Abstract

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis involves fusion of the mandibular condyle to the base of the skull. The treatment of TMJ ankylosis poses a significant challenge because of technical difficulties and a high incidence of recurrence. The experience of managing one such case is reported in light of a review of the literature on this condition. This report describes a case of a 7-year-old girl with inability to open her mouth, diagnosed with unilateral right bony TMJ ankylosis. Key management principles included adequate removal of the ankylotic mass, gap arthroplasty with interpositional temporalis myofascial grafting and post-operative physiotherapy. The patient maintains a satisfactory maximal incisal opening till the present day. A detailed history, clinical and functional examination, radiographic examination facilitating correct diagnosis followed by immediate surgical intervention, and physiotherapy might be beneficial to restore physical, psychological and emotional health of the child patient with TMJ ankylosis.

INTRODUCTION

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis is a well-known disorder that is characterized by restriction of mouth opening from partial reduction to complete immobility of jaw [1]. Patients with TMJ ankylosis experience a range of clinical, social, and psychological problems. Just to name a few - mastication, digestion, speech, appearance, and hygiene can have a great impact on personality [2]. It is well documented that malocclusion is a well-known occurrence in these cases [3, 4]. Although voluminous research articles are available, with lot of innovations and ideas but it has added to the never ending confusion of which treatment is the best because recurrence still remains the major problem when treating TMJ ankylosis [5–7]. This paper describes a case of unilateral right bony TMJ ankylosis and its successful management with gap arthroplasty in a 7-year-old child with a brief literature review.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 7-year-old girl, reported to our hospital with a chief complaint of inability to open her mouth since 2–3 years. History revealed that the patient had a fall when she was 5 years old and had a blow on right side of her face. She had pain and swelling on right TMJ area, which progressively subsided. However, there was also gradual reduction of mouth opening as a result of which she was unable to eat properly.

CLINICAL EXAMINATION

The clinical examination revealed a hypoplastic mandible with lower facial asymmetry and fullness of cheek on right side. The patient had trismus with a maximal incisal opening (MIO) of 5 mm. There was no palpable movement over the right TMJ and only slight rotation on left side (Figs 1 and 2).

Pre-operative facial profile.
Figure 1

Pre-operative facial profile.

Pre-operative MIO (5 mm).
Figure 2

Pre-operative MIO (5 mm).

RADIOGRAPHIC FEATURES

Orthopantomogram and computed tomography (CT) scan with 3D reconstruction revealed a lack of structural organization and obliteration of right TMJ space. The right body of mandible was arch shaped due to restriction of the right condyle with right coronoid pushing upwards. There was also occlusal cant on frontal CT scan. Coronal view of CT scan demonstrated ankylotic mass. Based on these finding, a diagnosis of unilateral bony ankylosis of TMJ on right side was confirmed (Fig. 3).

Right side bony ankylosis in coronal section CT.
Figure 3

Right side bony ankylosis in coronal section CT.

TREATMENT

A surgical treatment of gap arthroplasty with interpositional temporalis myofascial flap on right TMJ was planned under general anesthesia. In order to approach the TMJ area, a pre-auricular incision was utilized [8, 9]. The incision in shape of big question mark avoiding injury to the superfacial temporal vessels and facial nerve was made till the shining surface of temporalis fascia and dissection preceded in this plane to zygomatic arch and extended anteriorly and posteriorly to expose the limits of the ankylosis. Thereafter periostium over the zygomatic arch and the ramus incised and elevated (Fig. 4). After an adequate exposure of site of bony block, bone was removed by using a round bur until a thin cortical bone was left in the depth. To prevent injury to internal maxillary artery or pterygoid plexus of veins, a malleable retractor and surgical burs at slow speed were used. The joint cavity was then irrigated with betadine and irregular edges of segments were shaved by surgical bur and disconnected completely the ramus from the upper bony block (Figs 5 and 6). In this case, glenoid fossa was recontoured as much as anatomical as possible. A gap of at least 1.5 cm was created between glenoid fossa and mandible followed by insertion of interpositional temporalis myofascial graft (Figs 7 and 8). Zygomatic arch osteotomy was also performed, which immensely eased the coronoidectomy procedure but added to complexity of the surgery and fixation hardware had to be used in addition to fix the arch back into its position.

Alkyalam Briyam incision.
Figure 4

Alkyalam Briyam incision.

