Abstract

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, arising from the interstitial cells of Cajal. Although typically located in the stomach, they may present atypically, mimicking benign lesions such as gastric diverticula. This is a case of a 40-year-old Nepali female with rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes mellitus presenting with postprandial vomiting, abdominal fullness, and significant weight loss, where radiologic evaluation suggested a large posterior gastric diverticulum. On surgical excision, a gastric diverticulum was isolated, and histopathological analysis confirmed the diagnosis of a gastric GIST (C-kit+, DOG-1+, and CD34+). Despite low mitotic activity, the tumor was classified as high risk due to its size (>10 cm), and the patient was commenced on adjuvant imatinib therapy. This case highlights a gastric GIST masquerading as a giant gastric diverticulum and emphasizes the importance of considering GIST as a differential diagnosis of large gastric masses.

Introduction

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms that arise predominantly in the stomach (56%), followed by the small intestine (32%), colon and rectum (6%), and esophagus (<1%) [1, 2]. They originate from the interstitial cells of Cajal or their precursors, which function as pacemaker cells for gastrointestinal motility. The annual incidence is estimated at 10–15 cases per million worldwide [3]. GISTs are immunohistochemically characterized by expression of KIT (CD117), also known as C-kit, and DOG-1, with additional positivity for CD34 (70%), SMA (30%–40%), and rarely desmin (<5%) or S100 (~5%) [4].

Although most GISTs are small and asymptomatic, large tumors within a gastric diverticulum may cause symptoms depending on the width of the diverticular neck. Wide-neck diverticula are usually asymptomatic, whereas narrow-neck diverticula may cause food retention, resulting in symptoms ranging from dyspepsia, epigastric pain, dysphagia, early satiety, and postprandial fullness to major gastrointestinal bleeding [5]. Atypical presentations may mimic benign pathologies, complicating diagnosis. We report a case of a giant gastric GIST initially misdiagnosed as a gastric diverticulum and managed successfully with surgical resection and adjuvant targeted therapy.

Case presentation

A 40-year-old postmenopausal female, known to have rheumatoid arthritis and type 2 diabetes mellitus, presented with persistent postprandial vomiting for 2 months, associated with abdominal fullness and weight loss (17 kg over 5 years). On physical examination, the patient was ill-looking but afebrile and haemodynamically stable. The abdomen was soft and non-tender, with mild epigastric fullness and no palpable mass. The timeline of clinical events from presentation to follow-up is shown in Table 1. Initial upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed retained food particles suggestive of gastric outlet obstruction. Ultrasonography was inconclusive. Contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis showed a large posteriorly located cystic lesion (18 × 11 × 12 cm) with internal debris, initially interpreted as a giant gastric diverticulum compressing adjacent structures (Fig. 1a–c).

Table 1

Timeline of clinical events.

TimelineClinical events
5 years priorUnexplained weight loss of 17 kg over 5 years
2 months priorOnset of postprandial vomiting and abdominal fullness
Initial visitEndoscopy attempted-retained gastric contents
Hospital visits and admissionNG decompression: 1000–1200 ml, CECT suggested large gastric diverticulum from posterior wall of stomach
SurgeryOpen excision of gastric diverticulum
Postoperative periodUneventful recovery
Histopathology report in 1 week following operationSuggested GIST, started on adjuvant therapy
On 6 month-follow-upOn adjuvant imatinib 400 mg daily; asymptomatic and disease free; plan to continue imatinib for 2.5 years
TimelineClinical events
5 years priorUnexplained weight loss of 17 kg over 5 years
2 months priorOnset of postprandial vomiting and abdominal fullness
Initial visitEndoscopy attempted-retained gastric contents
Hospital visits and admissionNG decompression: 1000–1200 ml, CECT suggested large gastric diverticulum from posterior wall of stomach
SurgeryOpen excision of gastric diverticulum
Postoperative periodUneventful recovery
Histopathology report in 1 week following operationSuggested GIST, started on adjuvant therapy
On 6 month-follow-upOn adjuvant imatinib 400 mg daily; asymptomatic and disease free; plan to continue imatinib for 2.5 years
Table 1

Timeline of clinical events.

