Abstract

We present the case of a 32-year-old woman who was ultimately diagnosed with obstructive jaundice. She exhibited persist jaundice, liver dysfunction with normal drainage of T-tube (400–500 ml per day), and normal stools. Prior to her admission to our department, she had undergone a cholecystectomy and T-tube placement following common bile duct exploration for cholelithiasis. Although her serum bilirubin levels initially decreased post-surgery, it rose sharply after T-tube cholangiography. The diagnosis remained unclear until we performed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), which revealed that the obstructive jaundice was induced by improper T-tube placement. There were few such presentations reported before, and it’s particularly unusual to encounter jaundice following T-tube placement. Moreover, diagnosing and treating this condition can be challenging when T-tube drainage appears normal. Thus, our case report provides a unique contribution to the literature on obstructive jaundice.

Introduction

Jaundice is a common clinical finding in the practice of hepatologists, which could be divided into prehepatic, hepatic, and posthepatic based on its etiology [1]. Its diagnosis primarily relies on clinical presentation, laboratory evaluation, including hepatic and cholestatic enzymes, and imaging studies [2].

Cholelithiasis is the most common cause of posthepatic jaundice. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy + laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LC + LCBDE) was recommended for patients with gallstones and choledocholithiasis. In such cases, a T-tube would be placed to prevent postoperative complications. Monitoring of T-tube drainage involves assessing the volume, color, and consistency of bile, as well as the complaints of patients like discomfort or swelling around the T-tube site, and the characteristics of stool. Given its role as a pressure-free drainage system, it is uncommon to encounter jaundice following LCBDE and T-tube placement. However, in recent years, for the management of choledocholithiasis and cholangitis, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has become the standard of care [3, 4].

Case report

A 32-year-old woman was admitted to our department with persistent jaundice. Three months ago, she presented to the local hospital with sudden onset of upper abdominal pain. The CT scan suggested cholelithiasis with cholecystitis. She has had a history of hemolytic anemia for more than 10 years.

Though there was no significant obstruction manifestation in the CT scan, the markable elevated total bilirubin and gallstone necessitated an emergency operation (LC + LCBDE). Postoperatively, her bilirubin levels gradually decreased to around 100 μmol/L, with a T-tube output of ~800 ml per day and normal stools.

One month ago, she went to the hospital due to acute pain around the drain orifice for 3 days. The T-tube cholangiography was performed. However, during the procedure, the patient suffered sharp burning pain at right upper quadrant, chills, and hyperpyrexia. Although the cholangiography showed no obstruction of the bile duct, her symptoms suggested acute cholangitis. And her serum bilirubin increased sharply after cholangiography. Despite antibiotic therapy and T-tube drainage, her serum bilirubin exceeded 700 μmol/L, necessitating two sessions of plasma exchange. Glucocorticoid shock therapy was also taken to stabilize the liver cell membrane and reduce inflammation.

When she was admitted to our hospital, she was taking 20 mg methylprednisolone per day and complained of stomach discomfort with increased serum bilirubin for 322 μmol/L [238 for direct and 84 for indirect; normal ranges are 0–23(TB), 0–7(DB), and 3–14(IB)]. Tests for ceruloplasmin, immunoglobulin subtype 4 were negative. Although her reticulocyte count was elevated to 16.8%, there was no typical manifestation of hemolytic anemia, and her serum hemoglobin was stable; peripheral blood smears and urobilinogen were negative. A liver biopsy was performed when these non-invasive tests were inconclusive (Fig. 1). It revealed moderate cholestatic hepatitis according to cell morphology and immunostaining.

Liver biopsy showed moderate cholestatic hepatitis.
Figure 1

Liver biopsy showed moderate cholestatic hepatitis.

Despite the absence of obstruction on the T-tube cholangiography performed at the local hospital, we recommended ERCP. The biliary tract contrast during the operation revealed a slight distortion of the common bile duct (shown in Fig. 2), and a plastic biliary stent was placed to mitigate the distortion. The T-tube was subsequently removed, as her jaundice resolved rapidly following the procedure (bilirubin levels dropped from 382 to 159 μmol/L within 4 days).

The biliary tract contrast during ERCP showed a slight distortion of duct (a), and one plastic biliary stent was placed to mitigate the distortion (b).
Figure 2

The biliary tract contrast during ERCP showed a slight distortion of duct (a), and one plastic biliary stent was placed to mitigate the distortion (b).

