Abstract

Congenital epulis is a rare benign soft tissue lesion that occurs exclusively in neonates and usually develops from the alveolar mucosa at the frontal region of the maxilla. Lesions may be sessile or pedunculated, normal in color or reddish and vary in size from a few millimeters to a few centimeters. Although spontaneous regression has also been reported, surgical excision is indicated for large tumors that may obstruct the airway and make feeding the child difficult. In this case report, we present a rare case of congenital epulis involving the right side of the maxillary alveolar mucosa in a neonate delivered vaginally at Dhulikhel Hospital, Kavreplanchok, Nepal. The lesion was surgically removed by electrocautery, and histologic examination confirmed the clinical diagnosis of congenital epulis. No complications occurred after surgery, and when the child was examined 6 months later, no evidence of recurrence noticed.

INTRODUCTION

Congenital epulis is a rare benign soft tissue tumor that usually appears on the newborn’s anterior alveolar mucosa of the maxillary arch. The evidence of description about congenital epulis was recognized in the literature in 1871 by a German doctor, Dr Franz Ernst Christian Neumann, so it is also called as Neumann’s tumor. Other terminologies used to describe this tumor in the literature include congenital granular cell epulis, congenital granular cell lesion, congenital epulis of the infant, gingival granular cell tumor of the newborn, congenital granular cell myoblastoma and granular cell fibroblastoma [1]. This tumor has an extremely low incidence of roughly 0.0006%, and <250 cases have been described in the literature so far, with only two cases reported in Nepal [1–3].

Clinically, the tumor present as pedunculated or sessile mass protruding through the oral cavity of a newborn child and usually present as a single lesion; however, multiple lesions have been reported in 10% of cases [4]. The tumor has a higher female predominance than male (8:1) and ranges in size from a few millimeters to cm, with the largest size reported to date being 9 cm [4]. Though the tumor is benign and spontaneous regression has also been reported, surgical excision of tumor is usually recommended as it can interfere with newborn’s feeding and respiration with marked psychological impact on parent. No recurrence rate has been reported till date even after incomplete excision of tumor [3]. In this case report, we present a 2-day old newborn female patient who had a projecting mass from her mouth and was having trouble in breast feeding. The mass was surgically excised and was histologically identified as congenital epulis.

CASE REPORT

A 2-day old female patient delivered vaginally at Kathmandu University Dhulikhel Hospital referred to oral and maxillofacial surgery department with chief complain of difficulty in breast feeding because of protruding mass from the patient’s mouth. On examination there was presence of pedunculated pink colored fleshy mass of size ~2.5 cm / 2 cm protruding thorough patient’s oral cavity with base attached to the right-sided anterior alveolar region (Fig. 1). Based on clinical presentation, congenital epulis was made as provisional diagnosis. As the size of the mass was large and interfering with breast feeding, patient’s parent was counseled regarding surgical excision of the lesion. Routine preoperative investigations were sent, pediatric evaluation was also done and they suggest no other association of congenital anomalies followed by anesthesiology consultation. On the fifth day, the patient underwent excision of tumor mass using electrocautery (Fig. 2) under general anesthesia with intraoral intubation. Intraoperatively no bleeding was evident. The excised mass (Fig. 3) was sent for histopathological examination (Fig. 6), which shows presence of sheets of polygonal cells with eosinophilic granular cytoplasm with eccentrically placed nuclei with interspersed collagen fibers (HE stains, X10) suggestive of congenital epulis. Postoperatively, wound (Fig. 4) was cleaned gently with moist cotton every day and breast feeding was started the next day after surgery. Baby was discharged on the fourth postoperative day and kept on regular follow-up. The wound healed by secondary intension (Fig. 5) and was satisfactory and showed no signs of any recurrence after 6 months of follow up.

Preoperative clinical photograph showing epulis mass protruding through oral cavity.
Figure 1

Preoperative clinical photograph showing epulis mass protruding through oral cavity.

Intraoperative clinical photograph showing electrocauterization of epulis mass.
Figure 2

Intraoperative clinical photograph showing electrocauterization of epulis mass.

Excised epulis mass.
Figure 3

Excised epulis mass.

Third postoperative clinical photograph.
Figure 4

Third postoperative clinical photograph.

Sixth month postoperative clinical photograph.
Figure 5

Sixth month postoperative clinical photograph.

