Abstract

Spontaneous osteonecrosis or subchondral bone insufficiency fracture of the knee is a frequent injury in elderly female patients. The medial femoral condyle followed by the medial plateau is the most prevalent sites. When its evolution after conservative treatment is not favorable, medial unicompartimental arthroplasty is a surgical option with good results. We report three cases of early tibial component loosening of medial unicompartimental arthroplasty that could be related to a severe subchondral bone insufficiency fracture of the tibial plateau. In these cases of severe involvement of the tibial plateau, a more careful evaluation would be recommended to choose between unicompartimental and total knee replacement to avoid this early loosening.

INTRODUCTION

Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SONK), also known as subchondral bone insufficiency fracture of the knee (SIFK), is described as a subchondral bone injury, with uncertain pathogenesis [1]. Primary vascular insult, mild trauma in an osteoarthritic joint, meniscal injuries and even osteoporosis are cited as possible related factors [1–4]. This disease affects more females over 60 years old [4]. The most frequent affected site is the medial femoral condyle (MFC), followed by the medial plateau (MP) [4].

Conservative treatment with rest, analgesics and avoid weight bearing on the affected limb is effective in most of the cases [4]. However, in some patients, the evolution may not be favorable. In these situations, unicompartimental knee arthroplasty (UKA) would be a possible solution.

UKA surgery has evolved in recent years due to implant design, surgical technique improvements and better patient selection [5, 6]. This surgery would have the advantage of preserving bone stock, less surgical trauma, faster recovery and better functional results when compared with total knee replacement (TKR) [7, 8]. Despite this, the rate of early revisions (before 2 years after surgery) is higher in UKA [5–9]. In these early failures, aseptic tibial loosening is cited as the most common cause [5–8, 10, 11]. However, literature does not relate this failure to the previous existence of a severe SIFK.

Thus, we report three cases of early tibial component aseptic loosening of medial UKA in patients with previous severe MP SIFK.

Left knee T2 coronal MRI (top left) showing MP and femoral condyle SIFK with articular failure of both surfaces; Top right: same image (T1); Bottom left: orthostatic anterior view X-ray image of the same patient showing medial compartment bone-on-bone contact; Bottom right: lateral view X-ray image of the same patient.
Figure 1

Left knee T2 coronal MRI (top left) showing MP and femoral condyle SIFK with articular failure of both surfaces; Top right: same image (T1); Bottom left: orthostatic anterior view X-ray image of the same patient showing medial compartment bone-on-bone contact; Bottom right: lateral view X-ray image of the same patient.

Top: anterior (left) and lateral view (right) X-ray images of the immediate postoperative period (medial UKA); Bottom: anterior (left) and lateral view (right) X-ray images of the same patient with 5 months of follow-up with tibial component loosening.
Figure 2

Top: anterior (left) and lateral view (right) X-ray images of the immediate postoperative period (medial UKA); Bottom: anterior (left) and lateral view (right) X-ray images of the same patient with 5 months of follow-up with tibial component loosening.

Coronal (A) and sagittal (B) T2 MRI—left knee—showing severe MP SIFK; Anterior (C) and lateral view (D) X-ray images of immediate postoperative period (medial UKA); Anterior (E) and lateral view (F) X-ray images with 3 months of follow-up with tibial component loosening.
Figure 3

Coronal (A) and sagittal (B) T2 MRI—left knee—showing severe MP SIFK; Anterior (C) and lateral view (D) X-ray images of immediate postoperative period (medial UKA); Anterior (E) and lateral view (F) X-ray images with 3 months of follow-up with tibial component loosening.

Orthostatic anterior view (A) and Rosenberg (B) X-ray images with medial osteoarthritis—right knee; Lateral view X-ray image of the same knee (C); T2 coronal MRI (D) with severe MP and femoral condyle SIFK; Immediate postoperative X-ray image (E) and 3 months after surgery (F) showing tibial component loosening.
Figure 4

Orthostatic anterior view (A) and Rosenberg (B) X-ray images with medial osteoarthritis—right knee; Lateral view X-ray image of the same knee (C); T2 coronal MRI (D) with severe MP and femoral condyle SIFK; Immediate postoperative X-ray image (E) and 3 months after surgery (F) showing tibial component loosening.

CASES REPORT

The study was authorized by the research ethics committee (CAAE: 40632520.7.0000.5696). All patients signed a Consent Form for use of clinical data and images, respecting their anonymity.

