Abstract

Liposarcoma is a rare malignant tumor of mesenchymal origin. It accounts for ~7% of all mesenchymal sarcomas and 1% of cancers in general. Its incidence does not exceed 2.5 cases per million inhabitants per year. This tumor is generally locally invasive, often diagnosed at an advanced stage, and can grow to a considerable size and weight, culminating in a locally advanced form. We report a case of a 65-year-old patient with retroperitoneal liposarcoma treated by open surgical resection. The patient was admitted for the management of an abdomino-pelvic mass measuring 40 × 27 × 17 cm, progressively evolving over 5 years. The diagnosis was established by computed tomography scan. The postoperative course was uneventful, and after 1 year of chemotherapy, the patient died of respiratory distress.

Introduction

Liposarcomas (LPS) are malignant tumors resulting from the differentiation of adipocytes. They are among the most common subtypes of soft-tissue sarcomas (STS), accounting for ~15%–20% of all STS. This pathology is divided into four main subtypes: well-differentiated LPS (WDLPS, also known as atypical lipomatous tumors), dedifferentiated LPS (DDLPS), myxoid LPS (MLPS), and pleomorphic LPS [1].

It is locally invasive, usually diagnosed at a late stage, and can reach a significant size and weight, making it locally advanced.

What’s more, the recurrence rate is higher than for LPS in other locations [2].

Case presentation

A 65-year-old patient with a 15-years history of type 2 diabetes treated with insulin, presented with a progressively growing abdominopelvic mass over 5 years, worsening in the past 3 months with continuous right hypochondrium pain. No previous surgical history was reported Clinical examination revealed a stable patient with a distended abdomen, tenderness in the right hypochondrium, and a palpable large mass. Laboratory tests showed anemia (7.9 g/dl) and elevated C-reactive protein (250).

Preoperative staging, including computed tomography (CT) thorax, abdomen, and pelvis, showed no distant metastases. CT imaging (axial view, Fig. 1) identified a large retroperitoneal mass measuring 40 × 27 × 17 cm, involving the right kidney and its vasculature, displacing major structures like the inferior vena cava, duodenum, and pancreas. No magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed.

Axial section of CT scan, parenchymal window showing a large retroperitoneal mass measuring 40 × 27 × 17 cm (liposarcoma).
Figure 1

Axial section of CT scan, parenchymal window showing a large retroperitoneal mass measuring 40 × 27 × 17 cm (liposarcoma).

Preoperative preparation was completed, and with informed consent, open surgical resection involving the right kidney and abdominal drainage was performed (Fig. 2). The procedure lasted 6 hours and required blood transfusion (2 units). No intraoperative complications were reported. Intraoperative findings confirmed extensive adherence to surrounding tissues but no peritoneal carcinomatosis, ascites, or liver metastasis.

Surgical specimen showing resected liposarcoma.
Figure 2

Surgical specimen showing resected liposarcoma.

Histopathology (Fig. 3) reported a 40 × 27 × 17 cm encapsulated, high-grade (Grade III) dedifferentiated liposarcoma. No tumor proliferation was noted in the lymph nodes or adrenal gland. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, but the patient died after a year of chemotherapy due to respiratory distress.

Dedifferentiated liposarcoma. This image shows a high-grade tumor.
Figure 3

Dedifferentiated liposarcoma. This image shows a high-grade tumor.

Discussion

Sarcomas are rare primary tumors of mesenchymal origin, representing <1% of all cancers [2]. Between 10% and 15% of sarcomas are located in the retroperitoneum, where liposarcoma predominates, accounting for ~40%–50% of retroperitoneal sarcomas [3].

The progressive increase in tumour volume and the flexibility of the retroperitoneal space explain the long asymptomatic nature of the tumour [4].

In 80% of cases, clinical symptoms are mainly characterized by abdominal pain accompanied by a feeling of heaviness and abdominal mass [2].

It is important to remain vigilant during the workup of patients with large abdominopelvic masses, as rare coexistences or differential diagnoses may alter the treatment plan. Awareness of other possible diagnoses aside from sarcomas is essential to avoid mismanagement [5].

Abdominal CT and MRI are highly specific in suggesting the lipomatous nature of the lesion. Although poorly differentiated liposarcoma is easy to diagnose, using MRI, distinguishing between a lipoma and a well-differentiated liposarcoma is often a challenge due to the radiological similarities between these two types of lesion. However, there are certain radiological characteristics that can be used to differentiate them. Apart from the large size of the lesion, the presence of thick septa, nodular or globular lesions, nonfatty areas and a reduced proportion of adipose tissue in the lesion strongly suggest liposarcoma [6].

The patient’s progressively enlarging mass over five years, with worsening symptoms in the final three months, highlights the importance of early and thorough investigation of atypical symptoms. Prompt identification and intervention could prevent advanced disease and mitigate poor outcomes [7].

The definitive diagnosis is based on anatomopathological examination of the tumour resection specimen, which also classifies the tumour according to its histological variety [8].

Several histological varieties of liposarcoma, with increasing malignancy, have been described, including well-differentiated liposarcoma, myxoid liposarcoma, pleomorphic liposarcoma, round cell liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma. In the case of our patient, histological examination concluded that the patient had a well-differentiated liposarcoma [9].

