Journal Article

Duplicate gallbladder masquerading as a choledochal cyst: a case of single-port robotic surgery

Get access
Journal of Surgical Case Reports, Volume 2026, Issue 9, September 2026, rjag766, https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjag766
Published:
07 September 2026
Article history
Received:
23 June 2026
Accepted:
13 August 2026
Published:
07 September 2026

Abstract

Gallbladder duplication is a rare congenital anomaly (1 in 4000 births) that can mimic other biliary pathologies, risking iatrogenic injury. A 61-year-old male presented with fever, right upper quadrant pain, and elevated aminotransferases. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging initially suggested a 3.6-cm Todani type II choledochal cyst posterior to the gallbladder. Suspecting duplication, surgeons utilized a single-port robotic approach via the da Vinci SP system. Intraoperatively, two distinct gallbladders with independent cystic ducts were identified and successfully resected without complications. The operative time was 65 min, and histopathology confirmed chronic cholecystitis in both specimens. This case highlights the difficulty of differentiating gallbladder duplication from a type II choledochal cyst using cross-sectional imaging. Single-port robotic cholecystectomy offers enhanced visualization and articulating instrumentation, facilitating the safe, precise management of complex biliary anomalies.

Introduction

Gallbladder duplication is an extremely rare congenital malformation, with an estimated incidence of ~1 in 4000 live births [1, 2]. Although frequently asymptomatic, it becomes clinically meaningful when gallstone-related diseases or cholecystitis occurs [1, 3]. An unrecognized accessory gallbladder or aberrant cystic duct anatomy poses a substantial risk for incomplete surgery or iatrogenic bile duct injury (BDI) [4, 5].

Despite advances in imaging, preoperative diagnosis remains difficult. Ultrasonography has a relatively low sensitivity of ~66%, whereas magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) offers a higher diagnostic yield of up to 97% [2, 6]. Nevertheless, duplicated gallbladders can closely mimic other conditions, most notably Todani type II choledochal cysts, which represent only 2% of choledochal cysts and appear as true diverticula of the common bile duct [2].

Robotic single-port surgery aims to overcome the ergonomic limitations of conventional single-incision laparoscopic approaches. The da Vinci SP platform has demonstrated safety and efficacy in various biliary procedures [7, 8]; however, reports on its application in duplicated gallbladders remain limited [9–12].

Case presentation

A 61-year-old man presented to our hospital with a 3-day history of fever and abdominal pain. Clinical examination revealed tenderness in the upper right quadrant. Laboratory investigations showed a white blood cell count of 11 500/mm3 and elevated aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels (>100 IU/L), whereas total bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase levels were within normal ranges. The patient had no other medical history or previous surgical interventions.

Initial contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging/MRCP demonstrated two cystic structures. A 3.6-cm saccular lesion was noted posterior to the primary gallbladder. The radiology team interpreted this as a Todani type II choledochal cyst (diverticulum of the common bile duct) (Fig. 1). However, upon detailed multidisciplinary review, the presence of two separate ductal structures suggested a potential gallbladder duplication.

Four preoperative abdominal images. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography images (A and B) show a 3.6-cm saccular cystic structure posterior to the gallbladder. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography images (C and D) show two separate gallbladders, each with a distinct cystic duct, consistent with a duplicated gallbladder and dual cystic duct anatomy.
Figure 1

Preoperative imaging suggesting a choledochal cyst but ultimately consistent with duplicated gallbladder. (A and B) Contrast-enhanced CT images show a 3.6-cm saccular cystic lesion posterior to the gallbladder, initially interpreted as a Todani type II choledochal cyst (true diverticulum of the common hepatic duct). (C and D) MRCP images demonstrate two separate gallbladders with distinct cystic ducts: one draining into the common bile duct and the other arising near the right posterior hepatic duct. These findings were more suggestive of a duplicated gallbladder with dual cystic duct anatomy.

Based on this suspicion, a single-port robotic cholecystectomy using the da Vinci SP system was planned. Intraoperatively, a 2.5-cm transumbilical incision was made, and two distinct gallbladders were observed within the gallbladder fossa. The primary gallbladder was bile-filled, while the accessory gallbladder exhibited hydropic changes (Fig. 2). Notably, each gallbladder had an independent cystic duct and cystic artery (Fig. 3).

