Abstract

Paraduodenal hernias are rare congenital internal hernias, with right-sided cases being particularly uncommon and often difficult to diagnose due to nonspecific symptoms. We report a 21-year-old male with a 1-year history of recurrent abdominal pain and vomiting, previously managed conservatively. Physical examination and laboratory findings were unremarkable. Computed tomography demonstrated clustered small bowel loops in the right hemiabdomen with displacement of the superior mesenteric vessels, suggestive of an internal hernia. Laparoscopy confirmed a right paraduodenal hernia caused by a congenital mesenteric defect, which was successfully repaired laparoscopically, with prophylactic appendectomy performed. The patient had an uneventful recovery. This case highlights the importance of considering internal hernias in young patients with recurrent, unexplained abdominal symptoms and the role of early imaging and surgical intervention in preventing complications.

Introduction

Internal hernia is defined as the protrusion of a viscus through a peritoneal or mesenteric aperture. Its incidence ranges between 0.5% and 0.9% and it is associated with high mortality rates, reaching over 50% by causing ~5.8% small bowel obstructions [1, 2]. Internal hernias can be classified based on the origin of the defect as either congenital or acquired, or based on the anatomical location of the defect [3]. Paraduodenal hernias are the most common type of congenital internal hernias, accounting for ~53% of all cases. They are further classified into left and right paraduodenal hernias, with the right type accounting for ~25% [4]. We present a rare case of a right paraduodenal hernia in a young adult male, diagnosed after a year of intermittent, nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms. The hernia was confirmed by computed tomography (CT) imaging and successfully treated with laparoscopic surgery. This case underscores the diagnostic challenge posed by right paraduodenal hernias and the importance of considering internal hernias in patients with recurrent, unexplained abdominal symptoms.

Case presentation

A 21-year-old male, medically and surgically free with no known chronic conditions, presented to the Emergency Department with abdominal pain and vomiting. He reported experiencing similar episodes over the past year. Previously, he had received various diagnoses, including gastroenteritis and peptic ulcer disease, and was managed conservatively. On examination, he had mild epigastric tenderness. The patient was hemodynamically stable on presentation, and his complete blood count (CBC) and routine chemistry panel, as shown in Table 1, were unremarkable. Nasogastric decompression was not performed, as the patient did not exhibit significant gastric distension or persistent vomiting requiring decompression. Contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen demonstrated clustered small bowel loops displacing the superior mesenteric vessels toward the left hemiabdomen (Fig. 1). An additional axial image revealed a thick fibrous band adjacent to the iliac vessels (Fig. 2). Coronal CT images further showed clustered small bowel loops located in the right hemiabdomen, with the superior mesenteric vessels positioned laterally toward the left hemiabdomen (Fig. 3). His symptoms improved upon admission to the surgical ward. Given the congenital nature of the condition, surgical intervention was planned, and a diagnostic laparoscopy was performed. Intraoperative findings were consistent with the CT scan, showing a right iliac fossa defect formed by a long, thick band near the iliac vessels at the root of the mesentery (Fig. 4). The hernia opening was widened, and after medial mobilization of the ascending colon, the small intestine was noted to pass inferior to the third part of the duodenum and lateral to the superior mesenteric vessels, confirming a right paraduodenal hernia. The hernia sac was opened, and the bowel appeared normal with no interloop adhesions. A prophylactic appendectomy was performed due to the unusual position of the appendix after mobilization, to prevent future diagnostic confusion or complications. The entire procedure was completed laparoscopically. Postoperatively, the patient’s symptoms improved, and he was discharged two days after surgery. At the 3-week follow-up, he reported feeling well with only minor postoperative discomfort. He is scheduled for a follow-up visit in 9 months.

Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan of the abdomen demonstrating clustered small bowel loops with displacement of the superior mesenteric vessels toward the left hemiabdomen (arrow).
Figure 1

Axial CT image showing the clustered small bowel loops pushing the superior mesenteric vessels toward the left hemiabdomen (arrow points to the superior mesenteric vessels).

Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan demonstrating a thick fibrous band adjacent to the iliac vessels (arrow).
Figure 2

Axial CT image showing the thick band near the iliac vessels (arrow).

Coronal contrast-enhanced CT image demonstrating clustered small bowel loops within the right hemiabdomen with lateral displacement of the superior mesenteric vessels toward the left side.
Figure 3

Coronal images showing the clustered small bowel loops in the right hemiabdomen, notice the superior mesentrtic vessels lateral to it the left hemiabdomen.

Laparoscopic intraoperative image demonstrating a long, thick peritoneal band overlying the iliac vessels and extending cranially toward the mesenteric root, beneath which small bowel loops were herniated.
Figure 4

Laparoscopic intraoperative view showing a long, thick vessel-like peritoneal band over the iliac vessels passing cranially toward the mesenteric root, under which small bowel loops have herniated.

