Abstract

Giant inguinoscrotal hernias (GIH) are rare and are often complicated by loss of domain (LOD), incarceration, and chronic soft tissue changes. We report a 51-year-old male with a 30-year history of a progressively enlarging left inguinoscrotal hernia extending to the knee, who presented with abdominal pain and leukocytosis. Computed tomography demonstrated marked LOD without strangulation. Intraoperatively, a large scrotal abscess with soft tissue necrosis was identified in the setting of chronic dense bowel adhesions and spermatic cord involvement. Management required combined abdominal and inguinoscrotal approaches, small bowel resection with anastomosis, orchiectomy, and bilateral anterior component separation with absorbable biosynthetic mesh reinforcement. Due to concern for abdominal compartment syndrome following closure, the patient required planned postoperative intubation and paralysis. He was discharged on postoperative day 9 without major complications. This case highlights the complexity of GIH repair and underscores the importance of individualized operative planning and multidisciplinary perioperative management.

Introduction

Inguinal hernias are among the most common surgical conditions worldwide, with an estimated lifetime risk of 27% in men and 3% in women [1]. Giant inguinoscrotal hernias (GIH) are a rare subtype, typically defined as an inguinal hernia that extends below the midpoint of the inner thigh when standing [2, 3]. They most often arise from prolonged delay in treatment and are encountered infrequently in developed countries, likely reflecting improved healthcare access and earlier elective repair [4].

Unlike routine inguinal hernias, GIHs are frequently associated with loss of domain (LOD), in which a substantial portion of abdominal contents chronically resides outside the abdominal cavity [5]. Reduction of these contents can markedly increase intra-abdominal pressure, leading to respiratory compromise or abdominal compartment syndrome [6, 7]. Surgical management is further complicated by chronic adhesions, bowel fixation, and soft tissue changes, including infection or abscess formation [8, 9]. No standardized operative approach exists for GIH with LOD, and management is guided by safe visceral reduction and durable fascial repair.

Case description

A 51-year-old male with a body mass index of 24.09 kg/m2, prior appendectomy, daily cigarette use (1/2 pack per day), and no other significant medical comorbidities presented with a chronically enlarging left inguinoscrotal hernia of approximately 30 years’ duration. He had been asymptomatic until several days prior to presentation, when he developed abdominal pain radiating to the left scrotum and one episode of non-bloody, non-bilious emesis. Examination revealed a large, irreducible hernia extending to the level of the knee with scrotal skin induration and thickening (Fig. 1). The abdomen was soft without signs of peritonitis.

Clinical image of a patient lying supine with a large inguinoscrotal hernia extending toward the knee.
Figure 1

Preoperative clinical photograph demonstrating a giant left inguinoscrotal hernia extending to the level of the knee in the supine position.

Laboratory studies demonstrated leukocytosis and anemia. Computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis demonstrated a massive left inguinal hernia with marked LOD containing multiple loops of small bowel and mesenteric fat, without evidence of obstruction or strangulation (Fig. 2).

Computed tomography images showing abdominal contents herniating into a large inguinoscrotal sac without obstruction.
Figure 2

Computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast (coronal and sagittal views) demonstrating a large left inguinoscrotal hernia containing small bowel and colon with loss of domain, without evidence of obstruction or strangulation.

Given the size and chronicity of the hernia, open repair via midline laparotomy was planned with anticipated component separation. The patient was classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status II. Preoperative cefazolin was administered, and intraoperative ceftriaxone and metronidazole were initiated. At laparotomy, dense adhesions prevented intra-abdominal reduction. An oblique inguinoscrotal incision was performed, revealing a large abscess cavity with necrosis of scrotal soft tissue and omentum. The bowel was congested but not ischemic. During adhesiolysis, an enterotomy occurred, necessitating resection of a friable segment of distal small bowel densely adherent to the abscess cavity. A stapled side-to-side functional end-to-end anastomosis was then performed. The hernia sac and necrotic scrotal tissue were excised, and orchiectomy was required due to involvement of the spermatic cord.

The remaining herniated contents were successfully reduced into the abdominal cavity and a Cooper’s ligament repair was performed. Due to marked LOD, bilateral anterior component separation was performed to facilitate fascial closure. The external oblique aponeuroses were released bilaterally, allowing midline fascial closure with running looped PDS sutures. Peak airway pressures increased from 15 to 26 cm H₂O during closure, raising concern for abdominal compartment syndrome and prompting planned postoperative intubation and paralysis. An onlay absorbable biosynthetic mesh (GORE® ENFORM Biomaterial) was placed for reinforcement given the contaminated operative field. Scrotoplasty was performed with excision of redundant scrotal skin. Two scrotal drains and four abdominal Jackson-Pratt drains were placed.

Postoperatively, the patient remained intubated and paralyzed overnight with bladder pressure monitoring. Paralytics were discontinued on postoperative day 1 and intravenous ceftriaxone and metronidazole were continued until postoperative day 4. The Foley catheter and right scrotal drain were removed by postoperative day 7, and he transitioned from total parenteral nutrition to an oral diet by postoperative day 9. He was discharged home on postoperative day 9 in stable condition with abdominal and left scrotal drains in place (Fig. 3). At 3-week follow-up, he reported improving bowel function, full ambulation, and well-healed incisions without evidence of seroma, hematoma, or infection. At 4-month follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic with no evidence of recurrence (Fig. 4).

Postoperative image showing abdominal incision and multiple surgical drains in place.
Figure 3

Postoperative day 9 clinical photograph demonstrating closed midline abdominal incision with sutures and staples, 2 abdominal drains, and 1 scrotal drain following hernia repair and reconstruction.