Four intraoperative images of a duplicated gallbladder. Image A shows two separate gallbladders. Image B shows indocyanine green fluorescence in the first gallbladder and no fluorescence in the second. Images C and D show clear mucinous fluid being aspirated through a micro-perforation in the second gallbladder, indicating no communication with the biliary tract.
Figure 2

Intraoperative confirmation of a duplicated gallbladder. (A) Two separate gallbladders are identified intraoperatively. (B) Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging demonstrates uptake in the first gallbladder, while the second gallbladder shows no fluorescence, raising suspicion of a non-communicating second gallbladder. (C and D) Micro-perforation of the second gallbladder reveals clear mucinous fluid rather than bile, which was aspirated. This supports the absence of biliary communication and explains the lack of ICG fluorescence.

Four intraoperative images showing two distinct cystic ducts. Images A and B show strong indocyanine green fluorescence in the first cystic duct, confirming biliary communication. Images C and D show a separately identifiable second cystic duct without fluorescence, suggesting no communication with the biliary tract.
Figure 3

Dual cystic duct anatomy with functional discrepancy demonstrated by indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence. (A and B) The first cystic duct shows clear visualization and strong ICG fluorescence, confirming normal biliary communication. (C, D) The second cystic duct is independently identifiable but demonstrates no ICG fluorescence, suggesting a non-communicating duct associated with the second gallbladder.

Meticulous dissection was performed to achieve a critical view of safety for both structures before ligation (Fig. 3). Near-infrared fluorescence with indocyanine green (ICG) was used to clearly delineate the biliary tree (Fig. 4, Video 1).

Four intraoperative images showing the arterial and ductal anatomy of a duplicated gallbladder. Images A and B show two distinct cystic arteries, one supplying each gallbladder, being individually clipped and divided. Images C and D show the fully dissected first and second cystic ducts and their corresponding cystic arteries on operative and indocyanine green fluorescence views.
Figure 4

Intraoperative identification of dual cystic arteries and ducts in duplicated gallbladder. (A and B) Intraoperative views demonstrate two distinct cystic arteries supplying each gallbladder. Each cystic artery is individually identified, clipped, and divided. (C and D) Final operative and indocyanine green fluorescence views demonstrating the anatomical relationships of the first and second cystic ducts and their corresponding cystic arteries after complete dissection.

Both specimens were removed through the umbilical region. The total operative time was 65 min, with minimal blood loss. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 2. Histopathological examination confirmed chronic cholecystitis in both gallbladders, with no evidence of malignancy. The patient expressed high satisfaction with the clinical outcome, particularly noting the minimal postoperative pain and the cosmetic advantage.

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and images.

Discussion

This case highlights the critical diagnostic pitfall of mistaking a duplicated gallbladder for a Todani type II choledochal cyst. As both of these entities can appear as saccular structures connected to the extrahepatic bile duct, imaging misinterpretation can lead to unnecessary bile duct resection or reconstruction, which are required for choledochal cysts but not for gallbladder duplication [13].

In a systematic review of gallbladder duplications, the cystic duct was found to be common to both gallbladders in 43% of cases and separate in 50% [4]. This high frequency of separate ductal anatomy underscores the necessity of assuming the existence of ‘two cystic ducts’ until proven otherwise during surgery to prevent iatrogenic BDI. Current guidelines for safe cholecystectomy emphasize clear anatomical identification and the use of intraoperative imaging or ‘bail-out’ strategies when anatomy is unclear [14].

In our case, after the division of the first cystic duct, the second cystic duct was carefully isolated but not immediately transected. To minimize the risk of unintended BDI, a fundus-first (top-down) approach was adopted to detach the gallbladder from the liver bed. Next, the second cystic duct was identified, safely clipped, and divided after complete mobilization. This stepwise approach reflects a practical bailout strategy in the setting of an unclear biliary anatomy.

The da Vinci SP platform offers several technical advantages in complex biliary cases. Unlike multiport systems, the SP system allows three-wristed instruments and a fully articulating three-dimensional camera to operate through a single 25-mm cannula, providing stable visualization and superior dexterity in narrow fields [7]. These features are particularly beneficial when dealing with an anomalous biliary anatomy, where precise dissection is essential.

Furthermore, the integration of ICG fluorescence cholangiography enhanced real-time identification of biliary structures. Previous studies have demonstrated that near-infrared fluorescence imaging can significantly improve the visualization of the cystic duct–common bile duct junction, thereby reducing the risk of BDI [15]. In the present case, ICG imaging played a crucial role in confirming the separate entry points of the two cystic ducts and guiding safe dissection.

Conclusions

Gallbladder duplication is a rare but surgically meaningful anomaly that may mimic Todani type II choledochal cysts. An accurate preoperative evaluation and a high index of suspicion are essential to avoid misdiagnosis and inappropriate surgical planning.