Ankylotic mass.
Figure 5

Ankylotic mass.

Separation of condylar unit from skull base.
Figure 6

Separation of condylar unit from skull base.

Gap arthroplasty.
Figure 7

Gap arthroplasty.

Temporalis myofascial flap for interpositional gap arthroplasty.
Figure 8

Temporalis myofascial flap for interpositional gap arthroplasty.

Mouth opening of ~37 mm was done using Hister’s jaw opener at time of surgery (Figs 9 and 10). Suction drain was placed, and the flap was sutured using 3–0 vicryl for deeper layers and skin was closed using 4–0 prolene.

Immediate post-operative clinical picture.
Figure 9

Immediate post-operative clinical picture.

Post-operative coronal section CT image.
Figure 10

Post-operative coronal section CT image.

POST-OPERATIVE COURSE

Post-operative course was uneventful. Physiotherapy commenced 3 days post-operatively. Mouth opening exercises were given by using Hister’s mouth gag. The patient was instructed to continue with exercises for at least a period of 1 year. On follow-up after 2 weeks, the mouth opening was found to be 35 mm that was maintained in the next follow-up after 6 months (Fig. 11).

Follow-up after 6 months.
Figure 11

Follow-up after 6 months.

DISCUSSION

TMJ ankylosis surgery has to be considered in a stepwise approach to avoid any untoward sequelae.

Etiology

Mandibular hypomobility can be caused by trauma, radiation therapy, surgical removal of TMJ tumors, infection, and systemic diseases [10, 11]. On the other hand, Kaban et al. had noticed that infection remains the most common cause of TMJ ankylosis in children. On the contrary, Roychoudhury et al. reported trauma as a single most important reason for TMJ ankylosis [2]. A number of systemic diseases have also been cited as contributing factors, including ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, Paget's disease, pseudo-hypoparathyroidism, psoriasis and burns [12, 13]. In this case, trauma was the most important factor for development of TMJ ankylosis that might be attributed to hilly regions where fall from height is very common and difficult lifestyle of the patients wherein children and young adults have to climb trees for fetching fruits as a source of nutrition. This was further complicated by the issues like severe shortage of healthcare professionals and difficult access to tertiary and quaternary health facilities causing no prompt treatment and ensuing complications.

Classification

TMJ ankylosis is classified according to Perrott and Kaban [14]:

  • (i) Location (intra-articular or extra-articular),

  • (ii) Type of tissue involved (e.g. bone, fibrous or fibro-osseous), and

  • (iii) Extent of fusion (complete or incomplete).

Classification followed for this case is the one proposed by Sawhney [15] as shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Classification of TMJ ankylosis proposed by Sawhney [15]

TypeDescription
Type oneMinimal bony fusion, but extensive fibrous adhesions around the joint
Type twoMore bony fusion especially at the outer edge of the articular surface, but no fusion within the more medial area of the joint
Type threeThere is a bridge of bone between the mandible and the temporal bone
Type fourThe joint is replaced by a mass of bone
TypeDescription
Type oneMinimal bony fusion, but extensive fibrous adhesions around the joint
Type twoMore bony fusion especially at the outer edge of the articular surface, but no fusion within the more medial area of the joint
Type threeThere is a bridge of bone between the mandible and the temporal bone
Type fourThe joint is replaced by a mass of bone
Table 1

Classification of TMJ ankylosis proposed by Sawhney [15]

TypeDescription
Type oneMinimal bony fusion, but extensive fibrous adhesions around the joint
Type twoMore bony fusion especially at the outer edge of the articular surface, but no fusion within the more medial area of the joint
Type threeThere is a bridge of bone between the mandible and the temporal bone
Type fourThe joint is replaced by a mass of bone
TypeDescription
Type oneMinimal bony fusion, but extensive fibrous adhesions around the joint
Type twoMore bony fusion especially at the outer edge of the articular surface, but no fusion within the more medial area of the joint
Type threeThere is a bridge of bone between the mandible and the temporal bone
Type fourThe joint is replaced by a mass of bone

Treatment

A seven-step protocol has been developed as follow [5, 16]:

(i) aggressive resection of ankylotic segment,

(ii) ipsilateral coronoidectomy,

(iii) contralateral coronoidectomy when necessary,

(iv) lining of the joint with temporalis fascia or cartilage,

(v) reconstruction of ramus with a costochondral graft,

(vi) rigid fixation of graft, and

(vii) early mobilization and aggressive physiotherapy.

