Abstract

The anesthesia protocol of bariatric surgery has not been standardized in detail. This report introduced an optimized anesthesia strategy for a severely obese male patient for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and a continuous follow-up for 12 months. A 34-year-old male patient was admitted for super-super-obesity with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome. Based on the results of the examination before laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, he received an efficient preoperative exercise guidance for pulmonary function promotion and diet restriction. Multiple analgesia scheme consisted of regional nerve block and analgesics cocktail. He lost 103 kg without any complications till postoperative 12 months. His mental characteristics were also improved gradually. This case presented a superior composition in perioperative anesthesia management for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. To provide a reference for promoting the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in bariatric surgery.

Introduction

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have been shown to improve postoperative recovery and reduce hospital stay, complications, readmission, and cost in multiple types of surgery [1]. In the updated guidelines for perioperative care in bariatric surgery, it provided recommendations covering each ERAS item involving preoperative optimization, standardized anesthesia, and postoperative nutritional care [2]. In particular, it strongly recommends multi-aspect perioperative management, including preoperative exercise and multimodal, opioid-preserving analgesic approaches. Regarding the coexistence of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome and high pain sensitivity, as well as the tendency of persisted long-term severe pain [3], appropriate anesthesia strategy challenged every anesthesiologist. Hereby, we reported, from the perspective of anesthesiologists, the entire process of perioperative managing a patient with a BMI over 70 kg/m2 who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and the continuous follow-up in postoperative 12 months.

Case presentation

A 34-year-old male patient was admitted to our hospital on 12 May 2020 because of super-super-obesity (height 171 cm, body weight 225 kg, BMI 76.95 kg/m2) with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome.

After the admission, Blood gas analysis showed that PaO2 and PaCO2 were 68.4 and 59.6 mmHg, respectively. We asked him to blow 10 new balloons four times a day (each balloon blows five times), to exercise and diet. Then, after the completion of relevant examinations and the exclusion of contraindications, LSG was settled on 25 May 2020.

In the pre-anesthesia unit, ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block (Sonosite Micromaxx, Bothell, WA, USA) was performed bilaterally. Ropivacaine (0.33%, 30 mL/injection) with dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg) was injected in the fascial plane under the costal margin. And the arterial blood analysis presented PaO2 75 mmHg, PaCO2 42 mmHg, and fasting blood glucose 4.2 mM. Then he has received a bolus infusion of dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg/h for 10 min at a semi-upright position. Intravenous anesthesia induction consisted of midazolam 0.025 mg/kg, propofol 1.5 mg/kg, cisatracurium 0.2 mg/kg, and remifentanil 2 μg/kg. Anesthesia maintenance was achieved by sevoflurane inhalation accompanied by a continuous infusion with remifentanil 5 μg/kg/h, cisatracurium 0.1 mg/kg/h, and dexmedetomidine 0.4 μg/kg/h. The dosages of all intravenous anesthetics were calculated by IBW [ideal body weight (kg) = height (mm)-100]. To alleviate the visceral pain, parecoxib 40 mg and nalbuphine 10 mg were used before the surgery initiation. Thirty minutes before the end of the surgery, 3 mg granisetron, as prophylaxis against PONV was administered. Systemic postoperative analgesia was applied by patients-controlled intravenous analgesia (sufentanil 2 μg/kg, dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg, and granisetron 3 mg) for 48 h. An initial bolus of 2 mL was programmed to deliver followed by 0.8 mL bolus (lockout interval = 15 min, infusion rate = 2 mL/h).

Half an hour following surgery initiation, SPO2 was dropped to 95%. We performed a manual recruitment maneuver, then SPO2 was maintained at 100% till the end of surgery. Arterial blood analysis showed PaO2 186 mmHg, PaCO2 43 mmHg, and glucose 7.3 mM immediately after gastrectomy. Surgical procedures were completed within 75 min by the skilled surgeon team. During the entire surgery, 6 mg ephedrine and 244.3 μg phenylephrine were used to maintain arterial blood pressure. Total anesthetic consumption was propofol 190.3 mg, remifentanil 745.5 μg, cisatracurium 12.27 mg, and dexmedetomidine 70.36 μg. He was discharged 3 days later without postoperative pain, nausea, or vomiting experience.

During the 12-month follow-up period, there was no recorded complication. He reported a gradual physical improvement. At postoperative 2, 6, and 12 months, his body weight losses were 26.1%, 36.7%, and 45.8% respectively. BMI was also dropped to 39.8 kg/m2 at postoperative 12 months (Fig. 1). Results of laboratory tests were fluctuated at postoperative 2 months but returned to normal at postoperative 6 and 12 months (Table 1). In addition, we used the Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA), Hamilton depression scale (HAMD), and Toronto alexithymia scale (TAS) to assess his mental health. The scores were gradually declined, which suggested the improvement of mental status (Fig. 2).

