Journal Article

Transabdominal preperitoneal repair of a left bilocular inguinal interparietal hernia: a case report

Journal of Surgical Case Reports, Volume 2026, Issue 10, October 2026, rjag1001, https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjag1001
Published:
31 October 2026
Article history
Received:
12 August 2026
Accepted:
12 October 2026
Published:
31 October 2026

Abstract

An interparietal hernia (IPH) involves the invasion of the hernia sac into various muscle layers and the fascia of the abdominal wall. An 82-year-old man presented with lower abdominal pain lasting 2 weeks. Computed tomography (CT) scans suggested IPH, and the patient then underwent elective surgery. Intraperitoneal findings showed a bilocular interstitial hernia, with the hernial sac extending from between the transverse abdominis and internal oblique muscles into the inguinal canal, and an internal inguinal hernia. The transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) method was used to repair the hernias. With recent improvements in the diagnostic accuracy of abdominal CT scans and the widespread use of laparoscopic surgery, reports of inguinal IPH repairs have been increasing. In cases with complex hernial sacs, such as that presented herein, the TAPP method is useful for accurately diagnosing and identifying the hernial orifice.

Introduction

Interparietal hernia (IPH) is a rare hernia type in which the sac extends into various anatomical layers and the fascia of the abdominal wall within the inguinal region [1]. Bartolin first reported IPH in 1661, which was subsequently defined into three types by Lower et al. [1] as preperitoneal, interstitial, or superficial. Reports of IPH in Japan have become more frequent as laparoscopic hernia repairs have become more common.

Herein, we report a case of simultaneous left internal inguinal hernia and bilocular left inguinal IPH that was successfully repaired using the transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) method.

Case presentation

An 82-year-old man presented to the emergency department with complaints of lower abdominal pain during the 2 weeks prior to his visit. He was taking oral medication for hypertension, which was well-controlled. Although the patient’s abdominal pain intensified the day prior to his presentation, it showed improvement at the time of initial evaluation. Upon physical examination, a bulge was noted in the left groin while standing, suggesting a spontaneous reduction of the incarcerated left inguinal hernia. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis conducted on the day of presentation showed two hernia sacs (Fig. 1). One of these appeared to be an internal inguinal hernia medial to the inferior epigastric artery and vein. The lateral hernia sac with a prolapsed small bowel did not run through the inguinal canal. The patient was suspected of having a left inguinal IPH concomitant with an internal inguinal hernia and then underwent elective surgery. A laparoscopic examination of the abdominal cavity showed two hernias (Fig. 2). Visualization of the orifices through a peritoneal incision indicated one internal and one lateral inguinal hernia. The lateral inguinal hernia contained a hernia sac extending toward the inguinal canal located between the transverse abdominis and internal oblique muscles. Based on these findings, the patient was diagnosed with a bilocular interstitial hernia concomitant with an internal inguinal hernia, which was repaired using the TAPP method. The patient was discharged 2 d after surgery and has remained recurrence- and adverse event-free for >9 months after the repair.

CT images. The hernia sac is seen on the lateral (arrowhead) and medial (arrow) sides of the inferior epigastric artery and vein on the axial view. The lateral hernia sac (arrowhead) is observed outside the inguinal canal with the prolapse of the small intestine on the sagittal view.
Figure 1

CT images. The hernia sac is seen on the lateral (arrowhead) and medial (arrow) sides of the inferior epigastric artery and vein on the axial view. The lateral hernia sac (arrowhead) is observed outside the inguinal canal with the prolapse of the small intestine on the sagittal view.

Intraoperative findings peritoneal dissection showed an internal inguinal hernia with a hernia orifice lateral to it. From the lateral hernia orifice, one hernia sac extends toward the inguinal canal, and one extends between the transverse abdominis and internal oblique muscles. Mesh repair was performed on both hernia orifices.
Figure 2

Intraoperative findings peritoneal dissection showed an internal inguinal hernia with a hernia orifice lateral to it. From the lateral hernia orifice, one hernia sac extends toward the inguinal canal, and one extends between the transverse abdominis and internal oblique muscles. Mesh repair was performed on both hernia orifices.

