Abstract

Fecal calprotectin (FCAL) is commonly used to exclude inflammatory bowel disease in patients with symptoms of the irritable bowel syndrome spectrum. This retrospective case–control study evaluated FCAL levels in 81 postoperative patients to assess the impact of different gastrointestinal surgeries. Thirty-one patients had undergone esophago-gastric surgery (fundoplication or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass), and 50 had undergone colon surgery with hemicolectomy. Elevated FCAL levels (>50 μg/g) were observed in 56.7% of patients after esophago-gastric surgery compared with 24% of patients after hemicolectomy. Median FCAL levels were 96 μg/g and 99 μg/g, respectively. Statistically significant differences in FCAL levels were found between patients who underwent left-sided hemicolectomy and those who underwent Roux-en-Y bypass (P < .001), as well as right-sided hemicolectomy (P = .042). Overall, elevated FCAL levels were more than twice as common following esophago-gastric surgery, suggesting surgery-specific patterns of postoperative intestinal inflammation.

Introduction

Fecal calprotectin (FCAL) is released into the intestinal lumen from the gastrointestinal (GI) mucosa during intestinal inflammation. FCAL concentrations reflect the activity of inflammatory cells, primarily neutrophils, within the intestinal mucosa [1]. Current clinical guidelines recommend FCAL testing in patients presenting with symptoms within the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) spectrum to exclude inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [2]. In addition, FCAL is widely used as a non-invasive marker for quantifying intestinal inflammation. Its stability in stool samples, assay reproducibility, and low cost make it a valuable tool for guiding diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in clinical practice [3].

GI surgery is commonly performed and encompasses procedures involving the esophagus, stomach, and colon. Surgical treatment options for severe obesity include bariatric procedures such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and vertical sleeve gastrectomy [4]. In patients with severe gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) refractory to medical therapy, surgical interventions such as Nissen or Toupet fundoplication are established treatment options [5]. In colonic disease, right- and left-sided hemicolectomy are routinely performed, most commonly for oncologic indications [6].

During the implementation of an innovative laboratory method for FCAL determination, an unexpected observation was made: elevated FCAL levels appeared more frequently in patients with a history of esophageal or gastric surgery than in those who had undergone colonic surgery. Furthermore, previous studies have shown that FCAL elevations may persist for several years following RYGB surgery [7]. These postoperative FCAL elevations, which may reflect ongoing intestinal inflammation, require further investigation to determine whether they are associated with specific surgical procedures and whether they represent distinct patterns or intensities of intestinal inflammatory activity.

Case series

Study population

This retrospective case–control study used archived data collected between October and December 2023. Stool samples were obtained from patients attending a surgical outpatient clinic during routine follow-up visits as part of a collaboration aimed at validating a novel FCAL assay. In total, 81 consecutive white patients who had previously undergone GI surgery were included. Of these, 31 patients had undergone esophageal or gastric surgery, and 50 had undergone colonic surgery. All surgical procedures were reported as uncomplicated.

At the time of stool sampling, all patients were asymptomatic and reported no GI disturbances, including diarrhea. Among the 31 patients with upper GI surgery, 10 had undergone Nissen fundoplication and 4 Toupet fundoplication for severe GERD, while 17 had undergone RYGB for obesity. Among the 50 patients with colonic surgery for cancer, 25 had undergone right-sided and 25 left-sided hemicolectomy.

All patients were under active postoperative outpatient surveillance. Routine endoscopic evaluations revealed no abnormalities. Laboratory tests, including erythrocyte sedimentation rate, complete blood count, and liver and kidney parameters, were within normal limits. Patients were advised to avoid anti-inflammatory medications during stool sampling. Careful review of medical records revealed no evidence of systemic inflammation or bacterial infection. Patients with IBD, those who had undergone surgery within the preceding six months, or those receiving chemotherapy were excluded. The study did not evaluate the surgical procedures in terms of their open or minimally invasive nature with respect to GI surgery. Colonoscopy was performed in all patients aged ≥50 years and in those undergoing post-hemicolectomy surveillance, with normal findings in all cases.

