- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Sreethish Sasi, Arun Prabhakaran Nair, Sanjay Doiphode, Tejeswi Shashidhar Gutti, Jouhar Kolleri, Muna Al-Maslamani, Odoribacter splanchnicus bacteremia secondary to acute appendicitis: a case report with review of literature, Journal of Surgical Case Reports, Volume 2024, Issue 5, May 2024, rjae328, https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjae328
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
This report describes a rare instance of Odoribacter splanchnicus bacteremia secondary to acute appendicitis in a young man. Initially presenting with symptoms typical of appendicitis, he was diagnosed through clinical examination, laboratory tests, and computed tomography imaging, which confirmed an inflamed appendix with sealed perforation and abscess. O. splanchnicus, a Gram-negative anaerobe commonly found in the human gut, was identified as the causative agent through blood culture. The patient underwent successful laparoscopic appendectomy and was treated with intravenous amoxicillin–clavulanate, leading to a full recovery. This case highlights the potential of O. splanchnicus to act as an opportunistic pathogen in the context of intra-abdominal inflammation. It underscores the diagnostic challenges posed by O. splanchnicus, and the efficacy of advanced diagnostic tools like matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry in identifying such rare infections.
Introduction
Odoribacter splanchnicus, previously classified as Bacteroides splanchnicus, is a Gam-negative, strictly anaerobic bacterium commonly found in the human intestinal microbiota [1]. It belongs to the family Odoribacteraceae within the order Bacteroidales [2]. Known for its capacity to produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), particularly butyrate, O. splanchnicus plays a vital role in maintaining gut homeostasis and has been associated with various health benefits [3]. However, alterations in its abundance have been linked to several disorders, including inflammatory bowel disease, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and cystic fibrosis. Additionally, recent studies suggest a potential role of O. splanchnicus in metabolic health, with associations observed between its abundance and parameters such as systolic blood pressure and lipid metabolism [1]. Despite its potential health-promoting effects, the specific interactions between O. splanchnicus and the host remain largely unexplored.
Case presentation
A 24-year-old Bangladeshi male presented to our emergency department with a 4-day history of right iliac fossa pain and fever. The patient denied experiencing diarrhea, vomiting, upper respiratory tract infection symptoms, radiation of pain, anorexia, testicular pain, or constipation. On examination, his temperature was 38.7°C, heart rate 108 bpm, blood pressure 116/66 mmHg, respiratory rate 18 breaths per minute, and oxygen saturation 100% in room air. Abdominal examination revealed localized tenderness and guarding in the right iliac fossa, along with positive rebound tenderness and Rovsing’s sign. Psoas sign and obturator sign were also elicited. Differential diagnoses included acute appendicitis, among other causes of abdominal pain, such as gastroenteritis, mesenteric lymphadenitis, incarcerated inguinal hernia, acute diverticulitis (less common in younger individuals), and pelvic inflammatory disease (less common in males). Investigations comprised laboratory tests, revealing elevated white blood cell count (14.1 × 103/μl) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (228.2 mg/L), and imaging via Computed Tomography (CT) abdomen and pelvis, which confirmed an acutely inflamed retrocecal appendix with a suspicious sealed perforation and an abscess cavity behind the cecum (Fig. 1). Blood cultures were collected in two anaerobic and two aerobic bottles at the time of admission. These bottles were placed in a BacT/Alert system (Becton Dickinson, NJ) for incubation. On Day 3, tests from both anaerobic blood culture bottles came back positive, at 52 and 59.5 hours, respectively, and gram stain analysis revealed the presence of Gram-negative bacteria (Fig. 2B) when observed under a microscope. Specimens were then grown on common blood agar plates under anaerobic conditions at 35°C. On Day 5 after presentation, moist and gray-white colonies were found (Fig. 2A). These were rapidly identified as O. splanchnicus using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) Biotyper (Library BDAL-11897-4274 Version 12, Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) on the same day. Treatment involved laparoscopic appendectomy (Fig. 3) and subsequent administration of intravenous amoxicillin–clavulanate 1.2 g three times a day for 10 days. The patient responded well to treatment, with normalization of laboratory values (discharge CRP: 67.7mg/L) and resolution of fever. Blood culture repeated after 72 h of intravenous antibiotics was negative.
