Journal Article

Vagus nerve-fibre preservation during resection of vagal paraganglioma: a case series with patient-reported outcomes

Journal of Surgical Case Reports, Volume 2026, Issue 9, September 2026, rjag695, https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjag695
Published:
11 September 2026
Article history
Received:
23 May 2026
Accepted:
21 July 2026
Published:
11 September 2026

Abstract

Vagal paragangliomas are rare neuroendocrine tumours of the vagus nerve. Surgery typically causes vagus nerve paralysis with impairments of voice and swallow, and sometimes long-term gastrostomy dependence. We report a series of seven patients who underwent resections of enlarging, benign, non-functional vagal paragangliomas at a tertiary centre with attempted nerve-fibre preservation. MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) and University of Washington Quality of Life scores were obtained by telephone interviews of six patients. Nerve-fibre preservation was achieved in three patients (43%), versus 5% reported in published systematic reviews. The preservation group had superior swallowing (mean MDADI composite 91 versus 66) and quality of life. No patient required tracheostomy or gastrostomy, and no tumour recurrence was identified at a mean follow-up of 10.5 years (range 6.4–12.7). Nerve-fibre preservation, when anatomically feasible, may reduce surgical morbidity without compromising local tumour control. Regionalisation of paraganglioma care and multi-centre data are needed.

Introduction

Paragangliomas (PGL) are rare neuroendocrine neoplasms arising from neural crest derivatives. PGL of the head and neck (PGLHN) arise from parasympathetic glomus cells associated with the glossopharyngeal and vagus nerves, with an incidence of ~1:30 000 [1]. Vagal PGL arise from paraganglionic tissue along the vagus nerve and may present with a neck mass (70%), hoarseness (17%) or dysphagia (11%), or as an incidental finding at imaging (13%) [2]. A familial tendency is seen in ~40% of PGL (more than any other tumour affecting adults) which is frequently associated with pathogenic variants in succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) genes [1, 3]. Approximately 5% of PGLHN are metastatic and under 5% secrete catecholamines [4].

PGLHN should be managed at specialist centres owing to their rarity, complexity, and potential sequelae [1]. Treatment options include surveillance, surgery, and radiotherapy. Surveillance is appropriate for tumours that are benign, solitary, non-functional and asymptomatic [5]. In these circumstances, surgical resection may still be undertaken if the tumour is growing. Surgery involving transection of the vagus nerve on either side of the tumour causes vagus nerve paralysis and consequent impairments of articulation, voice, and swallow, with the potential for gastrostomy tube dependence long term [1, 6].

Vagus nerve-fibre sparing surgery is only reported rarely in the literature. In one retrospective study of 16 patients, nerve-fibre sparing was undertaken in four patients, with continued vocal fold motion and no aspiration occurring in two patients, while tumour recurrence occurred in one nerve-spared patient and two who had nerve resections [6]. A systematic review of 226 vagal PGL found the vagus nerve was functionally preserved in only 11 patients (5%), with tumour control in 98% of complete resections [7].

The present series reports a single-centre experience of vagal PGL resections with attempted nerve-fibre preservation, with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) comparing the preservation and transection groups.

Case series

Seven patients with radiologically confirmed, enlarging vagal PGL who underwent surgical resections at a tertiary head and neck unit between January 2007 and November 2016 were identified retrospectively from operative records. The consensus-based clinical case reporting (CARE) guideline was followed. Mean follow-up was 10.5 years (range 6.4-12.7).

Examination included flexible nasopharyngolaryngoscopy, assessment of cranial nerve function, and auscultation for bruit [1]. All patients underwent contrast-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the neck and some underwent whole-body MRI scanning to screen for multifocal disease, phaeochromocytoma, and distant metastases [1]. Metanephrines were tested by 24-hour urine collection or plasma at diagnosis [1]. All patients were offered genetic testing.

All patients were operated on by a single surgeon (PMC). Nerve-fibre preservation was attempted in all cases. Where vagus nerve fibres overlay the tumour capsule, and an identifiable plane existed between nerve fascicles and the capsule permitting sharp dissection without entering the tumour, those fibres were dissected and preserved. Six patients completed the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) [8] and University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire (UW-QOL) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by telephone interview in January 2023, at a mean of 10.1 years (range 6.4-12.3) after surgery; the seventh patient died from unrelated causes at 12.7 years follow-up, and before PROMs were collected for the present study.