Laboratory evaluations

FCAL concentrations were measured using a quantitative particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay (Calprest Turbo; Eurospital, Trieste, Italy). The assay detection range was 35–1500 μg/g. FCAL levels <50 μg/g were considered normal, levels between 50 and 120 μg/g were classified as mildly to moderately elevated, and levels >120 μg/g were considered abnormal. Stool samples were collected in the morning and processed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS statistics version 28.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), and GraphPad Pism version 10.3.1. (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for the generation of the figure. Data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilks test. Non-parametric tests (Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests) were used for group comparisons. Gender distribution was analysed using Fisher’s exact test. Age and gender were controlled for using a generalized linear model. A P-value <.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

Eighty-one postoperative patients (median age 65.1 years, range 25–82 years) were included. The esophago-gastric surgery group consisted of 31 patients (median age 50.6 years; 8 males, 23 females), while the colon surgery group included 50 patients (median age 67.6 years; 23 males, 27 females). The median time between surgery and FCAL testing was 5 years (range 0.5–21 years). The median time since surgery for esophago-gastric surgery was 6 years, with a range of 1–15 years, while for colonic surgery the median time since surgery was 4 years, with a range of 0.5–21 years.

FCAL outcomes

As illustrated in Table 1, the surgical procedure undergone and the outcomes of FCAL determinations are presented.

Table 1

The surgical procedures and results of FCAL determinations.

SurgeryNumber of patientsNumber of patients with elevated FCAL >50 μg/gFCAL μg/g median (range)Number of patients with normal FCAL <50 μg/g
Fundoplication146 (42.8%)94.5 (64–255)8 (57.1%)
RYGB1711 (64.7%)96 (60–301)6 (35.3%)
Right-sided hemicolectomy254 (16%)109 (76–215)21 (84%)
Left-sided hemicolectomy258 (32%)74 (52–349)17 (76%)
SurgeryNumber of patientsNumber of patients with elevated FCAL >50 μg/gFCAL μg/g median (range)Number of patients with normal FCAL <50 μg/g
Fundoplication146 (42.8%)94.5 (64–255)8 (57.1%)
RYGB1711 (64.7%)96 (60–301)6 (35.3%)
Right-sided hemicolectomy254 (16%)109 (76–215)21 (84%)
Left-sided hemicolectomy258 (32%)74 (52–349)17 (76%)
Table 1

The surgical procedures and results of FCAL determinations.

SurgeryNumber of patientsNumber of patients with elevated FCAL >50 μg/gFCAL μg/g median (range)Number of patients with normal FCAL <50 μg/g
Fundoplication146 (42.8%)94.5 (64–255)8 (57.1%)
RYGB1711 (64.7%)96 (60–301)6 (35.3%)
Right-sided hemicolectomy254 (16%)109 (76–215)21 (84%)
Left-sided hemicolectomy258 (32%)74 (52–349)17 (76%)
SurgeryNumber of patientsNumber of patients with elevated FCAL >50 μg/gFCAL μg/g median (range)Number of patients with normal FCAL <50 μg/g
Fundoplication146 (42.8%)94.5 (64–255)8 (57.1%)
RYGB1711 (64.7%)96 (60–301)6 (35.3%)
Right-sided hemicolectomy254 (16%)109 (76–215)21 (84%)
Left-sided hemicolectomy258 (32%)74 (52–349)17 (76%)

Table 2 presents the surgical procedures and a summary of concomitant diseases, including medical therapies, for patients with FCAL results >50 μg/g.

Table 2

The surgical procedures and summarized concomitant diseases including medical therapy in patients with FCAL results >50 μg/g.

