-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Wisal Al Sukaiti, Natasha Ranjit, Al Warith Al Hashmi, Salim Al Riyami, Ciliated foregut cyst of the pancreas mimicking a cystic neoplasm, Journal of Surgical Case Reports, Volume 2026, Issue 10, October 2026, rjag885, https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjag885
Close - Share Icon Share
Abstract
Pancreatic cystic lesions are being identified more frequently with widespread use of cross-sectional imaging. While most pancreatic cysts are mucinous neoplasms or pseudocysts, congenital cysts of foregut origin are exceptionally rare in this location, with these being commonly found in the mediastinum. Their occurrence in the hepatobiliary system is rare, and pancreatic involvement is even rarer. Fewer than 20 cases have been reported in literature since it was first described in the 1990s. Ciliated foregut cysts arise from abnormal development of the primitive foregut and, histologically, are lined by ciliated epithelium. In the pancreas, they may be asymptomatic and difficult to radiologically distinguish from other lesions, posing a diagnostic challenge. Given their rarity, reporting cases of ciliated foregut cysts of the pancreas adds valuable clinical insight. We present the case of a 67-year-old man with an incidentally discovered cyst in the body of the pancreas.
Introduction
A 67-year-old man presented to our hepatobiliary surgery department with non-specific abdominal pain. As part of the initial assessment, a computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen was performed, which incidentally demonstrated a lobulated cystic lesion within the body of the pancreas measuring 6.5 × 5.1 × 4.6 cm. The rest of the pancreas, common bile duct, hepatic vessels, spleen, kidneys, adrenal glands, and bowel were normal. There was unrelated evidence of fatty infiltration of the liver and gallbladder distension.
He had a past medical history of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Case report
Following identification of the pancreatic cystic lesion, baseline laboratory investigations were performed as part of the evaluation. Routine blood tests, including full blood count, renal function, liver function tests, and coagulation profile, were within normal limits. Serum tumour markers were not elevated (CA19-9: 5 U/ml; CEA: 1.2 μg/l).
Initial contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen demonstrated a cystic lesion in the body of the pancreas with features suggestive of a serous cystic neoplasm. The lesion was multiloculated with internal septations and lacked malignant features such as a solid component, mural nodules, diffusion restriction, or lymphadenopathy. However, given the cystic nature of the lesion and the need for further characterization, a pancreatic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed.
MRI of the pancreas with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography was undertaken using a pancreas-specific protocol, including dynamic post-contrast sequences. This demonstrated a lobulated, multiloculated cystic lesion within the pancreatic body measuring approximately 6.2 × 5.1 × 4.6 cm, which remained stable in size compared with prior imaging. The lesion showed high signal intensity on T2-weighted images and low signal intensity on T1-weighted images, without diffusion restriction. A faintly enhancing internal component was present. In addition, there was mild dilatation of the main pancreatic duct, measuring up to 3 mm, with possible communication between the duct and cystic lesion (Fig. 1). On post-contrast arterial-phase imaging, the lesion demonstrated faint enhancement of its internal septa (Fig. 2). These findings raised concern for an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm.

Axial T2-weighted MRI showing a lobulated, multiloculated cystic lesion in the pancreatic body (white arrow), with possible communication with the mildly dilated main pancreatic duct (yellow arrow).

Axial T1-weight abdominal MRI showing a multiloculated cystic lesion in the pancreatic body with enhancing septa (arrow).
Endoscopic ultrasound was subsequently performed to further evaluate the lesion morphology and assess for high-risk features. This demonstrated two large multiloculated macrocystic lesions involving the pancreatic head and pancreatic neck/body regions. The cysts were septated, with no solid components or mural nodules identified. No convincing communication with the pancreatic duct was visualized. Fine-needle aspiration was performed using a 22-gauge needle, yielding ~15 ml of brownish cyst fluid for biochemical and tumour marker analysis. Cyst fluid CEA was within the normal range, while cyst fluid CA19-9 was elevated at approximately 300. These results were inconclusive for a mucinous cystic lesion when interpreted in isolation.
