Abstract

Obesity is a chronic disease with pandemic levels of prevalence worldwide. The most often performed bariatric procedure is sleeve gastrectomy. Although the patient’s history may not indicate preoperative imaging studies, coincidental findings of unexpected pathology are not uncommon, such as leiomyoma. A 41-year-old female was scheduled to laparoscopic gastric sleeve with no contraindications for surgery. A tumor-like mass was identified on the left lateral face of the distal third of the esophagus. Trans-surgical endoscopy and pneumatic test were performed to rule out any type of communication. The surgeon managed to remove the tumor mass, that was sent to histopathological study, and concluded the procedure without complications. Benign tumors of the esophagus are rarely found lesions. Occasionally unexpected findings may occur during surgery, and they should be resolved intraoperatively when possible to allow the completion of the originally planned surgical procedure.

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is a multifaceted, chronic illness with pandemic levels of prevalence worldwide [1]. The most successful method of treating obesity is bariatric surgery. Additionally, it significantly increases the remission rate and improvement of metabolic co-morbidities [2]. The most often performed bariatric procedure in the world is laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy [3].

The prevalence of morbid obesity is rising and so is the number of bariatric surgeries carried out. Today, laparoscopy is the primary method used in all bariatric surgeries. Although the patient’s history may not indicate preoperative examinations, coincidental findings of unexpected pathology are not uncommon [4]. Submucosal growth, known as gastric leiomyoma, represents 2.5% of stomach tumors. It can be intraluminal or extramural, most frequently occurring in patients between 20 and 50 years old. Most common in the distal two-thirds of the esophagus, where they typically develop intramurally. The majority of them generally have no symptoms and are traditionally manifested as a filling malformation of the stomach wall and are seen as a submucosal mass during endoscopy. Gastric leiomyomectomy is the recommended course of treatment for these lesions [5].

CASE REPORT

A 41-year-old female patient, originally from and a resident of the USA, was scheduled to undergo laparoscopic gastric sleeve surgery; her height = 1.70 m, weight = 114 kg, body mass index = 39.4, with a history of arterial hypertension of 4 years of evolution, which was controlled with amlodipine, depression and anxiety of 26 years of evolution without treatment. Surgical background included three cesarean sections; the last one was 10 years ago, and hysterectomy was done 6 years ago. There was no further history of importance. The patient reported multiple diet and exercise regimens as well as the use of phentermine with no results. Pre-surgical assessment was performed with no contraindications for surgery. Laboratory test showed no relevant alterations (hemoglobin = 13.2, hematocrit = 42.2, leukocytes = 7.2, platelets = 336 000, glucose = 88, prothrombin time = 13, thromboplastin time = 27.8).

We intended to perform a conventional gastric sleeve [6], however, while dissecting the esophageal hiatus, a tumor-like mass was identified, which depended on the left lateral face of the distal third of the esophagus (Fig. 1). We decided to perform a pneumatic test and trans-surgical endoscopy to rule out any type of communication of the mass with the esophagus. Once the possible connection between the esophagus and the tumor mass has been discarded, the dissection continued, managing to remove the tumor mass which measured ~4 × 5 cm (Fig. 2) and it was sent to pathology for study (Figs 3 and 4). Finally, hiatus repair was performed and the gastric sleeve was completed in a conventional manner. A leak test was performed, confirming the integrity of the sleeve and the esophagus.

Tumor-like mass identified on the left lateral face of the distal third of the esophagus.
Figure 1

Tumor-like mass identified on the left lateral face of the distal third of the esophagus.

Macroscopic image of the tumor found, irregularly shaped tissue fragment measuring 4.3 × 2.9 × 2.1 cm.
Figure 2

Macroscopic image of the tumor found, irregularly shaped tissue fragment measuring 4.3 × 2.9 × 2.1 cm.

Fusiform hypercellular population in long and short bundles as well as hypercellular confluences with extensive myxoid edematous hypocellular areas.
Figure 3

Fusiform hypercellular population in long and short bundles as well as hypercellular confluences with extensive myxoid edematous hypocellular areas.

Abundant dilated congestive vascular structures; at higher magnification of spindle cells with pale acidophilic cytoplasm, elongated nuclei of vesicular chromatin, with smooth muscular characteristics.
Figure 4

Abundant dilated congestive vascular structures; at higher magnification of spindle cells with pale acidophilic cytoplasm, elongated nuclei of vesicular chromatin, with smooth muscular characteristics.

The histopathological study did not report any abnormal mitotic activity and the tumor was classified as an esophageal leiomyoma.

In the post-operative period, the patient reported no abnormalities or discomfort, wandering at 8 hours and adequately tolerating the resumption of oral intake at 48 hours. A new leak test was performed, which revealed no abnormalities in the digestive tract, and she was discharged from hospital. One month after her surgery, the patient had a weight loss of 10 kg and was reported to be without complications.

DISCUSSION

Benign tumors of the esophagus are lesions that are rarely found; of these, the most frequent are leiomyomas, which constitute two-thirds of them, and the most frequent age of appearance is between 20 and 50 years of age [7]. Because leiomyomas do not normally present characteristic symptoms, they are usually found as a finding; they are benign mesenchymal tumors derived from the smooth muscle [5]. When it is a large tumor, it can be symptomatic, and the most common symptoms are bleeding (acute or chronic), abdominal pain, nausea, weight loss and dysphagia [8].