Between August 2017 and August 2020, we performed medial mobile bearing UKA (Oxford®—Biomet) on 35 knees (31 patients). Of these, in 26 the surgical indication was due to anteromedial osteoarthritis, in 2 due to MFC SIFK, in 4 due to MP SIFK and in 3 patients due to SIFK in the MFC and MP. Early failure occurred in five patients, one due to instability and four to aseptic loosening. Of these last four patients, one had anteromedial osteoarthritis, and the other three are the patients reported here. There were no cases of femoral component loosening.

The three patients were female, aged between 66 and 70 years old. They had history of sudden onset knee pain (two left and one right knee). Magnetic resonance images (MRI) showed severe MP SIFK in all cases and involvement of the MFC in two cases. After a minimum of 3 months of conservative treatment, none of the patients showed improvement. Thus, medial cemented UKA (Oxford®—Biomet) was indicated.

To indicate surgery preoperative X-rays were performed, in addition to MRI of the affected knee [11].

During surgery good bone was observed, leading to adequate cementation. Patients had good outcomes for 3 months, restarting pain symptoms after that (in the medial side, worse when standing or walking). X-ray images showed tibial component loosening in the three cases (Figs 14). Septic loosening was ruled out with blood tests and joint aspiration to analyze liquid cellularity and culture.

All patients underwent revision surgery, where the tibial component loosening was confirmed.

DISCUSSION

SONK has its name under discussion because some authors suggest that necrosis is not the main involved factor. Due to its relationship with mechanical overload and focal stress on the subchondral bone resulting in small fractures, the suggestion is this would better be called subchondral bone insufficiency fracture [1, 3, 12].

This pathology affects more elderly female patients, where the incidence of osteopenia or osteoporosis is more frequent. Despite this, the bone mass deficit has not been definitively correlated [2, 9].

Some risk factors are related to worse prognosis like meniscal extrusion, a SIFK affecting >40% of the involved site, advanced age, varus alignment and Kellgren & Lawrence radiographic classification > III [3, 4, 12]. In our reported cases, all patents presented large involvement of the MP (> 40%).

When evolution is not favorable with unicompartimental involvement without ligament failure, reducible varus deformity <15°, flexion deformity <15°, minimum range of motion of 100° (under anesthesia) and absence of rheumatological diseases, the UKA would be an effective option [11].

Bergeson et al. [7] showed that UKA has a 10 and 20 years survival rate of 98 and 91%, respectively, being the tibial aseptic loosening the main cause of early failure. This was confirmed by other authors but without associating with the surgery indication (osteoarthritis or SIFK) [5, 6, 10].

The implant used in our patients has a mobile bearing. Finite element analysis studies have already shown this prosthesis increases the tension forces just below the tibial component in the immediate postoperative period [11]. Thus, if the bone is not of good quality an early loosening could have a greater chance of occurring (author’s hypothesis). If the SIFK is very extensive, this bone may be compromised and cannot support this increased tension force. Our cases demonstrated this is a possible theory, because such failure did not occur in other cases without severe involvement of subchondral bone (Fig. 5). The use of mobile or fixed bearing implants could be a concern. However, literature shows no difference related to clinical outcomes, radiographic evaluation, revision rates and survivorship [13].

Top: coronal (left) and sagittal (right) T2 MRI with MP SIFK and a mild articular irregularity; Bottom: anterior (left) and lateral view (right) X-ray images 2 years after surgery with good clinical and functional results.
Figure 5

Top: coronal (left) and sagittal (right) T2 MRI with MP SIFK and a mild articular irregularity; Bottom: anterior (left) and lateral view (right) X-ray images 2 years after surgery with good clinical and functional results.

Kaneko et al. [14] suggests evaluating the tibiofemoral angle and the tibial component alignment as risk factors for UKA postoperative complications. LoPresti et al. [8] cites the main factor related to complications would be articular line changes in coronal plane. However, no article relates the degree of tibial plateau SIFK involvement with early component loosening.

The cemented UKA are related to higher incidence of radiolucent lines (RLL) not related to pain, poor clinical outcomes or survivorship compromising compared with cementless [11, 15]. In our cases, RLL were not innocent because of the patients’ symptoms.

Our series of medial Oxford® UKA shows that early failure due to aseptic tibial component loosening is a concern that repeats literature experience. Thus, in cases of surgery indication with severe affected tibial plateau by SIFK, perhaps it would be safer to perform a TKR, for better load distribution and to prevent such complication.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

References

1.

Hussain
 
ZB
,
Chahla
 
J
,
Mandelbaum
 
BR
,
Gomoll
 
AH
,
LaPrade
 
RF
.
The role of meniscal tears in spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee. A systematic review of suspected etiology and a call to revisit nomenclature
.
Am J Sports Med
 
2019
;
47
:
501
7
.