Discussion
O. splanchnicus bacteremia secondary to appendicitis presents a unique clinical scenario, highlighting the potential for this commensal bacterium to become an opportunistic pathogen in the setting of intra-abdominal inflammation [4, 5]. Our case adds to the limited literature on such occurrences, underscoring the importance of considering unusual pathogens in the context of infectious complications following surgical procedures. This is only the third case report on this organism in literature. A comparative analysis of the three reports is provided in Table 1. Although O. splanchnicus is commonly found in the human gut microbiome, its role as a pathogen in appendicitis-associated bacteremia is rare and warrants further investigation. The association between O. splanchnicus bacteremia and appendicitis raises questions about the mechanisms by which this bacterium gains access to the bloodstream. It is plausible that disruption of the intestinal barrier integrity due to appendiceal inflammation allows translocation of O. splanchnicus from the gut lumen into the bloodstream [2, 4–6]. Additionally, factors such as impaired immune response and bacterial virulence properties may contribute to the development of bacteremia in the context of appendicitis [4]. Further studies elucidating the pathogenic mechanisms of O. splanchnicus in appendicitis-associated bacteremia are necessary to better understand its clinical significance and guide therapeutic interventions.
Aspect . | Case 1 . | Case 2 . | Case 3 . |
---|---|---|---|
Author | Our case | Aoi Kanematsu et al. (Anaerobe, 2022)4 | Hualiang Xiao et al. (Heliyon, 2024)7 |
Patient demographics | 24-year-old Bangladeshi male | 49-year-old Japanese male | 29-year-old Chinese male |
Initial presentation | Right iliac fossa pain, fever | Periumbilical colic pain, nausea | Lower abdominal pain, fever |
Vital signs | Fever (38.7°C), tachycardia | Fever (37.2 °C), hypertension | Fever (36.8 °C), normal blood pressure |
Laboratory findings | Elevated WBC (14.1 × 103/μl), elevated CRP | Elevated WBC (13.0 × 103/μl), elevated CRP | Elevated WBC (16.62 × 103/μl), elevated neutrophils and CRP |
Imaging | CT abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast | CT abdomen with intravenous contrast | CT abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast |
Diagnosis | Acute gangrenous appendicitis | Suppurative appendicitis | Intestinal perforation |
Blood culture | O. splanchnicus bacteremia | O. splanchnicus bacteremia | O. splanchnicus bacteremia |
Antibiotic therapy | Amoxicillin–clavulanate | Cefmetazole switched to ampicillin–sulbactam | Cefoperazone–sulbactam, then imipenem–cilastatin |
Surgical intervention | Laparoscopic appendectomy | Laparoscopic appendectomy | Emergency surgery for intestinal perforation |
Outcome | Normalization of lab values, resolution of fever | Discharged on oral amoxicillin–clavulanate | Discharged after recovery from surgery |
Aspect . | Case 1 . | Case 2 . | Case 3 . |
---|---|---|---|
Author | Our case | Aoi Kanematsu et al. (Anaerobe, 2022)4 | Hualiang Xiao et al. (Heliyon, 2024)7 |
Patient demographics | 24-year-old Bangladeshi male | 49-year-old Japanese male | 29-year-old Chinese male |
Initial presentation | Right iliac fossa pain, fever | Periumbilical colic pain, nausea | Lower abdominal pain, fever |
Vital signs | Fever (38.7°C), tachycardia | Fever (37.2 °C), hypertension | Fever (36.8 °C), normal blood pressure |
Laboratory findings | Elevated WBC (14.1 × 103/μl), elevated CRP | Elevated WBC (13.0 × 103/μl), elevated CRP | Elevated WBC (16.62 × 103/μl), elevated neutrophils and CRP |
Imaging | CT abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast | CT abdomen with intravenous contrast | CT abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast |
Diagnosis | Acute gangrenous appendicitis | Suppurative appendicitis | Intestinal perforation |
Blood culture | O. splanchnicus bacteremia | O. splanchnicus bacteremia | O. splanchnicus bacteremia |
Antibiotic therapy | Amoxicillin–clavulanate | Cefmetazole switched to ampicillin–sulbactam | Cefoperazone–sulbactam, then imipenem–cilastatin |
Surgical intervention | Laparoscopic appendectomy | Laparoscopic appendectomy | Emergency surgery for intestinal perforation |
Outcome | Normalization of lab values, resolution of fever | Discharged on oral amoxicillin–clavulanate | Discharged after recovery from surgery |
Aspect . | Case 1 . | Case 2 . | Case 3 . |
---|---|---|---|
Author | Our case | Aoi Kanematsu et al. (Anaerobe, 2022)4 | Hualiang Xiao et al. (Heliyon, 2024)7 |
Patient demographics | 24-year-old Bangladeshi male | 49-year-old Japanese male | 29-year-old Chinese male |
Initial presentation | Right iliac fossa pain, fever | Periumbilical colic pain, nausea | Lower abdominal pain, fever |
Vital signs | Fever (38.7°C), tachycardia | Fever (37.2 °C), hypertension | Fever (36.8 °C), normal blood pressure |
