Abstract

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) in pregnancy is rare but serious, presenting a diagnostic challenge due to symptom overlap with common gestational conditions and hesitancy around radiologic imaging. We describe a case of progressive, subacute SBO in a 46-year-old woman with dichorionic diamniotic twins and a history of caesarean section. The case culminated in bowel perforation, emergency laparotomy, and preterm delivery. This case highlights the need for early recognition, appropriate imaging, and multidisciplinary management to minimize maternal and foetal morbidity.

Introduction

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) accounts for 15% of surgical admissions for acute abdominal pain in non-pregnant adults but is rare in pregnancy [1, 2]. Symptoms are often nonspecific, and concerns of foetal safety may delay imaging and management. Yet, delayed diagnosis significantly increases the risk of maternal morbidity and foetal loss. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of SBO in pregnancy and the importance of early intervention.

History

A 46-year-old woman with a dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy booked for antenatal care at 18 weeks’ gestation. Obstetric history included a previous caesarean delivery at 38 weeks for placenta praevia, complicated by 2.2 L haemorrhage and postnatal transient hypertension. Past medical history included asthma.

In this pregnancy, hypertension developed at 20 weeks requiring treatment with Methyldopa. Anomaly scan demonstrated two structurally normal foetuses with high placentas.

At 25 weeks’ gestation, she presented with vomiting and epigastric pain following a restaurant meal. With a presumed diagnosis of gastroenteritis, she was discharged following intravenous fluids and antiemetics. She re-presented with episodes of vomiting, epigastric pain, and diarrhoea and was again conservatively managed. Bilious vomiting prompted further investigations. Blood and urinalysis results are presented in Table 1. Abdominal ultrasound showed normal hepatic architecture, thin-walled gallbladder with sludge without calculi.

Table 1

Laboratory and urinalysis results at 25 weeks’ gestation. Values out of range are indicated (*).

Blood results
Haemoglobin123 g/L
Platelets332 × 109/L
White cell count6.2 × 109/L
Alanine transaminase747* IU/L
Aspartate transaminase372* IU/L
Bilirubin24* μmol/L
Albumin29 g/L
C-reactive protein35.7 mg/L*
Lactate dehydrogenase310 U/L*
Lactate0.6 mmol/L
Placental growth factor441 pg/mL
ImmunoglobulinsNormal
Autoantibody screenNegative
Hepatitis A, B, C/Cytomegalovirus/Epstein–Barr VirusNegative
Fibrinogen6.55* g/L
Prothrombin time13.9 s
Activated partial thromboplastin time32.7 s
Urinalysis
Urine dipstick4+ ketones, 1+ protein
Urinary protein:creatinine ratio28 mg/mmol

Over the subsequent month, her symptoms resolved, and liver function improved. At 31 weeks’ gestation however epigastric pain and vomiting returned, with normal bowel opening. She reported preterm labour symptoms, with a shortened cervix on speculum examination. Maternal tachycardia was noted with otherwise normal observations. Foetal monitoring was initially pathological but subsequently normalized. Laboratory results showed: alanine transaminase 365 IU/L, creatinine 192 μmol/L, haemoglobin 126 g/L, white cell count 7.2 × 109/L, C-reactive protein 160 mg/L with metabolic acidosis on an arterial blood gas. Intravenous rehydration was given, alongside magnesium sulphate and corticosteroids for foetal neuroprotection and lung maturity. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed as the chronology meant the initial diagnosis of gastroenteritis was now unlikely. The MRI revealed a mechanical SBO involving the proximal to mid-ileum with a distinct transition point and no signs of perforation.

Nasogastric decompression and fluid resuscitation were initiated as first-line therapy. Due to the evolving clinical picture with foetal cardiotocography concerns, a balanced decision was made for delivery the following morning. Whilst awaiting her caesarean, the patient became suddenly unwell, with acute signs of peritonism and hypotension. Twin 1 developed a bradycardia and an emergency caesarean was performed.

A midline laparotomy was performed and a fresh small bowel perforation identified. A segment of mid-ileum was densely adherent to the anterior uterine and abdominal wall. Adhesiolysis was performed for access to the lower uterine segment. Following delivery of both twins, a 1 cm perforation proximal to a transition point was identified with oedematous bowel. A 20 cm bowel resection with side-to-side primary anastomosis was performed.

Postnatally, the patient required intensive care with vasopressors, nasogastric decompression, and total parenteral nutrition. Sepsis secondary to Enterococcus faecalis bacteraemia occurred. A large intra-abdominal collection and pleural effusion developed, both requiring drainage. A distal iliac vein thrombus was diagnosed incidentally necessitating 3 months of anticoagulation. The twins recovered well in the neonatal unit.

Discussion

SBO in pregnancy is rare, affecting 0.001%–0.003% of pregnancies [2]. Adhesions from previous surgery are the leading cause, causing 70% of cases. Although the incidence of post-caesarean section SBO is low (0.1%–1.35%), rising rates of caesarean births may increase future incidence [3].

Diagnosing SBO during pregnancy is challenging, as symptoms are often non-specific and may mimic normal pregnancy. Classic features such as complete constipation are observed in only 6.1% of cases and typically abdominal pain (54.7%) and vomiting (39.2%) are the sole presenting symptoms [4]. In our case, significant adhesions were present following only one prior caesarean. The compressive effect of a twin gestation may have further increased the risk of obstruction, with the intermittent nature of subacute SBO likely contributing to a delayed diagnosis.

In this case, raised liver enzymes were the presenting biochemical abnormality. Two prior case reports have described isolated raised liver transaminases, where bowel obstruction is thought to have prevented the duodenal bile passage [5, 6]. The cause here remained unclear and resolved postnatally.