Changes in characteristics over Time. POM, postoperative month.
Figure 1

Changes in characteristics over Time. POM, postoperative month.

Table 1

Laboratory tests.

VariablePreoperativePOM2POM 6POM 12Reference
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)2823.240149–50
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)3734251715–40
Total Bilirubin (mol/L)2940.510.516.60.0–26.0
Direct bilirubin (μmol/L)6.610.31.72.80.0–4.0
Indirect bilirubin (μmol/L)22.430.28.813.80.0–22.0
Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L)5.043.16.424.673.10–8.00
Creatinine (μmol/L)4271877957–97
Estimated glomerular filtration rate [ml/(min.l.)]266.23/114.19126.89>90.00
Uric Acid (μmol/L)569833506458208–428
Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L)4.045.545.55.123.90–6.10
Cholesterol (mmol/L)4.066.793.853.752.86–5.98
Triglycerides (mmol/L)0.852.332.331.40.56–1.70
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L)0.920.870.971.060.94–2.00
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L)2.794.582.462.510.00–2.60
VariablePreoperativePOM2POM 6POM 12Reference
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)2823.240149–50
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)3734251715–40
Total Bilirubin (mol/L)2940.510.516.60.0–26.0
Direct bilirubin (μmol/L)6.610.31.72.80.0–4.0
Indirect bilirubin (μmol/L)22.430.28.813.80.0–22.0
Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L)5.043.16.424.673.10–8.00
Creatinine (μmol/L)4271877957–97
Estimated glomerular filtration rate [ml/(min.l.)]266.23/114.19126.89>90.00
Uric Acid (μmol/L)569833506458208–428
Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L)4.045.545.55.123.90–6.10
Cholesterol (mmol/L)4.066.793.853.752.86–5.98
Triglycerides (mmol/L)0.852.332.331.40.56–1.70
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L)0.920.870.971.060.94–2.00
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L)2.794.582.462.510.00–2.60

POM, postoperative month.

Table 1

Laboratory tests.

VariablePreoperativePOM2POM 6POM 12Reference
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)2823.240149–50
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)3734251715–40
Total Bilirubin (mol/L)2940.510.516.60.0–26.0
Direct bilirubin (μmol/L)6.610.31.72.80.0–4.0
Indirect bilirubin (μmol/L)22.430.28.813.80.0–22.0
Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L)5.043.16.424.673.10–8.00
Creatinine (μmol/L)4271877957–97
Estimated glomerular filtration rate [ml/(min.l.)]266.23/114.19126.89>90.00
Uric Acid (μmol/L)569833506458208–428
Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L)4.045.545.55.123.90–6.10
Cholesterol (mmol/L)4.066.793.853.752.86–5.98
Triglycerides (mmol/L)0.852.332.331.40.56–1.70
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L)0.920.870.971.060.94–2.00
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L)2.794.582.462.510.00–2.60
VariablePreoperativePOM2POM 6POM 12Reference
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)2823.240149–50
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)3734251715–40
Total Bilirubin (mol/L)2940.510.516.60.0–26.0
Direct bilirubin (μmol/L)6.610.31.72.80.0–4.0
Indirect bilirubin (μmol/L)22.430.28.813.80.0–22.0
Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L)5.043.16.424.673.10–8.00
Creatinine (μmol/L)4271877957–97
Estimated glomerular filtration rate [ml/(min.l.)]266.23/114.19126.89>90.00
Uric Acid (μmol/L)569833506458208–428
Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L)4.045.545.55.123.90–6.10
Cholesterol (mmol/L)4.066.793.853.752.86–5.98
Triglycerides (mmol/L)0.852.332.331.40.56–1.70
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L)0.920.870.971.060.94–2.00
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L)2.794.582.462.510.00–2.60

POM, postoperative month.

Changes in mental health status over Time.
Figure 2

Changes in mental health status over Time.

Discussion and conclusions

For bariatric surgery, recent evidence has shown that ERAS protocols successfully improve analgesia, reduce opiate consumption, shorten the length of hospital stay, and lower costs [4, 5]. To avoid postoperative pulmonary complications, such as atelectasis, we suggested the patient perform an easy practice for pulmonary function exercise before surgery. This may contribute to the increase in PaO2 and reduction in PaCO2.

