Abstract

Mycotic aortic aneurysms pose a unique surgical challenge, with operative management dependent on patient factors and institutional capabilities. In an infected surgical field, cryopreserved aortic homograft (CAH) can provide a durable and infection-resistant repair. We present the case of a 48-year-old male with a mycotic abdominal aortic aneurysm, confounded by an initial diagnosis of blunt abdominal aortic injury. Endovascular aneurysm repair was performed; however, subsequent rapid mycotic degeneration elucidated an infectious component. The patient then underwent explantation of the infected graft with in-line reconstruction via CAH. He has demonstrated clinical stability and graft patency at 16 months postoperatively.

Introduction

Mycotic aortic aneurysm is a rare and life-threatening pathology that necessitates prompt diagnosis and treatment. Definitive management includes excision of the infected tissue, aortic reconstruction, and prolonged antibiotic therapy. In an infected field, cryopreserved aortic homograft (CAH) is an option for in-line aortic repair.

We present a case of a mycotic abdominal aortic aneurysm in a 48-year-old male. Initially diagnosed with blunt aortic injury following a fall, the patient first underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The mycotic component was elucidated postoperatively, eventually requiring open reconstruction with CAH. This case highlights a unique surgical problem: mycotic aortic aneurysm in the presence of infected endograft.

Case report

Patient is a 48-year-old male with history including obesity (BMI 42 kg/m2), type 2 diabetes mellitus (A1c 7.8%), myocardial infarction, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, stage three chronic kidney disease, and schizophrenia. Six days after falling down a staircase, he presented to an outside emergency department with back pain. Non-contrast computed tomography (CT) demonstrated nonspecific retroperitoneal stranding around the infrarenal aorta without aneurysm, hematoma, or disruption. He was discharged with analgesia and instructed to follow up with primary care.

Ten days after, the patient presented to our hospital with persistent back pain and new intermittent bilateral lower extremity weakness and paresthesia. CT angiography (CTA) revealed a 3.4 × 1.6 cm infrarenal aortic pseudoaneurysm (Fig. 1). He proceeded emergently to the hybrid operating room for EVAR. A 23 × 14.5 × 140 mm Excluder Endoprosthesis was deployed in infrarenal position via percutaneous left femoral arterial access. Accompanying 16 × 110 mm limb (GORE Medical, Newark, DE) was deployed via percutaneous right femoral arterial access. A Q50 angioplasty balloon (Merit Medical, South Jordan, UT) was inflated to ensure proper apposition. Completion aortography confirmed appropriate position without endoleak. He was discharged in stable condition on postoperative day (POD) 3.

Images from CTA with subfigures A-C showing the pseudoaneurysm in various views.
Figure 1

CTA images from initial presentation, demonstrating 3.4 × 1.6 cm posterior infrarenal aortic pseudoaneurysm (indicated by arrow). (A) Sagittal and (B) axial cuts of CTA, with (C) 3D aortic reconstruction.

On POD 13, the patient re-presented with hematuria, lower back pain, and euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis. CTA demonstrated mild cystitis and bilateral renal cortical hypodensities suggesting infarction versus infection. The endograft was patent, with hypodensity surrounding the distal abdominal aorta concerning for infection versus expected postoperative changes (Fig. 2). On hospital day 4, the hematuria and ketoacidosis had resolved, yet he was persistently tachycardic with new onset fever. Admission blood cultures were negative. Patient refused additional infectious workup and left against medical advice.

Images from CTA showing the mycotic aneurysm and associated infected collection in various planes via subfigures A-C.
Figure 2

CTA demonstrating mycotic aneurysm and infected collection, indicated by arrows. (A) Coronal slice, (B and C) axial slices.

On outpatient POD 23 follow-up, the patient was tachycardic (140 bpm) and febrile (38.2°C); he was subsequently readmitted. Blood cultures grew Salmonella species and Finegoldia magna. CTA showed enlargement of the aortic sac without contrast extravasation, suggesting endoleak versus abscess.