Despite a comprehensive multimodality assessment, pre-operative diagnostic uncertainty remained due to discordant findings across imaging modalities and cyst fluid analysis. Given the discrepant imaging findings regarding ductal communication and the absence of a definitive pre-operative diagnosis, a premalignant pancreatic cystic neoplasm could not be excluded. The patient, therefore, underwent laparoscopic subtotal pancreatectomy.
Intraoperative frozen section analysis of the proximal and distal pancreatic resection margins was undertaken to guide the extent of surgical resection. Both margins were negative for cyst epithelium and malignancy. Final histopathological examination confirmed a benign cystic lesion, subsequently diagnosed as a benign ciliated foregut cyst of the pancreas, with no evidence of dysplasia or invasive malignancy.
The postoperative course was complicated by a clinically insignificant pancreatic leak, from which the patient recovered well.
Discussion
Foregut cystic abnormalities occurring outside the mediastinum, particularly within the hepatobiliary or pancreatic systems, are rare. They are thought to arise from sequestration of an outpouching of the foregut intended for respiratory differentiation [1]. Historically, a variety of terms have been used to describe cysts originating from the foregut, with distinctions based on location, embryological origin, epithelial lining, and wall characteristics. This case report specifically discusses ciliated foregut cysts, which are defined as cysts lined by pseudostratified ciliated columnar epithelium, potentially containing goblet cells and lacking additional distinguishing features, as seen in this case [1, 2].
A total of 18 cases in 17 case reports have been seen in the English literature since first reported by Kohzaki et al. in 1993. Case reports describing the presence of a foregut cyst within the pancreas have been compiled and presented in Table 1, with cyst characteristics and differential diagnoses recorded as originally described.
| Paper [Ref no.] . | Age/gender . | Inner epithelium . | Size . | Location . | Presenting complaint . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim et al. [1] | 29/F | Pseudostratified ciliated columnar epithelium | 41 × 35 mm and 16 × 11 mm | Tail | Incidentally finding |
| Roda et al. [15] | 66/F | Epithelial lining with a ciliated border | 58 × 38 × 48 mm | Tail | Incidental finding |
| Huang et al. [9] | 45/F | Ciliated columnar epithelial cells | 30 × 23 mm | Tail | Incidental finding |
| Dua et al. [13] | 51/M | Pseudostratified tall ciliated columnar epithelium | 69 × 24 mm | Body/tail | Abdominal pain, postprandial bloating, decreased appetite |
| Kawamoto [6] | 66/M | Respiratory-like epithelium | 27 mm | Body | Incidental finding |
| Munshi et al. [5] | 33/M | Ciliated epithelium | 54 × 43 × 21 mm | Uncinate process | Epigastric pain |
| Kohzaki et al. [3] | 41/F | Ciliated simple columnar and pseudostratified epithelium | 20 mm | Head | Epigastric pain |
| Vyas et al. [2] | 52/F | Pseudostratified ciliated columnar epithelium | 90 × 50 × 60 mm | Body/tail | Non-specific abdominal pain |
| Chen et al. [11] | 47/F | Pseudostratified ciliated columnar epithelium | 98 × 35 mm | Neck | Postprandial bloating |
| Bellevicine et al. [4] | 50/F | Ciliated epithelium | 19 × 9 mm | Head | Incidental finding |
| Woon et al. [14] | 58/M | Pseudostratified ciliated epithelium | 20 mm | Head | Abdominal pain |
| Huq et al. [10] | 53/F | Ciliated epithelium | 24 × 53 × 24 mm | Body | Incidental finding |
| Horky et al. [8] | 46/M | Pseudostratified ciliated columnar epithelium | 18 mm | Head | Jaundice, pruritis, dark urine, acholic stools |
| Wang et al. [7] | 69/M | Ciliated respiratory-like epithelium | 70 × 35 × 20 mm | Body/tail | Right upper quadrant discomfort |
