Abstract

Gastroduodenal intussusception is a rare phenomenon in adults and is caused by gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) in the majority of the documented cases. It commonly presents with abdominal pain, vomiting and melena. GIST is the most common gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor in gastric and non-gastric locations. It is characterized classically by KIT or PGDFRA expression, and immunohistochemical analysis is the mainstay of diagnosis. Surgical resection provides definitive treatment in 70% of the cases. Here, we present a rare case of gastroduodenal intussusception caused by GIST in an elderly patient.

INTRODUCTION

Gastroduodenal intussusception in adults is a rare entity, found in only 10% of adult intussusception cases [1], as it typically requires a mobile structure, such as ileum, as an intussusceptum, and a relatively fixed structure, such as cecum, as an intussuscipiens [2]. A lead point pathology is responsible for about 80–90% of adult intussusceptions [3]. Here, we present a case of gastroduodenal intussusception caused by gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in an elderly patient.

CASE REPORT

A 72-year-old patient with no past surgical history and a past medical history of developmental delay, hypertension and hyperlipidemia presented to the Emergency Department in mild distress with periumbilical abdominal pain, nausea and intractable vomiting for 1 day. The patient denied any hematemesis, bowel changes, fever, melena or hematochezia. On physical exam, the abdomen was unremarkable, and a computed tomography (CT) scan with contrast of abdomen and pelvis revealed a 5.6 × 5.3 cm heterogeneous mass arising from the body of the stomach extending into pylorus with no evidence of bowel obstruction and liver metastasis (Fig. 1). Subsequently, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) showed a large, fungating and ulcerated mass and it was reported to involve two-thirds of the luminal circumference in the gastric body (Fig. 2). Cold forceps biopsy showed gastric mucosa with hyperplastic changes, mild chronic active antral gastritis with focal intestinal metaplasia, negative for Helicobacter Pylori and dysplasia. Surgical management was discussed with the family, but they refused any surgical intervention.

CT scan image of abdomen showing heterogenous gastric mass (red arrow).
Figure 1

CT scan image of abdomen showing heterogenous gastric mass (red arrow).

A large fungating gastric mass arising from the body of the stomach on endoscopy.
Figure 2

A large fungating gastric mass arising from the body of the stomach on endoscopy.

After a few days, the patient was found to have a large volume of melenic stool. A CT angiogram of the chest, abdomen and pelvis was done, revealing a mass in the antrum and pylorus of the stomach with a portion of the stomach pulled into it, consistent with gastroduodenal intussusception without any active extravasation. Repeat EGD showed a large, fungating, pedunculated mass with no bleeding and no stigmata of recent bleeding in the gastric body (Figs. 3 and4) and confirmed gastroduodenal intussusception. The intussusception spontaneously reduced while attempting to push passed the mass. The mass was too large to resect endoscopically. Given these new findings, the family agreed to surgical intervention. An exploratory laparotomy was made, and the patient underwent partial gastrectomy, distal antrectomy and Billroth II procedure. The resected large gastric body mass within the mid gastric body and two nodes were sent for frozen section and immunohistochemical analysis. The pathology report confirmed the mass as a GIST, spindle cell type with no significant nuclear atypia or mitosis, arising from muscularis propria, without mucosal invasion and R0 margins. The neoplastic cells stained positive for CD117 (KIT), CD34 and Desmin (focally). The tumor was T3N0M0 with a low mitotic rate, histologic grade G1 and was deemed low risk (3.6%). The patient was discharged to a subacute rehab with an uneventful recovery.

Gastric intussusception into pylorus on endoscopy.
Figure 3

Gastric intussusception into pylorus on endoscopy.

Gastric intussusception into pylorus on endoscopy.
Figure 4

Gastric intussusception into pylorus on endoscopy.

DISCUSSION

Most gastroduodenal intussusceptions present with acute epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting and melena, regardless of etiology. GIST is a common type of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor, and is commonly located in the stomach [4]. It only accounts for 1% of gastrointestinal tumors [5]. Molecular markers such as KIT, PDGFRA and DOG1 are the mainstay of providing the definitive diagnosis of GISTs [4, 6]. Zhang et al. [7] reported a similar case and compiled a list of 43 documented cases of gastric intussusception secondary to gastric tumors, out of which 24 were GIST. It is worth noting that it is responsible for >50% of the documented cases of gastroduodenal intussusception.

