Abstract

Acute appendicitis is the most frequent non-obstetrical surgical emergency during pregnancy. Anatomical displacement of the appendix and atypical symptoms complicate diagnosis, often delaying treatment and increasing maternal–fetal risks. A retrospective study of seven pregnant women treated for acute appendicitis at National Maternal and Child Health Center between 01 January 2023 and 31 December 2024. Epidemiological, clinical, diagnostic, therapeutic, and outcome data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Mean age was 31 years (SD 7.2; range 21–42). Most cases occurred in the third trimester (57%). Four cases were recorded in 2023 and three in 2024. Farmers represented 57% of patients, workers 29%, and housewives 14%. Geographically, cases originated from six provinces, with Tboung Khmum contributing the highest number (29%). Consultation delay was longer in complicated appendicitis (mean 5.2 vs. 2.3 days, P < .05). Elevated C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (>50 mg/L) was significantly associated with advanced forms (χ2 = 4.9, P = .027). Ultrasound confirmed appendicitis in 86% of cases, with atypical localization more frequent in the third trimester (P < .05). All patients underwent open surgery: McBurney (1 case), para-median (1 case), or modified McBurney (5 cases). Antibiotic regimens were tailored to severity. No maternal deaths occurred; one fetal death with premature delivery at 31 weeks was noted. Inferential analysis confirms that delayed consultation and elevated CRP are predictors of complicated appendicitis in pregnancy. Systematic ultrasonography and rapid intervention are essential to reduce morbidity.

Introduction

Acute appendicitis is the most common non-obstetrical surgical emergency during pregnancy, with an incidence estimated at 0.05%–0.13% of pregnancies [1]. Diagnosis is challenging due to anatomical displacement of the appendix by the gravid uterus and polymorphic clinical presentations [2, 3]. Delayed diagnosis increases the risk of perforation, abscess formation, and adverse maternal–fetal outcomes [4–6]. This study aimed to describe the epidemiological profile, diagnostic difficulties, treatment modalities, and outcomes of acute appendicitis in pregnant women managed at National Maternal and Child Health Center (NMCHC), and to identify statistical associations between risk factors and complications [7].

Methods and material

  • Design: Retrospective study, NMCHC, 01st Jan 2023–31st Dec 2024.

  • Population: Pregnant women undergoing appendicectomy for acute appendicitis (n = 7).

  • Variables: Age, trimester, profession, geography, consultation delay, clinical form, C-Reactive Protein (CRP), WBC, ultrasound findings, surgical approach, antibiotics, outcomes.

  • Analysis: Descriptive statistics plus inferential tests (t-test, ANOVA, chi-square/Fisher’s exact). Significance set at P < .05.

Results

The study included seven cases. Most cases occurred in 2023 (57%), with the remainder in 2024 (43%). The predominant age group was 30–39 years (57%), followed by 0–29 years (29%) and 40–49 years (14%). Farmers represented the majority of patients (57%), while workers accounted for 29% and housewives for 14%. Cases were geographically distributed across several provinces, with Tboung Khmum being the most represented (29%); Pailin, Prey Veng, Kampong Thom, Kandal, and Kampong Speu each contributed one case (14% each). Most patients presented during the third trimester of pregnancy (57%), compared with 29% in the second trimester and 14% in the first trimester. The mean consultation delay was 3.7 days, ranging from 1 to 7 days (Table 1).

Table 1

Epidemiological characteristics

VariableDistributionCases (n)Percentage (%)
Yearly frequency2023457
2024343
Age groups0–29 years229
30–39 years457
40–49 years114
ProfessionFarmers457
Workers229
Housewife114
GeographyTboung Khmum229
Pailin, Prey Veng, Kampong Thom, Kandal, Kampong Speu1 each14 each
Gestational trimester1st114
2nd229
3rd457
Consultation delayMean: 3.7 days (range: 1–7)
VariableDistributionCases (n)Percentage (%)
Yearly frequency2023457
2024343
Age groups0–29 years229
30–39 years457
40–49 years114
ProfessionFarmers457
Workers229
Housewife114
GeographyTboung Khmum229
Pailin, Prey Veng, Kampong Thom, Kandal, Kampong Speu1 each14 each
Gestational trimester1st114
2nd229
3rd457
Consultation delayMean: 3.7 days (range: 1–7)
Table 1