In the field of maxillofacial surgery, the TMJ arthroplasty is one of the more mysterious operations due to the nature of the problem as well as the fact that several follow-up options are available to the surgeon [17–24].

1. Gap arthroplasty,

2. Interpositional gap arthroplasty, and

3. Joint reconstruction with autogenousor alloplastic materials.

Table 2 shows the previous studies highlighting the treatment options for TMJ ankylosis.

Table 2

Various studies highlighting the treatment options for TMJ ankylosis

Authors/yearHighlights of studyResults
Matsuura et al.Studied the functional and anatomic changes after gap arthroplasty by using animal models.This procedure for TMJ ankylosis did not restore TMJ functionally and histologically to its preexisting state.
Kaban et al.Gap arthroplasty alone gives rise to a gap between the articular cavity and the mandibular ramus.Advantages of simplicity and short operating time were found. But disadvantage of generating a pseudo-articulation, with shortening of the mandibular ramus and, increase in the risk of recurrence were also observed.
Vasconcelos et al.Reported eight cases of ankylosis (Types I–IV) treated by gap arthroplastyNo recurrence in their series with a follow-up of at least 24 months. Complications such as the development of an open-bite in bilateral cases, premature occlusion on the affected side with contralateral open-bite in unilateral cases and limited mouth opening post-operatively were possible.
BorcbakanFirst to use an acrylic condyle in the surgical treatment of TMJ ankylosis.Inexpensive material that can be produced locally and does not require an additional surgical site. Acrylic does not produce any long-term complications and is well-tolerated. The only disadvantage of the technique is the development of facial asymmetry when it is used in a child, requiring corrective jaw surgery.
McCarthy et al.Distraction osteogenesis has been proposed for the treatment of bony TMJ joint ankylosis.Distraction osteogenesis offers many advantages over other more traditional surgical techniques. It has been shown that it can shorten the admission and operation time, the risks of surgery and the possibility of relapse. Above all, the direction and amount of bony lengthening can be controlled, and soft tissues as well as hard tissues can be lengthened.
Authors/yearHighlights of studyResults
Matsuura et al.Studied the functional and anatomic changes after gap arthroplasty by using animal models.This procedure for TMJ ankylosis did not restore TMJ functionally and histologically to its preexisting state.
Kaban et al.Gap arthroplasty alone gives rise to a gap between the articular cavity and the mandibular ramus.Advantages of simplicity and short operating time were found. But disadvantage of generating a pseudo-articulation, with shortening of the mandibular ramus and, increase in the risk of recurrence were also observed.
Vasconcelos et al.Reported eight cases of ankylosis (Types I–IV) treated by gap arthroplastyNo recurrence in their series with a follow-up of at least 24 months. Complications such as the development of an open-bite in bilateral cases, premature occlusion on the affected side with contralateral open-bite in unilateral cases and limited mouth opening post-operatively were possible.
BorcbakanFirst to use an acrylic condyle in the surgical treatment of TMJ ankylosis.Inexpensive material that can be produced locally and does not require an additional surgical site. Acrylic does not produce any long-term complications and is well-tolerated. The only disadvantage of the technique is the development of facial asymmetry when it is used in a child, requiring corrective jaw surgery.
McCarthy et al.Distraction osteogenesis has been proposed for the treatment of bony TMJ joint ankylosis.Distraction osteogenesis offers many advantages over other more traditional surgical techniques. It has been shown that it can shorten the admission and operation time, the risks of surgery and the possibility of relapse. Above all, the direction and amount of bony lengthening can be controlled, and soft tissues as well as hard tissues can be lengthened.
Table 2