Outside of pregnancy, abdominal radiographs (AXR), and computed tomography (CT) scans are primary used for SBO diagnosis. Water-soluble contrast has been used safely in pregnancy with an additional therapeutic effect in adhesional SBO but requires AXRs for imaging [4, 7]. Guidelines recommend foetal radiation exposure should remain below 50 mGy [8, 9] due to both deterministic effects on foetal cellular development as well as stochastic injury to cellular genetic material. Deterministic effects only occur above 100 mGy, but stochastic effects are seen with exposures over 25 mGy, with increased rates of childhood cancers above baseline reaching significant levels above 50 mGy. A simple AXR gives negligible foetal exposure of 1.0 mGy of radiation, whilst an abdominal CT yields radiation levels of 25 mGy [10], well within the radiation guidance. Non-ionizing imaging is preferred in pregnancy to negate all radiation risk, but may be more costly and not readily available, with lower detection rates. Ultrasound detects up to 55% of cases [11], MRI 67% [12], and CT 94% [13]. Imaging modality choice should therefore reflect acuity of clinical presentation, resource availability, and patient wishes.

SBO without foetal compromise does not necessarily warrant immediate delivery. However, those managing women with SBO should be aware of the higher risk of foetal complications such as growth restriction, preterm delivery, antepartum haemorrhage. Close monitoring of these pregnancies should continue with a multi-disciplinary approach [14].

Management should follow standard principles: fluid resuscitation, electrolyte correction, nasogastric decompression, and early surgical input. Complications of SBO in pregnancy are significant, including preterm delivery (45%), maternal mortality (3.7%), and foetal mortality (17%) [4, 15]. Delaying surgery increases these risks. Therefore, in pregnancy, earlier surgical intervention should be considered than in non-pregnant populations. Nutritional support is essential to minimize complications such as foetal growth restriction and maternal metabolic complications.

Conclusion

SBO should be suspected even if symptoms are non-specific, particularly when the history is not consistent with an alternative diagnosis. Timely imaging and early intervention are essential to reducing maternal-foetal adverse outcomes.

Acknowledgements

We thank the patient for their consent to publish the case report.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Funding

None declared.

References

1.

Gore
 
RM
,
Silvers
 
RI
,
Thakrar
 
KH
 et al.  
Bowel obstruction
.
Radiol Clin North Am
 
2015
;
53
:
1225
40
.

2.

Sivanesaratnam
 
V
.
The acute abdomen and the obstetrician
.
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol
 
2000
;
14
:
89
102
.

3.

Abenhaim
 
HA
,
Tulandi
 
T
,
Wilchesky
 
M
 et al.  
Effect of Cesarean delivery on long-term risk of small bowel obstruction
.
Obstet Gynecol
 
2018
;
131
:
354
9
.

4.

Ling
 
XS
,
Anthony Brian Tian
 
WC
,
Augustin
 
G
 et al.  
Can small bowel obstruction during pregnancy be treated with conservative management? A review
.
World J Emerg Surg
 
2024
;
19
:
13
.

5.

Haghiri
 
M
,
Borna
 
S
,
Hessami
 
K
 et al.  
Duodenal obstruction during pregnancy
.
Case Rep Obstet Gynecol
 
2022
;
2022
:
1
5
.

6.

Wang
 
Y
,
Thakur
 
K
,
Zweben
 
A
.
A curious case of transient fluctuations of liver function tests: 1960
.
Off J Am College Gastroenterol | ACG
 
2016
;
111
:
S936
.

7.

Robertson
 
R
,
Wu
 
L
.
Adhesive small bowel obstruction in pregnancy and the use of oral contrast media: a case report
.
J Surg Case Rep
 
2020
;
2020
:
rjaa018
.

8.

Committee ACoOG
.
ACOG Committee opinion. Number 299, September 2004 (replaces No. 158, September 1995). Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy
.
Obstet Gynecol
 
2004
;
104
:
647
51
.

9.

Health Protection Agency
, The Royal College of Radiologists, and the College of Radiographers. Protection of Pregnant Patients during Diagnostic Medical Exposures to Ionising Radiation: Advice from the Health Protection Agency, The Royal College of Radiologists and the College of Radiographers. Documents of the Health Protection Agency, Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards (RCE-9)  
2009
.

10.

Murji
 
A
,
Crosier
 
R
,
Rasuli
 
P
.
Non-obstetric diagnostic imaging in pregnancy
.
Cmaj
 
2015
;
187
:
1309
.

11.

Unal
 
A
,
Sayharman
 
SE
,
Ozel
 
L
 et al.  
Acute abdomen in pregnancy requiring surgical management: a 20-case series
.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
 
2011
;
159
:
87
90
.

12.

Bonouvrie
 
DS
,
van
 
Beek
 
HC
,
Taverne
 
SBM
 et al.  
Pregnant women after bariatric surgery: diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for small bowel obstruction
.
Obes Surg
 
2022
;
32
:
245
55
.

13.

Burkill
 
GJ
,
Bell
 
JR
,
Healy
 
JC
.
The utility of computed tomography in acute small bowel obstruction
.
Clin Radiol
 
2001
;
56
:
350
9
.

14.

Ashbrook
 
MJ
,
Cheng
 
V
,
Longo
 
E
 et al.  
Management of adhesive small bowel obstruction during pregnancy in the United States
.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg
 
2025
;
98
:
915
20
.

15.

Sagi
 
Y
,
Bussiere-Cote
 
S
,
Meier
 
K
 et al.  
Small bowel obstruction in pregnancy: a systematic review [32F]
.
Obst Gynecol
 
2018
;
131
:
72S
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.