Demographics and outcomes are summarised in Table 1. Mean age was 54 years (range 37–74). Three patients had multifocal PGL and three had pathogenic variants in SDH, consistent with the high familial predisposition in PGLHN. Pre-operative metanephrines were normal in all cases. One patient had embolisation pre-operatively. None had metastatic disease.

Table 1

Patient demographics and outcomes.

Characteristicn (%) or mean [range]
Sex (male:female)3 (43): 4 (57)
Age, years54 [37–74]
Neck mass4 (57)
Hoarseness3 (43)
Tumour size, cm3.8 [2.2–7.0]
Multifocal disease4 (57)
SDH pathogenic variant confirmed3 (43)
Pre-operative embolisation1 (14)
Nerve-fibre preservation achieved3 (43)
Post-operative radiotherapy3 (43)
Vocal fold medialisation5 (71)
Tracheostomy0
Gastrostomy0
Tumour recurrence0
Horner's syndrome4 (57)
Hypoglossal nerve paresis3 (43)
Follow-up, months107 [60–147]

Vagus nerve-fibre preservation was achieved in three patients (43%). Of these, two patients underwent subsequent vocal fold medialisations and one had successful laryngeal reinnervation. Three patients had complete vagus nerve transections, all of whom consequently underwent vocal fold medialisation. No patient required tracheostomy or gastrostomy, contrasting with the 25% tube-feeding dependence reported in other series [9]. Three patients received radiotherapy adjuvantly. No tumour recurrence had been identified by the last follow-up appointment.

Patient-reported outcome measures are shown in Table 2. The nerve-fibre preservation group (n = 3 achieved) demonstrated higher MDADI composite scores (91 versus 66) and superior UW-QOL physical and social–emotional function scores compared with the complete transection group (n = 3). Dysphonia was reported by five patients as mild difficulties projecting their voices in loud environments or when fatigued.

Table 2

Patient-reported outcome measures.

PROMNerve-fibre preservationTransectionAll
MDADIGlobal (max 5)534
Physical (max 40)392530
Emotional (max 30)261922
Functional (max 25)211820
Composite final (max 100)916674
UW-QOLPhysical function (max 600)503488495
Social–emotional (max 600)503454478
General QOL (max 300)200169184

Abbreviations: MDADI, MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory; UW-QOL, University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire; PROM, patient-reported outcome measure.

Discussion

Surgery for vagal PGL carries significant morbidity and should be carefully considered against other management options including surveillance [1]; only a selected group of patients underwent surgery at our centre. In a 20-year series of 46 vagal PGL resections, all patients developed permanent vocal fold paralysis and 25% were still dependent on tube feeding at discharge [9]. A systematic review found functional nerve preservation had been carried out in only 5% of patients [7].

Nerve-fibre preservation was achieved in 43% of the patients identified who received surgery, which is substantially higher than published rates. Preservation was only feasible when an identifiable dissection plane existed between nerve fascicles and tumour capsule. We cannot exclude that tumours amenable to preservation had more favourable characteristics, though mean tumour size did not differ substantially between groups (preservation 3.7 cm versus transection 3.9 cm). Nerve-fibre preservation did not prevent vocal fold immobility, but may have preserved some sensory and motor nerve fibres contributing to swallow function, which is consistent with the observation that in patients with pre-existing vagus nerve dysfunction, surgery causes further worsening of function [1].

The use of PROMs in vagal PGL appears to be novel. To our knowledge, MDADI and UW-QOL have not previously been reported in this population. The nerve-fibre preservation group demonstrated better long-term swallowing (MDADI composite 91 versus 66) and quality of life scores. However, these differences should be interpreted with caution given the small sample size and potential selection bias. No patient required gastrostomy, contrasting with the 25% tube-feeding rate reported elsewhere [9].

The genetics of PGLHN are increasingly understood. Pathogenic variants in SDHD are the most common germline variant. Tumours are rarely metastatic but frequently bilateral, with penetrance estimated to be 80%–90% by 50 years of age [10]. Pathogenic variants in SDHD demonstrate parent-of-origin effect, with tumour development only occurring when the pathogenic variant is inherited through the paternal line [11]. SDHB pathogenic variants carry a higher rate of metastatic disease [10, 12]. In the UK, 11 genes are now screened for pathogenic variants, and all patients with PGLHN should be offered genetic testing [1]. In our series, 43% had confirmed pathogenic variants in SDH, and 57% had multifocal disease.

The rate of metastasis in vagal PGL is reported to be <19% [13]. No patient in our series had metastatic disease, and no tumour recurrence was identified. Five-year tumour control from systematic review data is 98% after complete resections and 93% overall [7]. Our results are consistent with these published outcomes.