Discussion

A rare hernia in which the sac extends into various anatomical layers as well as the fascia of the abdominal wall within the inguinal region, IPH is classified into three types depending on the layers involved: (i) preperitoneal, prolapse between the peritoneum and transversus fascia (20%); (ii) interstitial, prolapse between the transversus abdominis and internal oblique or internal and external oblique muscles (60%); and (iii) superficial, prolapse between the external oblique muscle and skin (20%) [1, 2]. The etiology of IPH is thought to be both mechanical and congenital [1]. Mechanical causes include obstruction of the inguinal canal by undescended testicles, causing an IPH (abdominal wall hernia) in each anatomically vulnerable layer as the hernia sac progresses [3]. In congenital hernias, the absence or narrowing of the external ring may be responsible for arresting the hernia in its usual path [4, 5]. IPH may not always result from a single factor and may involve multiple factors.

Differentiating the type of IPH based on physical findings alone is often difficult. In some cases, CT scans may be inadequate, with poor negative predictive value for the presence of various types of hernias [4]. However, with the recent increase in reported IPH cases, awareness and a better understanding of the anatomy of IPH have led to cases in which preoperative diagnosis using CT scans, especially sagittal images, is possible [5–7].

Treatment methods for IPH include the TAPP and anterior approaches. The TAPP method may be inadequate to diagnose IPH if the periphery of the hernia sac is not identified, which may occur because of the circular incision made in the peritoneum [3]. The TAPP method is useful for cases of complex IPH, such as bilocular hernias. It is also helpful for cases complicated by the presence of other inguinal hernias, including occult hernias, such as internal inguinal and femoral hernias [7]. An intraperitoneal approach facilitates repair similar to that of hernias with the internal inguinal ring as the hernial orifice. Therefore, the TAPP method facilitates simple and rapid exposure of the hernial orifice, potentially enabling more reliable reinforcement with surgical mesh.

In Japan, 23 cases of adult IPH have been reported by the nonprofit organization, Japan Medical Abstract Society, 10 of which were bilocular, including the present case (Table 1). The median age was 77 years (range, 59–89) [8–15], and males predominated (eight men and two women). Of the bilocular cases, the IPH type was interstitial in eight and superficial in two cases. All the patients underwent preoperative CT, and preoperative diagnoses were made in eight cases. Treatment strategies included TAPP in eight cases and an anterior approach in two cases, one of which required laparoscopic observation. In that case [12], only laparoscopic observation was conducted due to difficulties in pre-operative diagnosis and the inability to perform surgery under general anesthesia. After confirming the diagnosis of IPH, surgery was performed via an anterior approach.

Table 1

Ten cases of bilocular IPH in Japan

Author/publication yearAgeSexSiteSymptomIPH typeTreatment
Yamamoto et al. [8]73ManRightSwelling, painInterstitialTAPP
Murao et al. [9]77WomanBilateralPainRight: interstitial+femoral hernia
Left: interstitial+femoral, obturator hernia
TAPP
71ManLeftGroin massInterstitialTAPP
Kano et al. [10]77ManLeftSwellingInterstitialTAPP
Taira et al. [11]59ManLeftSwellingSuperficialTAPP
Hirajima et al. [12]77ManLeftSwellingInterstitialLaparoscopic observation
⇒ Direct Kugel
Kobayashi and Takagawa [13]75ManRightSwellingInterstitial+internal inguinal herniaTAPP
Takayama [14]89WomanLeftPainInterstitialLichtenstein
Matsuoka et al. [15]86ManRightPainSuperficialTAPP
Our case, 202583ManLeftSwelling, painInterstitial + internal inguinal herniaTAPP

IPH: interparietal hernia, TAPP: transabdominal preperitoneal repair

As laparoscopy facilitates accurate visualization of the hernial orifice and the direction of hernia sac progression, with a high possibility of identifying occult hernias, TAPP is extremely useful for the treatment of IPH.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest for this article.

Funding

None declared.

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article, as no datasets were generated or analyzed in the current study.

Ethics statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

References

1.

Lower
 
WE
,
Hicken
 
NF
.
Interparietal hernias
.
Ann Surg
 
1931
;
94
:
1070
–
87
.