In our patient, histological examination showed a dedifferentiated liposarcoma.

Well-differentiated LPS have a better prognosis than other types of liposarcoma. Although they may recur locally after excision, their metastatic potential remains low. On the other hand, the myxoid form, which is the most malignant and most frequent (50% of cases), has a rapid recurrence rate and a poorer prognosis [1].

Prognostic factors include tumour grade, local recurrence and distant metastases. Other elements have also been associated with prognosis, such as complete resection, tumor volume, patient age, presence of synchronous metastases, retroperitoneal localization, and invasion of adjacent organs [10].

Surgical resection with negative margins is considered the first-line treatment for primary retroperitoneal LPS, as it improves local tumor control [11].

Retroperitoneal tumors are often large (median 30 cm) and can affect neighboring visceral organs as well as critical structures. Complete resection of the tumour is the standard of treatment, and when the tumour clearly invades adjacent organs or structures, resection of these areas is required. However, the ideal extent of resection remains a matter of debate, with some specialist sarcoma centers recommending removal of adjacent organs or structures even in the absence of clear signs of tumor invasion. Retrospective studies have shown that the extended or compartmental resection technique reduces locoregional recurrence rates and, in some cases, improves overall survival, particularly in the presence of low- or intermediate-grade tumors [12, 13].

Ultimately, the optimal extent of resection must take into account the histological subtype and strike a balance between the potential morbidity of surgery and the expected oncological results [11].

Conclusion

Retroperitoneal liposarcoma is a rare malignancy, often asymptomatic for long periods, leading to late diagnosis. Abdominal CT provides an accurate diagnosis. Surgical resection, with the widest possible margins, remains the only effective treatment.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Funding

None declared.

References

1.

Jones
 
RL
,
Lee
 
ATJ
,
Thway
 
K
, et al.  
Clinical and molecular spectrum of liposarcoma
.
J Clin Oncol
 
2018
;
36
:
151
9
. .

2.

Zribi
 
S
,
Bouassida
 
M
,
Sassi
 
S
, et al.  
Giant retroperitoneal liposarcoma
.
Press Medicale
 
2018
;
47
:
279
81
. .

3.

Stoeckle
 
E
,
Coindre
 
JM
,
Bonvalot
 
S
, et al.  
Prognostic factors in retroperitoneal sarcoma: a multivariate analysis of a series of 165 patients of the French Cancer Center Federation Sarcoma Group
.
Cancer
 
2001
;
92
:
359
68
. .

4.

Rives-Lange C, Poghosyan T, Dariane C, et al. .

Delayed retroperitoneal liposarcoma diagnosis and management in a patient with massive obesity
.
Eur J Clin Nutr
 
2021
;
75
:
1520
2
.

5.

Symeonidis
 
A
,
Tsikopoulos
 
I
,
Symeonidis
 
EN
, et al.  
More than meets the eye: a case of synchronous ipsilateral clear cell renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma of the pelvicalyceal system and literature review
.
Acta Biomed
 
2022
;
92
:2–4. .

6.

Kransdorf
 
MJ
,
Bancroft
 
LW
,
Peterson
 
JJ
, et al.  
Imaging of fatty tumors: distinction of lipoma and well-differentiated liposarcoma
.
Radiology
 
2002
;
224
:
99
104
. .

7.

Symeonidis
 
EN
,
Symeonidis
 
A
,
Gkekas
 
C
, et al.  
Urothelial neoplasm in a 19-year-old male patient with urine discoloration, negative lab, and imaging workup: should we investigate the findings or the symptom?
 
Clin Case Rep
 
2019
;
7
:
409
12
. .

8.

Setsu
 
N
,
Miyake
 
M
,
Wakai
 
S
, et al.  
Primary retroperitoneal myxoid liposarcomas
.
Am J Surg Pathol
 
2016
;
40
:
1286
90
. .

9.

Crago
 
AM
,
Dickson
 
MA
.
Liposarcoma: multimodality management and future targeted therapies
.
Surg Oncol Clin N Am
 
2016
;
25
:
761
73
. .

10.

Knebel
 
C
,
Lenze
 
U
,
Pohlig
 
F
, et al.  
Prognostic factors and outcome of liposarcoma patients: a retrospective evaluation over 15 years
.
BMC Cancer
 
2017
;
17
:
1
10
. .

11.

Eisenberg
 
B
,
Nassif
 
NA
,
Tseng
 
W
, et al.  
Recent advances in the management of liposarcoma
.
F1000Research
 
2016
;
5
:
1
7
. .

12.

Bonvalot
 
S
,
Rivoire
 
M
,
Castaing
 
M
, et al.  
Primary retroperitoneal sarcomas: a multivariate analysis of surgical factors associated with local control
.
J Clin Oncol
 
2009
;
27
:
31
7
. .

13.

Callegaro
 
D
,
Miceli
 
R
,
Brunelli
 
C
, et al.  
Long-term morbidity after multivisceral resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma
.
Br J Surg
 
2015
;
102
:
1079
87
. .

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com