A single-port robotic cholecystectomy combined with ICG fluorescence imaging is a safe and effective approach for managing complex biliary anatomy by enabling precise dissection and clear anatomical visualization.

Surgeons should maintain a high index of suspicion for gallbladder duplication and adopt flexible intraoperative strategies to ensure patient safety.

Author contributions

Study concept: EJJ; Drafting: KWK; Critical revision and editing: EJJ. Both authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form. The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Funding

None declared.

Ethical statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Dong-A University (IRB No. DAUH IRB-26-029). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report.

Reporting checklist

The authors have completed the CARE reporting checklist.

References

1.

Pillay
 
Y
.
Gallbladder duplication
.
Int J Surg Case Rep
 
2015
;
11
:
18
–
20
.

2.

Panday
 
B
,
Dangol
 
RS
,
Joshi
 
MD
 et al.  
Double gallbladder: a case report and review of literature
.
Ann Med Surg (Lond)
 
2025
;
88
:
785
–
8
.

3.

Goiney
 
RC
,
Schoenecker
 
SA
,
Cyr
 
DR
 et al.  
Sonography of gallbladder duplication and differential considerations
.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
 
1985
;
145
:
241
–
3
.

4.

Darnis
 
B
,
Mohkam
 
K
,
Cauchy
 
F
 et al.  
A systematic review of the anatomical findings of multiple gallbladders
.
HPB (Oxf)
 
2018
;
20
:
985
–
91
.

5.

Zhuang
 
H
,
Ma
 
Z
,
Yin
 
Z
 et al.  
Incidental intraoperative finding of gallbladder duplication in a patient with a choledochal cyst
.
J Int Med Res
 
2020
;
48
:0300060520924570.

6.

Botsford
 
A
,
McKay
 
K
,
Hartery
 
A
 et al.  
MRCP imaging of duplicate gallbladder: a case report and review of the literature
.
Surg Radiol Anat
 
2015
;
37
:
425
–
9
.

7.

Choi
 
YJ
,
Sang
 
NT
,
Jo
 
HS
 et al.  
A single-center experience of over 300 cases of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy comparing the da VINCI SP with the Si/xi systems
.
Sci Rep
 
2023
;
13
:
9482
.

8.

Jang
 
EJ
,
Kim
 
KW
.
Novel single-port robotic hepatectomy: initial clinical experience and outcomes
.
Surg Endosc
 
2025
;
39
:
8480
–
7
.

9.

Batista
 
JD
,
Liepshutz
 
A
,
Merdjane
 
BA
 et al.  
Two’s company: a case report presenting diagnostic and surgical challenges of a rare congenital duplicated gallbladder
.
Cureus
 
2025
;
17
:
e85241
.

10.

Fung
 
AKY
,
Fai Lee
 
K
,
Chong
 
CN
 et al.  
Robotic cholecystectomy for duplicated gallbladder
.
Scott Med J
 
2019
;
64
:
112
–
5
.

11.

Boyle
 
MA
,
Kaplin
 
AW
,
Kushnir
 
L
 et al.  
Management of gallbladder duplication using a single-site robotic-assisted approach: a case study
.
J Robotic Surg
 
2016
;
10
:
161
–
3
.

12.

Mar
 
PK
,
Besner
 
GE
,
Mangray
 
S
 et al.  
Robotic single-site cholecystectomy for a symptomatic duplicated gallbladder
.
J Pediatr Surg Case Rep
 
2020
;
55
:
101417
.

13.

Mahfoud
 
C
,
Haidar
 
A
,
Said
 
A
 et al.  
Double gallbladder mimicking choledochal cyst: a rare anatomical variation
.
Radiol Case Rep
 
2026
;
21
:
757
–
60
.

14.

Brunt
 
LM
,
Deziel
 
DJ
,
Telem
 
DA
 et al.  
Safe cholecystectomy multi-society practice guideline and state of the art consensus conference on prevention of bile duct injury during cholecy-stectomy
.
Ann Surg
 
2020
;
272
:
3
–
23
.

15.

Cai
 
Y
,
Chen
 
Q
,
Cheng
 
K
 et al.  
Intragallbladder versus intravenous indocyanine green (ICG) injection for enhanced bile duct visualization by fluorescent cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective cohort study
.
Gland Surg
 
2024
;
13
:
1628
–
38
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close

Gift article access

As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.

Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Please sign in to your personal account to gift article access.

Gift article access

Please create a link below to share with others. This will provide temporary access to this restricted article.

The link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Gift articles remaining: --

Gift article access

The link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Gift articles remaining: --

Gift article access

As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.

Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses.

You have reached the limit of 10 links within a 30 day period