Limitations of the present series include the single-institution sample size precluding statistical analysis, the retrospective design, and any selection bias. The single-institution design ensures consistency in selection for surgery and surgical technique but limits external validity.

Nerve-fibre preservation was achieved in 43% of vagal PGL resections. The absence of tumour recurrence at a mean follow-up of 107 months and superior PROMs in the nerve-preservation group indicate a potential role for this technique when anatomically feasible. The natural history of PGLHN is long, and there is a paucity of prospective data to support optimal management of these rare tumours [1]. Further progress will need regionalization of head and neck paraganglioma care and prospective, multi-centre data collection.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Funding

None declared.

Ethical approval

This study was a review of clinical outcomes and did not require submission to the local research ethics committee for approval.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for publication of this case series.

References

1.

Homer
 
JJ
,
Winter
 
SC
,
Abbey
 
EC
 et al.  
Head and neck cancer: United Kingdom national multidisciplinary guidelines, sixth edition
.
J Laryngol Otol
 
2024
;
138
:
S1
–
224
.

2.

Urquhart
 
AC
,
Johnson
 
JT
,
Myers
 
EN
 et al.  
Glomus vagale: paraganglioma of the vagus nerve
.
Laryngoscope
 
1994
;
104
:
440
–
5
.

3.

Erickson
 
D
,
Kudva
 
YC
,
Ebersold
 
MJ
 et al.  
Benign paragangliomas: clinical presentation and treatment outcomes in 236 patients
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
 
2001
;
86
:
5210
–
6
.

4.

Bardella
 
C
,
Pollard
 
PJ
,
Tomlinson
 
I
.
SDH mutations in cancer
.
Biochim Biophys Acta
 
2011
;
1807
:
1432
–
43
.

5.

Jansen
 
TTG
,
Timmers
 
H
,
Marres
 
HAM
 et al.  
Feasibility of a wait-and-scan period as initial management strategy for head and neck paraganglioma
.
Head Neck
 
2017
;
39
:
2088
–
94
.

6.

Miller
 
RB
,
Boon
 
MS
,
Atkins
 
JP
 et al.  
Vagal paraganglioma: the Jefferson experience
.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
 
2000
;
122
:
482
–
7
.

7.

Suárez
 
C
,
Rodrigo
 
JP
,
Bödeker
 
CC
 et al.  
Jugular and vagal paragangliomas: systematic study of management with surgery and radiotherapy
.
Head Neck
 
2013
;
35
:
1195
–
204
.

8.

Chen
 
AY
,
Frankowski
 
R
,
Bishop-Leone
 
J
 et al.  
The development and validation of a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer: the M. D. Anderson dysphagia inventory
.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
 
2001
;
127
:
870
–
6
.

9.

Netterville
 
JL
,
Jackson
 
CG
,
Miller
 
FR
 et al.  
Vagal paraganglioma: a review of 46 patients treated during a 20-year period
.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
 
1998
;
124
:
1133
–
40
.

10.

Ricketts
 
CJ
,
Forman
 
JR
,
Rattenberry
 
E
 et al.  
Tumor risks and genotype-phenotype-proteotype analysis in 358 patients with germline mutations in SDHB and SDHD
.
Hum Mutat
 
2010
;
31
:
41
–
51
.

11.

Bayley
 
JP
,
Oldenburg
 
RA
,
Nuk
 
J
 et al.  
Paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma upon maternal transmission of SDHD mutations
.
BMC Med Genet
 
2014
;
15
:
111
.

12.

Andrews
 
KA
,
Ascher
 
DB
,
Pires
 
DEV
 et al.  
Tumour risks and genotype-phenotype correlations associated with germline variants in succinate dehydrogenase subunit genes SDHB SDHC and SDHD
.
J Med Genet
 
2018
;
55
:
384
–
94
.

13.

Suárez
 
C
,
Rodrigo
 
JP
,
Mendenhall
 
WM
 et al.  
Carotid body paragangliomas: a systematic study on management with surgery and radiotherapy
.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
 
2014
;
271
:
23
–
34
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close

Gift article access

As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.

Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Please sign in to your personal account to gift article access.

Gift article access

Please create a link below to share with others. This will provide temporary access to this restricted article.

The link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Gift articles remaining: --

Gift article access

The link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Gift articles remaining: --

Gift article access

As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.

Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses.

You have reached the limit of 10 links within a 30 day period