SurgeryFundoplicationRYGBRight-sided hemicolectomyLeft-sided hemicolectomy
Number of patients with elevated FCAL >50 μg/g61148
Arterial hypertension3 with ACE- inhibitor02 with ACE- inhibitor5 with ACE- inhibitor, 1 with beta-blocker, 1 with calcium channel blocker
Arteriosclerosis3 with statin03 with statin6 with statin
Depression1 with mirtazapine and 2 with sertraline4 with escitalopram1 with escitalopram3 with escitalopram and 1 with sertraline
Hypercholesterinemia4 with statin03 with statin6 with statin
Osteoporosis3 with denosumab s. c. and 1 with bisphosphonate i. v.001 with bisphosphonate i. v.
Diabetes mellitus type 22 with metformin and 2 with SGLT-2i1 with life style modification2 with metformin2 with metformin and 1 with SGLT-2i
Reflux disease6 with PPI4 with PPI03 with PPI
Thyroid disease2 with levothyroxine4 with levothyroxine2 with levothyroxine1 with levothyroxine
SurgeryFundoplicationRYGBRight-sided hemicolectomyLeft-sided hemicolectomy
Number of patients with elevated FCAL >50 μg/g61148
Arterial hypertension3 with ACE- inhibitor02 with ACE- inhibitor5 with ACE- inhibitor, 1 with beta-blocker, 1 with calcium channel blocker
Arteriosclerosis3 with statin03 with statin6 with statin
Depression1 with mirtazapine and 2 with sertraline4 with escitalopram1 with escitalopram3 with escitalopram and 1 with sertraline
Hypercholesterinemia4 with statin03 with statin6 with statin
Osteoporosis3 with denosumab s. c. and 1 with bisphosphonate i. v.001 with bisphosphonate i. v.
Diabetes mellitus type 22 with metformin and 2 with SGLT-2i1 with life style modification2 with metformin2 with metformin and 1 with SGLT-2i
Reflux disease6 with PPI4 with PPI03 with PPI
Thyroid disease2 with levothyroxine4 with levothyroxine2 with levothyroxine1 with levothyroxine

Abbreviations: ACE, angiotensin converting enzyme; FCAL, fecal calprotectin; i. v., intravenous; PPI, proton pump inhibitor; s. c., subcutaneous; SGLT-2i, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor.

Table 2

The surgical procedures and summarized concomitant diseases including medical therapy in patients with FCAL results >50 μg/g.

SurgeryFundoplicationRYGBRight-sided hemicolectomyLeft-sided hemicolectomy
Number of patients with elevated FCAL >50 μg/g61148
Arterial hypertension3 with ACE- inhibitor02 with ACE- inhibitor5 with ACE- inhibitor, 1 with beta-blocker, 1 with calcium channel blocker
Arteriosclerosis3 with statin03 with statin6 with statin
Depression1 with mirtazapine and 2 with sertraline4 with escitalopram1 with escitalopram3 with escitalopram and 1 with sertraline
Hypercholesterinemia4 with statin03 with statin6 with statin
Osteoporosis3 with denosumab s. c. and 1 with bisphosphonate i. v.001 with bisphosphonate i. v.
Diabetes mellitus type 22 with metformin and 2 with SGLT-2i1 with life style modification2 with metformin2 with metformin and 1 with SGLT-2i
Reflux disease6 with PPI4 with PPI03 with PPI
Thyroid disease2 with levothyroxine4 with levothyroxine2 with levothyroxine1 with levothyroxine
SurgeryFundoplicationRYGBRight-sided hemicolectomyLeft-sided hemicolectomy
Number of patients with elevated FCAL >50 μg/g61148
Arterial hypertension3 with ACE- inhibitor02 with ACE- inhibitor5 with ACE- inhibitor, 1 with beta-blocker, 1 with calcium channel blocker
Arteriosclerosis3 with statin03 with statin6 with statin
Depression1 with mirtazapine and 2 with sertraline4 with escitalopram1 with escitalopram3 with escitalopram and 1 with sertraline
Hypercholesterinemia4 with statin03 with statin6 with statin
Osteoporosis3 with denosumab s. c. and 1 with bisphosphonate i. v.001 with bisphosphonate i. v.
Diabetes mellitus type 22 with metformin and 2 with SGLT-2i1 with life style modification2 with metformin2 with metformin and 1 with SGLT-2i
Reflux disease6 with PPI4 with PPI03 with PPI
Thyroid disease2 with levothyroxine4 with levothyroxine2 with levothyroxine1 with levothyroxine

Abbreviations: ACE, angiotensin converting enzyme; FCAL, fecal calprotectin; i. v., intravenous; PPI, proton pump inhibitor; s. c., subcutaneous; SGLT-2i, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor.

Statistical findings

Performing the Mann–Whitney U test, patients with esophago-gastric surgery exhibited significantly higher FCAL values than those with colonic surgery (median 61 μg/g vs. 34 μg/g; P = .014). Significant differences were also observed between specific surgical subgroups: patients with left-sided hemicolectomy had significantly lower FCAL levels (median 20 μg/g, range 15–35) compared with patients who underwent RYGB (median 87 μg/g, range 15–301; P < .001) and right-sided hemicolectomy (median 41 μg/g, range 15–301; P = .042) (Fig. 1).