CT scan is the most accurate diagnostic imaging modality and detects the lead point [2]. In this case, CT scan confirmed the diagnosis of intussusception. Once diagnosed, the management in such cases is focused on the reduction of intussusception and resection of the tumor to prevent a recurrence. A preoperative diagnosis of tumor pathology is recommended to aid the decision of tumor resection and to plan chemotherapy. EGD can help attempt reduction, detect the bleeding source and obtain a biopsy. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) is indicated for preoperative molecular diagnosis but can give poor diagnostic yield to assess mitotic rate [8]. If the EUS-FNA or EUS-Core biopsy is non-diagnostic, which is not uncommon, final diagnosis is made with surgical pathology.

Meanwhile, certain morphological features on CT scan provide vital clues toward the pathophysiology of the tumor, such as tumor size equal to or >5 cm and enlarged feeding vessels, irregular margins and intralesional hemorrhage are stipulated as the features of high-risk GISTs [9]. Hence, the location, size, enhancement and number of tumors on CT scan certainly assist the risk stratification and planning even in the absence of molecular diagnosis.

Generally, surgical resection is considered the standard of care in GIST cases. Often, resection of primary gastric GISTs can be done laparoscopically, but open, endoscopic and novel laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) can be employed [10]. Surgical management predominantly plays a role in (1) primary localized gastric or non-gastric tumors that are >2 cm to <10 cm, (2) stable disease, (3) limited progression and (4) emergencies [10, 11]. Tumors <2 cm can be monitored, and tumors up to 8 cm can be resected laparoscopically depending on tumor location [11]. The surgical technique is dictated by patient and tumor factors to achieve R0 or even R1 resection without disturbing the tumor pseudo capsule while preserving the function. In an antral GIST complicated by intussusception, antrectomy is preferable, which was done in this case [12]. Nodal metastasis is uncommon, and dissection is generally not required [11].

Although gastroduodenal intussusception in adults is rare, it can frequently present as a complication of GIST. There are various surgical approaches for the resection of tumors; however, partial gastrectomy may be preferable in some instances, and the decision should be made on a case-by-case basis.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The authors declare that data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

FUNDING

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

None declared.

References

1.

Stubenbord
 
WT
,
Thorbjarnarson
 
B
.
Intussusception in adults
.
Ann Surg
 
1970
;
172
:
306
10
.

2.

Marsicovetere
 
P
,
Ivatury
 
SJ
,
White
 
B
,
Holubar
 
SD
.
Intestinal intussusception: Etiology, diagnosis, and treatment
.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg
 
2016
;
30
:
030
9
.

3.

Wang
 
LT
,
Wu
 
CC
,
Yu
 
JC
,
Hsiao
 
CW
,
Hsu
 
CC
,
Jao
 
SW
.
Clinical entity and treatment strategies for adult intussusceptions: 20 years' experience
.
Dis Colon Rectum
 
2007
;
50
:
1941
9
.

4.

Miettinen
 
M
,
Lasota
 
J
.
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors
.
Gastroenterol Clin North Am
 
2013
;
42
:
399
415
.

5.

Judson
 
I
,
Demetri
 
G
.
Advances in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours
.
Ann Oncol
 
2007
;
18
:
x20
4
.

6.

Wong
 
NACS
.
Gastrointestinal stromal tumours--an update for histopathologists
.
Histopathology
 
2011
;
59
:
807
21
.

7.

Zhang
 
W
,
Chen
 
H
,
Zhu
 
L
,
Kong
 
Z
,
Wang
 
T
,
Li
 
W
.
Gastroduodenal intussusception caused by gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor in adults: a case report and literature review
.
J Int Med Res
 
2022
;
50
:3000605221100772.

8.

Akahoshi
 
K
,
Oya
 
M
,
Koga
 
T
,
Shiratsuchi
 
Y
.
Current clinical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor
.
World J Gastroenterol
 
2018
;
24
:
2806
17
.

9.

Cannella
 
R
,
Tabone
 
E
,
Porrello
 
G
,
Cappello
 
G
,
Gozzo
 
C
,
Incorvaia
 
L
, et al.  
Assessment of morphological CT imaging features for the prediction of risk stratification, mutations, and prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors
.
Eur Radiol
 
2021
;
31
:
8554
64
.

10.

Lim
 
KT
.
Surgical treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: current status and future perspective
.
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol
 
2017
;
2
:
104
.

11.

Schaefer
 
I-M
,
DeMatteo
 
RP
,
Serrano
 
C
.
The GIST of advances in treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor
.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book
 
2022
;
42
:
885
99
.

12.

Gervaz
 
P
,
Huber
 
O
,
Morel
 
P
.
Surgical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours
.
Br J Surg
 
2009
;
96
:
567
78
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com