Follow-up image of patient standing with healed surgical scars and improved abdominal contour.
Figure 4

Clinical photograph at 4-month follow-up demonstrating well-healed abdominal and scrotal incisions with restoration of abdominal wall and scrotal contour.

Final pathology demonstrated a 48-cm segment of small bowel with serosal adhesions, granulation tissue, and necrotic mesenteric fat without malignancy (0/3 lymph nodes). The scrotal specimen showed chronic inflammation and necrosis of peri-testicular soft tissue, benign scrotal skin with mixed acute and chronic inflammation, and a testis with reduced spermatogenesis without germ cell neoplasia.

Discussion

GIHs develop over years of progressive enlargement, resulting in anatomical distortion and physiologic adaptation. A key challenge is LOD, in which abdominal viscera reside chronically outside the abdominal cavity. Reduction may therefore increase intra-abdominal pressure, risking respiratory compromise and abdominal compartment syndrome [5]. No standardized operative guidelines exist, but various strategies have been described, including staged repair, component separation techniques, and use of traction to expand the abdominal cavity [3, 10, 11].

Severe complications such as bowel necrosis and advanced soft tissue changes may necessitate additional operative interventions. Scrotal abscesses may develop secondary to chronic ischemia, skin breakdown, or bowel perforation [12]. Even non-ischemic bowel may require resection in the setting of dense adhesions or chronic inflammation preventing safe reduction. Chronic enlargement may also necessitate reconstructive procedures such as scrotoplasty or penile reconstruction [13, 14].

Management of GIH with LOD often requires multidisciplinary planning involving surgery, anesthesia, and critical care teams due to the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome and prolonged postoperative ventilation. Preoperative counseling should address the physiologic consequences of abdominal closure and the possibility that definitive repair may not be feasible. Adjunctive tools such as P-POSSUM or CeDAR may further assist perioperative risk assessment in complex abdominal wall reconstruction.

This case highlights the importance of individualized operative planning and multidisciplinary management in GIH complicated by LOD, infection, and dense adhesions. Chronicity may necessitate adjunctive procedures such as bowel resection, orchiectomy, and advanced abdominal wall reconstruction. Early evaluation and elective repair remain critical to prevent complications associated with long-standing disease.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Funding

None declared.

Consent statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

References

1.

Kingsnorth
 
A
,
LeBlanc
 
K
.
Hernias: inguinal and incisional
.
Lancet
 
2003
;
362
:
1561
71
.

2.

Olaoye
 
I
,
Adesina
 
MD
.
Management of giant inguinal hernia; report of four cases and review of literature
.
Hernia
 
2025
;
29
:
175
.

3.

Cavalli
 
M
,
Biondi
 
A
,
Bruni
 
PG
 et al.  
Giant inguinal hernia: the challenging hug technique
.
Hernia
 
2015
;
19
:
775
83
.

4.

Koller
 
A
,
Oberholzer
 
J
,
Rössler
 
F
.
Giant Inguino-scrotal hernia with loss of domain: surgical report and literature review
.
Cureus
 
2024
;
16
:
e74599
.

5.

Parker
 
SG
,
Halligan
 
S
,
Liang
 
MK
 et al.  
Definitions for loss of domain: an international delphi consensus of expert surgeons
.
World J Surg
 
2020
;
44
:
1070
8
.

6.

Van Hoef
 
S
,
Dries
 
P
,
Allaeys
 
M
 et al.  
Intra-abdominal hypertension and compartment syndrome after complex hernia repair
.
Hernia
 
2024
;
28
:
701
9
.

7.

Petro
 
CC
,
Raigani
 
S
,
Fayezizadeh
 
M
 et al.  
Permissible intraabdominal hypertension following complex abdominal wall reconstruction
.
Plast Reconstr Surg
 
2015
;
136
:
868
81
.

8.

Oyewale
 
SO
,
Ariwoola
 
AO
.
Outcomes in the surgical management of giant inguinal hernias
.
Int J Abdom Wall Hernia Surg
 
2023
;
6
:
6
13
.

9.

Staubitz
 
JI
,
Gassmann
 
P
,
Kauff
 
DW
 et al.  
Surgical treatment strategies for giant inguinoscrotal hernia - a case report with review of the literature
.
BMC Surg
 
2017
;
17
:
135
.

10.

Tang
 
F-X
,
Zong
 
Z
,
Xu
 
J-B
 et al.  
Combination of preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum and botulinum toxin a enables the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal approach for repairing giant inguinoscrotal hernias
.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
 
2020
;
30
:
260
6
.

11.

Barbosa
 
E
,
Barone
 
G
,
Bertoglio
 
CL
 et al.  
Laparoscopic application of intraoperative fascial traction (fasciotensⓇHernia) during loss of domain scrotal hernia repair: a European multicenter case series with technical details and preliminary results
.
Hernia
 
2026
;
30
:
136
.

12.

Ahmed
 
MS
,
Hamati
 
T
,
Dar
 
F
 et al.  
A massive sliding inguinal hernia containing the entire right colon with caecal perforation: a rare surgical challenge
.
Cureus
 
2025
;
17
:
e93330
.

13.

Hodgkinson
 
DJ
,
McIlrath
 
DC
.
Scrotal reconstruction for giant inguinal hernias
.
Mayo Clin Proc
 
1982
;
57
:
383
6
.

14.

Vasiliadis
 
K
,
Knaebel
 
H-P
,
Djakovic
 
N
 et al.  
Challenging surgical management of a giant inguinoscrotal hernia: report of a case
.
Surg Today
 
2010
;
40
:
684
7
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.