Table 1

CBC and routine biochemical parameters.

ParameterResult(s) / RangeReference range*
CBC
White blood cell (count)6.4 × 109/L4–11 × 109/L
Hemoglobin15.9 g/dL13–17 g/dL
Hematocrit45.7%40–50%
Platelets220 × 109/L150–400 × 109/L
Chemistry
Aspartate aminotransferase14.2 U/L<40 U/L
Alanine aminotransferase13.8 U/L<41 U/L
Alkaline phosphatase60 U/L40–129 U/L
Direct bilirubin3.40 mg/dL<0.5 mg/dL
Total bilirubin7.00 mg/dL0.1–1.2 mg/dL
Sodium140 mmol/L135–145 mmol/L
Potassium4.10 mmol/L3.5–5.1 mmol/L
Chloride101 mmol/L98–106 mmol/L
CO₂ (Bicarbonate)24 mmol/L22–29 mmol/L
Calcium2.23 mmol/L2.15–2.55 mmol/L
Total protein75.60 g/L60–80 g/L
Albumin48.60 g/L35–50 g/L
Uric acid239.0–330.0 μmol/L200–430 μmol/L
Lipase37.7 U/L0–160 U/L

*Reference ranges are based on the institutional laboratory standards.

Discussion

Right paraduodenal hernias are a very rare type of congenital hernia, representing ~25% of all paraduodenal hernias [4]. In paraduodenal hernias, patients often present with a long-standing history of abdominal pain associated with vomiting and abdominal distention. Many patients have experienced similar episodes since childhood without any significance in the labs and physical examination which can make the diagnosis difficult [5, 6]. It is important to conduct further investigations in such cases, especially when patients present multiple times without a definitive diagnosis. CT scans are available, non-invasive, and play an important role in ruling out internal hernias [7]. Right paraduodenal hernia is described as herniation through Waldeyer’s fossa and occurs due to incomplete or absent rotation of the small bowel during fetal development [6, 8]. This abnormal rotation creates a space below the third part of the duodenum, located behind the small bowel mesentery, which extends downward to the right [8]. The superior mesenteric artery and vein can serve as landmarks for right paraduodenal hernia when they run anteromedial to Waldeyer’s fossa [9]. It is important to differentiate right paraduodenal hernia from midgut volvulus, which is considered a surgical emergency requiring immediate intervention. Midgut volvulus is typically identified on CT by the whirlpool sign, representing twisting of the mesenteric vessels around the superior mesenteric artery along with abnormalities of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) axis [10]. Right paraduodenal hernias are classified into three types based on anatomical and embryological features. Type I is characterized by a normally positioned duodenum and ligament of Treitz, with the hernia orifice located posterior to the superior mesenteric vessels near the jejunocecal isthmus, likely due to incomplete fusion of the ascending colon mesentery with the retroperitoneum. Type II involves absence of the ligament of Treitz, resulting in right-sided displacement of the duodenojejunal junction; the hernia sac contains only the efferent loop and is caused by incomplete rotation of the prearterial midgut. Type III resembles Type II but includes Ladd’s bands, abnormal cecal positioning in the right upper quadrant, and jejunoileal adhesions (Pellerin fusion), indicating severe midgut malrotation [11]. It is important to differentiate between those subtypes to reach the optimal surgical approach. The management of paraduodenal hernia depends on the patient’s clinical presentation. Patients presenting with acute small bowel obstruction require emergent surgical intervention. In contrast, when the diagnosis is established incidentally or in patients with intermittent symptoms, elective surgical repair is recommended, as the lifetime risk of developing small bowel obstruction is reported to be ~50%. If left untreated, paraduodenal hernia may progress to bowel obstruction, ischemia, and perforation, which are associated with high mortality [1, 2, 12, 13]. The surgical intervention includes reduction of the herniated bowel, followed by either closure of the hernia defect with sutures or widening of the defect to prevent future incarceration [14, 15]. The defect can be treated either by primary closure or widening the opening to prevent future incarceration. The choice depends on intraoperative findings; closure is preferred when the bowel is easily reducible, while enlargement of the defect is recommended when reduction is difficult due to a tight neck, edema, or adhesions to allow safe reduction and avoid vascular injury [15]. In our case, the patient had a structure mimicking a vessel, which made the decision to dissect it challenging due to its resemblance to true vascular structures, as shown in Fig. 4. The herniated bowel was successfully reduced, and the patient was managed by widening the hernia defect to facilitate reduction and prevent future incarceration. To the best of our knowledge, no previous case reports in the literature have described a similar finding. Our case demonstrates an abnormal and atypical form of right paraduodenal hernia. Recognizing this variation is crucial, as it helps surgeons distinguish between a peritoneal band and a true vascular structure, thereby facilitating safer intraoperative decision-making. This case further emphasizes the need for heightened suspicion and thorough evaluation in patients with recurrent abdominal symptoms, particularly when imaging or intraoperative findings are atypical.

