Abstract

Aortoenteric fistula (AEF) is a rare but catastrophic complication following esophagectomy, often resulting in massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding and high mortality. While most cases occur early in the postoperative period, delayed presentations remain poorly understood. We report the case of a 54-year-old woman who underwent esophagectomy and gastric pull-up for mid-esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nine months postoperatively, the patient presented with hematemesis, hemorrhagic shock, and died despite resuscitative efforts. Autopsy revealed a 0.9 cm erosion in the descending thoracic aorta with adjacent ulceration of the gastric conduit and bacterial infiltration consistent with a thoracic AEF. This case illustrates a rare, delayed presentation of AEF confirmed by post-mortem analysis. It highlights the need for ongoing clinical vigilance even in patients with initially uncomplicated recoveries.

Introduction

An aortoenteric fistula (AEF) is a rare, life-threatening complication following esophagectomy, causing massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding [1, 2]. Gastric conduits brought through the posterior mediastinum during reconstruction are positioned in close proximity to the aorta, trachea, and bronchi. The development of a fistula from the conduit to the aorta is an aortogastric fistula, a subtype of AEF. AEFs are typically attributed to early postoperative complications like infection, anastomotic leak, or radiation injury, and commonly present within weeks of surgery [3]. Delayed AEFs occurring months or even years later have been reported, though they remain exceedingly rare and often escape early detection [4].

We report a rare case of a delayed thoracic AEF nine months after esophagectomy for mid-esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Tumor adherence to the descending thoracic aorta required conversion from a transhiatal approach to a McKeown thoracotomy. Despite an initially uneventful postoperative recovery, she presented nine months later with catastrophic upper gastrointestinal bleeding and was found post-mortem to have gastric ulceration fistulizing to the aorta.

Case report

A 54-year-old non-smoking female presented with food impaction and progressive dysphagia. Workup revealed a T3N1M0 circumferential keratinizing invasive SCC of the mid-esophagus extending from 27-cm to 36-cm from the incisors. Pathologic-appearing lymph nodes were noted on endoscopic ultrasound. Computed tomography (CT) imaging reported an 8.6-cm long esophageal mass starting above the carina and adjacent but not involving the thoracic aorta (Fig. 1A). The mass was FDG avid (SUV 15.4) without distant metastases (Fig. 1B). Immunohistochemistry showed intact mismatch repair proteins, microsatellite stability, and low PDL1 expression. The patient received neoadjuvant CROSS protocol (carboplatin/paclitaxel and 23 fractions of 41.4 Gy of radiation). Repeat imaging showed significantly improved wall thickening (Fig. 1C) and decreased FDG avidity (SUV 3.2, Fig. 1D). Endoscopy showed a 10-mm mid-esophageal stricture with repeat negative biopsies. The planned transhiatal esophagectomy was converted to a right thoracotomy intraoperatively due to the esophagus being densely adherent at the carina and descending thoracic aorta. The esophagectomy was completed trans-thoracically avoiding injury to the trachea or aorta and securing clear margins. The stomach was brought up through the posterior mediastinum and anastomosed in the neck to the cervical esophagus. The patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged on postoperative day 10.

Imaging findings on presentation vs post-neoadjuvant therapy. (A) Coronal CT imaging showing 8.6-cm long esophageal mass. (B) PET imaging with mid-esophageal mass with SUV 15.4. (C) Post-CROSS protocol esophageal mass with significantly improved wall thickening on coronal CT. (D) Post-CROSS PET with decreased FDG avidity at the level of the mid esophagus.
Figure 1

Imaging findings on presentation vs post-neoadjuvant therapy. (A) Coronal CT imaging showing 8.6-cm long esophageal mass. (B) PET imaging with mid-esophageal mass with SUV 15.4. (C) Post-CROSS protocol esophageal mass with significantly improved wall thickening on coronal CT. (D) Post-CROSS PET with decreased FDG avidity at the level of the mid esophagus.

Pathology revealed a partial response to neoadjuvant therapy (grade 2) and no residual tumor on the descending thoracic aorta, trachea, or mainstem bronchi. The tumor had no lymphovascular invasion or perineural invasion. Of 18 lymph nodes, 2 lymph nodes were positive for metastatic disease. Final staging was a ypT2N1M0 SCC of the middle third of the esophagus.

Postoperatively, rising circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) level was noted despite the absence of radiographic evidence of disease. She was started on pembrolizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel. When ctDNA continued to rise, she was escalated to fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel in combination with pembrolizumab and completed six cycles. A lower posterior mediastinal lymph node was biopsy proven to have recurrence and was treated with 35 Gy of radiation in five fractions.

Nine months following surgery, she presented with massive hematemesis and shock. Massive transfusion protocol was implemented, but she rapidly deteriorated and had a cardiac arrest before she could undergo endoscopy or CT angiography (CTA). Despite aggressive resuscitation, she quickly expired.

Post-mortem examination revealed a 0.9-cm gastric ulcer with gram-positive cocci penetrating into the descending thoracic aorta (Fig. 2A and B) producing an AEF. Minute foci of treated SCC were in the vicinity of the ulcer, but the bacterial infection appeared to be the cause of the fistula.

