Med Sci
2018;
14
:
572
8
. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2016.58690.

11.

Olexa
J
,
Cohen
J
,
Alexander
T
,
Brown
C
,
Schwartzbauer
G
,
Woodworth
GF
.
Expanding educational Frontiers in neurosurgery: current and future uses of augmented reality
.
Neurosurgery
2022
;
92
:
241
50
. . https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002199.

12.

Shan
Q
,
Doyle
TE
,
Samavi
R
,
Al-Rei
M
. Augmented Reality Based Brain Tumor 3D Visualization.
Procedie Computer Science
.
2017
;
113
:
400
7
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.356.

13.

Vigo
V
,
Cornejo
K
,
Nunez
L
,
Abla
A
,
Rubio
RR
.
Immersive surgical anatomy of the craniometric points
.
Cureus
2020
;
12
:
e8643
3
. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8643.

14.

Ragnhildstveit
A
,
Li
C
,
Zimmerman
MH
,
Mamalakis
M
,
Curry
VN
,
Holle
W
, et al. 
Intra-operative applications of augmented reality in glioma surgery: a systematic review
.
2023
;
10
:1245851. https://doi.org/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1245851.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.