Journal Article

Removal of a large maxillary sinus mucocele via Le Fort I osteotomy during orthognathic surgery: a case report

Journal of Surgical Case Reports, Volume 2026, Issue 10, October 2026, rjag974, https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjag974
Published:
27 October 2026
Article history
Received:
29 August 2026
Revision received:
17 September 2026
Accepted:
07 October 2026
Published:
27 October 2026

Abstract

Maxillary sinus mucoceles are uncommon expansile lesions resulting from impaired sinus drainage and mucus accumulation. We report a 19-year-old male with a large left maxillary sinus mucocele identified during planning for bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Preoperative cone-beam computed tomography showed complete sinus occupation with extension into the nasal cavity and toward the nasopharynx. During the independently planned Le Fort I osteotomy, maxillary down-fracture provided direct access, allowing intact removal of the well-encapsulated lesion. Histopathological examination confirmed a mucocele. At 2-month follow-up, the patient had no nasal symptoms, and postoperative imaging demonstrated marked sinus re-aeration without radiographic evidence of residual or recurrent disease. When independently indicated, Le Fort I osteotomy may provide effective access for simultaneous management of selected extensive maxillary sinus mucoceles.

Introduction

Paranasal sinus mucoceles are benign, epithelium-lined expansile lesions caused by impaired sinus drainage and progressive mucus accumulation [1–5]. Maxillary sinus mucoceles are uncommon and may expand beyond the sinus, causing bony remodeling and extension into adjacent structures [2–6]. Although previous sinonasal surgery, chronic inflammatory disease, and facial trauma are recognized predisposing factors, some cases have no identifiable cause [1, 3–5, 7–10]. Transnasal endoscopic marsupialization is preferred for most accessible maxillary sinus mucoceles, whereas open or combined approaches may be required for extensive or inaccessible lesions [1, 4, 5, 8, 11]. Le Fort I osteotomy provides wide exposure of the maxillary sinus, nasal cavity, and nasopharyngeal region and has been used to access various midfacial lesions [12–14]. We report the removal of an extensive maxillary sinus mucocele through maxillary down-fracture during independently planned Le Fort I orthognathic surgery.

Case report

A 19-year-old systemically healthy male was referred for correction of a skeletal Class III dentofacial deformity and reported left-sided nasal obstruction. He had a history of early childhood nasal trauma but no previous sinonasal surgery. Preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) demonstrated a lesion completely occupying the left maxillary sinus, extending into the nasal cavity and toward the nasopharynx, with medial sinus wall thinning, ipsilateral airway narrowing, and widening of the natural maxillary ostium (Fig. 1A–C). Following otorhinolaryngology consultation, an antrochoanal polyp was considered the leading diagnosis, with a maxillary sinus mucocele included in the differential diagnosis. Preoperative nasal endoscopy was not performed.

Preoperative sagittal, coronal, and axial CBCT sections showing complete opacification of the left maxillary sinus, medial extension into the nasal cavity, posterior extension toward the nasopharynx, and widening of the natural maxillary ostium.
Figure 1

Representative preoperative CBCT sections. (A) Sagittal view demonstrating posterior extension of the lesion toward the nasopharynx. (B) Coronal view showing complete occupation of the left maxillary sinus, thinning and displacement of the medial sinus wall, and narrowing of the ipsilateral nasal airway. (C) Axial view demonstrating complete opacification of the left maxillary sinus, medial extension of the lesion into the nasal cavity, and widening of the natural maxillary ostium.

During the planned bimaxillary procedure, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy was followed by a Le Fort I osteotomy. Maxillary down-fracture provided direct access to a thick-walled, well-encapsulated cystic lesion containing mucoid fluid (Fig. 2A). No purulent material or other evidence of secondary infection was observed; therefore, microbiological culture was not performed. The lesion was separated from the maxillary sinus wall and removed intact (Fig. 2B). Although the natural maxillary ostium appeared widened on preoperative CBCT, its lumen was obstructed by the lesion on direct intraoperative inspection. No antrostomy or surgical enlargement of the natural ostium was performed. The planned orthognathic movements were then completed. Histopathological examination confirmed a maxillary sinus mucocele without evidence of neoplasia.