In this case, the patient reported no postoperative pain in the incision and viscera, neither did postoperative nausea and vomiting. This may be related to multimodal analgesia management, including multimode of analgesics, ultrasound-guided TAP block, and perioperative administration of dexmedetomidine. Parecoxib and nalbuphine can effectively improve the outcome of analgesia [6, 7]. The adjunct with TAP block in bariatric surgery was demonstrated to improve the postoperative analgesia [8, 9], and remained effective till 48 h after the block [10]. Compared with general anesthesia alone, it was reported that TAP block successfully increased patients’ satisfaction with recovery following LSG [11]. It is also evidence that the perioperative administration of dexmedetomidine could reduce opioid use and facilitate recovery [12, 13].

During the 12-month follow-up, the patient lost 103 kg (45.8% of his body weight) without any complications. Simultaneously, a gradual improvement of mental health was also achieved by continuous evaluation with HAMA, HAMD, and TASs. Particularly, at postoperative 2–3 months, the patient experienced cliff descent of his body weight, but the score of HAMA was similar to that at postoperative 1 month. He paid more attention on the acceptance of physical changes and nutrition guidance. It has been emphasized that the management of perioperative psychological health is as important as physical health. And psychological counseling could not be limited to the hospitalization phase, long-term postoperative assessment is also critical for patients’ recovery.

Throughout the ERAS protocol, each discipline has a different focus. For anesthesia, it is essential to stabilize intraoperative hemodynamics and to provide efficient postoperative analgesia. Moreover, anesthesiologists also play an important role in preoperative risk assessment and optimization, and postoperative management [14]. With the expanding popularity of bariatric surgery, to promote the application of ERAS for bariatric surgery, interdisciplinary communication and corporation should be strengthened in detail.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Funding

None declared.

References

1.

Ljungqvist
 
O
,
Scott
 
M
,
Fearon
 
KC
.
Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review
.
JAMA Surg
 
2017
;
152
:
292
8
.

2.

Stenberg
 
E
,
Dos Reis Falcão
 
LF
,
O'Kane
 
M
. et al.   
Guidelines for perioperative care in bariatric surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations: a 2021 update
.
World J Surg
 
2022
;
46
:
729
51
.

3.

Majchrzak
 
M
,
Brzecka
 
A
,
Daroszewski
 
C
. et al.   
Increased pain sensitivity in obese patients after lung cancer surgery
.
Front Pharmacol
 
2019
;
10
:
626
.

4.

Sapin
 
A
,
Hilden
 
P
,
Cinicolo
 
L
. et al.   
Enhanced recovery after surgery for sleeve gastrectomies: improved patient outcomes
.
Surg Obes Relat Dis
 
2021
;
17
:
1541
7
.

5.

Zhou
 
J
,
Du
 
R
,
Wang
 
L
. et al.   
The application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Obes Surg
 
2021
;
31
:
1321
31
.

6.

Huang
 
JM
,
Lv
 
ZT
,
Zhang
 
YN
. et al.   
Efficacy and safety of postoperative pain relief by parecoxib injection after laparoscopic surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
.
Pain Pract
 
2018
;
18
:
597
610
.

7.

Yu
 
P
,
Zhang
 
J
,
Wang
 
J
.
Nalbuphine for spinal anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Pain Pract
 
2022
;
22
:
91
106
.

8.

Aamir
 
MA
,
Sahebally
 
SM
,
Heneghan
 
H
.
Transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic bariatric surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
.
Obes Surg
 
2021
;
31
:
133
42
.

9.

Grape
 
S
,
Kirkham
 
KR
,
Albrecht
 
E
.
The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
.
Obes Surg
 
2020
;
30
:
4061
70
.

10.

Mittal
 
T
,
Dey
 
A
,
Siddhartha
 
R
. et al.   
Efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic gastric sleeve resection: a randomized single blinded case control study
.
Surg Endosc
 
2018
;
32
:
4985
9
.

11.

Hamid
 
HKS
,
Ahmed
 
AY
,
Saber
 
AA
. et al.   
Transversus abdominis plane block using a short-acting local anesthetic reduces pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a meta-analysis
.
Surg Obes Relat Dis
 
2020
;
16
:
1349
57
.

12.

Kruthiventi
 
SC
,
Hofer
 
RE
,
Warner
 
ME
. et al.   
Postoperative nausea and vomiting after bariatric surgery and dexmedetomidine anesthetic: a propensity-weighted analysis
.
Surg Obes Relat Dis
 
2020
;
16
:
545
53
.

13.

Zeeni
 
C
,
Aouad
 
MT
,
Daou
 
D
. et al.   
The effect of intraoperative dexmedetomidine versus morphine on postoperative morphine requirements after laparoscopic bariatric surgery
.
Obes Surg
 
2019
;
29
:
3800
8
.

14.

Feldheiser
 
A
,
Aziz
 
O
,
Baldini
 
G
. et al.   
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice
.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
 
2016
;
60
:
289
334
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com