Laboratory findings | Elevated WBC (14.1 × 103/μl), elevated CRP | Elevated WBC (13.0 × 103/μl), elevated CRP | Elevated WBC (16.62 × 103/μl), elevated neutrophils and CRP |
Imaging | CT abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast | CT abdomen with intravenous contrast | CT abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast |
Diagnosis | Acute gangrenous appendicitis | Suppurative appendicitis | Intestinal perforation |
Blood culture | O. splanchnicus bacteremia | O. splanchnicus bacteremia | O. splanchnicus bacteremia |
Antibiotic therapy | Amoxicillin–clavulanate | Cefmetazole switched to ampicillin–sulbactam | Cefoperazone–sulbactam, then imipenem–cilastatin |
Surgical intervention | Laparoscopic appendectomy | Laparoscopic appendectomy | Emergency surgery for intestinal perforation |
Outcome | Normalization of lab values, resolution of fever | Discharged on oral amoxicillin–clavulanate | Discharged after recovery from surgery |
Aspect . | Case 1 . | Case 2 . | Case 3 . |
---|---|---|---|
Author | Our case | Aoi Kanematsu et al. (Anaerobe, 2022)4 | Hualiang Xiao et al. (Heliyon, 2024)7 |
Patient demographics | 24-year-old Bangladeshi male | 49-year-old Japanese male | 29-year-old Chinese male |
Initial presentation | Right iliac fossa pain, fever | Periumbilical colic pain, nausea | Lower abdominal pain, fever |
Vital signs | Fever (38.7°C), tachycardia | Fever (37.2 °C), hypertension | Fever (36.8 °C), normal blood pressure |
Laboratory findings | Elevated WBC (14.1 × 103/μl), elevated CRP | Elevated WBC (13.0 × 103/μl), elevated CRP | Elevated WBC (16.62 × 103/μl), elevated neutrophils and CRP |
Imaging | CT abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast | CT abdomen with intravenous contrast | CT abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast |
Diagnosis | Acute gangrenous appendicitis | Suppurative appendicitis | Intestinal perforation |
Blood culture | O. splanchnicus bacteremia | O. splanchnicus bacteremia | O. splanchnicus bacteremia |
Antibiotic therapy | Amoxicillin–clavulanate | Cefmetazole switched to ampicillin–sulbactam | Cefoperazone–sulbactam, then imipenem–cilastatin |
Surgical intervention | Laparoscopic appendectomy | Laparoscopic appendectomy | Emergency surgery for intestinal perforation |
Outcome | Normalization of lab values, resolution of fever | Discharged on oral amoxicillin–clavulanate | Discharged after recovery from surgery |
Diagnostic challenges posed by O. splanchnicus infections are evident, as traditional culture-based methods may lead to misidentification or underreporting of this pathogen. Advanced techniques such as MALDI-TOF MS [7] and 16S rRNA [5] sequencing are crucial for accurate identification, highlighting the importance of incorporating these methodologies in clinical practice. Our case highlights the utility of MALDI-TOF MS in rapidly confirming the identity of O. splanchnicus, thereby facilitating appropriate management strategies. Moving forward, heightened clinical awareness, coupled with advanced diagnostic methodologies, will enhance our ability to recognize and manage O. splanchnicus bacteremia secondary to appendicitis, ultimately improving patient outcomes [2, 5, 7].
Furthermore, our case underscores the importance of tailored antibiotic therapy based on susceptibility testing, as different cases may require varying treatment approaches. Continued research efforts and improved diagnostic techniques will enhance our understanding of O. splanchnicus pathogenesis and clinical significance, ultimately guiding more effective management strategies for patients with O. splanchnicus-associated infections.
Our case of O. splanchnicus bacteremia underscores the rarity and potential pathogenicity of this bacterium in human infections. Similar to previous reports, our patient’s presentation highlights the diverse clinical manifestations associated with O. splanchnicus, ranging from acute appendicitis to bloodstream infections. Despite its prevalence as a commensal in the human gut microbiome, O. splanchnicus has been sporadically implicated in various disease states, including appendicitis, peritonitis, and bacteremia, emphasizing the need for heightened clinical suspicion and accurate diagnosis.
Author contributions
Sreethish Sasi (Manuscript writing, Literature Review, Patient Management), Arun Prabhakaran Nair (Manuscript writing, Literature Review, Patient Management), Sanjay Doiphode (Manuscript writing, Literature Review, Patient Management), Tejeswi Shashidhar Gutti (Manuscript writing, Literature Review, Patient Management), Jouhar Kolleri (Review, interpretation, and adaptation of radiology images), and Muna Al-Maslamani (Manuscript writing, Literature Review, Patient Management)
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Funding
None declared.