The FCAL tests include data from 31 patients who underwent esophageal and stomach surgical procedures as well as 50 patients who suffered colorectal surgery. The normal range for FCAL levels is indicated as less than 50 μg/g. Furthermore, the figure demonstrates statistically significant differences using FCAL values between patients who had left-sided hemicolectomy compared to those who underwent RYGB (P < .001) and, to those who had undergone right-sided hemicolectomy (P = .042).
Figure 1

The FCAL tests include data from 31 patients who underwent esophageal and stomach surgical procedures as well as 50 patients who suffered colorectal surgery. The normal range for FCAL levels is indicated as less than 50 μg/g. Furthermore, the figure demonstrates statistically significant differences using FCAL values between patients who had left-sided hemicolectomy compared to those who underwent RYGB (P < .001) and, to those who had undergone right-sided hemicolectomy (P = .042).

Patients undergoing esophago-gastric surgery were significantly younger than those with colon surgery (median 51 vs. 67 years; P < .001). Gender distribution did not differ significantly between groups. In a generalized linear model, age and gender had no significant influence on FCAL levels (P = .501 and P = .788, respectively). After adjustment, the difference in FCAL values between surgical groups narrowly missed statistical significance (P = .065). Postoperative time intervals (P = .9263) and gender (P = .3776) were not associated with FCAL elevation.

Discussion

Chronic inflammatory diseases such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and chronic respiratory disease are major contributors to global mortality [8]. Neutrophil granulocytes play a central role in inflammatory processes associated with these conditions. Human neutrophils have been shown to produce a wide range of proteins and cytokines [9]. Calprotectin, a calcium-binding protein comprising approximately 60% of the cytosolic protein content of neutrophils, has antimicrobial and immune-modulatory properties [3].

FCAL is an established biomarker for intestinal inflammation and is widely used in the diagnosis and monitoring of IBD, including Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis as well as for distinguishing organic disease from functional disorders within the IBS spectrum [10]. During intestinal inflammation, FCAL from neutrophils is released into the intestinal lumen [11]. However, FCAL levels can be influenced by several factors, including sample handling, intra-individual variability, and interactions with the gut microbiota [12]. The ingestion of foods may interact with the microbiota, which could in turn affect the FCAL values [13]. More recently, elevated FCAL levels have been linked to adverse clinical outcomes beyond GI disease. Elevated FCAL levels have been associated with clinical outcomes in older individuals [14] and have been identified as a prognostic marker for mortality and renal outcomes in chronic kidney disease [15] and adverse outcomes and mortality in advanced chronic liver disease [16]. The observed postoperative elevation of FCAL warrants further investigation, as it may reflect underlying intestinal inflammation.

The intestinal mucosa constitutes a pivotal barrier between the host and the luminal contents. Disruption of this barrier may facilitate the translocation of bacterial products and contribute to chronic systemic inflammation [17]. This intestinal barrier, which plays a crucial role in maintaining overall health, is subject to disruption in the presence of intestinal inflammation, as evidenced by elevated FCAL values. The present study demonstrates that postoperative FCAL elevations are more common following esophago-gastric surgery than colonic surgery, even several years after the procedure. This finding raises the possibility of persistent low-grade intestinal inflammation following upper GI surgery. Owing to the small patient cohort and the potential influence of concomitant diseases or medical therapies, these variables could not be established as contributing factors in patients with FCAL concentrations exceeding 50 μg/g.

Surgical interventions may alter GI anatomy, physiology, and microbial composition. Growing evidence indicates that surgical procedures from the esophagus to the rectum can influence the gut microbiota [17]. However, technological advancements in GI surgical techniques are consistently being pursued [18]. Bariatric surgery, particularly RYGB, is known to induce profound and sustained changes in GI function and microbiota, contributing to long-term weight loss and improvement of metabolic comorbidities [19]. Despite its beneficial metabolic effects, RYGB has been associated with persistent FCAL elevation, suggesting ongoing intestinal immune activation [7]. In the present study, nearly two-thirds of patients who had undergone bariatric surgery exhibited elevated FCAL levels years after surgery.