The patient was taken to the operating room for exploratory laparotomy. Periaortic phlegmon and a psoas abscess were debrided and drained. Proximal aortic control via 7 min of suprarenal clamping and distal control were obtained. The infected endograft was explanted (Fig. 3A). A 10 mm cryopreserved aortoiliac homograft (CryoLife, Kennesaw, GA) was implanted as an anatomic interposition graft with left graft external iliac artery (EIA) (graft hypogastric oversewn) anastomosed to left common iliac artery (CIA) and right graft EIA (graft hypogastric included bevel) anastomosed to right CIA (Fig. 3B). Patient was admitted to the intensive care unit.

Photos showing the operative field at two stages, indicated by subfigures A and B.
Figure 3

Intraoperative images demonstrating (A) mycotic aneurysm cavity post-removal of infected endograft (indicated by arrow) and (B) cryopreserved arterial homograft post-implantation.

Intraoperative cultures returned Salmonella species. Postoperative course was uneventful, and he was discharged on POD 9. He completed 6 weeks of IV ampicillin, with transition to lifelong oral cefdinir. He has remained well at 16-month follow-up, with 12-month CTA demonstrating patent graft (Fig. 4). Future management includes yearly exams with aortoiliac imaging. Figure 5 details temporality of presentations and surgical interventions.

Images from interval postoperative CTA with subfigures A-D showing the patent graft in various planes.
Figure 4

CTA images one year postoperatively. (A and C) Patent aortic graft (indicated by solid arrow) in coronal and axial imaging, respectively. (B and D) Patent iliac limbs of aortic graft with preserved distal flow (indicated by dotted arrow) in coronal and axial imaging, respectively.

Visual depiction of the clinical course organized chronologically.
Figure 5

Timeline illustrating patient’s presentations and subsequent interventions. AMA, against medical advice; IV, intravenous.

Discussion

Initially, the patient was diagnosed with blunt abdominal aortic injury (BAAI) and treated endovascularly. BAAI has been reported in <0.1% of trauma admissions with overall mortality of 28% [1, 2]. Presentation may include abdominal or back pain, decreased femoral pulses, neurological defects, or intestinal angina [3]. Treatment options include endovascular and open repair, with reportedly nonsignificant difference in mortality risk [1].

Although the mycotic aneurysm was likely present at the initial blunt injury, we consider the possibility of bacterial seeding via traumatic aortic disruption or a primarily infected prosthetic EVAR graft. However, Salmonella rather than Staphylococcus or Streptococcus species as the causative pathogen supports a diagnosis of primary mycotic aneurysm [4–6]. The patient reported potential Salmonella exposure, with consumption of reportedly undercooked chicken with subsequent gastrointestinal symptoms prior to initial presentation.

For primary aortic or graft infections, reconstruction options include extra-anatomic bypass or in-line reconstruction with CAH, silver coated or antibiotic impregnated (classically rifampin-soaked Dacron) protheses, or neo-aortoiliac system (NAIS) using autogenous femoral veins [7–9]. Extra-anatomic bypass grafting with removal or exclusion of the infected area is a widely accepted treatment option. However, this approach requires prolonged operative time, carries the risk for fatal aortic stump blowout, and has 3-to-5-year patency rates between 43% and 73% [10–13].

Studies assessing CAH for aortic reconstruction have been promising, with 3-year patency rate of 97%, 1-year survival of 75%, and 5-year survival of 51%. Complication rates at 5 years have been reportedly low, with graft-related complications, graft explant, and limb loss of 20%, 12%, and 3%, respectively [9].

The NAIS procedure, performed infrequently and generally at larger institutions, has the advantage of using native conduit, but has been associated with significant morbidity (20% re-intervention rates, 6% re-infection rates) and 9% 30-day mortality [8].

When compared to CAH, antibacterial-loaded prostheses have been associated with lower re-intervention rates but trend toward greater risk for infection reoccurrence. Regardless, 30-day and 5-year mortality have been shown to be not significantly different [14, 15].