Conclusion

We presented a rare case of a young patient with a long standing history of intermittent abdominal symptoms without a definitive diagnosis. In this case, there were many difficulties in reaching the diagnosis, especially due to the unremarkable physical examination and laboratory results. However, it is important to conduct further investigations using imaging tools such as CT scans, which can provide critical details to help in diagnosis. It is important to consider internal hernias in the differential diagnosis of young patients with unexplained, recurrent gastrointestinal symptoms. Early diagnosis and management are essential to reduce mortality and improve patient outcomes.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the institutional support provided by King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, which facilitated the clinical evaluation and diagnostic procedures required for this study. This research received no external funding, and the authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Funding

None declared.

References

1.

Newsom
 
BD
,
Kukora
 
JS
.
Congenital and acquired internal hernias: unusual causes of small bowel obstruction
.
Am J Surg
 
1986
;
152
:
279
85
.

2.

Kar
 
S
,
Mohapatra
 
V
,
Rath
 
PK
.
A rare type of primary internal hernia causing small intestinal obstruction
.
Case Rep Surg
 
2016
;
2016
:
3540794
.

3.

Murali Appavoo Reddy
 
UD
,
Dev
 
B
,
Santosham
 
R
.
Internal hernias: surgeons dilemma-unravelled by imaging
.
Indian J Surg
 
2014
;
76
:
323
8
.

4.

Lanzetta
 
MM
,
Masserelli
 
A
,
Addeo
 
G
 et al.  
Internal hernias: a difficult diagnostic challenge. Review of CT signs and clinical findings
.
Acta Biomed
 
2019
;
90
:
20
37
.

5.

Mehra
 
R
,
Pujahari
 
AK
.
Right paraduodenal hernia: report of two cases and review of literature
.
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)
 
2016
;
4
:
168
71
.

6.

Meyers
 
MA
,
Charnsangavej
 
C
,
Oliphant
 
M
.
Meyers’ Dynamic Radiology of the Abdomen: Normal and Pathologic Anatomy
.
New York
:
Springer
,
2010
.

7.

Nawas
 
MA
,
Oor
 
JE
,
Goense
 
L
 et al.  
The diagnostic accuracy of abdominal computed tomography in diagnosing internal herniation following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Ann Surg
 
2022
;
275
:
856
63
.

8.

Doishita
 
S
,
Takeshita
 
T
,
Uchima
 
Y
 et al.  
Internal hernias in the era of multidetector CT: correlation of imaging and surgical findings
.
Radiographics.
 
2016
;
36
:
88
106
.

9.

Okino
 
Y
,
Kiyosue
 
H
,
Mori
 
H
 et al.  
Root of the small-bowel mesentery: correlative anatomy and CT features of pathologic conditions
.
Radiographics
 
2001
;
21
:
1475
90
.

10.

Neville
 
JJ
,
Gallagher
 
J
,
Mitra
 
A
 et al.  
Adult presentations of congenital midgut malrotation: a systematic review
.
World J Surg
 
2020
;
44
:
1771
8
.

11.

Wang
 
XL
,
Jin
 
GX
,
Xu
 
JF
 et al.  
Right paraduodenal hernia, classification, and selection of surgical methods: a case report and review of the literature
.
J Med Case Reports
 
2023
;
17
:
536
.

12.

Martin
 
LC
,
Merkle
 
EM
,
Thompson
 
WM
.
Review of internal hernias: radiographic and clinical findings
.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
 
2006
;
186
:
703
17
.

13.

Al-Khyatt
 
W
,
Aggarwal
 
S
,
Birchall
 
J
 et al.  
Acute intestinal obstruction secondary to left paraduodenal hernia: a case report and literature review
.
World J Emerg Surg
 
2013
;
8
:
5
.

14.

Khalaileh
 
A
 
Schlager
 
A
,
Bala
 
M
 et al.  
Left laparoscopic paraduodenal hernia repair
.
Surg Endosc
 
2010
;
24
:
1486
9
.

15.

Palanivelu
 
C
,
Rangarajan
 
M
,
Jategaonkar
 
PA
 et al.  
Laparoscopic management of paraduodenal hernias: mesh and mesh-less repairs. A report of four cases
.
Hernia
 
2008
;
12
:
649
53
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.