2.

Althawadi
 
L
,
Alshaer
 
NEF
,
Senjab
 
A
 et al.  
Laparoscopic repair of a large incarcerated intraparietal inguinal hernia mimicking acute appendicitis: a case report
.
Cureus
 
2024
;
16
:
e60448
.

3.

Yamaguchi
 
T
,
Nagatani
 
S
,
Sakabe
 
R
 et al.  
A case of interparietal inguinal hernia (in Japanese)
.
J Jpn Surg Assoc
 
2017
;
78
:
2772
–
6
.

4.

Reddy
 
KM
,
Stellakis
 
MLC
,
Khaliq
 
T
 et al.  
Interparietal hernia mimicking malignant small bowel obstruction
.
Hernia
 
1999
;
3
:
37
–
8
.

5.

Cervantes
 
BYH
,
Lambert
 
RG
,
Lopez
 
DM
 et al.  
Giant intraparietal inguinal hernia misdiagnosed as Spigelian hernia in an old woman
.
Pan Afr Med J
 
2020
;
36
:
117
.

6.

Gungor
 
B
,
Topgul
 
K
,
Bilgin
 
M
 et al.  
Interparietal herniation: a rare cause of intestinal obstruction
.
J Med Cases
 
2010
;
1
:
58
–
60
.

7.

Ozawa
 
H
,
Hara
 
A
,
Hayashi
 
K
 et al.  
Two cases of interparietal inguinal hernias undergoing laparoscopic treatment: a case series
.
J Surg Case Rep
 
2023
;
2023
:
rjad051
.

8.

Yamamoto
 
Y
,
Matsuzawa
 
H
,
Nakajima
 
K
 et al.  
Interparietal hernia repaired by laparoscopic transabdominal preperinoneal approach: a case report (in Japanese)
.
J Jpn Soc Endosc Surg
 
2021
;
26
:
195
–
200
.

9.

Murao
 
N
,
Sakabe
 
R
,
Kidate
 
K
 et al.  
Two cases of interparietal hernia diagnosed preoperatively by prone CT and treated by TAPP method (in Japanese)
.
J Jpn Soc Endosc Surg
 
2021
;
26
:
201
–
9
.

10.

Kano
 
S
,
Makita
 
N
,
Munemoto
 
M
 et al.  
Bilocular type of inguinal interparietal hernia-a case report (in Japanese)
.
J Jpn Surg Assoc
 
2021
;
82
:
1612
–
6
.

11.

Taira
 
I
,
Tobara
 
Y
,
Inamine
 
S
.
Interparietal hernia repaired by laparoscopic approach using a port-free organ retractor: a case reports (in Japanese)
.
J Jpn Hernia Soc
 
2022
;
8
:
25
–
31
.

12.

Hirajima
 
S
,
Takagi
 
T
,
Kobayashi
 
H
 et al.  
A case report of interparietal hernia with dentification by anterior approach after laparoscopic view (in Japanese)
.
J Jpn Hernia Soc
 
2022
;
8
:
39
–
43
.

13.

Kobayashi
 
M
,
Takagawa
 
R
.
Interparietal hernia repaired by laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal approach: a case report (in Japanese)
.
J Jpn Soc Endosc Surg
 
2024
;
29
:
398
–
404
.

14.

Takayama
 
T
.
A case of Spigelian hernia with bilocular sac, difficult to distinguish from inguinal interparietal hernia (in Japanese)
.
J Jpn Hernia Soc
 
2024
;
10
:
37
–
42
.

15.

Matsuoka
 
K
,
Teraoka
 
H
,
Kinoshita
 
H
 et al.  
A case of inguinal interparietal hernia preoperativery diagnosed and laparoscopically repaired (in Japanese)
.
J Jpn Surg Assoc
 
2024
;
86
:
444
–
9
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close

Gift article access

As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.

Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Please sign in to your personal account to gift article access.

Gift article access

Please create a link below to share with others. This will provide temporary access to this restricted article.

The link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Gift articles remaining: --

Gift article access

The link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Gift articles remaining: --

Gift article access

As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.

Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses.

You have reached the limit of 10 links within a 30 day period