GERD-related inflammation may also be influenced by microbial shifts and procedures of fundoplication with bariatric surgery affects esophago-gastric physiology [20]. FCAL has been proposed as a predictive marker for esophageal injury [21], and elevated FCAL levels have been reported in children following surgical repair of esophageal atresia [22]. These findings are consistent with the elevated FCAL levels observed in over half of patients with esophago-gastric surgery in this study.

Hemicolectomy is most commonly performed for colon cancer, though diverticular disease also contributes to left-sided resections [6]. Elevated FCAL levels have been reported prior to colorectal cancer diagnosis [23]. In this study, 24% of patients exhibited elevated FCAL levels after hemicolectomy, although left-sided hemicolectomy was associated with particularly low FCAL values. The reasons for this observation remain unclear and warrant further investigation.

Age-related differences in FCAL have been reported, with higher levels observed in children and younger individuals [24]. Although patients with esophago-gastric surgery were younger in this cohort, age did not independently influence FCAL levels in adjusted analyses. Limitations of this study include its retrospective design, small sample size, ethnically homogeneous population, and lack of stratification by surgical technique.

Overall, this pilot study highlights the need for further clinical and experimental research to clarify the mechanisms underlying postoperative FCAL elevation, its relationship to intestinal inflammation, and its potential long-term systemic consequences [25].

Conclusions

This retrospective analysis indicates that postoperative FCAL elevations are more than twice as common following esophago-gastric surgery compared with colonic surgery. The particularly low FCAL levels observed after left-sided hemicolectomy suggest differing patterns of intestinal inflammatory activity depending on surgical intervention. Persistent FCAL elevation following upper GI surgery underscores the need for targeted follow-up studies to elucidate underlying mechanisms and assess potential clinical implications.

Author contributions

Wolfgang J. Schnedl: Corresponding author, Study design, Data collection, Manuscript writing and Final approval. Simon Michaelis: Participation at data collection, Manuscript writing and Manuscript final approval. Rudolf Schrittwieser: Data collection and interpretation, Manuscript writing and Final approval. Dietmar Enko: Data collection and analysis, Manuscript final approval. Sandra J. Holasek: Data analysis and interpretation, Manuscript final approval. All authors read and approve the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Funding

None declared.

Data availability

The data that support the findings are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Ethical approval and/or institutional review board approval

The study is of an observational and retrospective nature, and is based on existing data. The study adheres to the ethical guidelines outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

References

1.

Jukic
 
A
,
Bakiri
 
L
,
Wagner
 
EF
 et al.  
Calprotectin: from biomarker to biological function
.
Gut
 
2021
;
70
:
1978
88
.

2.

Savarino
 
E
,
Zingone
 
F
,
Barberio
 
B
 et al.  
Functional bowel disorders with diarrhoea: clinical guidelines of the United European Gastroenterology and European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility
.
United European Gastroenterol J
 
2022
;
10
:
556
84
.

3.

Xiang
 
BJ
,
Jiang
 
M
,
Sun
 
MJ
 et al.  
Optimal range of fecal calprotectin for predicting mucosal healing in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Visc Med
 
2021
;
37
:
338
48
.

4.

Hankir
 
MK
.
Gut microbiota turn up the heat after bariatric surgery
.
Cell Stress
 
2023
;
7
:
90
4
.

5.

Peristeri
 
DV
,
Room
 
H
,
Tsironis
 
D
 et al.  
Long-term efficacy of total versus posterior partial fundoplication in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl
 
2024
;
106
:
569
75
.

6.

Lippenberger
 
F
,
Ziegelmayer
 
S
,
Berlet
 
M
 et al.  
Development of an image-based random Forest classifier for prediction of surgery duration of laparoscopic sigmoid resections
.
Int J Color Dis
 
2024
;
39
:
21
.

7.

Boerlage
 
TC
,
Westerink
 
F
,
Poland
 
DC
 et al.  
Fecal calprotectin, elastase, and alpha-1-antitrypsin levels after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; calprotectin is significantly elevated in the majority of patients
.
Obes Surg
 
2016
;
26
:
2974
80
.

8.

Saavedra
 
D
,
Añé-Kourí
 
AL
,
Barzilai
 
N
 et al.  
Aging and chronic inflammation: highlights from a multidisciplinary workshop
.
Immun Ageing
 
2023
;
20
:
25
.

9.