The discovery of these type of lesions in the trans-surgical can be frightening due to the malignant potential that they may have. However, it has been described that these kind of findings can be managed laparoscopically during the same surgery, and the decision to finish the procedure or not should not be taken lightly [9]. A pre-surgical endoscopy can be controversial, but in this case, doing the trans-surgical endoscopy gives us a tool to determine whether to continue the surgery or not. Based on this case and the experience of some studies, it is shown that when the surgeon is faced with an unexpected finding in the surgical procedure, it can be resolved by laparoscopy. In fact, due to the high risk that derives from general anesthesia and due to the benefits of bariatric surgery, the recommendation of some authors is to conclude the originally planned procedure once the tumor has been removed, as in this case, as long as the lesion can be delimited and has clear margins [10].

Some authors recommend performing a preoperative endoscopy in the evaluation of patients [10], however, this remains a controversial issue. Madan et al. recommend carrying out this practice because they found that treatment can often change according to the findings evidenced in the endoscopy [11]. Similarly, Sharaf et al. have the same recommendation as they described up to 120 patients (61.5%) with clinically important findings in preoperative endoscopy [12]. On the other hand, authors such as Peromaa-Haavisto et al. do not consider pre-surgical endoscopy to be necessary, because in their study, in addition to the fact that all their findings were benign and without clinical relevance, none of them modified the initial surgical plan [13].

Whether or not an endoscopy is decided to be performed during the preoperative evaluation of the patient, unexpected findings during surgery may continue to appear, so the surgeon and his team must always be prepared.

In conclusion, unexpected findings during surgery may occur from time to time, and they should be resolved during surgery when possible to allow the completion of the originally planned surgical procedure.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

None declared.

FUNDING

None.

References

1.

World Obesity Federation
.
Prevalence of Obesity
. [
Internet
].
World Obesity
.
2019
. (
20 November 2022, date last accessed
).

2.

Papapietro
K
.
Cirugía Para la obesidad: efectos generales, beneficios y riesgos
.
Revista Médica Clínica Las Condes
2012
;
23
:
189
95
.

3.

Himpens
J
,
Ramos
A
,
Welbourn
R
,
Dixon
J
,
Kinsman
R
,
Walton
P
.
Fourth IFSO Global Registry Report
, Vol.
4
.
Chile
:
The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders
,
2018
.

4.

Naz
S
,
Afzal
M
,
Sarwar
H
,
Shakeel
O
,
Rehman
S
.
Gastric leiomyoma and its management: a rare occurrence
.
Oncol Cancer Case Rep
2019
;
5
:
1000154
.

5.

Jain
M
,
Atherton
L
,
Acharya
V
,
Sengupta
N
,
Barreca
M
.
Incidental oesophageal leiomyoma during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: finding the unexpected does not affect outcomes
.
J Surg Case Rep
2015
;
5
:
1
3
.

6.

Lee
AM
,
Fuchs
KH
,
Varga
G
,
Breithaupt
W
,
Neki
K
,
Broderick
R
, et al.
Sleeve gastrectomy for treatment of delayed gastric emptying-indications, technique, and results
.
Langenbecks Arch Surg
2020
;
405
:
107
16
.

7.

Mutrie
CJ
,
Donahue
DM
,
Wain
JC
,
Wright
CD
,
Gaissert
HA
,
Grillo
HC
, et al.
Esophageal leiomyoma: a 40-year experience
.
Ann Thorac Surg
2005
;
79
:
1122
5
.

8.

Rijcken
E
,
Kersting
CM
,
Senninger
N
,
Bruewer
M
.
Esophageal resection for giant leiomyoma: report of two cases and a review of the literature
.
Langenbecks Arch Surg
2009
;
394
:
623
9
.

9.

Maggard
MA
,
Shugarman
LR
,
Suttorp
M
,
Maglione
M
,
Sugar-Man
HJ
,
Livingston
EH
, et al.
Meta-analysis: surgical treatment of obesity
.
Ann Intern Med
2005
;
142
:
547
59
.

10.

Finnell
CW
,
Madan
AK
,
Ternocits
CA
,
Menachery
SJ
,
Tichansky
DS
.
Unexpected pathology during laparoscopic bariatric surgery
.
Surg Endosc
2007
;
21
:
867
9
.

11.

Madan
AK
,
Speck
KE
,
Hiler
ML
.
Routine preoperative upper endoscopy for laparoscopic gastric bypass: Is it necessary?
Am Surg
2004
;
8
:
684
6
.

12.

Sharaf
RN
,
Weinshel
EH
,
Bini
EJ
,
Rosenberg
J
,
Sherman
A
,
Ren
CJ
.
Endoscopy plays an important preoperative role in bariatric surgery
.
Obes Surg
2004
;
10
:
1367
72
.

13.

Peromaa-Haavisto
P
,
Victorzon
M
.
Is routine preoperative upper GI endoscopy needed prior to gastric bypass?
Obes Surg
2013
;
6
:
736
9
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com