Various studies highlighting the treatment options for TMJ ankylosis

Authors/yearHighlights of studyResults
Matsuura et al.Studied the functional and anatomic changes after gap arthroplasty by using animal models.This procedure for TMJ ankylosis did not restore TMJ functionally and histologically to its preexisting state.
Kaban et al.Gap arthroplasty alone gives rise to a gap between the articular cavity and the mandibular ramus.Advantages of simplicity and short operating time were found. But disadvantage of generating a pseudo-articulation, with shortening of the mandibular ramus and, increase in the risk of recurrence were also observed.
Vasconcelos et al.Reported eight cases of ankylosis (Types I–IV) treated by gap arthroplastyNo recurrence in their series with a follow-up of at least 24 months. Complications such as the development of an open-bite in bilateral cases, premature occlusion on the affected side with contralateral open-bite in unilateral cases and limited mouth opening post-operatively were possible.
BorcbakanFirst to use an acrylic condyle in the surgical treatment of TMJ ankylosis.Inexpensive material that can be produced locally and does not require an additional surgical site. Acrylic does not produce any long-term complications and is well-tolerated. The only disadvantage of the technique is the development of facial asymmetry when it is used in a child, requiring corrective jaw surgery.
McCarthy et al.Distraction osteogenesis has been proposed for the treatment of bony TMJ joint ankylosis.Distraction osteogenesis offers many advantages over other more traditional surgical techniques. It has been shown that it can shorten the admission and operation time, the risks of surgery and the possibility of relapse. Above all, the direction and amount of bony lengthening can be controlled, and soft tissues as well as hard tissues can be lengthened.
Authors/yearHighlights of studyResults
Matsuura et al.Studied the functional and anatomic changes after gap arthroplasty by using animal models.This procedure for TMJ ankylosis did not restore TMJ functionally and histologically to its preexisting state.
Kaban et al.Gap arthroplasty alone gives rise to a gap between the articular cavity and the mandibular ramus.Advantages of simplicity and short operating time were found. But disadvantage of generating a pseudo-articulation, with shortening of the mandibular ramus and, increase in the risk of recurrence were also observed.
Vasconcelos et al.Reported eight cases of ankylosis (Types I–IV) treated by gap arthroplastyNo recurrence in their series with a follow-up of at least 24 months. Complications such as the development of an open-bite in bilateral cases, premature occlusion on the affected side with contralateral open-bite in unilateral cases and limited mouth opening post-operatively were possible.
BorcbakanFirst to use an acrylic condyle in the surgical treatment of TMJ ankylosis.Inexpensive material that can be produced locally and does not require an additional surgical site. Acrylic does not produce any long-term complications and is well-tolerated. The only disadvantage of the technique is the development of facial asymmetry when it is used in a child, requiring corrective jaw surgery.
McCarthy et al.Distraction osteogenesis has been proposed for the treatment of bony TMJ joint ankylosis.Distraction osteogenesis offers many advantages over other more traditional surgical techniques. It has been shown that it can shorten the admission and operation time, the risks of surgery and the possibility of relapse. Above all, the direction and amount of bony lengthening can be controlled, and soft tissues as well as hard tissues can be lengthened.

Follow-up

In immediate follow-up period it is recommended that potential problem with early mobilization is that it may provoke bleeding and create a large hematoma with delayed healing [12]. But the present case was treated with physiotherapy from the first post-operative day to the extent that was acceptable and comfortable to the patient without any severe pain or discomfort. In long-term follow-up, the interincisal opening of the patients to see if patient is showing any signs of recurrence of ankylosis and whether the mandibular growth is being affected in any way was studied [25].

CONCLUSION

Traumatic injury to the TMJ should be considered as a risk for ankylosis in children. A careful surgical technique and meticulous long-term physiotherapy are considered essential to achieve a satisfactory result.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

None declared.

FUNDING

None.

DATA AVAILABLITY

The data set used in the paper will be made available on request from Namdeo Prabhu (drpranam@gmail.com).

References

1.

Shanmugavadivel
 
G
,
Vasanthakumari
 
A
,
Sankar
 
S
.
Unilateral temperomandibular joint ankylosis—a case report
.
IOSR J Dental Med Sci
 
2016
;
15
:
101
3
.

2.

Roychoudhury
 
A
,
Parkash
 
H
,
Trikha
 
A
.
Functional restoration by gap arthroplasty in temporomandibular joint ankylosis: a report of 50 cases
.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
 
1999
;
87
:
166
9
.

3.

Miyamoto
 
H
,
Kurita
 
K
,
Ogi
 
N
,
Ishimaru
 
JI
,
Goss
 
A
.
The role of the disk in sheep temporomandibular joint ankylosis
.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
 
1999
;
88
:
151
8
.

4.

Raveh
 
J
,
Vuillemin
 
T
,
Ladrach
 
K
,
Sutter
 
F
.
Temporomandibular joint ankylosis: surgical treatment and long-term results
.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
 
1989
;
47
:
900
6
.

5.