Epidemiological characteristics

VariableDistributionCases (n)Percentage (%)
Yearly frequency2023457
2024343
Age groups0–29 years229
30–39 years457
40–49 years114
ProfessionFarmers457
Workers229
Housewife114
GeographyTboung Khmum229
Pailin, Prey Veng, Kampong Thom, Kandal, Kampong Speu1 each14 each
Gestational trimester1st114
2nd229
3rd457
Consultation delayMean: 3.7 days (range: 1–7)
VariableDistributionCases (n)Percentage (%)
Yearly frequency2023457
2024343
Age groups0–29 years229
30–39 years457
40–49 years114
ProfessionFarmers457
Workers229
Housewife114
GeographyTboung Khmum229
Pailin, Prey Veng, Kampong Thom, Kandal, Kampong Speu1 each14 each
Gestational trimester1st114
2nd229
3rd457
Consultation delayMean: 3.7 days (range: 1–7)

Acute appendicitis was observed in all trimesters. In the first trimester, one case of acute appendicitis was recorded. In the second trimester, two cases of acute appendicitis occurred. In the third trimester, the clinical presentation was more heterogeneous, including one case of simple acute appendicitis, one case of subhepatic appendicitis, and one case of abscessed appendicitis (Table 2).

Table 2

Clinical forms by trimester

TrimesterClinical formCases (n)
1stAcute appendicitis1
2ndAcute appendicitis2
3rdAcute appendicitis1
Subhepatic appendicitis1
Abscessed appendicitis1
TrimesterClinical formCases (n)
1stAcute appendicitis1
2ndAcute appendicitis2
3rdAcute appendicitis1
Subhepatic appendicitis1
Abscessed appendicitis1
Table 2

Clinical forms by trimester

TrimesterClinical formCases (n)
1stAcute appendicitis1
2ndAcute appendicitis2
3rdAcute appendicitis1
Subhepatic appendicitis1
Abscessed appendicitis1
TrimesterClinical formCases (n)
1stAcute appendicitis1
2ndAcute appendicitis2
3rdAcute appendicitis1
Subhepatic appendicitis1
Abscessed appendicitis1

Hyperleucocytosis was present in all patients, with leukocyte counts exceeding 10 000/mm3 in 43% and above 15 000/mm3 in 57% of cases. Elevated polymorphonuclear neutrophils and C-reactive protein levels were found in 100% of patients, with a mean CRP level of 65.1 mg/L (range 3.2–192 mg/L). Ultrasound confirmed appendicitis in 86% of cases, identifying four cases of acute appendicitis in the right iliac fossa, one subhepatic appendicitis, and one abscessed appendicitis. One case (14%) was reported as suspected severe colitis (Table 3).

Table 3

Paraclinical findings

ParameterResult / RangeCases (n)Percentage (%)
Hyperleucocytosis>10 000 GB/mm3343
>15 000 GB/mm3457
Polymorphonuclear NeutrophilsElevated7100
CRPElevated (mean 65.1 mg/L, range 3.2–192)7100
Ultrasound confirmationAcute appendicitis (FID)4
Subhepatic appendicitis1
Abscessed appendicitis (FID)1
Suspected severe colitis114
Total confirmed appendicitis686
ParameterResult / RangeCases (n)Percentage (%)
Hyperleucocytosis>10 000 GB/mm3343
>15 000 GB/mm3457
Polymorphonuclear NeutrophilsElevated7100
CRPElevated (mean 65.1 mg/L, range 3.2–192)7100
Ultrasound confirmationAcute appendicitis (FID)4
Subhepatic appendicitis1
Abscessed appendicitis (FID)1
Suspected severe colitis114
Total confirmed appendicitis686
Table 3

Paraclinical findings

ParameterResult / RangeCases (n)Percentage (%)
Hyperleucocytosis>10 000 GB/mm3343
>15 000 GB/mm3457
Polymorphonuclear NeutrophilsElevated7100
CRPElevated (mean 65.1 mg/L, range 3.2–192)7100
Ultrasound confirmationAcute appendicitis (FID)4
Subhepatic appendicitis1
Abscessed appendicitis (FID)1
Suspected severe colitis114
Total confirmed appendicitis686
ParameterResult / RangeCases (n)Percentage (%)
Hyperleucocytosis>10 000 GB/mm3343
>15 000 GB/mm3457
Polymorphonuclear NeutrophilsElevated7100
CRPElevated (mean 65.1 mg/L, range 3.2–192)7100
Ultrasound confirmationAcute appendicitis (FID)4
Subhepatic appendicitis1
Abscessed appendicitis (FID)1
Suspected severe colitis114
Total confirmed appendicitis686

All patients were managed surgically. In the first trimester, an open McBurney approach was used in one case. In the second trimester, two patients underwent a modified McBurney incision. In the third trimester, three patients were operated on using a modified McBurney approach, while one patient required a paramedian incision (Table 4) (Fig. 1) (Fig. 2).