Intraoperative photographs showing the well-encapsulated cystic lesion within the left maxillary sinus after maxillary down-fracture and the intact excised specimen beside a metric ruler.
Figure 2

Intraoperative removal and gross appearance of the lesion. (A) Direct visualization of the thick-walled, well-encapsulated cystic lesion within the left maxillary sinus following Le Fort I osteotomy and maxillary down-fracture. (B) Gross appearance of the intact specimen after complete removal, positioned adjacent to a metric ruler.

The postoperative course was uneventful. At the 2-month follow-up, the patient reported no nasal symptoms. Postoperative sagittal, coronal, and axial CBCT demonstrated marked re-aeration of the left maxillary sinus without radiographic evidence of residual or recurrent disease; the natural ostial region appeared radiographically unobstructed (Fig. 3A–C). Preoperative and 2-month postoperative frontal and right-profile photographs documented the facial outcome following orthognathic surgery (Fig. 4A–D).

Postoperative sagittal, coronal, and axial CBCT sections demonstrating marked re-aeration of the left maxillary sinus, a radiographically unobstructed appearance of the natural ostial region, and no evident residual or recurrent lesion at 2 months.
Figure 3

CBCT sections obtained at the 2-month postoperative follow-up. (A) Sagittal, (B) coronal, and (C) axial views demonstrating marked re-aeration of the left maxillary sinus and no radiographic evidence of residual or recurrent disease. The natural maxillary ostial region appeared radiographically unobstructed on the axial view.

Preoperative and 2-month postoperative frontal and right-profile facial photographs demonstrating the clinical facial changes following bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.
Figure 4

Preoperative and 2-month postoperative facial photographs. (A) Preoperative frontal view. (B) Preoperative right-profile view. (C) Frontal view at the 2-month postoperative follow-up. (D) Right-profile view at the 2-month postoperative follow-up.

Discussion

Maxillary sinus mucoceles are uncommon, and extensive lesions may cause only nonspecific symptoms [1, 3, 10]. In the present case, the lesion occupied the entire maxillary sinus and extended into the nasal cavity and toward the nasopharynx, yet the only sinonasal symptom was unilateral nasal obstruction. The etiology remained uncertain because the patient had no history of sinonasal surgery, and the relationship between his remote childhood nasal trauma and the mucocele could not be established [1, 3–5, 8–10]. Following otorhinolaryngology consultation, an antrochoanal polyp was initially considered, with mucocele included in the differential diagnosis; histopathological examination established the definitive diagnosis.

Transnasal endoscopic marsupialization is the preferred treatment for most accessible maxillary sinus mucoceles [4, 5, 8, 11]. In this case, however, Le Fort I osteotomy had already been independently planned for orthognathic correction. Maxillary down-fracture provided wide access to the sinus and lesion extensions without requiring an additional surgical approach. En bloc removal was selected because the well-encapsulated lesion could be clearly visualized and separated from the sinus wall without fragmentation. Le Fort I access has similarly been used for other extensive lesions involving the maxillary sinus and adjacent midfacial regions [12–14]. This case-specific use should therefore not be interpreted as an alternative to endoscopic marsupialization for routine treatment.

Although the natural maxillary ostium appeared widened on preoperative CBCT, its lumen was obstructed by the lesion intraoperatively. Neither antrostomy nor surgical enlargement of the ostium was performed. At 2 months, CBCT demonstrated marked sinus re-aeration, a radiographically unobstructed ostial region, and no evidence of residual or recurrent disease. However, these findings do not establish functional ostial patency or durable treatment success, and delayed recurrence remains possible [1, 4, 5, 8, 10, 11].

The principal limitation is the short 2-month follow-up. The absence of preoperative and postoperative nasal endoscopy limited direct endoscopic assessment of the lesion and postoperative functional ostial patency, respectively. Longer clinical and radiographic follow-up, with nasal endoscopy when indicated, is required to assess sustained sinus ventilation and recurrence [2, 5, 6, 10].