Microscopic feature of the tumor showing sheets of polygonal cells with eosinophilic granular cytoplasm (HE stains, X10).
Figure 6

Microscopic feature of the tumor showing sheets of polygonal cells with eosinophilic granular cytoplasm (HE stains, X10).

DISCUSSION

Congenital epulis is most commonly seen in neonates, with a mass developing from the gingiva and spreading over the maxillary alveolar ridge, generally near the lateral incisors or canines [5]. The term epulis, which means ‘on the gums’ or ‘gum boil’ in Greek, is derived from the word [3]. Other locations of this tumor have been documented, including the mandibular gingiva and tongue, as well as many locations at the same time [6]. It is estimated to be twice as common on the maxilla as it is on the mandible [7]. Many theories such as myoblastic, odontogenic, neurogenic, fibroblastic, histiocytic, endocrinologic or basically reactive factors has been suggested as the possible etiology of congenital epulis [6]. Though the lesion shows female predilection, no direct association with specific hormones has been identified, since endogenous hormone receptors have not been found in the lesions [8]. Melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy (MNTI), hemangioma, fibroma, embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, granuloma, malignant granular cell myoblastoma, chondrogenic and osteogenic sarcoma and schwannoma are all possible differential diagnosis for congenital epulis [9]. Published reports suggest that, this lesion has also been diagnosed prenatally, which helps parents mentally prepare for the postnatal circumstances [3]. Sadly, no prenatal diagnosis was performed in this case.

Although spontaneous regression has been described, large lesions interfering with feeding and respiration require immediate surgical excision, whereas small lesions can be watched for spontaneous remission. There have been no reports of lesion recurrence or malignant change to yet [8]. In such circumstances, electrocautery under general anesthesia is generally advised [10]. For smaller lesions or where intubation is impossible, excision under local anesthetic can be an alternative technique of treatment [10]. This lesion has a very good postoperative prognosis, and spontaneous regression may occur despite inadequate excision [8].

Though congenital epulis is a benign tumor that is uncommon, clinicians must be well-versed in its management in order to limit aggressive treatment and assist parents in dealing with the situation appropriately.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

None declared.

FUNDING

None.

DATA AVAILABILITY

Data included in this article are obtained from articles published online.

References

1.

Agarwal
 
M.
 
Congenital granular cell tumor in an infant: a case report
.
Annals of Woman and Child Health
2016;
2
:C9–12.

2.

Singh
 
A
,
Ghosh
 
S
,
Yadav
 
AK
,
Panthee
 
A
.
Congenital granular cell tumor: report of a case with literature review and differential diagnosis
.
Clin Case Rep
 
2022
;
10
:
e05580
.

3.

Sigdel
 
B
,
Baidya
 
R
,
Shrestha
 
P
,
Shrestha
 
S
.
Congenital granular cell epulis: a rare diagnosis
.
J Pathol Nepal
 
1970
;
1
:
69
72
.

4.

Bosanquet
 
D
,
Roblin
 
G
.
Congenital epulis: a case report and estimation of incidence
.
Int J Otolaryngol
 
2009
;
2009
:
1
3
.

5.

Ritwik
 
P
,
Brannon
 
RB
,
Musselman
 
RJ
.
Spontaneous regression of congenital epulis: a case report and review of the literature
.
J Med Case Reports
 
2010
;
4
:
331
.

6.

Merglova
 
V
,
Mukensnabl
 
P
,
Andrle
 
P
.
Congenital epulis
.
Case Rep
 
2012
;
2012
:
bcr0120125483
3
.

7.

Yuwanati
 
M
,
Mhaske
 
S
,
Mhaske
 
A
.
Congenital granular cell tumor – a rare entity
.
J Neonatal Surg
 
2015
;
4
:17.

8.

Kang
 
MJ
,
Kang
 
SH
.
Congenital epulis in a newborn
.
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg
 
2022
;
48
:
382
5
.

9.

Kumar
 
R
,
Jaiswal
 
S
,
Singhal
 
A
,
Garg
 
R
.
Congenital granular cell lesion: a rare tumor of new born
.
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol
 
2013
;
17
:
440
.

10.

Silva
 
GCC
,
Vieira
 
TC
,
Vieira
 
JC
,
Martins
 
CR
,
Carvalho
 
E
.
Congenital granular cell tumor (congenital epulis): a lesion of multidisciplinary interest
.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal
 
2007
;
12
:
E428
30
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com