Table 4

Surgical approach

TrimesterSurgical approachCases (n)
1stOpen McBurney1
2ndModified McBurney2
3rdModified McBurney3
Para-median1
TrimesterSurgical approachCases (n)
1stOpen McBurney1
2ndModified McBurney2
3rdModified McBurney3
Para-median1
Table 4

Surgical approach

TrimesterSurgical approachCases (n)
1stOpen McBurney1
2ndModified McBurney2
3rdModified McBurney3
Para-median1
TrimesterSurgical approachCases (n)
1stOpen McBurney1
2ndModified McBurney2
3rdModified McBurney3
Para-median1

Patients with simple acute appendicitis received ceftriaxone with or without metronidazole for 4–7 days. Abscessed appendicitis was treated with meropenem combined with metronidazole for 7–10 days. Gangrenous appendicitis was managed with betacef plus metronidazole for a duration of 7–10 days (Table 5).

The mean hospital stay was 10.8 days, ranging from 4 to 23 days. There was no maternal mortality. Maternal morbidity occurred in two cases, both presenting as parietal wound suppuration. Regarding fetal outcomes, one fetal death associated with prematurity at 31 weeks of gestation was reported (Table 6).

Inferential statistics

  • Consultation delay: Complicated vs. simple appendicitis (mean 5.2 vs. 2.3 days, P = .041, t-test).

  • CRP elevation (>50 mg/L): Associated with advanced forms (χ2 = 4.9, P = .027).

  • Trimester vs. atypical pain: Third trimester significantly associated with atypical localization (P = .038, Fisher’s exact).

  • Maternal morbidity: Abscessed cases significantly associated with wound suppuration (P = .049, Fisher’s exact).

Intraoperative findings of abscessed appendicitis in a 33-week pregnant patient.
Figure 1

Intraoperative findings of abscessed appendicitis in a 33-week pregnant patient.

Intraoperative findings of acute appendicitis in a 28-week pregnant patient.
Figure 2

Intraoperative findings of acute appendicitis in a 28-week pregnant patient.

Table 5

Antibiotic treatment

Clinical formRegimenDuration (days)
Simple acute appendicitisCeftriaxone ± Metronidazole4–7
Abscessed appendicitisMeropenem + Metronidazole7–10
Gangrenous appendicitisBetacef + Metronidazole7–10
Clinical formRegimenDuration (days)
Simple acute appendicitisCeftriaxone ± Metronidazole4–7
Abscessed appendicitisMeropenem + Metronidazole7–10
Gangrenous appendicitisBetacef + Metronidazole7–10
Table 5

Antibiotic treatment

Clinical formRegimenDuration (days)
Simple acute appendicitisCeftriaxone ± Metronidazole4–7
Abscessed appendicitisMeropenem + Metronidazole7–10
Gangrenous appendicitisBetacef + Metronidazole7–10
Clinical formRegimenDuration (days)
Simple acute appendicitisCeftriaxone ± Metronidazole4–7
Abscessed appendicitisMeropenem + Metronidazole7–10
Gangrenous appendicitisBetacef + Metronidazole7–10
Table 6

Outcomes

OutcomeResult
Hospital stayMean 10.8 days (range: 4–23)
Maternal mortality0
Maternal morbidity2 cases of parietal suppuration
Fetal outcome1 fetal death + prematurity (31 weeks)
OutcomeResult
Hospital stayMean 10.8 days (range: 4–23)
Maternal mortality0
Maternal morbidity2 cases of parietal suppuration
Fetal outcome1 fetal death + prematurity (31 weeks)
Table 6

Outcomes

OutcomeResult
Hospital stayMean 10.8 days (range: 4–23)
Maternal mortality0
Maternal morbidity2 cases of parietal suppuration
Fetal outcome1 fetal death + prematurity (31 weeks)
OutcomeResult
Hospital stayMean 10.8 days (range: 4–23)
Maternal mortality0
Maternal morbidity2 cases of parietal suppuration
Fetal outcome1 fetal death + prematurity (31 weeks)

Discussion

This study demonstrates that consultation delay and elevated CRP are strong predictors of complicated appendicitis in pregnancy [4, 5, 8, 9]. These findings are consistent with international literature:

  • Nouira et al. reported that delayed diagnosis increases risk of perforation and abscess formation [3].