| Zhang et al. [12] | 54/F | Respiratory-like epithelium | 30 × 30 × 10 mm | Body | Incidental finding |
| Paper [Ref no.] | Age/gender | Inner epithelium | Size | Location | Presenting complaint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim et al. [ | 29/F | Pseudostratified ciliated columnar epithelium | 41 × 35 mm and 16 × 11 mm | Tail | Incidentally finding |
| Roda et al. [ | 66/F | Epithelial lining with a ciliated border | 58 × 38 × 48 mm | Tail | Incidental finding |
| Huang et al. [ | 45/F | Ciliated columnar epithelial cells | 30 × 23 mm | Tail | Incidental finding |
| Dua et al. [ | 51/M | Pseudostratified tall ciliated columnar epithelium | 69 × 24 mm | Body/tail | Abdominal pain, postprandial bloating, decreased appetite |
| Kawamoto [ | 66/M | Respiratory-like epithelium | 27 mm | Body | Incidental finding |
| Munshi et al. [ | 33/M | Ciliated epithelium | 54 × 43 × 21 mm | Uncinate process | Epigastric pain |
| Kohzaki et al. [ | 41/F | Ciliated simple columnar and pseudostratified epithelium | 20 mm | Head | Epigastric pain |
| Vyas et al. [ | 52/F | Pseudostratified ciliated columnar epithelium | 90 × 50 × 60 mm | Body/tail | Non-specific abdominal pain |
| Chen et al. [ | 47/F | Pseudostratified ciliated columnar epithelium | 98 × 35 mm | Neck | Postprandial bloating |
| Bellevicine et al. [ | 50/F | Ciliated epithelium | 19 × 9 mm | Head | Incidental finding |
| Woon et al. [ | 58/M | Pseudostratified ciliated epithelium | 20 mm | Head | Abdominal pain |
| Huq et al. [ | 53/F | Ciliated epithelium | 24 × 53 × 24 mm | Body | Incidental finding |
| Horky et al. [ | 46/M | Pseudostratified ciliated columnar epithelium | 18 mm | Head | Jaundice, pruritis, dark urine, acholic stools |
| Wang et al. [ | 69/M | Ciliated respiratory-like epithelium | 70 × 35 × 20 mm | Body/tail | Right upper quadrant discomfort |
| Zhang et al. [ | 54/F | Respiratory-like epithelium | 30 × 30 × 10 mm | Body | Incidental finding |
Most incidences were recorded in the body/tail of the pancreas and contained respiratory-like epithelium, specifically pseudostratified ciliated columnar epithelium. Cyst sizes varied across the literature, with the cyst described in this paper falling at the upper end of the reported spectrum. As was seen in this case, cysts initially identified on imaging were often thought to represent alternative lesions, such as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, serous cystadenomas, or pseudocysts, and were not definitively diagnosed until excision and histopathological analysis.
This highlights the difficulty in diagnosing pancreatic ciliated foregut cysts based on imaging alone, as features including location, size, definition, locularity, and wall thickness demonstrate non-specific variation [3]. Fine needle aspiration findings have not been consistently described and reported aspirates range from milky white to brown viscous or clear serous fluid, limiting its diagnostic utility [2]. Histopathological analysis following excision remains the most reliable method for confirming the diagnosis [3].
Although ciliated foregut cysts are benign lesions, malignant transformation has previously been reported in other anatomical locations, such as the liver [12]. While malignant transformation has not been reported in pancreatic ciliated foregut cysts, the occurrence of malignancy in foregut cysts at other anatomical sites suggests that, in the presence of concerning clinical or radiological features, a prompt operative approach may be justified.
Conflicts of interest
None declared.
Funding
None declared.
References
Kawamoto S. Case 49: foregut malformation cyst. In: Zaheer A, Fishman EK, Pittman ME et al. . (eds), Pancreatic Imaging: A Pattern-Based Approach to Radiologic Diagnosis with Pathologic Correlation. Cham:
Author notes
Wisal Al Sukaiti, Natasha Ranjit and Al Warith Al Hashmi contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.