Finally, the patient was diagnosed with obstructive jaundice due to the distortion of the common bile duct (CBD) caused by the T-tube. And the plastic biliary stent was scheduled for removal 3 months later.

Discussion

Jaundice can be induced by various pathogenesis, among which, obstruction was the most common. It can result from choledocholithiasis, benign biliary strictures, pancreaticobiliary malignancies, and metastatic disease [5].

Historically, T-tube was placed in CBD after exploration to provide external bile drainage and internal support. By bypassing the sphincter of Oddi and offering structural support, the T-tube effectively reduces CBD pressure, ensuring satisfactory drainage. However, in some patients after CBD exploration, bile could also drain internally through duodenal papilla, complicating the assessment of normal bile volume via the T-tube. Like this patient showed above, despite a T-tube drainage of ~400 ml/day and normal stool passage, obstructive jaundice persisted.

It’s difficult to measure intrabiliary pressure through a non-invasive method, despite its importance in indicating biliary content reflux into the vascular system [6]. The additional complications of surgical duct exploration about T-tubes are predominantly bile leakage and tube displacement [4]. Migratory T-tube could result in bile duct distortion, leading to recessive stenosis and increasing intrabiliary pressure. During cholangiography through T-tube or ERCP, extra external pressure was often required to inject contrast media, which exceeded the intrabiliary pressure induced by distortion, potentially leading to false-negative results for obstruction.

A meta-analysis by the Cochrane Collaboration found that there is no significant difference in the mortality, morbidity, retained stones, and failure rates between the LCBDE and ERCP [7]. In selected patients, LCBDE for concomitant gallstones and CBD stones might be considered as the preferred approach for its higher rate of complete clearance and lower postoperative hospital stays [8, 9]. ERCP, being less invasive and more widely available, remains a popular choice, particularly for elderly patients (>75-years-old) or in settings where surgical expertise in LCBDE is limited [10, 11].

Conclusion

This case emphasizes that care should be taken when there are signs of T-tube accidental dislodgement, including acute pain, swelling around the T-tube site, and re-elevated jaundice. In addition, this case also highlights the value of ERCP in posthepatic jaundice diagnosis and treatment.

Author contributions

Gu Yangjun wrote the paper; Fang Qingqing, Chen Zhitao, and Li Qiyong performed the edit and review.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Funding

None declared.

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

References

1.

Roche
SP
,
Kobos
R
.
Jaundice in the adult patient
.
Am Fam Physician
2004
;
69
:
299
304
.

2.

Pavlovic Markovic
A
,
Stojkovic Lalosevic
M
,
Mijac
DD
, et al. 
Jaundice as a diagnostic and therapeutic problem: a general Practitioner's approach
.
Dig Dis
2022
;
40
:
362
9
. .

3.

Buxbaum
JL
,
Abbas Fehmi
SM
,
Sultan
S
, et al. 
ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis
.
Gastrointest Endosc
2019
;
89
:
1075
1105.e1015
. .

4.

Williams
EJ
,
Green
J
,
Beckingham
I
, et al. 
Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS)
.
Gut
2008
;
57
:
1004
21
. .

5.

Modha
K
.
Clinical approach to patients with obstructive jaundice
.
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol
2015
;
18
:
197
200
. .

6.

Takada
T
,
Takikawa
H
,
Sawada
N
, et al. 
Cholangio-venous reflux of biliary contents through paracellular pathways between hepatocytes in patients with acute cholangitis
.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
2021
;
28
:
508
14
. .

7.

Dasari
BV
,
Tan
CJ
,
Gurusamy
KS
, et al. 
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones
.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2013
;
9
:
Cd003327
. .

8.

Li
ZQ
,
Sun
JX
,
Li
B
, et al. 
Meta-analysis of single-stage versus two-staged management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones
.
J Minim Access Surg
2020
;
16
:
206
14
. .

9.

Xie
W
,
Ma
Z
,
Zuo
J
, et al. 
The efficacy and safety of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy for the treatment of difficult common bile duct stones combined with gallstones: a multicenter retrospective study
.
Langenbecks Arch Surg
2023
;
408
:
195
. .

10.

Lan
WF
,
Li
JH
,
Wang
QB
, et al. 
Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci
2023
;
27
:
4656
69
. .

11.

Pavlidis
ET
,
Pavlidis
TE
.
Current management of concomitant cholelithiasis and common bile duct stones
.
World J Gastrointest Surg
2023
;
15
:
169
76
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com