TimelineClinical events
5 years priorUnexplained weight loss of 17 kg over 5 years
2 months priorOnset of postprandial vomiting and abdominal fullness
Initial visitEndoscopy attempted-retained gastric contents
Hospital visits and admissionNG decompression: 1000–1200 ml, CECT suggested large gastric diverticulum from posterior wall of stomach
SurgeryOpen excision of gastric diverticulum
Postoperative periodUneventful recovery
Histopathology report in 1 week following operationSuggested GIST, started on adjuvant therapy
On 6 month-follow-upOn adjuvant imatinib 400 mg daily; asymptomatic and disease free; plan to continue imatinib for 2.5 years
TimelineClinical events
5 years priorUnexplained weight loss of 17 kg over 5 years
2 months priorOnset of postprandial vomiting and abdominal fullness
Initial visitEndoscopy attempted-retained gastric contents
Hospital visits and admissionNG decompression: 1000–1200 ml, CECT suggested large gastric diverticulum from posterior wall of stomach
SurgeryOpen excision of gastric diverticulum
Postoperative periodUneventful recovery
Histopathology report in 1 week following operationSuggested GIST, started on adjuvant therapy
On 6 month-follow-upOn adjuvant imatinib 400 mg daily; asymptomatic and disease free; plan to continue imatinib for 2.5 years
Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of abdomen and pelvis. (a) Sagittal plane. (b) Coronal plane. (c) Axial plane.
Figure 1

Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of abdomen and pelvis. (a) Sagittal plane. (b) Coronal plane. (c) Axial plane.

The patient underwent open surgical excision of the mass with 2 cm clear margins (Fig. 2a–c). No tumour rupture or peritoneal seeding was observed intraoperatively. The lesion appeared as a well-circumscribed, encapsulated mass arising from the posterior gastric wall with a large neck. Postoperatively, she received supportive care and was discharged on the seventh postoperative day. On one-week follow-up, immunohistochemistry confirmed spindle-shaped tumor cells arranged in fascicles with minimal pleomorphism and low mitotic activity (Table 2), consistent with a gastric GIST. Despite the low mitotic index, the tumor size (>10 cm) classified it as high risk according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria. Following multidisciplinary discussion, adjuvant imatinib (400 mg daily for 3 years) was initiated. At 6-month follow-up, the patient remains asymptomatic with no radiological evidence of recurrence or metastasis and continues imatinib with good tolerance.

Intraoperative findings. (a) Gastric diverticulum attached to the posterior wall of stomach. (b) Gastric diverticulum attached to the posterior wall of stomach. (c) Gastric diverticulum following excision.
Figure 2

Intraoperative findings. (a) Gastric diverticulum attached to the posterior wall of stomach. (b) Gastric diverticulum attached to the posterior wall of stomach. (c) Gastric diverticulum following excision.

Table 2

Immunohistochemistry profile.

  1. C-kit: weak positive

  2. DOG-1: Positive

  3. CD34: Positive

  4. CK-8/18, Desmin: Negative

  5. Ki-67: 2%–3%

Consistent with GIST, spindle cell type, low-risk.
  1. C-kit: weak positive

  2. DOG-1: Positive

  3. CD34: Positive

  4. CK-8/18, Desmin: Negative

  5. Ki-67: 2%–3%

Consistent with GIST, spindle cell type, low-risk.
Table 2

Immunohistochemistry profile.

  1. C-kit: weak positive

  2. DOG-1: Positive

  3. CD34: Positive

  4. CK-8/18, Desmin: Negative

  5. Ki-67: 2%–3%

Consistent with GIST, spindle cell type, low-risk.
  1. C-kit: weak positive

  2. DOG-1: Positive

  3. CD34: Positive

  4. CK-8/18, Desmin: Negative

  5. Ki-67: 2%–3%

Consistent with GIST, spindle cell type, low-risk.