Conclusion

When a Le Fort I osteotomy is independently indicated for correction of a dentofacial deformity, maxillary down-fracture may provide direct access for simultaneous management of an extensive maxillary sinus lesion. In this patient, it permitted intact removal of the mucocele without an additional surgical approach. This case-specific use does not replace endoscopic marsupialization as the standard treatment for accessible maxillary sinus mucoceles [4, 5, 8, 11] but may represent a practical option in selected patients when the planned Le Fort I osteotomy already provides the required exposure [12–14].

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data availability

The data underlying this article are available within the article. Additional patient-level data are not publicly available to protect patient confidentiality.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and the accompanying clinical and radiological images.

References

1.

Obeso
 
S
,
Llorente
 
JL
,
Rodrigo
 
JP
 et al.  
Paranasal sinuses mucoceles: our experience in 72 patients
.
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp
 
2009
;
60
:
332
–
9
.

2.

Capra
 
GG
,
Carbone
 
PN
,
Mullin
 
DP
.
Paranasal sinus mucocele
.
Head Neck Pathol
 
2012
;
6
:
369
–
72
.

3.

Scangas
 
GA
,
Gudis
 
DA
,
Kennedy
 
DW
.
The natural history and clinical characteristics of paranasal sinus mucoceles: a clinical review
.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol
 
2013
;
3
:
712
–
7
.

4.

Abdel-Aziz
 
M
,
El-Hoshy
 
H
,
Azooz
 
K
 et al.  
Maxillary sinus mucocele: predisposing factors, clinical presentations, and treatment
.
Oral Maxillofac Surg
 
2017
;
21
:
55
–
8
.

5.

Busaba
 
NY
,
Salman
 
SD
.
Maxillary sinus mucoceles: clinical presentation and long-term results of endoscopic surgical treatment
.
Laryngoscope
 
1999
;
109
:
1446
–
9
.

6.

Lee
 
TJ
,
Li
 
SP
,
Fu
 
CH
 et al.  
Extensive paranasal sinus mucoceles: a 15-year review of 82 cases
.
Am J Otolaryngol
 
2009
;
30
:
234
–
8
.

7.

Plantier
 
DB
,
Brandão Neto
 
D
,
Pinna
 
FR
 et al.  
Mucocele: clinical characteristics and outcomes in 46 operated patients
.
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol
 
2019
;
23
:
88
–
91
.

8.

Caylakli
 
F
,
Yavuz
 
H
,
Cagici
 
AC
 et al.  
Endoscopic sinus surgery for maxillary sinus mucoceles
.
Head Face Med
 
2006
;
2
:
29
.

9.

Yeom
 
HG
,
Lee
 
W
,
Han
 
SI
 et al.  
Mucocele in the maxillary sinus involving the orbit: a report of 2 cases
.
Imaging Sci Dent
 
2022
;
52
:
327
–
32
.

10.

Devars du Mayne
 
M
,
Moya-Plana
 
A
,
Malinvaud
 
D
 et al.  
Sinus mucocele: natural history and long-term recurrence rate
.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis
 
2012
;
129
:
125
–
30
.

11.

Har-El
 
G
,
Balwally
 
AN
,
Lucente
 
FE
.
Sinus mucoceles: is marsupialization enough?
 
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
 
1997
;
117
:
633
–
40
.

12.

Singh
 
R
,
Hazarika
 
P
,
Nayak
 
DR
 et al.  
Role of Le fort type I osteotomy approach in juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma
.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
 
2011
;
40
:
1271
–
4
.

13.

Alstad
 
V
,
Abtahi
 
J
.
Surgical removal of keratocystic odontogenic tumours via a Le fort I osteotomy approach: a retrospective study of the recurrence rate
.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
 
2017
;
46
:
434
–
9
.

14.

Soares
 
ECS
,
Medeiros
 
JR
,
Bezerra
 
TP
 et al.  
The use of Le fort I approach in the resection of an extensive ossifying fibroma
.
Oral Maxillofac Surg
 
2013
;
17
:
209
–
12
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close

Gift article access

As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.

Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Please sign in to your personal account to gift article access.

Gift article access

Please create a link below to share with others. This will provide temporary access to this restricted article.

The link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Gift articles remaining: --

Gift article access

The link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Gift articles remaining: --

Gift article access

As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.

Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses.

You have reached the limit of 10 links within a 30 day period