Aroca-Crevillén
 
A
,
Vicanolo
 
T
,
Ovadia
 
S
 et al.  
Neutrophils in physiology and pathology
.
Annu Rev Pathol
 
2024
;
19
:
227
59
.

10.

Campbell
 
JP
,
Zierold
 
C
,
Rode
 
AM
 et al.  
Clinical performance of a novel LIAISON fecal calprotectin assay for differentiation of inflammatory bowel disease from irritable bowel syndrome
.
J Clin Gastroenterol
 
2021
;
55
:
239
43
.

11.

Manceau
 
H
,
Chicha-Cattoir
 
V
,
Puy
 
H
 et al.  
Faecal calprotectin in inflammatory bowel diseases: update and perspectives
.
Clin Chem Lab Med
 
2017
;
55
:
474
83
.

12.

Lasson
 
A
,
Stotzer
 
PO
,
Öhman
 
L
 et al.  
The intra-individual variability of faecal calprotectin: a prospective study in patients with active ulcerative colitis
.
J Crohns Colitis
 
2015
;
9
:
26
32
.

13.

Schnedl
 
WJ
,
Michaelis
 
S
,
Enko
 
D
 et al.  
Fecal calprotectin elevations associated with food intolerance/malabsorption are significantly reduced with targeted diets
.
Nutrients
 
2023
;
15
:
1179
.

14.

Heinzel
 
S
,
Jureczek
 
J
,
Kainulainen
 
V
 et al.  
Elevated fecal calprotectin is associated with gut microbial dysbiosis, altered serum markers and clinical outcomes in older individuals
.
Sci Rep
 
2024
;
14
:
13513
.

15.

Lee
 
SY
,
Han
 
K
,
Kwon
 
HS
 et al.  
Fecal calprotectin as a prognostic biomarker for mortality and renal outcomes in chronic kidney disease
.
Biomolecules
 
2025
;
15
:
557
.

16.

Koller
 
T
,
Vrbova
 
P
,
Kubanek
 
N
 et al.  
Assessment of intestinal inflammation via fecal calprotectin for early prediction of adverse outcomes in advanced chronic liver disease
.
United European Gastroenterol J
 
2025
;
13
:
305
16
.

17.

Di Vincenzo
 
F
,
Del Gaudio
 
A
,
Petito
 
V
 et al.  
Gut microbiota, intestinal permeability, and systemic inflammation: a narrative review
.
Intern Emerg Med
 
2024
;
19
:
275
93
.

18.

Kim
 
HS
,
Noh
 
GT
,
Chung
 
SS
 et al.  
Long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic approaches for right colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Tech Coloproctol
 
2023
;
27
:
1183
9
.

19.

Courcoulas
 
AP
,
Daigle
 
CR
,
Arterburn
 
DE
.
Long term outcomes of metabolic/bariatric surgery in adults
.
BMJ
 
2023
;
383
:
e071027
.

20.

Wang
 
YH
,
Tang
 
XM
,
Jiang
 
RH
 et al.  
Fecal calprotectin: a novel predictor of ulcerated esophageal injury after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation
.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol
 
2024
;
47
:
167
71
.

21.

Westerink
 
F
,
Huibregtse
 
I
,
De Hoog
 
M
 et al.  
Faecal inflammatory biomarkers and gastrointestinal symptoms after bariatric surgery: a longitudinal study
.
Inflamm Intest Dis
 
2021
;
6
:
109
16
.

22.

Traini
 
I
,
Chan
 
SY
,
Menzies
 
J
 et al.  
Intestinal dysbiosis and inflammation in children with repaired esophageal atresia
.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr
 
2024
;
78
:
43
51
.

23.

Blad
 
N
,
Palmqvist
 
R
,
Karling
 
P
.
Pre-diagnostic faecal calprotectin levels in patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective study
.
BMC Cancer
 
2022
;
22
:
315
.

24.

Orfei
 
M
,
Gasparetto
 
M
,
Hensel
 
KO
 et al.  
Guidance on the interpretation of faecal calprotectin levels in children
.
PloS One
 
2021
;
16
:
e0246091
.

25.

Burns
 
GL
,
Talley
 
NJ
,
Keely
 
S
.
Immune responses in the irritable bowel syndromes: time to consider the small intestine
.
BMC Med
 
2022
;
20
:
115
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.