Kaban
 
LB
,
Perrott
 
DH
,
Fisher
 
K
.
A protocol for management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis
.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
 
1990
;
48
:
1145
51
.

6.

Manganello-Souza
 
LC
,
Mariani
 
PB
.
Temporomandibular joint ankylosis: report of 14 cases
.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
 
2003
;
32
:
24
9
.

7.

Chossegros
 
C
,
Guyot
 
L
,
Cheynet
 
F
,
Blanc
 
JL
,
Cannoni
 
P
.
Full-thickness skin graft interposition after temporomandibular joint ankylosis surgery: a study of 31 cases
.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
 
1999
;
28
:
330
4
.

8.

Ellis
 
E
,
Zide
 
MF
.
Surgical Approaches to the Facial Skeleton
, 1st edn.
Media
:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
,
1995
.

9.

Hall
 
MB
,
Brown
 
RW
,
Lebowitz
 
MS
.
Facial nerve injury during surgery of the temporomandibular joint: a comparison of two dissection techniques
.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
 
1985
;
43
:
20
3
.

10.

Topazian
 
RG
.
Etiology of ankylosis of temporomandibular joint: analysis of 44 cases
.
J Oral Surg Anesth Hosp Dent Serv
 
1964
;
22
:
227
33
.

11.

Kaban
 
LB
,
Troulis
 
MJ
.
Pediatric Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
.
Philadelphia
:
PA, WB Saunders
,
2004
,
469
.

12.

Gay-Escoda
 
C
,
Arguero
 
M
.
La corrección quirúrgica de la anquilosis de la articulación temporomandibular. Descripción de siete casos
.
Avances en Odontoestomatologia
 
1994
;
10
:
74
.

13.

Kaban
 
LB
,
Pogrel
 
MA
,
Perrott
 
DH
.
Complications in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
, 1st edn.
Philadelphia
:
WB Saunders
,
1997
.

14.

Perrott
 
DH
,
Kaban
 
LB
.
Temporomandibular joint ankylosis in children
.
Oral Maxillofacial Clin North Am
 
1994
;
6
:
187
96
.

15.

Sawhney
 
CP
.
Bony ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint: follow-up of 70 patients treated with arthroplasty and acryli cspacer interposition
.
Plast Reconstr Surg
 
1986
;
77
:
29
38
.

16.

Moriconi
 
ES
,
Popowich
 
LD
,
Guernsey
 
LH
.
Alloplastic reconstruction of the temporo-mandibular joint
.
Dent Clin N Am
 
1986
;
30
:
307
25
.

17.

Chidzonga
 
MM
.
Temporomandibular joint ankylosis: review of thirty-two cases
.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
 
1999
;
37
:
123
6
.

18.

Lei
 
Z
.
Auricular cartilage graft interposition after temporomandibular joint ankylosis surgery in children
.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
 
2002
;
60
:
985
7
.

19.

Atef
 
M
,
Mounir
 
M
,
Fetouh Abou-El
 
A
,
Hatem
 
H
,
Hakam
 
M
.
Non-vascularized autogenous bone grafts for immediate reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects: a systematic review
.
Int J Adv Res
 
2016
;
4
:
273
80
.

20.

MacIntosh
 
RB
.
The use of autogenous tissues for temporomandibular joint reconstruction
.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
 
2000
;
58
:
63
9
.

21.

Ko
 
EW
,
Huang
 
CS
,
Chen
 
YR
.
Temporomandibular joint reconstruction in children using costochondral grafts
.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
 
1999
;
57
:
789
98
.

22.

Saeed
 
N
,
Hensher
 
R
,
McLeod
 
N
,
Kent
 
J
.
Reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint autogenous compared with alloplastic
.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
 
2002
;
40
:
296
9
.

23.

Yadav
 
S
,
Dhupar
 
V
,
Dhupar
 
A
,
Akkara
 
F
.
Temporalis muscle flap in midfacial region defects. Internet.
 
J Plastic Surg
 
2009
;
7
:1–8.

24.

Cheong
 
RC
,
Kassam
 
K
,
Eccles
 
S
,
Hensher
 
R
.
Congenital temporomandibular joint ankylosis: case report and literature review
.
Case Rep Otolaryngol
 
2016
;
2016
:
1
4
.

25.

Posnick
 
JC
,
Goldstein
 
JA
.
Surgical management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis in the pediatric population
.
Plast Reconstr Surg
 
1993
;
91
:
791
8
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.