Discussion

GIST behavior is primarily driven by mutations in the KIT gene (85%), PDGFRA gene (10%), or rarely the BRAF gene, with ~95% of tumours showing KIT positivity, leading to uncontrolled cellular proliferation in the gastrointestinal tract [6]. Clinically, GISTs often present with nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms. Radiologically, their appearance varies depending on tumor size, growth pattern, and the presence of necrosis or hemorrhage, and they may mimic diverticular outpouchings or cystic lesions, increasing the likelihood of misinterpretation on imaging studies [7, 8]. In the present case, the cystic morphology of a posterior gastric wall GIST led to misdiagnosis as a gastric diverticulum.

Complete surgical resection with negative microscopic margins (R0 resection) remains the treatment of choice for localized GISTs and offers the best chance for long-term disease control. Open surgical approaches are preferred for tumors measuring ≥5 cm or those at risk of rupture to minimize intraoperative spillage and peritoneal dissemination [9]. For high-risk GISTs, evidence supports 3 years of adjuvant imatinib therapy, which significantly improves recurrence-free survival and overall prognosis compared with shorter regimens [10].

Immunohistochemical profiling further guide therapeutic decisions, as certain mutations may influence sensitivity to imatinib and require alternative dosing strategies or therapies [11, 12]. This case highlights the importance of accurate risk stratification and a multidisciplinary approach when large GISTs mimic benign gastric conditions on imaging.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Funding

None declared.

References

1.

Miettinen
 
M
,
Lasota
 
J
.
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors--definition, clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic features and differential diagnosis
.
Virchows Arch
 
2001
;
438
:
1
12
.

2.

Søreide
 
K
,
Sandvik
 
OM
,
Søreide
 
JA
 et al.  
Global epidemiology of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST): a systematic review of population-based cohort studies
.
Cancer Epidemiol
 
2016
;
40
:
39
46
.

3.

Corless
 
CL
,
Heinrich
 
MC
.
Molecular pathobiology of gastrointestinal stromal sarcomas
.
Annu Rev Pathol
 
2008
;
3
:
557
86
.

4.

Blay
 
JY
,
Kang
 
YK
,
Nishida
 
T
 et al.  
Gastrointestinal stromal tumours
.
Nat Rev Dis Primers
 
2021
;
7
:
22
.

5.

Shah
 
J
,
Patel
 
K
,
Sunkara
 
T
 et al.  
Gastric diverticulum: a comprehensive review
.
Inflamm Intest Dis
 
2019
;
3
:
161
6
.

6.

Demetri
 
GD
. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor. In:
DeVita
 
L
,
Lawrence
 
TS
,
Rosenberg
 
SA
(eds).
DeVita, Hellman, and Rosenberg’s Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology
, (9th) edn.
Philadelphia
:
Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
,
2011
.

7.

Nishida
 
T
,
Blay
 
JY
,
Hirota
 
S
 et al.  
The standard diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on guidelines
.
Gastric Cancer
 
2016
;
19
:
3
14
.

8.

Inoue
 
A
,
Ota
 
S
,
Yamasaki
 
M
 et al.  
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a comprehensive radiological review
.
Jpn J Radiol
 
2022
;
40
:
1105
20
.

9.

Rutkowski
 
P
,
Skoczylas
 
J
,
Wisniewski
 
P
.
Is the surgical margin in gastrointestinal stromal tumors different?
 
Visc Med
 
2018
;
34
:
347
52
.

10.

Joensuu
 
H
,
Eriksson
 
M
,
Sundby Hall
 
K
 et al.  
Survival outcomes associated with 3 years vs 1 year of adjuvant Imatinib for patients with high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an analysis of a randomized clinical trial after 10-year follow-up
.
JAMA Oncol
 
2020
;
6
:
1241
6
.

11.

Casali
 
PG
,
Blay
 
JY
,
Abecassis
 
N
 et al.  
ESMO-EURACAN-GENTURIS clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
.
Ann Oncol
 
2022
;
33
:
20
33
.

12.

Rutkowski
 
P
,
Gronchi
 
A
,
Hohenberger
 
P
 et al.  
Neoadjuvant imatinib in locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): the EORTC STBSG experience
.
Ann Surg Oncol
 
2013
;
20
:
2937
43
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.