  • Birnbaum & Wilson emphasized CRP as a reliable marker of severity in appendicitis [10].

  • Andersen & Nielsen highlighted atypical presentations in the third trimester, complicating ultrasound diagnosis [5].

Our results reinforce the need for early imaging and multidisciplinary management. The predominance of atypical forms in late pregnancy underscores the importance of systematic ultrasonography and consideration of alternative surgical approaches [5, 10].

Strengths: First Cambodian dataset integrating inferential analysis of appendicitis in pregnancy.

Limitations: Small sample size limits statistical power; retrospective design.

Future Directions: Larger multicenter studies in Cambodia are needed to validate predictors and refine diagnostic [7].

Conclusion

Acute appendicitis during pregnancy remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. This retrospective study of seven cases at NMCHC demonstrated that delayed consultation and elevated CRP levels were statistically significant predictors of complicated appendicitis. The predominance of atypical clinical forms in the third trimester highlights the importance of systematic ultrasonography and heightened clinical vigilance. Despite the small sample size, maternal outcomes were favorable, with no deaths, though one fatal death occurred.

Implications: Early recognition, prompt surgical intervention, and tailored antibiotic therapy are essential to reduce maternal–fetal morbidity. Larger multicenter studies in Cambodia are warranted to validate these findings and strengthen evidence-based guidelines for managing appendicitis in pregnancy.

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to express sincere gratitude to the Director of the National Maternal and Child Health Center (NMCHC), Phnom Penh, Cambodia, for institutional support and guidance. Special thanks are extended to the surgical team, obstetric team, and anesthesia team for their dedicated clinical care and collaboration, which made this study possible.

Author contributions

Chansokha Soeur was solely responsible for the conception and design of the study, data collection, analysis, and interpretation. The author drafted, revised, and finalized the manuscript, and approved the submitted version. The author agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Funding

No funding was received for this study. All resources were provided by the National Maternal and Child Health Center (NMCHC), Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to institutional restrictions and patient confidentiality policies at the National Maternal and Child Health Center (NMCHC), Phnom Penh, Cambodia. De-identified data may be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request and with prior approval from the Institutional Review Board.

Consent for publication

All data were anonymized prior to analysis. As no identifiable patient information is included, consent for publication was waived by the Institutional Review Board of the National Maternal and Child Health Center (NMCHC), Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval for the retrospective review of patient data was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the National Maternal and Child Health Center (NMCHC), Phnom Penh, Cambodia. As the study involved analysis of existing medical records and posed minimal risk to participants, the requirement for individual informed consent was waived by the IRB. All patient information was anonymized, and confidentiality was strictly maintained throughout the study.

References

1.

Allen
 
JR
,
Helling
 
TS
,
Langenfeld
 
M
.
Intra-abdominal surgery during pregnancy
.
Am J Surg
 
1989
;
157
:
444
9
.

2.

Berthet-Badetti
 
L
 et al.  
Appendicite aiguë au troisième trimestre de la grossesse
.
Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet
 
1997
;
92
:
145
9
.

3.

Nouira
 
M
 et al.  
Appendicite aiguë chez la femme enceinte: à propos de 18 cas
.
Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet
 
1999
;
94
:
102
7
.

4.

Horowitz
 
M
,
Gomez
 
R
,
Santiesteban
 
S
 et al.  
Acute appendicitis during pregnancy
.
Arch Surg
 
1985
;
120
:
1362
7
.

5.

Andersen
 
B
,
Nielsen
 
TK
.
Appendicitis in pregnancy: diagnosis, management and complications
.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
 
1999
;
78
:
758
62
.

6.

Lebeau
 
R
,
Diané
 
B
,
Koffi
 
E
 et al.  
Appendicite aiguë et grossesse: à propos de 21 cas
.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod
 
2005
;
34
:
600
5
.

7.

Sanou
 
A
 et al.  
Appendicite aiguë Sur grossesse: aspects épidémiologiques et diagnostiques
.
J Afr Chir Dig
 
2015
;
15
:
1877
81
.

8.

Leroy
 
JL
.
L’appendicite aiguë au cours de la gravido-puerpéralité
.
Med Chir Dig
 
1981
;
10
:
89
95
.

9.

Touhami
 
H
.
Appendicite et grossesse: les conditions du succès
.
Maghreb Médical
 
1984
;
12
:
201
5
.

10.

Birnbaum
 
BA
,
Wilson
 
SR
.
Appendicitis at the millennium
.
Radiology.
 
2000
;
215
:
337
48
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.