2.

Nelson
 
FR
,
Craig
 
J
,
Francois
 
H
,
Azuh
 
O
,
Oyetakin-White
 
P
,
King
 
B
.
Subchondral insufficiency fractures and spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee may not be related to osteoporosis
.
Arch Osteoporos
 
2014
;
9
:
194
.

3.

Pareek
 
A
,
Parkes
 
CW
,
Bernard
 
C
,
Camp
 
CL
,
Saris
 
DBF
,
Stuart
 
MJ
, et al.  
Spontaneous osteonecrosis/subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee. High rates of conversion to surgical treatment and arthroplasty
.
J Bone Joint Surg Am
 
2020
;
102
:
821
9
.

4.

Strauss
 
EJ
,
Erickson
 
BJ
,
Bush-Joseph
 
C
,
Bach
 
BR
 Jr
. Chap 35 secondary, spontaneous, and postarthroscopy osteonecrosis of the knee: diagnosis and management. In:
Insall & Scott Surgery of the Knee
, 6th edn.
2018
,
475
84
.

5.

Aleto
 
TJ
,
Berend
 
ME
,
Ritter
 
MA
,
Faris
 
PM
,
Meneghini
 
M
.
Early failure of unicompartimental knee arthroplasty leading to revision
.
J Arthroplasty
 
2008
;
23
:
159
63
.

6.

Mozella
 
AP
,
Gonçalves
 
FB
,
Vasconcelos
 
JO
,
Cobra
 
HAAB
.
Revision of unicompartimental Knee arthroplasty: implants used and causes of failure
.
Rev Bras Ortop
 
2014
;
49
:
154
9
.

7.

Bergeson
 
AG
,
Berend
 
KR
,
Lombardi
 
AV
 Jr
,
Hurst
 
JM
,
Morris
 
MJ
,
Sneller
 
MA
.
Medial mobile bearing unicompartimental knee arthroplasty early survivorship and analysis of failure in 1000 consecutive cases
.
J Arthroplasty
 
2013
;
28
:
172
5
.

8.

LoPresti
 
M
,
Raspugli
 
GF
,
Reale
 
D
,
Iacono
 
F
,
Zaffagnini
 
S
,
Filardo
 
G
, et al.  
Early failure in medial unicondylar arthroplasty: radiographic analysis on the importance of joint line restoration
.
J Knee Surg
 
2019
;
32
:
860
5
.

9.

Citak
 
M
,
Dersch
 
K
,
Kamath
 
AF
,
Haasper
 
C
,
Gehrke
 
T
,
Kendoff
 
D
.
Common causes of failed unicompartimental knee arthroplasty: a single-centre analysis of four hundred and seventy cases
.
Int Orthop
 
2014
;
38
:
961
5
.

10.

Van der List
 
JP
,
Zuiderbaan
 
HA
,
Pearle
 
AD
.
Why do medial unicompartimental knee arthroplasties fail today?
 
J Arthroplasty
 
2016
;
31
:
1016
21
.

11.

Goodfellow
 
J
,
O’Connor
 
J
,
Pandit
 
H
,
Dodd
 
C
,
Murray
 
D
.
Unicompartimental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
.
Oxford
:
Goodfellow Publishers Limited
, Wolvercote, Oxford.
2015
.

12.

Pareek
 
A
,
Parkes
 
CW
,
Bernard
 
CD
,
Abdel
 
MP
,
Saris
 
DBF
,
Krych
 
AJ
.
The SIFK score: a validated model for arthroplasty progression after insufficiency fractures of the knee
.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
 
2019
;28:3149–55.

13.

Zhang
 
W
,
Wang
 
J
,
Li
 
H
,
Wang
 
W
,
George
 
DM
,
Huang
 
T
.
Fixed- versus mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
.
Sci Rep
 
2020
;
10
:
19075
.

14.

Kaneko
 
T
,
Kono
 
N
,
Sunakawa
 
T
,
Okuno
 
Y
,
Ikegami
 
H
,
Musha
 
Y
.
Reliable patient-reported outcome measure and survivorship of UKA for primary spontaneous osteonecrosis
.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
 
2019
;
29
:
119
24
.

15.

Stempin
 
R
,
Kaczmarek
 
W
,
Stempin
 
K
,
Dutka
 
J
.
Midterm results of cementless and cemented unicondylar knee arthroplasty with mobile meniscal bearing: a prospective cohort study
.
Open Orthop J
 
2017
;
11
:
1173
8
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com