This case details the diagnosis and management of a rarity in vascular surgery: mycotic aortic aneurysm with infected aortic endograft in place. The patient’s aortic injury, initially presumed to be secondary to his blunt abdominal trauma, was treated endovascularly. In retrospect, a mycotic aneurysm was likely present at this time. The diagnosis, especially in patients with relevant potential exposures such as Salmonella via undercooked poultry, should be considered to allow for timely repair. Strategies for operative intervention take into consideration patient factors, surgeon experience, and institutional capabilities. For aortic reconstruction in the setting of highly virulent organisms or frank purulence, cryopreserved homograft has seen favorable outcomes and should be considered.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Funding

None declared.

References

1.

Sheehan
 
BM
,
Grigorian
 
A
,
De Virgilio
 
C
 et al.  
Predictors of blunt abdominal aortic injury in trauma patients and mortality analysis
.
J Vasc Surg
 
2020
;
71
:
1858
66
.

2.

De Mestral
 
C
,
Dueck
 
AD
,
Gomez
 
D
 et al.  
Associated injuries, management, and outcomes of blunt abdominal aortic injury
.
J Vasc Surg
 
2012
;
56
:
656
60
.

3.

Randhawa
 
MPS
,
Menzoian
 
JO
.
Seat belt aorta
.
Ann Vasc Surg
 
1990
;
4
:
370
7
.

4.

Li
 
HL
,
Chan
 
YC
,
Cheng
 
SW
.
Current evidence on management of aortic stent-graft infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Ann Vasc Surg
 
2018
;
51
:
306
13
.

5.

Sörelius
 
K
,
Budtz-Lilly
 
J
,
Mani
 
K
 et al.  
Systematic review of the management of mycotic aortic aneurysms
.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
 
2019
;
58
:
426
35
.

6.

Huang
 
YK
,
Chen
 
CL
,
Lu
 
MS
 et al.  
Clinical, microbiologic, and outcome analysis of mycotic aortic aneurysm: the role of endovascular repair
.
Surg Infect (Larchmt)
 
2014
;
15
:
290
8
.

7.

Shiraev
 
T
,
Barrett
 
S
,
Heywood
 
S
 et al.  
Incidence, management, and outcomes of aortic graft infection
.
Ann Vasc Surg
 
2019
;
59
:
73
83
.

8.

Girshfeld
 
SJ
,
Motta
 
JC
,
De Grandis
 
EC
 et al.  
Contemporary experience of the neo-aortoiliac system (NAIS) procedure: a case series with review of the literature
.
Ann Vasc Surg
 
2024
;
109
:358–69.

9.

Harlander-Locke
 
MP
,
Harmon
 
LK
,
Lawrence
 
PF
 et al.  
The use of cryopreserved aortoiliac allograft for aortic reconstruction in the United States
.
J Vasc Surg
 
2014
;
59
:
669
674.e1
.

10.

Brown
 
KE
,
Heyer
 
K
,
Rodriguez
 
H
 et al.  
Arterial reconstruction with cryopreserved human allografts in the setting of infection: a single-center experience with midterm follow-up
.
J Vasc Surg
 
2009
;
49
:
660
6
.

11.

Yeager
 
RA
,
Taylor
 
LM
,
Moneta
 
GL
 et al.  
Improved results with conventional management of infrarenal aortic infection
.
J Vasc Surg
 
1999
;
30
:
76
83
.

12.

Seeger
 
JM
,
Pretus
 
HA
,
Welborn
 
MB
 et al.  
Long-term outcome after treatment of aortic graft infection with staged extra-anatomic bypass grafting and aortic graft removal
.
J Vasc Surg
 
2000
;
32
:
451
61
.

13.

Quiñones-Baldrich
 
WJ
.
Long-term results following surgical management of aortic graft infection
.
Arch Surg
 
1991
;
126
:
507
.

14.

Tabiei
 
A
,
Cifuentes
 
S
,
Glasgow
 
AE
 et al.  
Cryopreserved arterial allografts vs rifampin-soaked Dacron for the treatment of infected aortic and iliac grafts
.
J Vasc Surg
 
2023
;
78
:
1064
1073.e1
.

15.

Bisdas
 
T
,
Bredt
 
M
,
Pichlmaier
 
M
 et al.  
Eight-year experience with cryopreserved arterial homografts for the in situ reconstruction of abdominal aortic infections
.
J Vasc Surg
 
2010
;
52
:
323
30
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.