Gross autopsy images showing AEF. (A) Image of the intra-thoracic structures from the posterior-to-anterior view with the aorta opened. For orientation, the aorta is outlined in yellow and the gastric conduit outlined in pink. Note the ulceration on the aorta side of the AEF. LL, left lung. RL, right lung. GC, gastric conduit. Ao, aorta. (B) Probe traversing the AEF from the aorta into the gastric conduit, which is now opened, containing intra-luminal hemorrhage.
Figure 2

Gross autopsy images showing AEF. (A) Image of the intra-thoracic structures from the posterior-to-anterior view with the aorta opened. For orientation, the aorta is outlined in yellow and the gastric conduit outlined in pink. Note the ulceration on the aorta side of the AEF. LL, left lung. RL, right lung. GC, gastric conduit. Ao, aorta. (B) Probe traversing the AEF from the aorta into the gastric conduit, which is now opened, containing intra-luminal hemorrhage.

Discussion

AEF following esophagectomy is a rare complication with high mortality, often occurring within weeks of surgery from acute infection, anastomotic leak, or conduit ischemia [3, 4]. Our patient developed a thoracic AEF nine months postoperatively, without preceding leak, infection, or sentinel bleed, highlighting the potential for delayed and silent progression. Autopsy revealed a gastric conduit ulcer with transmural bacterial infiltration eroding into the descending thoracic aorta, suggesting a chronic and indolent process culminating in sudden fatal hemorrhage.

Delayed thoracic AEFs are exceedingly uncommon, with only a handful of documented cases and even fewer substantiated by autopsy. Nishimura et al. described an AEF 11 years post-esophagectomy, attributed to chronic mechanical irritation from a staple line [5]; other cases have postulated radiation-induced vasculopathy and persistent inflammation as potential contributors [1, 6]. Our case is characterized by the convergence of several high-risk features: tumor adherence to the aorta, complex dissection, chemoradiation, and subsequent subclinical gram-positive conduit ulceration.

This case invites careful reflection on surveillance strategies in post-esophagectomy patients with known vascular proximity. Current guidelines do not advocate routine vascular imaging in asymptomatic individuals; however, in patients with known aortic involvement, consideration may be given to tailored surveillance protocols employing periodic contrast-enhanced CT or endoscopy to detect early mucosal compromise or impending conduit-aortic erosion [7, 8]. Notably, our patient remained clinically stable until the final presentation with no warning signs on routine postoperative imaging that might have prompted a preemptive intervention.

In exsanguinating patients, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) represents a potentially life-saving temporizing adjunct. It does not require CTA and placement of a Zone 1 REBOA catheter has demonstrated utility in trauma and selected cases of non-variceal gastrointestinal hemorrhage [9, 10]. While REBOA would not have addressed the underlying pathology in this case, it might have facilitated transient hemodynamic stabilization for definitive surgical or endovascular control. Unfortunately, the fulminant nature of our patient’s presentation precluded even this temporizing strategy. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) also offers rapid exclusion of the fistula and hemorrhage control in AEF [11]. Although not always curative without concomitant management of the infected conduit, TEVAR might serve as a bridge to surgical reconstruction in selected patients.

This case underscores the need for long-term vigilance in post-esophagectomy patients, especially when the conduit abuts major vascular structures. Delayed AEF may arise without warning signs and may present suddenly and fatally. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion in any post-esophagectomy patient with unexplained upper gastrointestinal bleeding or hemodynamic instability.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Funding

None declared.

References

1.

Amin
 
S
,
Luketich
 
J
,
Wald
 
A
.
Aortoesophageal fistula: case report and review of the literature
.
Dig Dis Sci
 
1998
;
43
:
1665
71
.

2.

Edmondson
 
J
,
Hunter
 
J
,
Bakis
 
G
, et al.  
Understanding post-esophagectomy complications and their management: the early complications
.
J Clin Med
 
2023
;
12
:
7622
.

3.

Molina-Navarro
 
C
,
Hosking
 
SW
,
Hayward
 
SJ
, et al.  
Gastroaortic fistula as an early complication of esophagectomy
.
Ann Thorac Surg
 
2001
;
72
:
1783
8
.

4.

Uittenbogaart
 
M
,
Sosef
 
MN
,
van
 
Bastelaar
 
J
.
Sentinel bleeding as a sign of gastroaortic fistula formation after oesophageal surgery
.
Case Rep Surg
 
2014
;
2014
:
1
4
.

5.

Nishimura
 
E
,
Kawakubo
 
H
,
Ryota
 
A
, et al.  
Successful surgical treatment for aortoenteric fistula after esophagectomy: a case report
.
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Cases
 
2024
;
3
:
34
.

6.

Parikh
 
MP
,
Sherid
 
M
,
Panginikkod
 
S
, et al.  
Radiation therapy-induced aortoesophageal fistula: a case report and review of literature
.
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)
 
2018
;
6
:
320
.

7.

Haveman
 
JW
.
Intensive surveillance after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: when, why, and how often?
 
Ann Surg Oncol
 
2023
;
30
:
1948
9
.

8.

Chidambaram
 
S
,
Sounderajah
 
V
,
Maynard
 
N
, et al.  
Evaluation of postoperative surveillance strategies for esophago-gastric cancers in the UK and Ireland
.
Dis Esophagus
 
2022
;
35
.

9.

Sano
 
H
,
Nakamura
 
R
,
Nakajima
 
Y
, et al.  
Use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in uncontrollable nonvariceal upper GI bleeding
.
World J Emerg Surg
 
2016
;
11
:
20
.

10.

Brenner
 
ML
,
Moore
 
LJ
,
DuBose
 
JJ
, et al.  
A clinical series of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for hemorrhage control and resuscitation
.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg
 
2013
;
75
:
506
11
.

11.

Canaud
 
L
,
Ozdemir
 
BA
,
Bee
 
WW
, et al.  
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair in management of aortoesophageal fistulas
.
J Vasc Surg
 
2014
;
59
:
248
54
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.